<defy_> where is anarchystar with what he was doing? haven't seen him speak in a while
[09:24] == uiop [~uiop@207-181-221-81.c3-0.hnc-ubr1.chi-hnc.il.cable.rcn.com] has joined ##mtgox-talk
[09:26] <sobriket> He was here yesterday and he's still pushing for liquidation and working on multisig.com
[09:28] <sobriket> Shaded: without a debt-for-equity swap, the sunlot plan hardly differs, for current account holders, from charitable initiatives
[09:29] <sobriket> It is also one that is likely to fail and to lead to botched liquidation at a later stage, when a company starts with hundreds of millions in debt on its books
[09:30] == faouanima [~faouanima@unaffiliated/faouanima] has joined ##mtgox-talk
[09:43] == Lao_Ban_ [~Adium@n056.s821.m-zone.jp] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
[09:45] == Lao_Ban_ [~Adium@n056.s821.m-zone.jp] has joined ##mtgox-talk
[09:45] == im_ [da4105d5@gateway/web/freenode/ip.218.65.5.213] has quit [Quit: Page closed]
[09:48] == yerp1 [~Adium@61.197.183.65] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
[09:57] == Skirmant [Skirmant@78-60-20-68.static.zebra.lt] has joined ##mtgox-talk
[09:57] == Skirmant [Skirmant@78-60-20-68.static.zebra.lt] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
[09:58] == roler [~chatzilla@p4109-ipbf6908marunouchi.tokyo.ocn.ne.jp] has joined ##mtgox-talk
[09:58] == Skirmant [Skirmant@78-60-20-68.static.zebra.lt] has joined ##mtgox-talk
[09:58] == ivcho [4d4e0382@gateway/web/freenode/ip.77.78.3.130] has joined ##mtgox-talk
[10:00] == Sawk [~sawk@118.27.3.73] has quit []
[10:00] == my_BTC_ [~my_BTC_@50.31.98.66] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
[10:00] == Skirmant [Skirmant@78-60-20-68.static.zebra.lt] has quit [Client Quit]
[10:00] == my_BTC_ [~my_BTC_@50.31.98.66] has joined ##mtgox-talk
[10:00] == Skirmant [Skirmant@78-60-20-68.static.zebra.lt] has joined ##mtgox-talk
[10:19] == chickmi [~chickmi@p549969C9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined ##mtgox-talk
[10:20] == im_ [df5363f6@gateway/web/freenode/ip.223.83.99.246] has joined ##mtgox-talk
[10:22] == Tiraspol_ [~Tiraspol@unaffiliated/tiraspol] has joined ##mtgox-talk
[10:23] == roler [~chatzilla@p4109-ipbf6908marunouchi.tokyo.ocn.ne.jp] has quit [Quit: ChatZilla 0.9.90.1 [Firefox 28.0/20140317233948]]
[10:27] == Trinil [~Trinil@194.95.250.30] has joined ##mtgox-talk
[10:27] == Skirmant [Skirmant@78-60-20-68.static.zebra.lt] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
[10:31] <+Shaded> sobriket: Our plan differs by providing immediate cashout options, regardless of any further profit sharing plans
[10:32] <+Shaded> 06:38 < SuSEno> brokenmusic: He is Jon Holmquist of Coinabul
[10:32] <+Shaded> 06:38 < SuSEno> brokenmusic: He is Jon Holmquist of Coinabul
[10:32] <+Shaded> 06:38 < SuSEno> brokenmusic: He is Jon Holmquist of Coinabul
[10:32] <+Shaded> 06:38 < SuSEno> brokenmusic: He is Jon Holmquist of Coinabul
[10:32] == Tiraspol_ [~Tiraspol@unaffiliated/tiraspol] has quit [Quit: Tiraspol_]
[10:33] <+Shaded> 06:38 < SuSEno> brokenmusic: He is Jon Holmquist of Coinabul
[10:33] <+Shaded> 06:38 < SuSEno> brokenmusic: He is Jon Holmquist of Coinabul
[10:33] <brokenmusic> Shaded, so, let's get this straight. Suppose this offer is accepted by the court and you are the new owners of the exchange. How soon do we get our 20% back? Realistically?
[10:33] <+Shaded> Oh whoops
[10:33] <+Shaded> Didn't see that go through haha
[10:33] <brokenmusic> yeah :)
[10:33] <+Shaded> SuSEno: I prefer Jon Holmquist of Bitcoin Black Friday
[10:33] <+Shaded> Coinabul turned into a crapfest, which is why I left
[10:33] <sobriket> I know but without equity, there's little to make it worthwhile
[10:33] <brokenmusic> thanks, now I'm absolutely certain who you are )
[10:33] <sobriket> And i think a court would recognise that
[10:34] <+Shaded> brokenmusic: Once again, right now we're dealing with Mark's magical accounting numbers. We need to do an audit to see how much money Gox has and how much each person is owed.
[10:34] <sobriket> Profit sharing doesn't mean much without equity
[10:34] <+Shaded> What we offer, that the courts do not offer, is more intensive investigative services to get to a fair repayment of all parties involved.
[10:35] <sobriket> Especially when debt then remains
[10:35] <+Shaded> Courts will dip into the remaining assets to pay their fees. We offer to pay those costs upfront.
[10:36] <brokenmusic> Shaded: let's say it only has the said 202K btc and nothing more
[10:37] <brokenmusic> Shaded: the reason I'm saking is because my main concern is time. I want SOME money ASAP
[10:37] <brokenmusic> Shaded: so to me, whether it will be 20% or 25% is less important than when
[10:38] <brokenmusic> Shaded: and, I presume, that is the case for many people
[10:38] <+Shaded> brokenmusic: In the courts, you might see your cash (cash not coins) in a year.
[10:38] <+Shaded> Maybe in 2 or 5... maybe 10.
[10:38] <+Shaded> It's fairly unknown.
[10:38] <brokenmusic> Shaded: yes, so the question is, can you make it happen in 6mo or less?
[10:38] <+Shaded> With our plan, you'll see your coins once the audit is over.
[10:39] <+Shaded> I'll be pushing for less than 6months.
[10:39] <+Shaded> Once we know who is owed what, everyone will have the option of cashing out immediately.
[10:39] <Dr-G3> depends on how magical the account numbers are I guess
[10:39] <+Shaded> In BITCOIN, not cash.
[10:39] <+Shaded> That's the biggest difference.
[10:41] <brokenmusic> another important issue is that some BTC may not be claimed. That is someone who had 1BTC on Gox might have forgotten about it. This should be redistributed among other users who make a claim
[10:41] <+Shaded> In time I'm sure. We're not looking to claim dead assets.
[10:41] <+Shaded> Everyone needs to be given a fair amount of time to claim what is theirs.
[10:41] <Dr-G3> broken: this is what would happen in liquidation
[10:41] <+Shaded> In anycase, this is a complicated scenario.
[10:42] <brokenmusic> Shaded: so, when do you think we're gonna know the courts decision regarding your offer?
[10:42] <+Shaded> Would you prefer people who understand Bitcoin... or those who were court appointed?
[10:42] <+Shaded> brokenmusic: Sometime after next tuesday.
[10:42] <brokenmusic> Shaded: oh, that sounds good
[10:42] <+Shaded> If you'd like to help us, please sign up on SaveGox.com
[10:42] <+Shaded> If you'd like to get more involved, pm me
[10:43] <brokenmusic> Dr-G3: yeah, I mean, look. Surely Shaded wants to profit from this whole thing. I understand it. But I'm okay with it as long as ew get our money faster and in BTC
[10:43] <brokenmusic> Shaded: already signed up
[10:43] <Dr-G3> exchange business with that many customers should be profitable and it was
[10:43] <+Shaded> Eh, I'm not looking for any profit.
[10:44] <+Shaded> I got involved because honestly, this is one of the biggest deals in Bitcoin right now
[10:44] <+Shaded> I think a positive decision for SaveGox would benefit the entire community.
[10:44] <Dr-G3> yes
[10:44] <+Shaded> Brock and Sandlot, yes, of course they are in it for the profit. Any business has to be.
[10:45] <+Shaded> But the net positive is already there, without any shady paranoia that people keep sprouting.
[10:45] <Dr-G3> as long as it's a win-win it's not a problem
[10:46] <+Shaded> It's a win-win from what I've been able to deterime.
[10:46] <+Shaded> determine*
[10:48] == renfr [~renfr@mar92-12-88-162-230-238.fbx.proxad.net] has joined ##mtgox-talk
[10:49] <sobriket> What legal basis can profit sharing have if the recipients do not hold equity?
[10:49] <sobriket> Having equity also allows creditors to trade their equity with others
[10:50] <sobriket> Obviously it needn't be so that 100 pct of a new company is owned by former mtgox creditors
[10:50] <+Shaded> I'm not a lawyer, so I won't speculate.
[10:50] <sobriket> That's completely impossible
[10:51] == mortale [~mortale@gateway/tor-sasl/mortale] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
[10:51] <sobriket> But instead of a 50 pct profit sharing agreement, I feel equity of around the same size is a much better deal
[10:51] <sobriket> And I'm sure a court would agree
[10:52] <+Shaded> Around 50%?
[10:52] <papa> shaded
[10:52] <papa> let s take a real example
[10:53] <papa> i have 2 acct with mtgox
[10:53] <papa> in one i ve got almost 6060 btc and the other one i have 60 btc
[10:53] <papa> meaning i have around 6120 btc around
[10:54] == roler [~chatzilla@p4109-ipbf6908marunouchi.tokyo.ocn.ne.jp] has joined ##mtgox-talk
[10:54] <papa> so how much could i expect back with your plan?
[10:55] <SuSEno> Until now seems that they can't calculate, because Mark's MAgical Number.
[10:55] == rokj [~rokj@BSN-61-77-146.static.dsl.siol.net] has joined ##mtgox-talk
[10:55] <SuSEno> We even don't know if they really have 202000 BTC
[10:55] <SuSEno> even we don't know how much money they left on MtGox Bank account
[10:55] <papa> he has confirmed this to the court
[10:55] <SuSEno> Need to do an Audit
[10:56] <papa> abt the bank acct we don t know anything
[10:57] == Guyver2 [~Guyver2@guyver2.xs4all.nl] has joined ##mtgox-talk
[11:00] <+Shaded> If Mark has 202000 BTC, you'll get a pro rata percentage back
[11:00] == my_BTC_ [~my_BTC_@50.31.98.66] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
[11:00] == my_BTC_ [~my_BTC_@50.31.98.66] has joined ##mtgox-talk
[11:00] <+Shaded> 202000/totalbtc = the percentage back. papa
[11:01] <+Shaded> Like I've said before, it is impossible to give you a hard number without an actual audit, past Mark's word.
[11:01] <papa> how much is total btc
[11:01] <+Shaded> Your guess is as good as mine.
[11:01] == Lao_Ban_ [~Adium@n056.s821.m-zone.jp] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
[11:01] <+Shaded> The big, big, BIG, difference here though is the equation.
[11:01] <papa> ok so at the moment u don t have precise figure
[11:02] <+Shaded> With the courts, (((yourBTC/totalBTC)*yourBTC)*conversiontofiat-conversionfees)-courtfees=amount returned
[11:02] <+Shaded> With us, (YourBTC/totalBTC)*yourbtc).
[11:03] <+Shaded> Little bit shorter eh
[11:05] <papa> hmm and how abt the remaining?
[11:05] <+Shaded> Remaining what?
[11:06] == mortale [~mortale@gateway/tor-sasl/mortale] has joined ##mtgox-talk
[11:06] <Dr-G3> cash probably
[11:07] <papa> btc because u will return only the btc available there
[11:07] <+Shaded> fiat gets distrubted in the same manner
[11:07] <papa> but it s not the total one
[11:07] <+Shaded> We're returning all funds to customers.
[11:07] <+Shaded> No court fees, no fees period.
[11:07] <papa> yeah but i ll still get losses
[11:08] <Dr-G3> but the fiat ppl get more % back (if mtgox didn't burn a lot of cash already)
[11:08] <+Shaded> Do you want 80
[11:08] <papa> because u wont return the totality of my btc
[11:08] <+Shaded> 80% lossess or 97% losses
[11:08] <+Shaded> losses*
[11:08] <+Shaded> No one is going to pay you back the totality of your BTC.
[11:09] <+Shaded> No one. I'm not here to sugarcoat it.
[11:09] <+Shaded> Our plan is the best plan to get you back the most of your already crappy situation :/
[11:09] <+Shaded> I wish there was a way to get all of it back in the next 6 months, but that is just implausible.
[11:10] <papa> but ure not bringing any value in your plan
[11:10] <papa> just come and say hey guys take the remainung here
[11:10] <papa> and we ll take the db for free
[11:10] <papa> and basta
[11:11] <papa> i don t think it ll work like this
[11:11] <+Shaded> We're bringing a rockstar team, we're pledging the legal and auditing costs to figure out who is owed what and we're bringing a resolution to this sticky situation in a much shorter time than the courts can.
[11:11] <papa> u re not adding any value here
[11:11] <+Shaded> I just gave you three separate examples of value added.
[11:11] <papa> the team if for u to make money on mtgox that s all
[11:11] <papa> how it can help us?
[11:11] <SuSEno> yeah with court, that 202k BTC probably will be auctioned at low price
[11:11] <papa> if u don t bring anything?
[11:12] <+Shaded> Like we've mentioned before, customers will have the choice to participate in the new exchange and get paid back more than what is left at Gox.
[11:12] <+Shaded> Ultimately, papa, it's us or the courts. We care about the community. We want to help you guys out. The court
[11:12] <+Shaded> just wanted to settle it and deal with fiat.
[11:14] <SuSEno> But I have little bit concern. The same concern as anarchystar. What is your and people from Sunlot Holdings connection with Mark Karpeles?
[11:14] <papa> where i m not ok with your plan is that u just want the db of mtgox for free
[11:14] <papa> and this is not good for us
[11:14] <papa> u have 1 million customers names and adress
[11:14] <papa> this is worth somethng
[11:15] <SuSEno> What is your affiliation with Mark Karpeles, Jed Mc Caleb, Gay Bouchery
[11:15] <papa> suseno are u asking me?
[11:16] <+Shaded> SuSEno: I've had lovely conversations with GGB, I personally don't like Jed very much, and I think Mark and I have shared one IRC convo.
[11:16] <SuSEno> No, I am asking Shaded
[11:16] <papa> i have no affilitiation i m just a customer who have lost almost all his savings in this
[11:16] <+Shaded> papa: We're fronting the legal costs and auditing costs. It is not a free bid.
[11:17] <Dr-G3> shaded: Did you ask Jed how the customer funds from old mtgox were handed over to mark?
[11:17] <+Shaded> Dr-G3: I personally did not. Not sure about
[11:17] <Dr-G3> might be useful for the audit
[11:17] <+Shaded> the other folks from Sunlot. Probably not though
[11:17] <papa> this is normal cost when u buy a company shahed and it should come with other money for the assets of mtgox
[11:17] <Dr-G3> you should do that
[11:17] <Dr-G3> or the other people
[11:17] <papa> 1 million customers can t worth 1 btc
[11:18] <+Shaded> papa: how much in debt is that 1BTC going to cost us? ;)
[11:18] <Dr-G3> you guys have the leaked database or real data?
[11:18] <+Shaded> We have nothing unless the court approves the proposal
[11:18] <Dr-G3> true
[11:18] <+Shaded> You guys determine that.
[11:19] <+Shaded> If the creditors don't support the plan, we will probably launch a seperate exchange with no backstory and no debt.
[11:19] <+Shaded> You guys will be forced through liquidation and well, ask the Bitcoinica guys how that's worked out so far.
[11:19] == pdipao [~pdipao@93-42-155-61.ip87.fastwebnet.it] has joined ##mtgox-talk
[11:20] <papa> do u know if they were able to find out where the btc has gone or not yet?
[11:20] <Dr-G3> anyway if it happens, ask jed that it's important information to make the data consistent
[11:20] <sobriket> I will wholly support a good rehabilitation plan and I've already voiced my concerns about liquidation to the current administrator
[11:21] <+Shaded> We'll launch a full fledged investigation if we get access to internal docs, along with supporting the proper authorities.
[11:21] <+Shaded> We'll look for any coins belonging to Mt. Gox, regardless of where they are.
[11:21] <sobriket> However, as I said in my email to you Shaded, i think equity to current creditors is a must
[11:21] <papa> so what they ve done until now?
[11:21] <+Shaded> and hopefully they've found something
[11:22] <+Shaded> In anycase, if we find any coins, we'll return them in their current form, without converting them to cash.
[11:22] <sobriket> If such doesn't happen, how can a new company with hundreds of millions of debt ever be credit worthy to both prospective customers and banks or other creditors
[11:22] <+Shaded> Luckily you're wooing a group of investors.
[11:22] <+Shaded> The plan works out
[11:22] <+Shaded> You guys can support it or not.
[11:23] <sobriket> If no equity is given in exchange for debt, what is to prevent a botched liquidation from happening in another jurisdiction?
[11:23] <+Shaded> I'm off to bed, I'll be back and at it tomorrow in about 7 hours :)
[11:23] <sobriket> Good night
[11:23] <SuSEno> How can we support your plan?
[11:23] <SuSEno> just register in SaveGox dot com /
[11:23] <SuSEno> ?
[11:23] <+Shaded> Go to SaveGox.com and sign up. If you want to help past that, send me an email, jon@jonht
[11:23] <+Shaded> jon@jonhq.com*
[11:24] <SuSEno> OK
[11:24] <+Shaded> Thank you guys for your questions. I understand that a lot of people lost money on this whole thing. It's a touchy subject. But discussions like this will help us move forward.
[11:24] <+Shaded> Hopefully we can turn this story into less of a sad story.
[11:25] <SuSEno> Good Night