Advertisement
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- 01[23:22] <%Buffalo_Wing> so, let's discuss this
- 01[23:22] <%Buffalo_Wing> [23:06:24] <+Buffalo_Wing> don't play with R_I_P
- 01[23:22] <%Buffalo_Wing> [23:06:27] <+Buffalo_Wing> he doesn't know how the rules work
- 01[23:23] <%Buffalo_Wing> who thinks this is unprofessional
- 01[23:23] <%Buffalo_Wing> to let other drafters know about a player
- 01[23:23] <%Buffalo_Wing> who agreed to play a match with me but quit game one
- 01[23:23] <%Buffalo_Wing> after being incorrect about the rules and refusing to come here
- [23:23] <&niknight> when you have a symbol in front of your nick, it is unprofessional
- 01[23:23] <%Buffalo_Wing> no
- [23:24] <&Betamonkey> i think it's petty for regular users, and i think it's unprofessional for judges
- 01[23:24] <%Buffalo_Wing> that's just another unjustified assertion
- 01[23:24] <%Buffalo_Wing> explain how it is petty, please.
- [23:24] <&Betamonkey> what player has a right to tell the community what they should and should not do?
- 01[23:24] <%Buffalo_Wing> lol?
- 01[23:24] <%Buffalo_Wing> obviously people can play with him if they want
- [23:24] <&niknight> you are supposed to be an impartial arbiter, and respect is paramount. what you did was basically taunting the player b/c he iddn't know the rules.
- 01[23:25] <%Buffalo_Wing> i wasn't taunting him
- 01[23:25] <%Buffalo_Wing> HE REFUSED TO COME HERE
- 01[23:25] <%Buffalo_Wing> AND THEN QUIT
- 01[23:25] <%Buffalo_Wing> like do you really think this is the time to make your "moral beacon!!!!!" stand?
- [23:25] <&niknight> no better time than the present
- 01[23:25] <%Buffalo_Wing> no better time than an appropriate time
- [23:25] <&niknight> and tbh, you precipitated this last week
- 01[23:26] <%Buffalo_Wing> lol
- [23:26] <&niknight> and don't give any crap about clariax, b/c he was absolutely, 100% right
- 01[23:26] <%Buffalo_Wing> you weren't even going to say ANYTHING
- 01[23:26] <%Buffalo_Wing> until clariax came in
- [23:26] <&niknight> it's called reflection
- 01[23:26] <%Buffalo_Wing> and, again, i said i wouldn't say anything more
- 01[23:26] <%Buffalo_Wing> like the j3 comment
- [23:26] <&niknight> and tbh, I was way too heated to do something at that point
- [23:26] <%PV> [23:06:24] <+Buffalo_Wing> don't play with R_I_P
- [23:26] <%PV> <%Buffalo_Wing> [23:06:27] <+Buffalo_Wing> he doesn't know how the rules work
- [23:26] <%PV> <%Buffalo_Wing> who thinks this is unprofessional
- 01[23:26] <%Buffalo_Wing> so i'm not sure how much of an issue it is now
- [23:27] <%PV> doesn't seem unprofesional to me
- [23:27] <%PV> besides, we are not professionals here are we ;(
- 01[23:27] <%Buffalo_Wing> ty pv
- 03[23:27] * Clariax (Clariax@SolidIRC-8ce0e9f3.bcvloh.sbcglobal.net) has joined #judges4you
- 03[23:27] * ChanServ sets mode: +h Clariax
- [23:27] <%PV> sotd ;(
- [23:28] <&niknight> his spidey senses were tingling...
- 01[23:28] <%Buffalo_Wing> i was making an objective comment, the drafting community on ml outside of minis
- 01[23:28] <%Buffalo_Wing> is largely self-policed
- [23:28] <%PV> sotd ;(like
- [23:28] <%PV> er
- [23:28] <%PV> like
- [23:28] <%Zapgaze> sotd?
- [23:28] <%Zapgaze> soup of the day?
- [23:28] <%PV> if the guy was disruptive to the drafts
- [23:28] <%Zapgaze> slut of the day?
- [23:28] <%PV> speaking of the devil!
- [23:28] <%PV> :(
- [23:28] <@DARKING> :O
- [23:28] <%Zapgaze> saint of the day?
- [23:28] <&niknight> and if you want to make said comment, then do /mode #draft4you -v buffalo_wing
- [23:28] <%Zapgaze> oh:P
- [23:28] <&niknight> then make your comment
- [23:28] <&niknight> then hop
- [23:28] <%PV> if the guy was disruptive to the drafts, then the fact that buff has a v before his nick should not stop him to try to prevent that from happening again
- [23:29] <&Betamonkey> he wasn't PV - look at the context of the discussion
- 03[23:29] * Zapgaze sets mode: +v Zapgaze
- 03[23:29] * Zapgaze sets mode: -v Zapgaze
- 01[23:29] <%Buffalo_Wing> that's a joke niknight
- 01[23:29] <%Buffalo_Wing> he was disruptive
- 01[23:29] <%Buffalo_Wing> to my draft
- [23:29] <%PV> from what I gathered
- [23:29] <%PV> the guy drafted
- [23:29] <%PV> didnt know stuff
- [23:29] <%PV> didnt come here
- [23:29] <%PV> and quit in the middle
- 01[23:29] <%Buffalo_Wing> yes
- 01[23:29] <%Buffalo_Wing> that is very disruptive
- [23:29] <%PV> also like
- [23:29] <&niknight> pv: he drafted, started playing
- [23:29] <%PV> it is not like buff speaks for the league or anything
- [23:29] <&niknight> and didn't have a problem until the game started
- [23:29] <%PV> to the point where he is a public person
- 01[23:29] <%Buffalo_Wing> [23:29:47] <&niknight> and didn't have a problem until the game started
- 01[23:29] <%Buffalo_Wing> uh so
- [23:29] <%PV> and can no longer talk "for himself"
- [23:30] <%PV> but niknight
- [23:30] <%PV> people can decide by themselves
- [23:30] <%Zapgaze> technically, every judge is a representative of the league
- [23:30] <%PV> if they think that is disruptive or not
- [23:30] <%Zapgaze> and must act accordingly at all times
- [23:30] <%PV> oh come on
- [23:30] <%Zapgaze> regardless of what the situation is
- 01[23:30] <%Buffalo_Wing> thanks Zapgaze
- [23:30] <%Zapgaze> and I know I sound hypocritical
- [23:30] <&niknight> pv: so what would you do if a judge at San Juan called you out?
- 01[23:30] <%Buffalo_Wing> for that awesome contribution
- 01[23:30] <%Buffalo_Wing> called him out on what?
- [23:30] <%PV> called me out?
- [23:30] <&niknight> on anything
- [23:30] <%PV> what doyou mean
- 01[23:30] <%Buffalo_Wing> if it was for doing a draft for fun, then being objectively wrong, then quitting
- 01[23:30] <%Buffalo_Wing> then i think
- 01[23:30] <%Buffalo_Wing> he'd be fine with it
- 01[23:30] <%Buffalo_Wing> not to speak for pv
- [23:30] <&niknight> if a judge said that you didn't have a clue in front of other players
- 01[23:31] <%Buffalo_Wing> lol
- [23:31] <%PV> well
- 01[23:31] <%Buffalo_Wing> way to put words in my mouth
- [23:31] <%PV> people do get DQed
- [23:31] <&niknight> would you not find the HJ and complain
- 01[23:31] <%Buffalo_Wing> league representative
- [23:31] <%PV> by judges
- [23:31] <%PV> dont they?
- 01[23:31] <%Buffalo_Wing> niknight that's a bullshit comparison
- [23:31] <%PV> when they are wrong
- 01[23:31] <%Buffalo_Wing> and you know that's a bullshit comparison.
- [23:31] <%PV> they get punishments
- [23:32] <%PV> I mean, from the way you guys talk
- [23:32] <%PV> it seems that bwing is no longer a person
- [23:32] <%PV> he is not a head of state or anything
- [23:32] <%PV> do I even make sense
- [23:32] <%PV> ;[
- 01[23:33] <%Buffalo_Wing> even as a representative of the league i don't think giving people information is acting inappropriately
- 01[23:33] <%Buffalo_Wing> yes
- 01[23:33] <%Buffalo_Wing> [23:30:56] <&niknight> if a judge said that you didn't have a clue in front of other players
- 01[23:33] <%Buffalo_Wing> this would never happen to pv
- 01[23:33] <%Buffalo_Wing> not only because he knows the rules
- 01[23:33] <%Buffalo_Wing> but also because a) he's willing to listen to other people b) if he isn't, he'd be willing to accept the view of a third-party judge c) he doesn't completely quit the game and waste a half-hour of someone's time just because he disagrees (and, again, is wrong)
- 01[23:34] <%Buffalo_Wing> and if he were all three of those other things then anyone there would be perfectly justified in telling other people
- 01[23:34] <%Buffalo_Wing> to not waste their time drafting with him
- 01[23:34] <%Buffalo_Wing> .
- [23:34] <%PV> agreed!
- [23:35] <&Betamonkey> so we're allowed to potentially alienate (and in some eyes, bully) a player just because we don't see eye to eye with them?
- [23:35] <&Betamonkey> we
- [23:36] <&Betamonkey> we are allowed to pass off our beliefs as fact just because we are judges and thus are automaticaly correct?
- [23:36] <%PV> bully?
- 01[23:36] <%Buffalo_Wing> bully?
- 01[23:36] <%Buffalo_Wing> our beliefs?
- 01[23:36] <%Buffalo_Wing> he literally did not know the rules
- 01[23:36] <%Buffalo_Wing> i tried to educate him
- [23:36] <%PV> what's belief in "he quit the game"
- 01[23:36] <%Buffalo_Wing> and then i tried to bring him in here
- 01[23:36] <%Buffalo_Wing> and then he refused either and quit
- [23:36] <%PV> besides, people can decide for themselves if they know the facts
- 01[23:36] <%Buffalo_Wing> he's alienating himself
- [23:36] <%PV> it is not like buff went ILL BAN WHOEVER PLAYS WITH THIS GUY
- [23:36] <%PV> he merely said what happened
- [23:36] <%PV> how is that bullying
- [23:37] <%PV> I see it as the equivalent of, say, you are a moderator of a trading website
- [23:37] <%PV> then you trade with someone
- [23:37] <&Betamonkey> i said in some eyes PV
- [23:37] <%PV> and they send you cards in terrible condition
- 01[23:37] <%Buffalo_Wing> in some eyes the world is 7k years old
- [23:37] <%PV> then you go and post "this person sends cards in bad condition"
- [23:37] <%PV> you are a moderator
- [23:37] <%PV> is that bullying?!
- [23:37] <%PV> if people are going to trade with him, they should know what they are getting into
- [23:37] <&niknight> pv: he didn't just say that
- 01[23:38] <%Buffalo_Wing> [23:35:46] <&Betamonkey> so we're allowed to potentially alienate (and in some eyes, bully) a trader just because we don't see eye to eye with them?
- 01[23:38] <%Buffalo_Wing> [23:36:09] <&Betamonkey> we are allowed to pass off our beliefs as fact just because we are moderators and thus are automaticaly correct?
- [23:38] <&niknight> if he had said "my opp quit b/c he didn't know the rules" that would have been one thing
- [23:38] <&niknight> but he flat out told people to avoid playing with him
- 01[23:38] <%Buffalo_Wing> oh please
- 01[23:38] <%Buffalo_Wing> you think people are going to take that as an ml edict?
- 01[23:38] <%Buffalo_Wing> that's a joke and you know it
- 03[23:38] * dieplstks (a@SolidIRC-9872c61f.dyn.optonline.net) has joined #judges4you
- 03[23:38] * ChanServ sets mode: +ao dieplstks dieplstks
- [23:38] <&Betamonkey> i think that you could have unreasonably influenced a player's opinion of a peer because of your status. That's what i believe
- 01[23:39] <%Buffalo_Wing> unreasonably?
- 01[23:39] <%Buffalo_Wing> how is it unreasonable
- 01[23:39] <%Buffalo_Wing> please make this case to me
- 01[23:39] <%Buffalo_Wing> (hint: there's no case to be made, you're still just arguing because you can't change your mind because you assume bwing is morally wrong!)
- [23:39] <%PV> it didnt seem like he used his status
- [23:39] <&dieplstks> I agree
- [23:40] <%PV> if the fact that he does have a status make people more likely to believe him
- [23:40] <&dieplstks> with bwing
- [23:40] <&dieplstks> for the record
- [23:40] <%PV> that's completely different, and not like he was abusing it or anything :/
- 03[23:40] * Haro (Haro@Pink.Bunnies) has joined #judges4you
- 03[23:40] * ChanServ sets mode: +o Haro
- [23:40] <&Betamonkey> what if those players do not give a chance for R_I_P to redeem himself? We are here to educate and preserve the intergrity of the game and the league, we are not here to shoot down players just because they did something wrong. That's why we don't permanently ban players, that's why we don't permanently dejudge judges and that's why i don't agree with how you addressed that issue bwing
- [23:40] <%PV> I want something sweet to eat :(
- 01[23:40] <%Buffalo_Wing> [23:40:33] <&Betamonkey> what if those players do not give a chance for R_I_P to redeem himself?
- 01[23:40] <%Buffalo_Wing> lollllllllllllll
- 03[23:40] * DARKING665 (darking665@01C7C6.225CF5.CC1951.1799C0) has joined #judges4you
- [23:41] <%PV> I think telling people not to play with the quitter
- 02[23:41] * @DARKING (darking665@01C7C6.225CF5.265C83.54F85A) Quit (Ping timeout: 121 seconds)
- 01[23:41] <%Buffalo_Wing> firstly it's not like i put it in the topic, so there is literally 0% chance he doesn't get another person to play with
- [23:41] <%PV> does wonders to preserve the integrity of the game
- 02[23:41] * &brimstone (a@sunshine.and.rainbows) Quit (Ping timeout: 121 seconds)
- [23:41] <&Betamonkey> that's not the point and you know it bwing
- 01[23:41] <%Buffalo_Wing> secondly HE IS AN AWFUL OPPONENT WHY SHOULD HE NOT BE RESPONSIBLE
- 03[23:41] * DARKING665 is now known as DARKING
- 01[23:41] <%Buffalo_Wing> FOR THAT
- 03[23:41] * ChanServ sets mode: +o DARKING
- [23:41] <&dieplstks> I think this is absurd
- [23:41] <&Betamonkey> again, i never said that. You know this.
- 01[23:42] <%Buffalo_Wing> lolz
- 01[23:42] <%Buffalo_Wing> k yeah it's definitely me being unfair in this debate
- 01[23:42] <%Buffalo_Wing> not the person who brought up bullying
- 01[23:43] <%Buffalo_Wing> like this is utterly ridiculous, but i have a draft match to play against an actual opponent
- 01[23:43] <%Buffalo_Wing> if anyone has any substantive points lmk
- 02[23:58] * %Djinn (Djinn@SolidIRC-b5388f2c.dynamic.jazztel.es) Quit (Ping timeout: 121 seconds)
- 03[23:59] * Djinn (Djinn@SolidIRC-85651a2f.dynamic.jazztel.es) has joined #judges4you
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement