The Holocaust

a guest Mar 17th, 2017 2,899 Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
  1. Examining Jewish Casualties During World War II
  3.     It is claimed that six million Jews were systematically killed by Germany during World War II, many through the use of gas chambers. Here we will examine the details which throw this into question.
  5. 1) Numbers
  7.     One of the most problematic areas for proponents of the Holocaust clam is the official statistics and censuses taken before and after the war. These censuses do not show changes in the numbers of Jews along the lines required to prove the Holocaust. In 1959, Swedish author Einar Aberg, citing publications by the American Jewish Committee and The World Almanac, showed that they did not document a substantially sharp decline during the years of the war. According to his source, in 1936 there were 15,233,633 Jews worldwide, while in 1949 there were 15,713.638. Even taking into account the slightly different numbers offered by various publications, the six million figure cannot be substantiated.
  9. For example:
  10.     Meyers Hardlexaon, Germany:                 11.60 million Jews worldwide in 1921
  11.     World Almanac & Book of Facts (1935):           15.63 million Jews worldwide in 1925
  12.     World Almanac & Book of Facts (1929):           15.60 million Jews worldwide in 1928
  13.     National Council of Churches:               15.60 million Jews worldwide in 1930
  14.     World Almanac & Book of Facts (1934):           15.31 million Jews worldwide in 1933
  15.     Daily Express (25th March, 1933):               14.00 million Jews worldwide in 1933
  16.     World Almanac (1941):                   15.75 million Jews worldwide in 1938
  17.     Jewish Committee Bureau Synagogue Council:      15.60 million Jews worldwide in 1939
  18.     World Almanac (1940):                   15.32 million Jews worldwide in 1940
  20.     World Almanac & Book of Facts (1942):           15.10 million Jews worldwide in 1942
  21.     World Almanac & Book of Facts (1947):           15.80 million Jess worldwide in 1946
  22.     World Almanac USA (1942):               15.69 million Jews worldwide in 1947
  23.     World Almanac (1949):                   15.75 million Jews worldwide in 1948
  25.     Additionally, the World Almanac Karts out that only 240,130 Jews were living in Germany in 1938. To date, no Holocaust accuser has provided an explanation for the lack of a six million decline in Jewish numbers. Another aspect which undermine the official story is the presence of a vast and seemingly unending abundance of so-called Holocaust survivors. The work of Sergio Della Pergola, a Jewish demographer who works for the Hebrew University of Jerusalem demonstrates the statistical inconsistencies. In 2003, he was able to locate at least 1,094,000 living people who claimed to be Holocaust survivors. It should also be noted that as many as 500,000 Jews died under Soviet control, with 200,000 dying in combat as members of the Red Army.
  27. 2) Official Order?
  29.     Now we examine whether there was an official order to implement the Holocaust. We find that no single piece of documentation exists. All we have are flawed inferences and after-the-fact admissions. To substantiate the claim that millions of Jews were deliberately murdered in concentration camps during World War Two on the orders of German authorities, two and only two contemporaneous papers have been presented: the Franke-Gricksch Report and the Wannsee Conference Protocol. The Franke-Gricksch Report was recently exposed as fabrication by Canadian researcher B. A. Renk. It is a particularly clumsy fabrication and is thus hardly ever cited in the modern day. The Wannsee Conference, however, is still cited.
  30.     According to enforcers of Holocaust orthodoxy, the purpose of the conference was to inform senior governmental administrators of plans for the “Final Solution to the Jewish Question.” It is claimed this was code-word for “extermination”. Revisionist historians have long doubted the “extermination” claims about Wannsee. Some have pointed out that “Final-Solution” is a clear reference to the resettlement of Jews away from Europe. Others have shown that almost everything that is alleged about the Conference lacks any substantiation. That a conference between high officials and Party leaders took place in January 1942 in the villa ‘Am Großen Wannsee’ is probably true, although the precise date is unknown. No other documentation of this conference exists other than the ‘protocol’ and its accompanying letter(s). There is no entry in a guest book, an appointment calendar, or any other kind of incidental evidence.
  31.     Whether the discussion pertained to the Jewish question is not certain, but it is likely. What actually was discussed there is unknown. No legally valid transcript or protocol of the discussion exists. The ‘Minutes of Discussion’ of unknown origin, first submitted in 1947 by Kempner, deposited in the Foreign Office and copied repeatedly, is a fabrication in the sense that the text of this paper was concocted years after the alleged discussion by a person not involved in the conference.
  33. 3) Supposed Process of Extermination
  35.     According to the Holocaust narrative, the victims undressed and went into a room that was completely sealed off. The room was then gassed, which killed the victims. The gas could have been hydrogen cyanide gas–aka Zyklon B (Auschwitz)–or diesel engine exhaust–(Sobibor, Majdanek, Belzec. Chelmno and Treblinka). The corpses were transferred in Auschwitz by a special working group to the incineration furnaces (crematoria), where they were cremated. In Sobibor, Majdanek, Belzec. Chelmno and Treblinka, they were buried in pits dug in the ground and later cremated in the open air. Now-discredited allegations of the manufacture of soap and lampshades from human remains have played a role in historians’ evaluation of holocaust claims, as have individual eyewitness accounts. In the part, it was alleged that some were killed by electricity, water vapor, or chlorine gas. These allegations were later dropped without explanation and no longer feature in the narrative. The evidence against these claims is as follows:
  36.     Diesel engine exhaust contains carton monoxide in such a low percentage that the gas pressure necessary for murder would blow up the building before it could kill anybody. In order to bury the number of alleged corpses, a much larger area than the areas of the camps would be needed. On the alleged burial site, no traces of bones or teeth were found. These do not burn completely during combustion, and the primitive bone-mills described by witnesses also cannot chop them up completely. Traces of bullets and cartridge cases were not found in the sod, even where witnesses spoke about shootings. The alleged gas chambers’ walls do not contain visible traces of hydrogen cyanide (Berlin blue). To execute the number of people claimed by Holocaust orthodoxy, the amount of gas needed would have caused orders of magnitude more hydrogen cyanide traces in the walls than they actually contain.
  37.     The boiling point of the hydrogen cyanide (HCN) in Zyklon B is 26°C. The evaporation of HCN from Zyklon B below 26°C is too slow to kill humans in gas chambers in the way it has been alleged. To kill within minutes, the gas chamber would need to be heated to at least 26°C, but the kind of heating device required was not found in Auschwitz. Moreover, the witnesses claim that SS men just poured Zyklon B through four holes in the roof. Some Holocaust-accusers explain this by saying that the human bodies in the gas chamber provided the required heating. But it is unlikely that the human bodies would be able to heat a room of 10°C in winter to 26°C. The alleged Nazi gas chambers of Auschwitz or elsewhere are quite simply inconceivable for obvious physical and chemical reasons: immediately after the purported hydrogen cyanide gassing of hundreds or thousands of persons in a closed space, others could not have entered the veritable bath of that poison and proceeded to handle and remove so the corpses, untouchable due to being steeped with cyanide gas on both outside and inside. Hydrogen cyanide adheres firmly to surfaces–it penetrates even cement and bricks and is very difficult to remove from a room by ventilation. It settles within the body, mixing with its fluids.
  38.     In the United States, it is precisely this poison that is still used today in an execution chamber to kill a condemned prisoner, but that chamber is of steel and glass and is equipped with machinery which is, of necessity, quite complex, calling for extraordinary precautions in its use. It is enough to see an American gas chamber designed for putting to death a lone individual to realize that the alleged Auschwitz gas chambers, which supposedly served to kill crowds of individuals, day after day, can neither have existed nor functioned.
  40. 4) Supposed Process of Body Disposal
  42.     Another problem is the burning of corpses. A corpse, calculated very modestly, needs 30 kg of coal to burn. For the alleged number of corpses, 30 million tons of coal should have been transported to Auschwitz, but there is no trace of these transports. For example, between October 1943 and March, there is acknowledgment of transporting 638 tons of coal to Auschwitz. With that amount of coal, up to 21,850 corpses can be burned. According to extermination enforcers like Danuta Czech, Raul Hilberg and others, 125,000 corpses were burned in that period of time, which is definitively not possible. The burning time of a 60 kg corpse is an hour. If there were five furnaces available, these can cremate 24 * 10 corpses a day, if two corpses fit into an oven. In a year (365 * 24 * 10), 86,700 corpses can be burned, and between June 1941 and January 1945, a total of up to 303,450 dead bodies might have been burned, in theory, without taking into account the maintenance and rebuild time of the furnace, which is needed for technical reasons after several thousand cremations. Incineration of one 60 kg corpse–according to a rather modest estimation–needs 200 kg of tree wood. In order to burn the alleged amount of corpses accounting for the absence of coal, hundreds of acres of trees should have been leveled, branches cut, and transported. There is no trace of such activity in the vicinity of the camps. There is also no trace of coal transport and storage to these places. In India, where there are many years of experience in the field of burning corpses, an average of 300 kg wood is estimated to be needed to burn a corpse. Additionally, some of the concentration camps claimed at the end of World War II to be death camps are no longer listed as such, even by Holocaust claimers. The opposite is also true. For example, until 2003, the Holocaust Museum in Dachau had a sign saying that the gas chamber was never used. However, in the trend of gradually embellishing the narrative, the current sign today claims it was used.
  44. 5) Admissions of Guile?
  46.     Most of the evidence consists of the testimonies of leading National Socialists like Adolf Eichmann and Rudolf Hoess (not to be confused with Rudolf Hess), who were forced to write those memoirs under duress by the victorious forces after the end of World War II. Their supposed recollections are full of mistakes and often cite nonexistent elements. It should also be noted that Hoess was tortured by Allied forces. Another major link in the pro-holocaust case is the testimony of National Socialist defendants in the Nuremberg show trials (and other trials such as that of Eichmann in Israel). Holocaust revisionists point out that defendants were in fear for their lives and under much duress, including torture and harsh maltreatment. They argue that in confessing to alleged crimes, the defendants were merely trying to save their own skins (in many cases, unsuccessfully), and deliberately embellished their testimony accordingly. Revisionists also point to later admissions of torture of the defendants, which could have led to false confessions. Evidence obtained through the use of torture should be not-admissible in our examination.
  48. 6) Conclusion
  50.     The Germans of the Third Reich wanted to remove the Jews from Europe, but not to exterminate them. They sought “a definitive–or final–territorial solution of the Jewish question” and not a “final solution” in the sense of any physical suppression. To want a “final solution of unemployment” is not to desire the death of the unemployed. The Germans had concentration camps but not “extermination camps.” They used disinfection gas chambers operating, notably, with an insecticide called Zyklon B, but never had any homicidal gas chambers or homicidal gas vans. Crematory ovens were used to incinerate corpses, not used for the incineration of living beings.
  51.     For the entire duration of the war, millions of European Jews lived, plain for all to see, amidst the rest of the population, a good part of them being employed in factories by the Germans who were cruelly short of manpower, and those millions of Jews were therefore not killed. Better still: the Germans stubbornly offered to hand over to the Allies, up to the last months of the conflict, as many Jews as they might want on the express condition that they must not subsequently send them to Palestine. This proviso was made out of respect for “the noble and valiant Arab people” of that region, already violently beset by Jewish colonists. Excesses which might be committed against Jews could well bring on the severest sanctions: the killing of a single Jew could get the perpetrator, although he be a German solder, sentenced to death by court martial and shot. In other words, the Jews under German rule continued to enjoy, If they observed the regulations in place, the protection of penal law, even in the face of the armed forces.
  52.     As for the official historians of the alleged physical extermination of the Jews, they cannot invoke a single document proving the crime, they are unable to provide the least representation of the crime weapon, they do not possess any proof–nor even any evidence–they cannot name a single truthful witness, the sources formerly invoked have revealed themselves to be not only rarer than was claimed but also unreliable, the alleged traces of the crime are few and far between–and difficult to interpret–and at their end there have been falsification, misrepresentations and artifice.
  54. 1) No Extermination Order: There was no extermination order issued by Hitler–or anyone else. There is no proof for this at all, in all the millions of Internal documents seized after the war.
  55. 2) No One Was “Gassed”: There were no fatal gassings of human beings at Auschwitz–or anywhere else. There is a good deal of technical and forensic evidence against this black propaganda clam. It has repeatedly been demolished by various revisionists from various angles, including in chemical analysis in the famous Leuchter Report and then in the Rudolf Report, as well as in a Polish government forensic examination.
  56. 3) The Six Million Fraud: The “six million“ figure is an absurd exaggeration. It is actually technically impossible, because there were never six million Jews under German control during the war.
  58. ~:~
  60.     This is what you have to believe in order to believe the official holocaust narrative:
  61.     Despite a 5 year long policy of encouraging Jewish emigration away from his grasp, Adolf Hitler always wanted to kill all Jewish on the face of the earth. For some reason, it took him 8 years in power to realize it was about time to get started. He then proceeded to move Jews from all over Europe to Poland instead of just exterminating then locally. Yes, even the 400,000 Jews that lived in France, despite the existence of dozens of internment camps in France that could just be modified for the task, this still somehow makes logistical sense.
  62.     Arriving at the camp, Jews were stripped naked and fooled into thinking it was shower time, they were all gassed for about a hour. After that, a group of Jewish collaborators soaked the bodies with water hoses to release the gas from the clothing and they were all hauled to the furnaces. Yes, Jewish collaborators. Despite knowing their were all going to die, somehow Jews were convinced to be the manpower in most of their own extermination process; this somehow worked flawlessly without any sizable revolts and this ultra-efficient system killed about 200,000 people per month.
  63.     While estimates put the number of guards necessary in the soviet Gulag system to be around 1,000,000 strong, Germans somehow managed to murder 6,000,000 Jews using almost no German manpower, which was much in need in the front. Hooray for German efficiency! Then the bodies were shaved and the hair processed to be used for clothing. Lice? What lice? The bodies were then burned in ultra hot industrial furnaces that worked almost around the clock, never mind the waste in metal, fuel, or industrial capacity for the building of all the specialized machinery involved while a war is still being fought to a losing end. As the allied advance approached, the heavily armed fleeing Germans somehow failed to exterminate all of the remaining, unarmed, semi-starved Jews left in the camp, because they always left “in a hurry.” The holocaust makes no logical sense. Problem is, most people think “racism” makes no logical sense, so in their minds it all checks out.
  65. ~:~
  67.     They were work camps, not death camps. This is the first step to realizing that an enormous amount of the Holocaust, if not all of it, is a lie. The second step is asking which camps were “death” camps, how we know that, and wondering how we got the ‘six million’ number. The third is asking how many people actually died. The fourth is asking why asking any of these questions get you years in prison time when mussulman savages only get a hundred hours of community service for raping Scandinavian women. The fifth is asking why the Holocaust matters at all, since it is in no way a remarkable or noteworthy occurrence, historically speaking. Even if six million Jews did die, it is not the largest genocide in human history, nor is it the most recent. It is not the first, or even the first to occur since the Industrial Revolution. It is not the first massacre to attack a religious or ethnic group, nor was it the largest. It is not even noteworthy in terms of size or brutality, as the Communists killed far, far more than six million people, and did so far more monstrously and inhumanely.
  68.     The final question is asking who benefits the most from covering all of this up and inventing the lie that six million Jews were butchered. If it is a lie–if we suppose that it isn’t true–then who profits the most off it? Does anyone? The truth doesn’t fear investigation. If the Holocaust isn’t Allied propaganda to support Israel’s existence and discourage people from looking at the things that Hitler’s regime did right, then why does Washington DC have a Holocaust museum that does nothing but talk about jews in every exhibit while there is not so much as a plaque to commemorate the tens of millions of Christians, Chinese, and Russian nationalists who died resisting our supposed “great enemy”, the Communist regime?
  69.     It’s propaganda. It has to be. There is simply nothing else it can be. Once you realize that the Holocaust was a lie–once you comprehend that the establishment can sell such an enormous lie–then at last you truly begin to see the shape our world is in. Only once you understand the size of the lie they can get away with telling do you begin to understand just how bad things really are. “Corruption” doesn’t even begin to cover it.
  70.     You take the blue pill and you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe.
  71.     You take the red pill and you find out just how deep this rabbit hole goes.
  73. ~:~
  75.     It’s hard to put yourself into the European ghettos of the early 20th century to understand the mindset of the Jews living there, but I will try to give a brief insight. Hopefully, I will be able to explain why many Jews in work camps legitimately believed they were being gassed.
  76.     The Jews, on the whole, worked for their own and their community’s self interest. They stayed within their communities–if they went to school then they did so at Jewish schools. The Jews mingled with the local population only through merchant trading. They were essentially a nation within a nation, completely oblivious to what was happening in the world outside of their ghettos. Furthermore, they were a lowly lot–the majority was uneducated, easily frightened, highly superstitious, consumed with a victim mentality, and physically weak as they rarely performed hard labor. Thus when Germany fought back against their behavior, they Oy vey’d because they didn’t realize how their degeneracy and subversion had finally caught up to them. When they were sent to work camps, they couldn’t understand why. What on Earth are we responsible for?! We did nothing wrong! We are just Jews suffering once more under vicious and cruel host nations.
  77.     Then boom, they were forced to work–forced to do hard physical labour. Now, to a scrawny, weakling Jew, hauling dirt is not his type of work, so in his mind this was equivalent to torture. Their weak muscles must have ached for weeks before they became accustomed to work. Then, later in the war, when Jews were dying of starvation and disease, they legitimately thought they were being gassed alive because this superstitious, uneducated lot could not understand why diseased bodies needed to be burned. One Jew would say we are burning bodies, then like Chinese whispers the word spreads, then Oy Vey we are being gassed! This is why so many Jews “survived” the “gas chambers” or were surprised that instead of gas they were instead given showers. Even Schindler’s List shows this.
  79. ~:~
  81.     You need to look at who benefits. From the holocaust ‘magic spell’, the Jews get a nation (Israel) in the middle east and are able to influence world oil trade while reaping reparations from Germany and foreign and military aid from the USA. An entire country and 70 years of reparations. Also, Israel is a place where major Jewish criminals from other states can escape to avoid prosecution. Jews all around the world can claim victim status while victimizing the rest of the world for as along as the holocaust meme can be kept alive. Of course, if the holocaust meme is ever discovered to be false in a widespread manner, Israel loses all its funding and Jews lose the victim card. Furthermore, people will be angry that they have been lied to.
  82.     None of it makes any sense if you look into details. It was designed, partly, to be a distraction from even greater evils like:
  83.     The Soviet purges, where millions really were killed. Remember, the USSR was our “ally” and the Bolsheviks were majority Jewish.
  84.     The Holodomor in Ukraine, where millions starved to death deliberately.
  85.     The treatment of German prisoners after the war.
  86.     The firebombing of Dresden and carpet bombing of Germany in general.
  87.     The way the ‘oppressed’ Jews murdered their way into Palestine and their tyrannical behavior to this day, the excuse being “We don’t want to be holocasusted again!” Take away that excuse and look at the Jews in Israel again. They don’t look so innocent anymore. They just start to look as they are–a brutal, merciless people who will do anything to get what they want and who live off the pain of others. The worst part for the Jews is this: by the time they get deported from wherever they are, no one else will want to take them in and Israel will collapse from having its foreign aid shut off. There will be nowhere left to run for them. Meanwhile, everyone will know what they really are, and no one will show any mercy. Everyone has been aggrieved by the banker, the usurper, the traitor, the outsourcer, and now everyone would who was behind all of it. The greatest lie of the 20th century, perhaps of all time, if you look at how much money it made. It’s probably the biggest redpill to swallow.
  89. ~:~
  91.     In their attempt to try and feel superior to us, they’ve taken whatever semblance of logic they might have possibly been able to conjure up and use for the purposes of thinking and writing and threw it out the window. If they truly believe that we only see the history of WWII ideologically, then they must be mentally ill. It is objective fact that the modem story of the holocaust is nothing more than a fraud–a bedrock on which to build complete and total control of the masses of the world. The holocaust–even using the most outlandish claims (now debunked), and even using the equally insane modern claims–was not the biggest genocide, nor the fastest, nor the most brutal, nor the most efficient, nor the most successful, and yet it is taboo to even consider questioning the popular narrative. In some instances, you can be jailed for such an offense.
  92.     The perception of jews as a people under permanent oppression, which climaxed in the supposed holocaust, has rendered them essentially untouchable. Anything resembling a hint of criticism towards a jew is instantly decried as antisemitism, and as a result they can get away with anything and expect nary an eye batted in response. In a similar vein, the mass acceptance of such shaky evidence in favor of the holocaust sets the stage for today’s epidemic of blind acceptance, saliently described by the phrase “listen and believe.”
  93.     Evidence doesn’t matter as long as there is a perceived victim and aggressor and that the allocation of those labels suits the current establishment. What’s that? Tyrone robbed a store, tried to rush a cop, and then got shot? Police brutality! Racism! Systemic oppression! The epitome of this mode of thinking was the Nuremberg trials, which served as a kangaroo court from which to garner more sympathy for the jews and to demonize nationalism. On this point, the modem fable of the holocaust, by its very being, has lead to the association of any sort of white racial consciousness with images of gas chambers, ovens, death marches, and mass graves. If one accepts the official narrative of the holocaust as is pushed so much by the jew-owned media, they are immediately opposed to any form of white unity under the pretense of an impending genocide. This is why it is so important that the holocaust be outed as a fraud–not simply because we have a fetish for boots and brown uniforms.
  95. ~:~
  97.     Let me quote my prime minister, who spent half a year chasing a comedian who dared to make fun of the holocaust. He summed up everything in one sentence. “The shoah–the extermination of Jews–the genocide–must be regarded as sacred, sacred, and when you start to attack that, it’s the entirety of our system of values that is attacked.”
  98.     He is actually right when he says that. The whole system of political correctness–of whining, of reparation demands, of carte blanche to jews, of hell raining down on others–is based on what Nuremberg said. If you start to say, “Yeah, but,” you are destroying the 70 years of lies that led to our world. For them, it is sacred. Doubting the gassing or saying that some things were actually overestimated is the same to them as saying, “Jesus wasn’t actually crucified, he was just pinched.”  It’s something that is a given–that cannot be changed. If you start to doubt it, the whole world crumbles for them.
  100. ~:~
  102.     Jewish Dr. Roger Dommergue Polacco de Menasce mercilessly and completely debunked the holocaust in his book Le Silence de Heidegger, which hasn’t seen a rebuttal to this day. His 10 main points are:
  103.     1. The evidence gathered by the Zündel trials, especially the Leuchter Report
  104.     2. The fact that only about 3.5 million Jews lived in Europe during that period, according to the American Jewish Year Book.
  105.     3. The evidence presented by professor Robert Faurisson, which the Jews refused to debate in public.
  106.     4. Paul Rassinier’s testimony affirming that he had never heard of gassings during his imprisonment in German concentration camps, only after the war.
  107.     5. Henri Roques’ debunking of the Gerstein Report.
  108.     6. The forgery of photos of the last three months of the war with fake captions.
  109.     7. The blatant psychological, arithmetical, and technical imposture of the “6 million Jews gassed” figure.
  110.     8. How the Human Rights Movement never expresses opposition to the crimes of Marxism (Jewish-Bolshevism), yet keeps bringing up the “6 million holocausted Jews.”
  111.     9. Why does the modem political paranoia judges the 60 million genocided by the Marxist Jew Lazar Kaganovich and his comrades, among whom was Joseph Stalin, to be somehow inferior to the alleged 6 million exterminated by Adolf Hitler?
  112.     10. The work of revisionist historians is perfectly valid, for they will help demystify the incredible hysteria and bad faith that the “six million in the gas chambers” theme provokes.
  114.     He also mentions the opinions of Jews opposed to the “holocaust” ruse, like G. J. Burg, Miss Grossmann, Benedit Kautsky, Jacob Timermam and Leon Jick. Seriously, the Holocaust is not up to debate anymore. It has been exhaustively proven to be a fraud. We’ve fallen into a spiral of silence, though, for speaking against this deception is forbidden by law.
  116. ~:~
  118.     Jewish prophecies require that 6 million Jews must “vanish” before the state of Israel can be formed. “You shall return minus 6 million.” That’s why Tom Segev, an Israeli historian, declared that the “6 million” is an attempt to transform the holocaust story into state religion. Those six million, according to prophecy, had to disappear in “burning ovens” (the Greek word ‘holocaust’ means ‘burned offerings’). Robert B. Goldmann writes: “…without the holocaust, there would be no jewish state.” But with it, the prophecies have now been “fulfilled” and Israel can become a legitimate state.
  119.     Before Adolf Hitler–before the Nazi Party, before WW2, starting as early as the 1800s–western newspapers began to use the term ‘holocaust’ and claim the “extermination” of “6 million jews” while blaming it on Imperial Russia. There are over 256 references to the idea of 6,000,000 Jews being exterminated before this number was officially announced at the Nuremberg trials, starting in 1869 in the Memphis Daily Appeal. Almost all of them allege that Imperial Russia had exterminated or was planning to exterminate “6 million Jews,” and some of these articles actually used the term ‘holocaust.’
  120.     The First Holocaust by Don Heddesheimer is a critical work documenting the continuous Jewish attempts at claiming a ‘holocaust’ and the “death of 6 million jews” before WW2. As documented in the book, Zionists have continuously and hysterically attempted to claim that six million Jews were dead, dying, or in grave danger of doing so in Europe or Russia since the late 1800s so that they could have the “legitimacy of prophecy” to finally create “New Israel.”
  122. ~:~
  124.     This always has bothered me. WWII lasted from 1939 to 1945–6 years. They claim that about 6 million Jews and 6 million miscellaneous (gypsies, blacks, gays, etc.) died in the concentration camps–not in the war. That’s almost 12 million people. 12 million people were killed in just a matter of 6 years? The numbers don’t add up. I’ve done the math.
  126.     5 years = 1525 days
  127.     1825 days = 43800 hours
  128.     43800 hours = 2628000 minutes
  129.     6000000 Jews / 2628000 minutes = 2.28310502 Jews per minute
  131.     You see the problem with this? That’s ~2 Jews per minute, one Jew every 30 seconds. There were only 8 death camps in total, Auschwitz being the largest and longest operating. But Auschwitz didn’t get gas chambers until 1943. Let’s assume they killed an equal number of Jews per year. So that’s 2 million Jews, per year, in 1943, 1944, and the first half of 1945 when it was shut down.
  133.     365 days = 8760 hours
  134.     8760 hours = 525600 minutes
  135.     1000000 dead / 525600 hours = 1.90258752 killed a minute
  137.     There seems to be a common assumption–that it takes 30 seconds to kill one person. Surely, then, every 30 seconds, every day, for at least two years, these camps must have killed someone. There’s one problem here. We know it took four hours from start to finish to operate a crematorium. Four hours to kill 2000 people. This means that each individual took 8 minutes to burn.
  139.     730 days * 24 hours * 60 minutes = 1051200 minutes
  141.     Divided by eight minutes per person, we see that the best death camp might have killed only 131400 people. Let’s take that and work by percents.
  143.     Auschwitz: 131400
  144.     Belzec: 55188 (42% of Auschwitz)
  145.     Chelmno: 30222 (23%)
  146.     Jasenovac: 55188 (42%)
  147.     Majadnek: 34164 (26%)
  148.     Maly Trostinets:  5256 (4%)
  149.     Sobibór: 23652 (18%)
  150.     Treblinka: 81468 (62%)
  151.     Total: 416538
  153. ~:~
  155.     The number of Jews said to have been cremated by Nazis after having been gassed in homicidal gas chambers is implausible given time constraints. Round one, the daily total:
  156.     I’ll focus on Auschwitz, but you can do these calculations yourselves from the stats at Wikipedia articles for the other death camps. 1.1 million is the current estimate for how many were murdered at Auschwitz (it was originally 4 million, but even they don’t claim that anymore). By the spring of 1944, 8,000 people were being gassed every day at Auschwitz. (1) According to a specialist site, “Cremating at the optimum temperature (16-1800º), the average weighted remains takes 2 to 2.5 hours. (2) Let’s say 2 hours for the sake of calculation. They had 52 crematoria at Auschwitz into which one body at a time could be placed. (3) To cremate 8,000 bodies with 52 crematoria at your service burning non-stop would require 12.8 days. Yet this was supposedly done every day.
  157.     Round two, the entire total:
  158.     All these gassed bodies, 8,000 a day by the climax, were burnt, according to the orders of Höss in September 1942. 800,000 is the lowest estimate I could find among court historians for the number of Jews killed at Auschwitz. (4) The Wikipedia holocaust article also says, “From spring 1942 until the fall of 1944, transport trains delivered Jews to the camp’s gas chambers from all over Nazi-occupied Europe.” So that’s 33 months–990 days. Let’s say 1,000 days, just because. Let’s divide the 800,000 bodies to burn, which makes 800 bodies a day. 52 ovens at 2 hours a body means 624 bodies a day, assuming a non-stop burn rate. That’s below the 800 bodies which would have needed to be burnt, and also assumes extra days to burn, remember. Note all of the favorable roundings, giving it the lowest number of bodies (lower than the legally acceptable number in Europe) and the greatest amount of time possible, likely making these numbers lower than most court historians would claim.
  160. 1.
  161. 2.
  162. 3.
  163. 4. The Final Solution, Gerald Reitlinger, painter and potter (yes, an artist, not a historian)
  165. ~:~
  167.     There were no gas chambers because it is a design, mathematical, and logistical impossibility. The supposed exhaust chimneys extended no more than 20 feet above the rest of the camp buildings (rendering them dangerously useless). We know for an absolute fact that these did not exist because aerial recon photos taken by the allies have no record of structures that high, as the shadow would be cast over the entire camp. There were no HVAC air decontamination pumps to remove the gas from the room. Had this setup been used for actual executions, the guards would have inhale the fumes and died on the spot, convulsing. If your argument is that they’d wait for it to “air out”, then they’d have to wait over 3 hours after each gassing, making the killing of 6 million people in the timeframe claimed even more impossible than if they’d had said equipment.
  168.     There were no airtight doors on the chambers. Considering they were directly adjacent to the troop barracks, the troops within would have died or became extremely ill due to leaks. The real “gas chambers” where they deloused clothing were pointed away from the base, no less than 200 yards away from the general population, their walls stained with blue residue to this day.
  169.     There are no mass graves or evidence of large amounts of human bone ash. The grounds at any and all concentration camps have never been disturbed, other than one or two pits where they burned the corpses of typhus victims. In the crematory at Auschwitz, they could only fit two people if you stuffed them in (there is no evidence of this happening other than hearsay). Even if they were burning 24 hours a day 7 days a week for two years, there is no possible way it could disintegrate 350,000 people in a year. It takes 2 hours to disintegrate a body in modem crematories and there are 8700 hours in a year. In order to disintegrate 350,000 people, all 38 of these ovens would have to run 4,605 times with two people stuffed in them for 4 hours without ever turning off, ever.
  170.     When we talk about cremation, we need to take the minimum possible sustainable time. Meaning 2 corpses would be more than 4 hours due to the effect it has on the stages of cremation, such as water evaporation and the heat reduction associated therewith. “Survivors” claim 5 minutes for 4 corpses, which isn’t even possible with a 3630ºF oven. The thermal barrier is that at temperatures of over 2010–2190°F, one encounters the phenomenon of sintering, where the bones of the corpse and the oven refractory begin to soften and to melt together (fuse), and at temperatures under ~1290º F the body merely chars.
  171.     We must also take into account extraneous circumstances, such as the downtime of the ovens which was 3-4 hours each day for cleaning/maintenance. The ovens also suffered from constant defects. Crematorium II was subjected to the first serious repairs a little more than a week after it started operating. On March 24-25, 1943, the Topf engineers Prüfer and Schultze came to Auschwitz to verify the extent of the damages. At the beginning of April, it was discovered that the damage was not restricted to the three forced-draft blowers, which had burned out, but that parts of the refractory material of flue and chimney had collapsed, so that the Auschwitz Central Construction Office asked Prüfer during his visit (April 4-9) for a ”new suggestion regarding the chimney lining.” From a drawing of the Central Construction Office, it turns out that the damage had affected parts of the walls delimiting the chimney’s center smoke channel. This crematorium was inactive from May 17-September 1, 1943 and was doubtlessly operated at reduced load before that. Crematorium III was in service June 25-December 31, and Crematorium IV from March 22-May 10.
  172.     All totaled, the ovens existed for 1039 days, and of those, they were out of service 551 days. This is probably why they had so many crematoria. If we factor in the downtime, we can’t even approach the theoretical maximum numbers.
  174. ~:~
  176.     What about those pictures of mountains of dead bodies in the camps? Typical of a large number of such photos often shown on TV in holocaust documentaries, they come without commentary or else with allegations that the dead are victims thereof. In fact, the photographs we have are of victims of an epidemic which occurred at the war’s end. The cause of death is evident from the condition of the corpses. If they ha been “gassed”, they would not be emaciated, and if they had died of starvation, they would have swollen joints and stomachs. Any medical professional will see at first glance that these people died of typhus.
  177.     All the photographs of heaps of corpses were taken in western camps around the end of the war, such as Dachau, Bergen-Belsen, and Buchenwald, where historians all explicitly agree that no mass murders took place. Significantly, there are no such photographs taken at the camps in which mass murder is alleged to have occurred (Auschwitz, Treblinka, Belzec, Sobibor, Chelmno, Majdanek.) These eastern camps were all in areas which came under Soviet control at the war’s end. It is very telling that the Soviets released no pictures of mass graves or heaps of corpses and allowed no journalists, medical professionals, or other experts to examine the camps. Since the end of the 1980s, historians have been investigating these sites for evidence of mass murder, but the officials have obstructed their efforts by all possible means.
  178.     In the absence of authentic photographs documenting mass murder, it frequently happens that photographs of those who died in the western camps of malnutrition and typhus are presented as evidence of deliberate mass murder. To be sure, by the end of the war, the hellish conditions in the western camps convinced many Allied observers that mass murder had taken place. In reality, these conditions resulted from a situation for which the German government was not solely responsible. Toward the end of the war, Himmler ordered the evacuation of the eastern camps as the Red Army approached (to save the prisoners from what would happen to them at the hands of the Soviets), which led to hopeless overcrowding in the western camps. By that time, Allied bombing had almost completely destroyed German infrastructure, making it impossible to supply the camps with food, medicine, and sanitation supplies.
  179.     Misunderstandings about the causes of the massive die-off continue to this day, especially among Americans. The respected leftist historian Norbert Frei has given the following reason for misinterpretation, (from Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte 35 (1987), page 400), “The shock of these discoveries [of mountains of corpses] often led to false conclusions which turned out to be enduring.”
  180.     There is no denying that a government which imprisons people in camps is responsible for them, and so the unjustly imprisoned were therefore victims of the Third Reich, even if they died only of disease. However, one should not overlook the fact that by the war’s end, mountains of corpses had become commonplace throughout Germany. In German cities, there were 600,000 victims of Allied terror bombings. Millions more died of starvation and disease, which ran rampant through 1949. In Eastern Europe, some two million Germans were murdered by Serbs, Czechs, Poles, and Russians in the course of history’s bloodiest ethnic cleansing. In the POW camps of the western Allies, a million young German men died and millions more vegetated. Hundreds of thousands more were shipped to the labor camps of the Soviet Gulag, never to be seen again. But the media show only one variety of corpse piles, those in the concentration camps. We should all ask ourselves why this is so.
  182. ~:~
  184. 1. International Committee of the Red Cross Records
  185.     The International Red Cross was stationed in all German labour, internment, concentration and prison camps throughout World War II. The Red Cross were never given access to any Russian camps before, during or after World War II. At his trials in Canada, during the 1980s and 1990s, Professor Ernst Zundel finally got the Red Cross to release their records from the German camps, despite strong Israeli objections. The Red Cross records seem to suggest that there were no gas chambers, and a total of 271,301 died during World War II in these camps, mostly from typhus. In a letter to the US State Department dated November 22, 1944, the Red Cross, who were stationed in all the camps, stated, “We have not been able to discover any trace of installations for exterminating civilian prisoners.”
  187. 2. United States Airforce Aerial Photos Of Camps:
  188.     From 1942, until the end of World War II, the United States Air Force performed low flying, low-speed photography of all the alleged death camps to obtain evidence of what was going on. This followed jewish claims in the West that a mass murder was occurring. All these photographs were released in 1979 when they were declassified. None of these photographs show any sign of mass murder or disposal of millions of bodies.
  190. 3. Western Allies Never Liberated Any Death Camps With Gas Chambers
  191.     None of the Western Allies (Britain, Canada, USA, Australia, France, etc.) liberated any camps that had gas chambers or other systems of mass murder in them. All the alleged death camps with gas chambers were liberated by the Soviets. Consequently, any alleged evidence of death camps and/or gas chambers was forthcoming solely from Soviet Russia. The Western Allies liberated a total of 12 camps and the Soviets 8 camps.
  193. 4. The Leuchter Report
  194.     One of the pieces of evidence Professor Ernst Zundel produced at his trials in Canada was the “Leuchter Report” compiled by Fred Leuchter on his commission. Fred Leuchter is the world’s foremost expert on gas chambers and holds the patents for nearly all the gas chambers used for executions worldwide. He has also personally built–or supervised the building of–all gas chambers in the USA and most in the rest of the world. After inspecting the alleged gas chambers at Auschwitz, Leuchter concluded they were unsuitable for use thereas due to their lack of airtight doors, lack of a gas extraction system, and general shoddy build. He also chemically analyzed the walls for ferrocyanide (produced when the byproducts of Zyklon-B react with brick walls) and concluded there was none. The Auschwitz authorities took the same tests with the same results and now admit there was no gas chamber in Auschwitz.
  196. 5. The British Secret Service Monitored All Concentration Camp Deaths
  197.     Using some of the world’s first computers, the British Secret Service cracked the German top-secret Enigma code and had access to most German military communications by 1942. Sir Frank H. Hinsley, in his book British Intelligence In The Second World War: Its Influence On Strategy And Operations, stated, “The returns of Auschwitz mentioned illness as the main cause of death but included references to shootings and hangings. There were no references in the decrypts to gassings.” The numbers of dead in the decoded messages tallied exactly with Red Cross and German Military records of the time. The British Secret Service also monitored various atrocities carried out by the Germans across the rest of Europe. Why would the Germans report these to Berlin but not the alleged gas chambers at Auschwitz and other camps?
  199. 6. The French Resistance Denied The Holocaust
  200.     During World War II, Germany invaded France and occupied the north from 1940 to 1944. A secret army of French Patriots known collectively as The French Resistance fought the German occupiers in various ways. A large number of French Resistance members were imprisoned, tortured, and executed–including their leader, Jean Moulin. After World War II, French resistance members were released from various German concentration camps, including Auschwitz and other alleged death camps. On their return to France, they all gave horrific accounts of their treatment by the Germans and were full of hatred for them. However, they all denied any knowledge of gas chambers and a mass murder programm in the concentration camps.
  202. 7. The Gas Chambers Of World War One
  203.     It was widely reported during World War I that the Germans and their allies were using gas chambers to kill thousands of prisoners. However in 1919, after the end of the war, British Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin admitted in Parliament that it had been propaganda and no such gas chambers had existed. He also apologized publicly to the German people for this racist slur on them.
  205. 8. Amounts Of Zyklon-B Used At The Camps
  206.     Zyklon-B was the trade name for a cyanide-based pesticide invented in the early 1920s. It was used in Germany, before and during World War II, for disinfection and pest extermination in ships, buildings and machinery. Zyklon-B consisted of diatomite, in the form of granules the size of fine peas, saturated with prussic acid. In view of its volatility and the associated risk of accidental poisoning, it was supplied in sealed metal canisters. One of the co-inventors of Zyklon-B, the chemist and businessman Bruno Tesch, was executed by the British in 1946 for his role in the alleged Holocaust.
  207.     In the concentration camps it was used for sanitation and pest control. There were disinfectant chambers in all the camps where inmates clothes were disinfected to combat typhus and other diseases. When you break down the amount of Zyklon-B used in all the camps–those not alleged to have gas chambers and those alleged to have gas chambers–the amount per inmate is very similar. This means the alleged death camps would have had to have had a secret supply for the “gas chambers.”
  209. 9. The Nuremberg Trials 1945 to 1949
  210.     The Nuremberg Trials were held in the German city of Nuremberg from 1945 to 1949. These Trials were held by the victorious Allies with the Germans as defendants. They were the worst sort of show trials in human history–the main judge was Iona Nikitchenko, who had presided over Stalin’s show trials of 1936-38 in the Soviet Union. The court invented ridiculous findings, like jews being turned in to lampshades and even soap–these claims are now discredited and even the jews admit they were untrue.
  211.     The Chief Justice of the United States, Harlan Fiske Stone, called the Nuremberg trials a fraud. He wrote, “Chief US prosecutor Jackson is away conducting his high-grade lynching party in Nuremberg. I don’t mind what he does to the Nazis, but I hate to see the pretense that he is running a court and proceeding according to common law. This is a little too sanctimonious a fraud to meet my old-fashioned ideas.” Associate Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas charged that the Allies were guilty of “substituting power for principle” at Nuremberg. “I thought at the time–and still think–that the Nuremberg trials were unprincipled,” he wrote. “Law was created ex post facto to suit the passion and clamor of the time.” According to British General Montgomery, the Germans had only one sin: They lost the war. President John F. Kennedy, in his book Profiles in Courage, criticized Nuremberg as a show trial. Out of 139 German witnesses who testified that the Holocaust had occurred, the British Medical Officer recorded that 137 had “damage to their testicles that is beyond repair.” A number of Germans had died under interrogation by the Allies. There was also the threat of sending peoples’ families to Soviet Gulags.
  213. 10. The Concentration Camp Crematorium
  214.     One of the main problems with claim of 6 million jews being murdered is disposal of the bodies. It was claimed at Nuremberg that they had been disposed of in the camp crematorium. There were crematoria in each camp, but they simply didn’t have the capacity. Each oven could burn a body in about two hours, meaning a maximum capacity of 12 bodies every day, or just less than 6000 bodies per year, per oven, assuming perfect operation. The camps had between four and twelve ovens each, giving 24,000 to 72,000 bodies per year, maximum, at each camp. This still wouldn’t be possible, as you can’t run ovens nonstop without the metal fracturing. Even double or triple loading wouldn’t help, as this simply increases the time to burn–three hours for two bodies or four and a half hours for three bodies. Also, bodies aren’t totally reduced by this process and usually leave the pelvis and thigh bones, which need crushing with special machinery. No such machinery was found or alleged to have been found at any of the camps. There is also the problem of fuel, as each body would need about 40 kilograms of coal to burn–there is no record of the massive amount of coal required being supplied.
  216. 11. The Liberation Of Belsen Concentration Camp Film
  217.     The whole world has probably seen the film of the liberation of Belsen concentration camp; it is horrific, to say the least. Human skeletons are walking round with dead bodies covering the ground. This film was shown worldwide at the time to show the evil of Nazi Germany. However, Belsen was liberated by the Western Allies and was never alleged to have had any gas chamber or be part of a systematic mass murder program. The victims are, in fact, all dying from typhus, which is confirmed by German military, Red Cross, and British military medical records. This is never pointed out whenever this film is shown. Interestingly, the deaths were mostly due to a lack of Zyklon-B at the end of the war with Germany collapsing, which led to a mass typhus outbreak in the camp.
  219. 12. No Film Or Photographs Of Any Gas Chambers
  220.     The Nazis were technology freaks, to say the least, and filmed and photographed virtually everything they did during World War II. Hitler even had executions of his political enemies filmed so he could watch them with his cronies. However, there has never been a single photograph or film found of any of the alleged gas chambers in operation. The Nazis did film, and photograph, themselves committing many atrocities across occupied Europe, so it seems unlikely they wouldn’t film the alleged gas chambers. All the films we are shown of gas chambers are Hollywood recreations made after the war.
  222. 13. Sir Winston Churchill Never Mentioned The Alleged Holocaust
  223.     In his monumental six volume The Second World War, Sir Winston Churchill, British wartime Prime Minister, never makes any reference to gas chambers or a planned mass extermination of European jews. This is despite the fact he goes in to great detail about virtually every facet of World War II, including many atrocities committed by the Nazis. The same can be said about Eisenhower’s Crusade in Europe. After WWII, with the Cold War starting, Churchill stated, “I think we slaughtered the wrong pig here…” a clear reference to the fact Britain would have been better helping Germany defeat Soviet Russia, or at least staying out completely.
  225. 14. Star Witness To The Alleged Holocaust Elie Wiesel
  226.     One of the star witnesses to the Auschwitz allegations is Nobel Prize winner Elie Wiesel. Wiesel was born in Sighet, Romania on September 30, 1928. Wiesel gave evidence at various trials around the world on his alleged experiences in German camps during WWII. Wiesel is a well-known writer of fiction with over 40 published books. However, it is his autobiography of his time in Auschwitz, Night, which has come under scrutiny. First, Wiesel claims the bodies were disposed of by a secret Nazi method of using bodies to burn bodies–if this was possible, wouldn’t everyone else, everywhere else, just use this method to cremate bodies? Second, Wiesel claims that his concentration camp number–A7713–was tattooed on his left arm like all inmates. However, video evidence shows no such tattoo and he has never explained where his tattoo went. Third, his camp number was assigned to a different prisoner and there is no record of him at Auschwitz despite all camp records being recovered after the war. Fourth, in all his different accounts of Auschwitz, Wiesel never mentions any gas chambers. Fifth, Wiesel makes bizarre claims about mass graves that would shoot fountains of blood up in to the air–this is also scientifically impossible. Sixth, Wiesel claims he spent three weeks in the Auschwitz camp hospital with an infected leg–would a death camp bother curing prisoners? There are many other major discrepancies to his claims, and reading Night is recommended.
  228. 15. Fake Photographic And Film Holocaust Evidence And The Ever Changing Numbers
  229.     The first time fake evidence was used was during the Nuremberg Trials. This, however, became an industry in its own right after 1945, with large rewards paid to investigators for “finding” Holocaust evidence. At the time, a lot of this evidence was very cutting-edge, but under modern scrutiny it simply doesn’t stand up. Modern forensic techniques have exposed a lot of “holocaust” photographic evidence as faked. New systems of examining photographs and film have exposed large amounts of it as utter falsehood, other evidence has been exposed as coming from completely different sources–e.g. the Soviet gulags. As evidence has emerged discrediting large parts–if not all–of the alleged Holocaust narrative, the jews have been forced to constantly change the numbers in their claims. They have, however, constantly stuck to an overall total of 6 million jewish deaths, even though this makes no mathematical sense as the component numbers are revised downwards. This hasn’t led to a partial refund of the damages paid to Israel by Germany based on the 6 million figure, note.
  231. 16. The Balfour Declaration, World War I, And 6 Million Jews
  232.     During World War I, the British Government agreed with leading jews that they would support a jewish homeland in Palestine in exchange for the powerful jewish lobby in America getting the USA to join the Allies. This led to the Balfour Declaration being made by the British Government, promising the jews a homeland in Palestine. After World War I, the British Government were unable, or unwilling, to make good on this promise. From 1919 onward, the jews claimed 6 million jews in Europe were under threat from extermination unless they got a homeland in Palestine. This was 14 years before the Nazis came to power and 24 years before the alleged Holocaust started.
  234. 17. Holocaust Denial And The Holocaust Deniers
  235.     In most parts of Europe, questioning any aspect of the findings of the Nuremberg Trials is a very serious criminal offense–on par with rape, murder, or armed robbery. In France, you can receive up to 20 years in prison, which may have to be served in solitary confinement. Even where it is not illegal, questioning the official Holocaust narrative in the Western world will probably cost you your job, family, house, etc. Despite this, a lot of top writers, academics, historians, and scientists have questioned the official Holocaust narrative or denied it entirely. Professor Ernst Zundel was put on numerous trials around the world, had his house firebombed, received death threats, his family broke up, was deported from several countries, and eventually was imprisoned for five years in Germany. No other historical event can attract this type of punishment for questioning the official narrative. It is not a crime to deny the spherical nature of the Earth. It is not a crime to deny the Soviet genocide of 40 million Russian Christians. Despite these threats, the official narrative is constantly exposed as being a lie and the jews have to constantly change their claims when faced with irrefutable evidence of their lies.
  237. 18. The Mainstream Media And The Alleged Holocaust
  238.     The MSM never questions the official narrative of the holocaust, and openly assaults anyone who does. They have created the term “Holocaust Denier” for anyone who doesn’t believe–or dares to question–the official narrative. “Holocaust Denier” is one of the multicultural buzz-words like “Fascist/Nazi/racist/homophobe” designed to denigrate the person described as such, and lead to “pack-attacks” by the media, politicians, etc. However, bear in mind that around 96% of the Western world’s media is controlled by jews and/or zionists. You will notice that the jews/zionist are willing to keep running newspapers/TV channels and other media outlets at a financial loss simply to keep control of the MSM.
  240. 19. There’s No Business Like Shoah Business
  241.     “Shoah” is the term used by jews to describe the Holocaust. After WWII, Germany was forced to pay trillions of dollars in compensation to set up Israel, and is still paying to this day. There are now second and third generation “victims” of holocaust “survivors” who receive compensation from the German government and various German corporations. The American government also uses this as an excuse to give billions of American taxpayers’ money to Israel, although the real reason behind these payments is the strength of the Israeli lobby in America. As early as 1941, two years before the alleged Holocaust is even said to have started, the World Jewish Congress began demanding that Germans pay for the resettlement of jews in Israel as reparations. Guess they missed the Haavara Agreement.
  243. ~:~
  245. Nuremberg
  247.     The farce of the Nuremberg trials was necessary because of what happened following the Great War. In both wars the British and later the American public were fed a nonstop diet of tales of German atrocities to keep the fighting spirit high against an “enemy” who had done them no injury. In the Great War, the Germans raped nuns, crucified children, burned churches, cut the hands off babies - and made soap of their own war dead. But in the 1920’s, a powerful historical revisionist movement exposed these lies, and the men who fought that war came to see themselves as “the lost generation,” betrayed by their true enemies, the power-hungry warmongers who controlled their world.
  248.     You find in reading original newspapers and magazines printed during the Second German War that the atrocity stories, particularly those alleged to have been committed against Jews, are datelined from two main sources, the Polish underground and the Soviet Red Army, both British allies and masters of disinformation in their home countries. Recall that Britain attacked Germany in 1939 for the same reason she started World War I a quarter century earlier, because her leaders perceived Germany’s 1871 unification as an existential threat to Britain’s continental power-sharing arrangement with France, and ultimately to English worldwide hegemony. In each case the hypothetical rescue of a small nation, Belgium in 1914 and Poland in 1939, provided the rationale for an otherwise unprovoked declaration of war. With Soviet and American help, Britain accomplished her goal, the annihilation of Germany as an economic rival. Twenty million Germans were slaughtered and the nation lay dismembered in ruins.
  249.     To justify what they had done, Allied powers returned to the tried and true image of the German as “the other,” a cruel, inhuman enemy capable of the worst depravity - when the case could be made that it was Britain’s intransigence and genuine evil, perfected in centuries of pillage in the Third World, that brought the horrors of total war to Europe. To preempt a too-close examination of their wartime propaganda, the victorious allies created the kangaroo court at Nuremberg. Based on the state mock-trials of Germans held in Soviet zones, with the main judge being Nikitchenko (who had presided over Stalin’s show trials of 1936 to 1938 in the Soviet Union), the court’s constitution included such outrageous rules as “The Tribunal shall not be bound by technical rules of evidence” (Article 19); “The Tribunal may require to be informed of the nature of any evidence before it is entered so that it may rule upon the relevance thereof” (Article 20;) “The Tribunal shall not require proof of facts of common knowledge” (Article 21).
  250.     The Tribunals also rejected the age-old tradition of immunity from criminal prosecution of sovereign nations.  The Allies discarded basic principles of Western jurisprudence, most notably the well-established principle that in the absence of a law there can be neither crime nor punishment. Instead, the Tribunal established new laws for the occasion, which were applied not only retroactively, but uniquely and exclusively to the German defendants. Testimony was obtained by routine torture of the German defendants and documentary evidence was methodically falsified; yet to dare to question these myths today is to invite facing criminal charges in most European countries.
  252. ~:~
  254.     Page 232 of the ICRC report on concentration camps: whereas from 1914-1918 only 524 camps were visited, delegates of the ICRC from 1939-1947 carried out over 11,000 visits.
  255.     Page 234: The delegate had to form a definite opinion of all these features in the short time at his disposal. After getting information from the camp leader and the camp authorities, he made a careful inspection of the various buildings: sleeping quarters, cookhouses, mess halls, sick wards, rooms for games or recreation, latrines, washhouses, etc. He questioned any PW whom he met there: men who had remained in the dormitories for any reason, patients in the sick ward, and kitchen staff. He asked for the bills of fare and checked the stock of foodstuffs and store of medicaments. He saw the men returning form work, inspected them to see how they were turned out and what was the state of their clothing and footwear. He had long talks with the chaplains of the different communities, with the camp leader, and finally with all PW who asked to be heard. All complaints were listened to and forwarded. The delegate took note of the names of the men who had no news from their relatives and of requests of all kinds submitted to him. He could thus carry away from his visits a complete picture: equipment of the camp, discipline, relations between the authorities and men, etc. Insofar as impartial evidence can give an accurate idea of real conditions, the ICRC, and therefore the government of the country of origin, could rely on this single witness.
  256.     Page 272: Germany: The principles laid down in the Convention relating to hygiene in the camps were in generally conscientiously applied, notwithstanding the grave difficulties which arose during the last months of war. X-ray examinations and radioscopy were carried out in most PW camps. Both medical personnel and the majority of PW were vaccinated against exanthematic typhus, of which only a few cases occurred. Rooms and even whole huts were set aside for delousing. In some camps, they comprised both a hut for internal diseases and one for infections cases. The air raids had very serious consequences for the maintenance of hygiene in camps. Water pipes were frequently destroyed, and it became increasingly difficult to maintain the necessary standard of cleanliness and healthful conditions. The destruction of sleeping quarters forced the camp commandants to crowd the men into the remaining huts. If one ads to these conditions the overcrowding caused by the arrival of PW evacuated from camps too close to the fighting zone, it can be realized that the problem of hygiene became increasingly hard to solve during the last weeks of the war. It was at this period that the shortage of food became most acutely felt. In many camps, general loss of weight and increasingly marked physical exhaustion were observed.
  257.     That last bit is familiar, isn’t it.
  259. ~:~
  261.     Not one person from the camps took part in the trials, was invited, or was even allowed to take part. The confession of Rudolf Hess, the commandant of Auschwitz, was written in English and signed by him, despite not speaking English. Signs of torture (such as crushed testicles) were found on the interrogated Germans, and their confessions were used in the trials. The gas chamber doors of Auschwitz were not airtight, which would have killed all the guards. The chimney of the gas chambers (was not built until the Soviets took control of the land) was not high enough to safely release the fumes without killing everyone. If you look at the blueprints of the camp, the gas chambers are labeled as morgues to hold dead bodies (hence why they’re underground). No written order concerning the extermination of jews exists. Papers about the Madagascar Plan, however, do. Equal amounts of Zyklon B was delivered to both work and death camps. Photos from allied planes do not show the chimneys of the gas chambers. The number given by the Soviets is used to this day–the number was given at the same time as claims of being turned to ash by electricity and secret German nuclear bombs. In 1990, the official number killed at Auschwitz was reduced from 4 million to 1.5 million, but the total remains 6.
  263. Questions
  265.     Jews can be a bit of a disgruntling topic. They’re never talked about except as a sinless people that we are not allowed to criticize in Western societies, and to go from that to a place where they are constantly criticized can be quite overwhelming. It wouldn’t be such a big issue if it wasn’t a major underpinning justification for so much of what /pol/ (and many others) detest in modern society. Of course, being such a substantial pillar /pol/ is more than happy to attack it, although many people express skepticism at/pol/’s claims (such as the Einsatzgruppen’s main purpose being anti-partisan warfare). While I won’t try to get into the specifics of each or argue about the validity of evidence, there are major holes in the official story that should cast doubt in the mind of even the most firm believer. To this end, there are seven questions that should be asked:
  266.     Why would the Nazis even kill Jews?
  267.     If they had them in concentration labor camps, why kill them instead of putting them to work doing useful labor? In the middle of a total war, labor is a precious resource, and yet the Nazis are supposed to have been stupid (or hateful) enough to kill millions of potential laborers while being smart enough to manage the whole operation and keep it secret? This doesn’t seem to add up.
  268.     If they did kill millions in an organized genocide, why use such inefficient methods?
  269.     For a people so renowned for their efficiency, the Germans do not seem to possess this quality when it comes to the Holocaust. Gas chambers, gas cars, ovens… even electrical racks or masturbation machines (according to some “eyewitnesses”): all of these are extremely inefficient and wasteful. Some are downright goofy. With millions of rounds of ammunition being produced monthly, and weapons certainly not being scarce, why would the Nazis not just use a cheap bullet to kill millions? They would have the necessary materials in less than a month rather than the countless resources needed to produce deadly gases, burn people alive, or electrocute them. Would the Nazis really have chosen such inefficient methods of extermination during a war decided by resources, knowing that by choosing these more gruesome and inefficient methods they were condemning millions of their own countrymen to death? Knowing that choosing to do so would likely lead to the defeat of their country and the subjugation of their people?
  270.     Why are so-called eyewitness accounts given such weight and believed to be so trustworthy?
  271.     In modern criminal courts we do not lend such power to eyewitnesses, especially if there is a conflict of interests and they are also victims. And yet when it comes to the Holocaust, all we seem to need as evidence are the claims of the self-reported victims, without evidence or substantiation. This is a serious lapse in historical and public integrity, and yet it is never discussed. What is worse is some of the outright lies and fabrications of these eyewitnesses that have proven to be so–such as the soap and lampshades myth that was quietly dropped. If it is possible for these “eyewitnesses” to lie about this, is it not possible for them to lie about other events? Furthermore, why is there no weight given to the effects of trauma and group psychology, such as would be considered when examining the testimonies of eyewitnesses in criminal cases? Eyewitness testimonies are rarely fully accurate, and oftentimes will wildly differ from each other–exaggerating some facts, downplaying or outright omitting others, and sometimes even creating details entirely. Yet for all of this, there is no consideration, and we take claims of Nazi masturbation machines at face value.
  272.     Why are the only purported death camps investigated by Soviets?
  273.     Of all the camps investigated, it was only the ones specifically investigated by the Soviets–in zones which the Allies were forbidden to enter–that were claimed to be death camps. By choosing to believe this claim, we are, in effect, putting faith in Soviet claims of German atrocities. Given that the Soviets blamed many of their own against the Germans, fabricated other claims, and instigated countless more atrocities than could be ever attributed to the Nazis, are their claims really so valid? Should we really be giving them so much weight?
  274.     Why is it that it is only Jewish Holocaust supposed victims that are talked about?
  275.     Even according to the official narratives, Jews were only a fraction of the total number of victims claimed by the Holocaust, and yet they are focused on almost exclusively. Where are the tears shed for the millions of Poles killed? The hundreds of thousands of Russians and other Slavs? Where are the tears and Holocaust museums and novels and commemorations for these victims? If the Holocaust is truly such a horrifying and shocking event that must live ‘forever’ in our memories, lest it be repeated, why are so many of its victims forgotten? Why are they shoved by the wayside, pressed into the footnotes of history? Are they not also worth our tears? Do they not deserve reparations just as the Jewish victims received? Why is it we never see any mention of this?
  276.     Why is the Holocaust so important anyway?
  277.     In terms of the total death toll, it is not the largest. In terms of brutality, it is not the worst. In terms of the amount or percentage of the targeted ethnic group eliminated, it is not the most successful. It is not the most recent genocide. It was not the first genocide. All of this is true, and yet the Holocaust is treated as a unique horror and taught and repeated in perpetuity. Why? What makes the Holocaust so uniquely horrifying and evil? Was it simply that the targeted ethnic group was Jews? Are other ethnic groups not worth our tears? Why is there barely any mention of such horrifying events as the Rwandan genocide? Why are there no mentions of such atrocities as the Armenian genocide by the Turks, the millions of whites killed by the Soviets during the Holodomor, or the countless others killed in various other Asian states throughout the past hundred or more years? Where is the course in schools about these events? Why are they not apparently worth the media’s attention?
  278.     If the Holocaust is so undeniably true–so thoroughly established–why is it illegal in many countries to question it at all?
  279.     Why is the supposed truth in fear of criticism? Do we ban discussion and argument over whether the Earth is, in fact, round? Should it be illegal to question whether the Roman Empire ever existed? Of course not. Such thinking is preposterous, and there is no need to ban that which is, to the best that we can determine, truthful. And yet this does not apply to the Holocaust, for some reason. Despite numerous holes, revisions, and changes in the Holocaust narrative, questioning any or all of the purported “facts” will get you, in many countries, your own cell in jail–merely for espousing a healthy skepticism that is applied equally to other areas of life! It should be clear that if the Holocaust requires an environment free of criticism to survive, it is not, at least in whole, the truth.
  281. ~:~
  283.     Why did Elie Wiesel and countless other Jews survive the Holocaust if it was the intention of the Third Reich to eliminate every Jew? Elie was a prisoner for several years; other Jews survived even longer. Most of these “survivors” were ordinary people who did not have any unique expertise that the Germans could have exploited. There was no logical reason for them to be kept alive if the goal was extermination. The very existence of more than a million survivors even today, some sixty years later, contradicts one of the basic components of the Holocaust; i.e. that the Germans had a policy to eliminate every Jew.
  284.     Why is there no mention of the Holocaust in Churchill’s six volume History of the Second World War, the wartime memoirs of either De Gaulle or Eisenhower, or any of the other lesser luminaries who wrote about the Second World War? Keep in mind all these were written years after the war ended and thus after the Holocaust had been allegedly proven by the Nuremberg Trials. With regard to the Holocaust, the silence of these “cognoscenti” is deafening! What was an inmate infirmary (and a brothel) doing in Auschwitz if in fact it was a death camp?
  285.     Why would the Germans round up Jews from their far-flung empire (thereby tying up large numbers of personnel and rolling stock, while fighting a world war on two fronts) to deliver people to “death camps” hundreds of miles away to simply execute them upon arrival? Wouldn’t a bullet on the spot have appealed to the legendary German sense of efficiency?
  286.     Why, after seventy years, have historians been unable to come up with a single German document that points to the Holocaust? Should we believe the likes of Raul Hilberg that in the place of written orders there was an “incredible meeting of the minds” by the literally tens of thousands of people who would have had to coordinate their actions in order to carry out an undertaking of this magnitude?
  287.     Why is it still insisted upon that six million Jews were killed when the official Jewish death toll at Auschwitz, the flagship of the Holocaust gulag, has been reduced from an immediate post-war figure of 4 million to a figure of less than 1 million? Why do many respond to this observation by saying, “What’s the difference whether it’s six million or one million?” The answer is that the difference is five million. Another difference is that saying so can get you three years in an Austrian jail… just ask David Irving!
  288.     All of Germany’s wartime codes were compromised, including the one used to send daily reports from Auschwitz to Berlin. The transcripts of these messages make no mention of mass executions or even remotely suggest a genocidal program in progress. Furthermore, it has been insisted that the Germans used a kind of euphemistic code when discussing their extermination program of the Jews–e.g. “final solution”, special treatment, resettlement, etc. Why was it necessary for them to use such coded euphemisms when talking to one another unless they thought their codes had been cracked by the Allies? And then why would they still use cracked codes? The water table at Auschwitz lies a mere 18 inches below the surface, which makes claims of huge burning pits for the disposal of tens of thousands of victims untenable.
  289.     Initially, claims were made that mass executions in homicidal gas chambers had taken place in camps located within the boundaries of the old Reich (e.g. Dachau, Bergen-Belsen). “Evidence” to that effect was every bit as compelling as what is offered for other camps–located in occupied Poland–yet without explanation in the early sixties we were told that this was not the case and that all the “death camps” were located in the East (i.e. Poland), outside (some would say conveniently) the probing eyes of western scholars.
  290.     No one has been able to reconcile the eyewitness accounts that personnel entered the gas chambers after 20 minutes without any protective gear, and the fact that Zyklon B was a “time release” fumigant that would have had a lethal capability for at least another 24 hours. And that even after 24 hours the corpses would have themselves remained sufficiently contaminated by the hydrogen cyanide gas that they would have had the capacity to kill anyone who touched them who was not wearing protective gear.
  291.     Why do we no longer hear claims that the Germans manufactured soap, lampshades, and riding britches from the bodies of dead Jews? Could it be that in the light of modem forensics and DNA knowledge these claims are totally untenable? Why do we no longer hear claims that huge numbers of Jews were exterminated in massive steam chambers or electrocuted on special grids? “Evidence” of this was presented at Nuremberg–evidence that sent men to the gallows. Elie Wiesel has been described as “the Apostle of Remembrance,” yet in his memoir, Night, which details his stay at Auschwitz, he makes no mention of the now infamous homicidal gas chambers. Isn’t this a bit like one of the Gospels making no mention of the Cross? Virtually every survivor who was examined at Auschwitz says that he or she was examined by the infamous Dr. Mengele. How?
  292.     According to survivor testimony, hundreds of thousands of Jews were executed at Treblinka and then buried in mass graves in the surrounding area. Why is it that extensive sonar probing of these burial grounds reveals that this alleged final resting place for Holocaust victims has remained undisturbed since at least the last ice age? “Proof” of the Holocaust rests primarily on survivor testimony. There is little, if any, hard evidence. The best of this has been described by Jean Claude Pressac as merely “criminal traces.” Even Judge Grey who presided at the Irving-Lipstadt Trial commented that he was surprised the evidence pointing to the Holocaust was “extremely thin.” To paraphrase Arthur Butz, “a crime of this magnitude would have left a mountain of evidence.” Where is it? There was more hard evidence against O. J. Simpson at his trial and he was found innocent.
  293.     Why has Holocaust revisionism been criminalized in at least eleven countries? What other historic truth needs the threat of prison or the destruction of one’s career to maintain itself? Should someone be sent to prison for expressing skepticism about the official Chinese claim that they suffered 35 million dead in World War II? Why do the court historians insist that “denying the Holocaust” is like denying slavery or saying the Earth is flat? The leading Revisionists are first rate scholars who hold advanced degrees from the world’s leading universities. Is there anyone comparable among those who say the world is flat or that slavery never existed? Notice again that it is not illegal to say the Earth is flat or that slavery never existed. The truth of these things does not seem to need legal protection.
  294.     Promoters of the Holocaust have expressed concerns about remembering the Holocaust once the last survivors die. Why haven’t Civil War historians expressed similar concerns since the last survivor of that conflict died in 1959? Survivors of the Holocaust have testified that smoke billowed from the crematoriums as they consumed the bodies of murdered victims–some eyewitnesses even claimed they could detect national origins by the color of the smoke. How can this be reconciled with the fact that properly operating crematoriums do not produce smoke of any color? According to the official version of the Holocaust, hundreds of thousands of Hungarian Jews were rounded up in mid-1944 and sent to Auschwitz, where most were gassed immediately upon arrival and their bodies were disposed of by burning in huge open air pits using railroad ties and gasoline. Why is that there is no evidence of these huge funerary pyres in the high resolution surveillance photos taken by Allied aircraft overflying the camp on a daily basis during this time period? Furthermore, why have no remains been found, since open pit burning, even when gasoline is used, generates insufficient heat to totally consume a body?
  295.     All of the liberated camps were littered with corpses; is there a single autopsy report or any other forensic evidence that shows that even a single one of these deaths was a consequence of poison gas? The death toll for the Holocaust relies exclusively on population statistics provided by Jewish sources; has any independent demographic study been produced that shows that approximately six million Jews were “missing” at the end of the war? Why do the wartime inspection reports of camps made by the International Red Cross contain no references to mass executions? It strains credulity that such monumental crimes could be hidden. The only explanations are that either these crimes were not occurring or that the Red Cross was complicit in a cover up.
  296.     Why has there been no effort to respond to the Leuchter Report? “The Holocaust was technologically possible because it happened.” Why is this intellectually bankrupt argument, which turns scholarship on its head, considered by the promoters of the Holocaust as historical truth, and considered a sufficient response to the mounting Revisionist evidence to the contrary? What other historical truths rely to the extent that the Holocaust does on so-called “eyewitness” testimony, and why have none of these witnesses ever been cross-examined? According to the official version of the Holocaust, the Jews remained ignorant of their fate until the very end–so skillful were their Nazi murderers in deceiving their victims. How can this ignorance be reconciled with the fact that the Jews have historically been, as a group, the most literate and highly informed people on the planet, with legendary access to the highest echelons of government?
  298. ~:~
  300.     No autopsies of bodies were conducted by any Allied investigators to prove gassings of camp inmates. No photographic evidence was taken by Allied aerial reconnaissance of the camps between 1942-1945 showing mass exterminations or removal of human remains, even though such activity would have been easily spotted. No German communications–which were being monitored by the British government throughout the war due to the early cracking of German codes–alluded to any mass extermination or extraordinary loss of life in the camps. No captured diaries or journals of high-ranking German officials alluded to any program of extermination, nor is there any documentation whatsoever alluding to a program of extermination, as admitted by all Jewish outlets and Israeli organizations. As holocaust believers claim that the National Socialists killed eleven million people–roughly five million Europeans and six million Jews–the idea that every single document alluding to this massive operation was destroyed is ludicrous.
  301.     Neither mass graves of eleven million bodies–nor the remains of the equivalent number of bodies in layers of ash and crushed bone–have ever been located in or around the internment camps. The human soap, skin lampshades, and shrunken head claims were admitted as lies in mainstream American newspapers in the 1980s and now accepted by Israeli and jewish sources. The steam chambers and electrified floor–the first alleged methods of mass extermination–were quickly proven false before the gas chamber story took hold. If the gas chambers had been real, there would have been no need to lie about steam chambers and electrified floors initially.
  302.     The Katyn Massacre–the shootings of over 20,000 Poles for which Germans were hanged–was admitted by the Russian government in 1990 to have been actually committed by the Bolshevik NKVD. The Babi Yar massacre was a lie conjured up by Soviet Jewish propaganda minister Ilya Ehrenburg. The story, which involved the Germans killing 30,000 Jews outside of sniper-infested Kiev in 1941 (with no eyewitnesses) and returning to the site three years later to dig up the remains and destroy them using “bone crunching machines” (while being pursued by the Red Army, no less), was laughable to begin with. However, there is evidence which supports the mass executions of Ukrainians at the site in the early 1930s by the NKVD. It’s probable that, like Katyn, the Babi Yar massacre was an example of the Soviets projecting their own atrocities onto their enemies.
  303.     Official Soviet policy was to prioritize the evacuation of Jews via trains ahead of the German advance. Eastern Soviet territories such as Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Tajikistan recorded huge numbers of Jews flooding into their lands during WWII. All the “information” on gas chambers came from the Soviet Union, as the Western Allies did not capture any camps that are currently said to have had any–though initially they did falsely claim that they had liberated “death camps” with gas chambers in them, such as Dachau. All German camps had supplies of Zyklon B, not just the camps which were said to have had gas chambers. Large quantities of Zyklon B are nether mysterious nor sinister, as it takes a relatively high amount of the spray to kill lice.
  304.     A ground-penetrating radar study conducted by an Australian team in 1999 proved that the ground around Treblinka had been undisturbed down to 30 meters, meaning that no human remains of one million people were deposited there. This supports official German documentation which show Treblinka was a transit camp. Records show that German guards were severely reprimanded for so much as striking camp inmates, let alone killing them. Karl Koch, the commandant of the Buchenwald camp, was executed by the SS for killing several inmates and stealing their personal possessions.
  305.     Germany has no history of genocidal behavior, not even at its most aggressive (go back to the sack of Rome by the Germanic barbarians, even; no genocide). Jews, on the other hand, have a long and bloody history of genocidal behavior towards their enemies–real or perceived. Recent examples including Russian Orthodox Christians, Ukrainian kulaks, Polish Catholics, Germans, and Palestinians. Furthermore, Jews are notorious for projecting their pathologies, hatreds, and fears onto their enemies. German “admissions of guilt” were obtained through brutal torture–by Allied agents–which included genital mutilation, mock executions, beating, and threats directed at family members. Rudolf Höss, commandant of Auschwitz, was tortured so terribly he admitted to the location of a concentration camp that didn’t even exist.
  306.     If the Germans had wanted to kill Jewish inmates, all they would had to have done is simply not feed them. This is how Eisenhower exterminated 1,500,000 German POWs in the Rhineland death camps after the war. No need for gas chambers, brain-bashing machines, electrified floors, tickling to death, bears and eagles to maul them, dogs to attack them, for Hitler to personally burn anyone at the stake, or any of the weird and wild claims. Rudolf Vrba, the Slovak Jew who popularized the gas chamber story, was forced to admit, under oath, during the Ernst Zundel trial in 1985, that he had never witnessed an actual gassing and that his stories were “artistic representations” (that’s Jewish for “lies”). Numerous holocaust memoirs, such as Herman Rosenblat’s Angel at the Fence and Jerzy Kosinski’s The Painted Bird, have been proven to be fiction. Elie Wiesel’s Night, supposedly based on his experiences at Auschwitz, fails to mention any gas chambers and instead talks about huge pits where Jews were burned alive.
  307.     Deception is central to Jewish interaction with non-Jews, as well as jewishness in general. Extreme dishonesty in regard to their holocaust stories is entirely in keeping with their racial character. The holocaust is used as a political weapon to extort hundreds of billions of dollars from Germany and other nations, to inculcate sympathy for Jewry in the face of its global criminality, and to stifle European nationalism at a time when their homelands are being invaded by millions of hostile racial aliens. If the holocaust had actually happened, it would not require laws drafted by powerful Jewish organizations to defend its “veracity.” No other historical narrative is protected by the threat of heavy fines and imprisonment. Truth doesn’t fear investigation.
  308.     All German documents and statements made by German officials show that the “Final Solution” meant the repatriation of Jews to their own territory in the East (or any of various locations), not an extermination. Holocaust believers claim the Germans spoke and wrote in coded language (for example, ausroten = “extermination” as opposed to its actual meaning, “uprooting”–i.e. physically removing and transporting people) but there is no evidence to support this idea. During World War I, the British government ran stories in the newspapers about Germans gassing people to death and bayoneting babies. After the war, the British government issued an official apology for the lies. They didn’t do so after World War II due to the need to justify the foundation of Israel. Jews have a history of exaggerating their suffering, such as during the Khmelnytsky Uprising in Ukraine in the 17th century. For centuries, jews claimed that half a million to a million of them died during the rebellion, while today it’s generally accepted that actual Jewish casualties did not exceed ten thousand.
  309.     There is no reason to believe that the emaciated corpses found in the camps by the Allied forces were anything other than victims of starvation and typhus, which afflicted all of Germany in the final weeks of the war due to Allied saturation bombing. Gassing people does not cause them to lose weight, and if Jews were being immediately gassed upon arrival at the camps as propaganda states, where are the otherwise healthy bodies that died from these gassings (never mind the accounts of the colors of the bodies not matching exposure to the right gas, etc.)?
  310.     The mobile gas vans allegedly use to gas Jews were actually a method of execution devised in the Soviet Union by NKVD official, Isay Berg. German commanders refused to follow Hitler’s Commissar Order of 1941 (mandatory executions of bolshevik commissars and Soviet intelligentsia), as they considered cold-blooded killing dishonorable and a violation of international law. Yet people are told to believe that these same commanders were overseeing the widespread extermination of millions of civilians on the Eastern Front. Sporadic killings of the few Jews that remained to be caught by the Germans in the Soviet Union were typically carried out by vengeful Slavs who had scores to settle after two decades of Jewish tyranny and violence directed at their countries and families. It was German soldiers who routinely stepped in to stop the violence.
  311.     The Einsatzgruppen, who lately have been the focus of TV shows, movies, and books due to the death of the gas chamber narrative, were German troops tasked to secure the rear lines, which were frequent targets of terrorist activity by Soviet partisans. There is no reason to believe they were shooting thousands or millions of people, as is routinely claimed.
  313. ~:~
  315. Holocaust Remembrance: What’s Behind the Campaign?
  317.     Since the late 1970s “Holocaust Remembrance” has become ever more important in the United States and many other countries. The campaign to remember the Holocaust–often defined as the genocidal killing of six million Jews in Europe during the Second World War–includes numerous commemorative events, education courses in many schools, and a stream of motion pictures, television specials, books, and magazine articles. Across the United States, prominent political and civic leaders participate in annual Holocaust commemoration ceremonies. A number of countries, including Britain, Germany, and Italy, officially observe a yearly Holocaust Remembrance Day. In 2005, the United Nations General Assembly approved a resolution introduced by Israel to designate January 27 as an international Holocaust remembrance day.
  318.     Every major American city has at least one Holocaust museum or memorial. Worldwide there are more than 250 Holocaust museums and memorials, most of them in the US and Europe. [1] The largest is the US Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, DC, which is run by a taxpayer-funded federal government agency, and draws some two million visitors yearly. The public is continually reminded of Jewish suffering during World War II. Between 1989 and 2003 alone, more than 170 films with Holocaust themes were made. [2] In many American and European schools, and in all Israeli classrooms, a focus on the wartime suffering of Europe’s Jews is obligatory. [3]
  319.     Yehuda Bauer, a prominent Holocaust specialist and a professor at Hebrew University in Israel, observed in 1992: “Whether presented authentically or inauthentically, in accordance with the historical facts or in contradiction to them, with empathy and understanding or as monumental kitsch, the Holocaust has become a ruling symbol of our culture… Hardly a month passes without a new TV production, a new film, a number of new books of prose or poetry dealing with the subject, and the flood is increasing rather than abating.” [4]
  320.     Tim Cole, a history professor and prominent specialist of Holocaust studies, writes in his book Selling the Holocaust: “From a relatively slow start, we have now come to the point where Jewish culture in particular, and Western culture more generally, are saturated with the ‘Holocaust’. Indeed, the ‘Holocaust’ has saturated Western culture to such an extent that it appears not only centre stage, but also lurks in the background. This can be seen in the remarkable number of contemporary movies which include the ‘Holocaust’ as plot or sub-plot.” [5] How did the Holocaust come to play such a large role in America? “A good part of the answer,” writes Jewish scholar Peter Novick, “is the fact… that Jews play an important and influential role in Hollywood, the television industry, and the newspaper, magazine, and book publishing worlds.” Anyone who denies that this is a major factor behind the “massive attention” given to the Holocaust in the US media, he adds, “is being naïve or disingenuous.” [6]
  322. Exploiting the Holocaust
  323.     What’s behind the Holocaust remembrance campaign? Whose interests does it serve? It is, of course, fitting and proper to remember victims of genocide, war, and oppression. But Holocaust remembrance is not, as its supporters claim, a noble effort motivated by sincere concern for humanity. Instead, this relentless campaign is an expression of Jewish-Zionist power, and is designed to further Jewish-Zionist interests. On the occasion of the opening of the US Holocaust Memorial Museum on the Mall in Washington, noted Jewish author Melvin Jules Bukiet called the Museum a “statement of raw power,” and added: “It’s not Jewish tragedy that’s remembered on the Mall this week; it’s Jewish power to which homage is paid.” [7]
  324.     The Holocaust Remembrance campaign encourages sympathy and support for Jews and Israel. It helps to justify America’s massive and on-going support for Israel, and to excuse otherwise inexcusable policies of the Zionist state. Among Jews it strengthens a feeling of group solidarity and promotes a sense of community purpose. Norman Finkelstein, a Jewish scholar who has held teaching posts at New York University and DePaul University, writes in his bestselling book, The Holocaust Industry, that “invoking The Holocaust” is “a ploy to delegitimize all criticism of Jews.” He adds: “By conferring total blamelessness on Jews, the Holocaust dogma immunizes Israel and American Jewry from legitimate censure… Organized American Jewry has exploited the Nazi holocaust to deflect criticism of Israel’s and its own morally indefensible policies.” [8]
  325.     Paula Hyman, a professor of modern Jewish history at Yale University, has observed: “With regard to Israel, the Holocaust may be used to forestall political criticism and suppress debate; it reinforces the sense of Jews as an eternally beleaguered people who can rely for their defense only upon themselves. The invocation of the suffering endured by the Jews under the Nazis often takes the place of rational argument, and is expected to convince doubters of the legitimacy of current Israeli government policy.” [9] This view is echoed by another Jewish scholar, Tony Judt, director of the Remarque Institute at New York University: [10] “The Shoah [Hebrew term for Holocaust] is frequently exploited in America and Israel to deflect and forbid any criticism of Israel. Indeed, the Holocaust of Europe’s Jews is nowadays exploited thrice over: It gives American Jews in particular a unique, retrospective ‘victim identity’; it allows Israel to trump any other nation’s sufferings (and justify its own excesses) with the claim that the Jewish catastrophe was unique and incomparable; and (in contradiction to the first two) it is adduced as an all-purpose metaphor for evil–anywhere, everywhere, and always–and taught to schoolchildren all over America and Europe without any reference to context or cause. This modern instrumentalization of the Holocaust for political advantage is ethically disreputable and politically imprudent.”
  326.     “In Israel,” says Tom Segev, a prominent Israeli journalist and author, the Holocaust has become “an object of worship.” Moreover, he writes, “the ‘heritage of the Holocaust,’ as it is taught in [Israel’s] schools and fostered in national memorial ceremonies, often encourages insular chauvinism and a sense that the Nazi extermination of the Jews justifies any act that seems to contribute to Israel's security, including the oppression of the population in the territories occupied by Israel in the Six-Day War.” [11]
  327.     Amira Hass, an award-winning Israeli journalist and author, is even more blunt. Writing in a leading Israeli daily paper, [12] she says, “…Israel has turned the liquidation of Europe’s Jews into an asset. Our murdered relatives are being enlisted to enable Israel to continue not giving a damn about international decisions against the occupation. The suffering our parents endured in the ghettoes and concentration camps that filled Europe, the physical and mental anguish and torment that our parents were subjected to every single day since the ‘liberation,’ are used as weapons to thwart any international criticism of the society we are creating here. This is a society with built-in discrimination on the basis of nationality, and the discrimination is spreading on either side of the Green Line. This is a society that is systematically continuing to banish the Palestinian nation from its land and usurp its rights as a nation and its chances for a humane future.”
  328.     The great lesson of the Holocaust, says Israel prime minister Ariel Sharon, is that Jews must “always remain vigilant and trust no one but ourselves. Jews can only rely on themselves.” Young Jews, he adds, “have the duty to bequeath the lesson, memories and stories, to underscore the importance of the existence of the Jewish state.” [13]
  330. No Similar Remembrance of Non-Jews
  331.     Non-Jewish victims of genocide, oppression and war do not merit the same consideration as do Jewish victims of the Holocaust. There are no comparable museums, memorials or solemn ceremonies to commemorate, for example, the vastly greater number of victims of Soviet and Chinese Communism. As historians acknowledge, the non-Jewish victims of Soviet Russian dictator Joseph Stalin greatly outnumber the Jews who perished as a result of Hitler’s policies. Robert Conquest, a prominent scholar of twentieth century Russian history, estimates the number of those who lost their lives as a consequence of Stalin’s policies as “no fewer than 20 million.” [14]  Authoritative estimates of the number of Chinese who perished as victims of killings, repression, starvation and forced labor under the Communist regime of Mao Zedong range from about 30 million to more than 60 million. [15]
  332.     Americans are trained and encouraged to “know” that six million Jews were murdered by the Nazis in World War II. But few Americans, even well-educated ones, have any idea of how many Russians, Poles, Chinese or even Americans lost their lives in that global conflict. Estimates of the number of Chinese who lost their lives as direct and indirect victims of Japanese aggression and occupation during the 1930s and 1940s range from about ten million to more than twice that number. The Chinese government has put the figure at 35 million. [16] During the years 1885 through 1908, an estimated five to eight million Africans perished in the Congo as direct and indirect victims of the brutal policies of the Belgian colonial authorities. These little-remembered deaths were the result of widespread killings, starvation, exhaustion and exposure. [17]
  334. Holocaust Denial Laws
  335.     In some countries, “Holocaust denial” laws stifle free and objective discussion of the Holocaust issue. In Israel, Germany, France, Austria and a few other nations, it is a crime publicly to “play down,” dispute, “whitewash,” or “deny” the Holocaust. No other chapter of history is protected by law in this way. Even factually accurate statements that violate “Holocaust denial” laws are punished. Over the years, many individuals in those countries have been fined, imprisoned or forced into exile for disputing Holocaust claims.
  337. God’s “Chosen”
  338.     The Holocaust is often treated with reverence, and as a central event of world history. For many Jews, says Rabbi Michael Goldberg, a Jewish author and religious leader, the “veneration” of the Holocaust has become a new religion. “And as with any organized church,” he adds, “this Holocaust cult has its own tenets of faith, rites, and shrines.” [18] The Holocaust remembrance campaign reflects an arrogant view of Jews as a special and superior people. Abraham Foxman, head of the Anti-Defamation League–one of the most influential Zionist groups–has declared: “The Holocaust is something different. It is a singular event. It is not simply one example of genocide but a near successful attempt on the life of God’s chosen children and, thus, on God himself. It is an event that is the antithesis of Creation as recorded in the Bible; and like its direct opposite, which is relived weekly with the Sabbath and yearly with the Torah, it must be remembered from generation to generation.” [19] Jewish death and suffering do not deserve to be venerated more than the death and suffering of non-Jews. The Holocaust remembrance campaign deserves scorn, not support, because it is a one-sided effort that serves narrow Jewish and Israeli interests and bolsters Jewish-Zionist power.
  340. References
  341. 1. A. Barkat, “Yad Vashem Was the First, And Now It’s The Latest,” Haaretz, March 15, 2005 (
  342. 2. D. Sterritt, “The one serious subject Hollywood doesn’t avoid,” The Christian Science Monitor, November 22, 2002 (
  343. 3. Peter Novick, The Holocaust in American Life, 1999, p. 207
  344. 4. Quoted in: David Cesarani, ed., The Final Solution: Origins and Implementation, 1994, pp. 305, 306
  345. 5. Tim Cole, Selling the Holocaust, 2000), p. 2
  346. 6. P. Novick, The Holocaust in American Life, 1999, p. 207. See also pp. 11-12, 208
  347. 7. Melvin Jules Bukiet, “The Museum vs. Memory: The Taming of the Holocaust”, The Washington Post, Sunday, April 18, 1993, p. C3. Quoted in: P. Novick, The Holocaust in American Life, 1999, p. 330, n. 104
  348. 8. Norman G. Finkelstein, The Holocaust Industry 2003, pp. 37, 52, 149
  349. 9. Paula E. Hyman, “New Debate on the Holocaust,” The New York Times Magazine, Sept. 14, 1980, p. 79
  350. 10. Tony Judt, “Goodbye To All That?”, The Nation, New York, Jan. 3, 2005, p. 17
  351. 11. Tom Segev, The Seventh Million: The Israelis and the Holocaust, 1993, pp. 513, 517
  352. 12. Amira Hass, “Using the Holocaust to ward off criticism”, Haaretz, March 16 (or 21?), 2005
  353. 13. Leonard Fein, “Too Young to March?”, Forward, New York, May 13, 2005, p. 8; “Israel marks Auschwitz liberation,” BBC News, Jan. 27, 2005 ( “Sharon: Never Forget Nazi Killers,” CNN, May 6, 2005 (
  354. 14. R. Conquest, The Great Terror: A Reassessment, Oxford University Press, 1990, p. 48
  355. 15. S. Courtois, and others, The Black Book of Communism, Harvard University Press, 1999, pp. 4, 463-464; D. Southerland, “Repression’s Higher Toll,” The Washington Post, July 17, 1994, pp. A1, A22, A 23; Richard L. Walker, The Human Cost of Communism in China. A study of the Committee on the Judiciary, US Senate (1971)
  356. 16. “Dispute over mission stalls Japanese war museum,” The Palm Beach Post, May 21, 1995, p. 22A (from The New York Times); Sam Jameson, “WWII Apology Fails to Find a Voice in Japan,” Los Angeles Times, June 10, 1995, p. A12
  357. 17. Adam Hochschild, “In the Heart of Darkness,” The New York Review of Books, October 6, 2005, pp.39-42; Adam Hochschild, King Leopold’s Ghost, Houghton Mifflin, 1999; A. Roxburgh, “Belgians Confront Colonial Past,” BBC News, March 9, 2005 (
  358. 18. Michael Goldberg, Why Should Jews Survive?: Looking Past the Holocaust Toward a Jewish Future, Oxford University Press, 1996, p. 41
  359. 19. A. Foxman, “Schindler’s List: The Meaning of Spielberg’s Film,” ADL On the Frontline, January 1994, p. 2
RAW Paste Data
We use cookies for various purposes including analytics. By continuing to use Pastebin, you agree to our use of cookies as described in the Cookies Policy. OK, I Understand