(Raggeh conversations with Karkat, practice with dialogue.)
(Raggeh = perspicaciousAxioms: PA.)

PA: If I recall correctly, you were quite confounded by the fundamentals of human cultural habits, specifically on the topic of romance. Am I not incorrect?
PA: While I do not intend to deny the complexities between our species, particularly on the topic of romance (among other fields), I uphold the opinion that the differences between us are minimal at best.
PA: You had a query regarding how "HOMOSEXUALITY IS EVEN A THING", as well as knowing if someone is homosexual or not, how someone can confess romantic feelings with the variables, etc.
PA: I have a similar query myself, regarding the subject of kissing.
PA: Based on my personal extensive research projects, I have found that the activity of kissing is appropriate for both Matespritship and Kismesissitude. Please interrupt if this data is incorrect. (Seeing as interrupting is one of your personal favorite activities.)
PA: The source of my puzzlement stems from the following situation: What would happen if Troll A has intensive feelings of Kismesissitude for Troll B, whilst Troll B has intensive feelings of Matespritship for Troll A.
PA: What, indeed, would be the logical string of events? Hypothetically speaking, would the chain of events not lead into kissing as I imagine? And, if such is the case, would Troll B suddenly come to the revelation that Troll A is more kismesis-driven?
PA: (I have realized from prior studies that kissing driven by Kismesissitude and kissing driven by Matespritship have some exceedingly distinct differences, although none learned prior to the event itself, thus making preparation null and void, so to speak.)
PA: Where would the relationship stand, might I ask, after such an event, where one party feels no hatred towards the other, and the other party feels no love towards the one, yet a kiss has still taken place? Would such an event cause friction? This, I would hypothesize to be so.
PA: Ultimately, my point with that situation, was to prove that your species, indeed, has variables in it's own right. Judging humans for "PUTTING CATEGORIES OF LOVE UNDER STUPID THINGS" or having homosexuality as an anti-constant may perhaps be hypocritical in its own right. You do not have to answer my former query, although perhaps it would be appreciated if you implemented your expertise none the less, merely for the sake of my research.