Guest User

Untitled

a guest
May 22nd, 2018
82
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 4.52 KB | None | 0 0
  1. 16:38:11 <xxxx> hi Wraith told me to pm you
  2. 16:38:17 <dYReL> yes
  3. 16:38:24 <dYReL> you're from REQ right?
  4. 16:38:29 <xxx> yup :)
  5. 16:38:34 <dYReL> and you dont agree with the nukes
  6. 16:38:34 <dYReL> ?
  7. 16:39:13 <xxx> no I even explained myself in my nfo's and wrote readnfo in releasename, the source is messed up and only sold from one place, they had it specialy made, other customers on the website even talk about the poor quality of the source
  8. 16:39:32 <xxx> but this nuker only seem to download sample and not even read nfo, I dont want to get in to a nuke war though heh
  9. 16:39:51 <dYReL> nah, i'm on the same network as the nuker and talking with him right now
  10. 16:40:00 <xxxx> okay cool
  11. 16:41:58 <xxxx> at times it can look like a VHS to bluray transfer hehe
  12. 16:42:23 <dYReL> why didnt you deinterlaced it?
  13. 16:43:20 <xxx> it is not a constant thing, the picture is very different from time to time
  14. 16:43:30 <xxxx> when I ran it though dgindex, it didnt show up as interlaced either
  15. 16:44:14 <dYReL> i'll pass the message to him
  16. 16:45:02 <xxxx> okay cool, I dont care if they stay nuked though but I just dont agree with it and I will keep releasing the rest of them :)
  17. 16:45:27 <xxxx> some people been asking me for it for awhile and since only sold from one place, not so easy to find
  18. 16:45:36 <dYReL> understandable
  19. 16:45:37 <dYReL> but
  20. 16:45:43 <dYReL> global nukes and site nukes are not the same
  21. 16:45:49 <dYReL> so maybe your presites unnukes em
  22. 16:46:01 <dYReL> but i guess they will remain nuked global
  23. 16:46:12 <xxxY> yea I know, our stats wont take much harm for a few nukes :P
  24. 16:46:18 <xxx> hehe
  25. 16:46:35 <dYReL> heh, nah, but right should be right.
  26. 16:46:46 <dYReL> but, if the source is fucked up its not rlsable
  27. 16:46:48 <dYReL> imo
  28. 16:46:59 <dYReL> atleast in the mp3 section, and thats where im from
  29. 16:47:04 <xxxx> yeah excatly, I tried to explain myself in nfo
  30. 16:47:09 <xxxx> okay :)
  31. 16:47:32 <xxx> it is also very strange that the source is ref 4
  32. 16:47:37 <xxxx> I never seen that before
  33. 16:50:33 <dYReL> i asked the nuker if he wanted to talk with you
  34. 16:50:39 <dYReL> lets see what he says
  35. 16:51:48 <xxxxx> hehe
  36. 16:53:06 <x> tell him to read my nfo and go to the link for the discovery store page
  37. 16:53:17 <xx> then tell him to hit user reviews
  38. 16:53:29 <x> Almost all the reviews here complain about the horrible video quality. It's important for me to add mine to the growing list. Honestly, the image quality here is inferior to all of my blu-rays. I can't imagine this is a true blu-ray release. I spoke with a supervisor about this issue. Sh &
  39. 16:53:30 <x> are more likely to be taken seriously.
  40. 16:53:30 <x> Bottom Line No, I would not recommend this to a friend
  41. 16:54:32 <dYReL> whats your nick on linknet?
  42. 16:54:39 <dYReL> xxxx?
  43. 16:54:39 <x> same
  44. 16:54:41 <dYReL> k
  45. 16:54:43 <x> yup
  46. 16:54:47 <dYReL> he'll pm you
  47. 16:54:56 <xxx> okay
  48. 16:56:01 <dYReL> yep. hope you'll sort it out
  49. 16:58:02 <xxxxx> =)
  50. 16:58:13 <dYReL> lemme know how it goes
  51. 16:58:30 <xx> okay, I havnt heard from him yet though
  52. 17:15:43 <x> I guess he doesnt want to write anyway :)
  53. 17:16:05 <dYReL> nuker seems retarded
  54. 17:16:20 <dYReL> <xxxx> if they are willing to give the source I can make some group do those 1080p
  55. 17:16:43 <xx> I cut a sample of the source to him, so he could check out the quality heh
  56. 17:16:47 <xx> but he never wrote
  57. 17:17:17 <xxxY> maybe I should release samplefix? and put m2ts file there
  58. 17:17:19 <dYReL> he doesnt write to me anymore
  59. 17:17:27 <xx> hehe okay
  60. 17:17:45 <dYReL> nah, the source is fucked up it seems, and if it doesnt work with deinterlaced, it will be nuked anyway
  61. 17:17:46 <dYReL> :p
  62. 17:18:10 <x> okay but the sample shows that the quality is not bad all the time
  63. 17:18:16 <xxx> therefor it cant be interlace problem
  64. 17:18:23 <xx> if interlace problem, it would be bad all the time, right ?
  65. 17:18:45 <dYReL> probably, but as i said, x264 aint my section therefor i hence him to pm you
  66. 17:18:51 <dYReL> but as i told you, he seems to be retarded
  67. 17:18:53 <xx> okay
  68. 17:19:10 <dYReL> but
  69. 17:19:18 <dYReL> i do know another x264 guy
  70. 17:19:22 <dYReL> lemme see if hes around
  71. 17:19:34 <xY> hehe okay
  72. 17:19:55 <dYReL> he's .us so he might not be here now
  73. 17:20:20 <xxxxx> no worries, I think I am just going to release the m2ts sample, then people can check if they want to heh
  74. 17:20:53 <xx> m2ts is the source file, incase you didnt know
  75. 17:21:00 <dYReL> yeh, that i know
  76. 17:21:06 <xx> okay :)
  77. 17:21:34 <dYReL> ill talk with my friend when hes here, and ill see what he has to say about it
  78. 17:22:00 <xxx> hehe okay :)
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment