This letter is going to be a book of revelations to many readers. In particular, many will be surprised to learn that as part of his latest power grab, Christopher has been weaving his quixotic traits, stupid precepts, and crazy artifices into a rich tapestry that is sure to demonize and penalize people who find success on the road to happiness. I realize that the following is going to make me sound like a crazy person and put me completely at odds with every respectable thinker reading this letter, but when a friend wants to drive inebriated, you try to stop him. Well, Christopher is drunk with power, which is why we must explain why charlatanism is a failed philosophy. (Hint: It's because it denies the realities of human nature and teaches that no one is smart enough to see through Christopher's transparent lies.)

I attribute the social and psychological problems of modern society to the fact that Christopher's bruta fulmina have kept us separated for too long from the love, contributions, and challenges of our brothers and sisters in this wonderful adventure we share together—life! You don't have to say anything specifically about Christopher for him to start attacking you. All you have to do is dare to imply that we should demonstrate conclusively that Christopher exhibits an air of superiority. You realize, of course, that that's really just a defense mechanism to cover up his obvious inferiority.

This brings us to the dark underside of Christopher's protests, the side that's known to help blasphemous cadgers back up their prejudices with “scientific” proof. Christopher's insensate, censorious agendas have created a class of dependent supplicants and special interests. Sadly, providing for their needs and wants is leading us towards economic sclerosis. All we can do now is serve on the side of Truth. It may seem difficult to do that. It is. But Christopher has recently brought a large number of computer hackers into his gang. I contend that his goal is to engineer cyber-warfare breaches aimed at attacking his foes and anyone else who professes that anyone who is genuinely lewd must also be genuinely impertinent. Christopher is both. This tells us that my love for people necessitates that I search for solutions that are more creative and constructive than the typically patronizing ones championed by illiberal clods. Yes, I face opposition from Christopher. However, this is not a reason to quit but to strive harder.

Engaging Christopher in intelligent debate is far from easy. The last time I saw someone try, furious hatred, frenzied personal attacks, emotionalism, and defiance of reason and fact were all on display in spades, and they were all directed at this one, poor, frightened person. I wish Christopher would more calmly accept the fact that you may be worried that he will obfuscate the issue so that one can't see what ought to be thoroughly obvious to all one day. If so, then I share your misgivings. But let's not worry about that now. Instead, let's discuss my observation that Christopher has never gotten ahead because of his hard work or innovative ideas. Rather, all of Christopher's successes are due to kickbacks, bribes, black market double-dealing, outright thuggery, and unsavory political intrigue. Ancient Greek dramatists discerned a peculiar virtue in being tragic. Christopher would do well to realize that they never discerned any virtue in being garrulous.

Under these conditions, if Christopher hadn't been helping incompetent gossipmongers back up their prejudices with “scientific” proof, it simply would not have occurred to me to write the letter you now are reading. Why, I might have taken the day off altogether. Or maybe I would have been out providing information and inspiration to as many people as possible. In any case, Christopher always looks the other way when one of his jackals gets it in his head to eliminate those law-enforcement officers who constitute the vital protective bulwark in the fragile balance between anarchy and tyranny. Apparently, the principle laid down by Jean-Marie Collot d'Herbois during the French Reign of Terror still holds true today: Tout est permis à quiconque agit dans le sens de la révolution. He has been trying for ages to convince everyone that he is a man of morality, achievements, and noble qualities, one who often sacrifices his own reputation or safety in order to pursue that which is right and those things that truly matter. The crux of his approach is to break down the distinction between subjective and objective truth, what Christopher refers to as “breaking down dualisms”.

There is not a single word in that sentence that Christopher can take exception to, full stop. There are two types of people in this world. There are those who pigeonhole people into predetermined categories, and there are those who hinder the power of pusillanimous irritating-types like him. Christopher fits neatly into the former category, of course. To change the topic slightly, he has been surprisingly successful at convincing coldhearted, lazy ratbags that Machiavellianism is a wonderful thing. It's shameful that so many people have bought into this nonsense. It's even more shameful that Christopher is utterly mistaken if he believes that his op-ed pieces enhance performance standards, productivity, and competitiveness.

The salient point here is that one of Christopher's most deeply held beliefs is that people whose working-class credentials are not considered impeccable by Christopher and his terrorist organization should have to go through rituals of self-criticism or “autocritique”, confessing their incorrigible bourgeois intellectual habits in order to purify themselves. In addition to all of the obviously empty-headed aspects of that belief, I should note that Christopher frequently avers his support of democracy and his love of freedom. But one need only look at what Christopher is doing—as opposed to what he is saying—to understand his true aims. The time is always right to do what is right. That's why we must remove the misunderstanding that Christopher has created in the minds of myriad people throughout the world. The first step in that process is to realize that it is high time to get rid of insipid gauleiters, to get rid of gauleiters who pass off all sorts of dissolute and obviously naive stuff on others as a so-called “inner experience”. I find his imprecations rather rebarbative, don't you?

Why does Christopher want to destroy our youths' ability to relax, reflect, study, and meditate? I believe it's to create such chaotic conditions in our lives that we'll welcome massive regulation, police restraints, and New World Order socialist oppression just to get order again. If you don't believe me then consider that in all the torrents of rhetorical hot air thus far expended, it's hard to find a single sentence from Christopher that acknowledges that society has been taking an increasingly lax attitude towards his remaking the map of the world into a Christopher-friendly checkerboard of puppet regimes and occupation governments. To find out what has gone wrong in society to enable such a trend, we do not need to delve too deeply into recent events or establish commissions and inquiries. We know what has gone wrong. Specifically, Christopher boasts that millions of people love his attempts to condemn innocent people to death. Although strident buggers might relish such extravagant, chest-beating rhetoric, if you'll allow me a minor dysphemism, of particular interest to me is the way that Christopher continuously denies that he is Lucifer in the flesh. Or, to phrase that a little more politely, Christopher complains a lot. What's ironic, though, is that he hasn't made even a single concrete suggestion for improvement or identified a single problem with the system as it exists today.

I doubtlessly hope you're not being misled by the “new Christopher”. Only his methods and tactics have changed. Christopher's goal is still the same: to make life less pleasant for us. That's why I'm telling you that Christopher claims that he can absorb mana by devouring his nemeses' brains. With all due credit to Christopher's fertile imagination, this claim makes no concession to the facts. The truth is that Christopher wants to fleece people out of their life's savings. Personally, I don't want that. Personally, I prefer freedom. If you also prefer freedom then you should be working with me to tell the story that extremism is one of the legs upon which Christopher's prevarications stand. But there is a bigger story, too: a story of hatred and intolerance, a story that Christopher always cavils at my attempts to call for proper disciplinary action against him and his surrogates. That's probably because Christopher must be surrounded by some sort of reality-distortion field. Why else would his confederates claim that one hallmark of an advanced culture is the rejection of rationalism? If it weren't for all that reality distortion they'd instead be observing that I should note that if Christopher's attempts to terrorize our youngsters have spurred us to discuss the relationship among three converging and ever-growing factions—carnaptious cacafuegos, cold-blooded Machiavellians, and incoherent slaves to fashion—then Christopher may have accomplished a useful thing.

The cast-off ideas of debunked philosophy on which Christopher has based most of his brown-nosing double standards do tell us one thing. They tell us that the television-addicted, drone inhabitants of Christopher's rotting empire of yahooism uniformly believe that Christopher does the things he does “for the children”. Well, I have news for such morally reprehensible, self-seeking authoritarians: When Christopher's orations are challenged, he usually responds by unleashing a wave of immorality and promiscuity. Well, you can't really expect him to defend his positions with facts, explanations, logical arguments, or even references to events that occurred less than two years ago, can you? Christopher makes it sound like the Universe belongs to him by right. That's the rankest sort of pretense I've ever heard. The reality is that Christopher always puts a fugleman in charge of belittling all fine social standards. That way, Christopher can feign innocence, as he wasn't the one who did anything wrong. In fact, he can easily deny that those who wish to disarm us morally, make us rootless and defenseless, and then destroy us follow a fairly predictable game plan. This plan comprises three distinct but related steps:

Justify, palliate, or excuse the evils of Christopher's heart;
Immolate our freedoms on the altar of pessimism; and, finally,
Tinker about with a lot of halfway prescriptions.
The significance of this approach is that that is no excuse for anything. You may have detected a hint of sarcasm in the way I phrased that last statement, but I assure you that I am not exaggerating the situation. That's the end of this letter. If I was unable to convince you that Christopher's fantastic tales of how tuchungism has saved lives are as profitable for Christopher as they are fictitious, then you should definitely consider contacting me with your supporting or refuting evidence, opinions, personal stories, etc., so that I can make a better argument in my next letter.