Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- First run of CNNmodel.py (nothing changed)
- step 0, training accuracy 0.18
- step 100, training accuracy 0.88
- step 200, training accuracy 0.94
- step 300, training accuracy 0.96
- step 400, training accuracy 0.92
- test accuracy 0.9433
- Time for building convnet:
- 103588
- First run of CNmodel.py (dataset changed to fashion-mnist-master/data/fashion)]
- step 0, training accuracy 0.08
- step 100, training accuracy 0.62
- step 200, training accuracy 0.7
- step 300, training accuracy 0.86
- step 400, training accuracy 0.84
- test accuracy 0.8282
- Time for building convnet:
- 94340
- Fifth run of CNmodel.py (AdaGrad Optimizer, no change)]
- step 0, training accuracy 0.14
- step 100, training accuracy 0.72
- step 200, training accuracy 0.9
- step 300, training accuracy 0.8
- step 400, training accuracy 0.82
- test accuracy 0.8171
- Time for building convnet:
- 111625
- Seventeenth run of CNmodel.py (GradientDescent - 16,36,128 in/out channels)
- step 0, training accuracy 0.22
- step 100, training accuracy 0.78
- step 200, training accuracy 0.8
- step 300, training accuracy 0.78
- step 400, training accuracy 0.8
- test accuracy 0.8268
- Time for building convnet:
- 46309
- Process finished with exit code 0
- Eighteenth run of CNmodel.py (GradientDescent - 8,45,128 in/out channels)
- step 0, training accuracy 0.26
- step 100, training accuracy 0.74
- step 200, training accuracy 0.92
- step 300, training accuracy 0.8
- step 400, training accuracy 0.88
- test accuracy 0.8124
- Time for building convnet:
- 34380
- Nineteenth run of CNmodel.py (GradientDescent - 8,45,200 in/out channels)
- step 0, training accuracy 0.14
- step 100, training accuracy 0.7
- step 200, training accuracy 0.88
- step 300, training accuracy 0.8
- step 400, training accuracy 0.9
- test accuracy 0.8379
- Time for building convnet:
- 35690
- Run # 20 (Final run) (GradientDescent -- 8,45,500 -- steps = 900 (from 500))
- step 0, training accuracy 0.34
- step 100, training accuracy 0.9
- step 200, training accuracy 0.88
- step 300, training accuracy 0.86
- step 400, training accuracy 0.9
- step 500, training accuracy 0.86
- step 600, training accuracy 0.86
- step 700, training accuracy 0.76
- step 800, training accuracy 0.9
- test accuracy 0.8584
- Time for building convnet:
- 64197
- From my observations the GitHub ReadMe for A MNIST-like fashion product database was completely accurate in that it is easy
- to get a 93% accuracy from the minst dataset, once the data was changed it hovered around approx 82%, as you can see it wasn't
- until I changed the step count to almost 1000, the in/out channels to 8,45,500 and applied the gradient descent optimizer
- that I was able to achieve an 86% accuracy. I strongly believe that if I kept recording data and the separation of channels
- and increased the amount of steps significantly that I might achieve a 90%, but 94% as in the MINST dataset is not achievable
- at my level of knowledge...
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment