Advertisement
Guest User

Untitled

a guest
Mar 19th, 2018
71
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 1.25 KB | None | 0 0
  1. I argue that above all else, in any situation, the car should protect its occupants. While some may say this is contrary to the goal of minimizing death, it is in fact a far better way to accomplish that goal. Consider the following statements:
  2.  
  3. We wish to minimize loss of life in car accidents
  4. Self driving cars will cause far fewer deaths than human-controlled cars
  5. People will likely not use self-driving cars that will potentially intentionally kill them
  6.  
  7. The first statement is obvious. While technically not thoroughly field-tested, statement two is reasonable to assume as true as the technology advances. To back up the third statement, studies have shown that people overwhelmingly value passenger safety over pedestrian safety, see (link to study)
  8.  
  9. 1. If we wish to minimize loss of life in car accidents, then we should maximize the amount of self-driving cars on the road
  10. 2. If we wish to maximize the amount of self-driving cars on the road, people must trust them and want to buy/use them
  11. 3. If people are to trust self-driving cars, the cars cannot be programmed to intentionally kill the occupants.
  12. 4. Therefore, if we wish to minimize loss of life in car accidents, we cannot program self-driving cars to intentionally kill their occupants.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement