API tools faq
paste
Advertisement
Guest User

Untitled

a guest
Oct 16th, 2019
111
0
Never
Add comment
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 22.08 KB | None | 0 0
raw download clone embed print report
  1. ==32069==
  2. ==32069== HEAP SUMMARY:
  3. ==32069== in use at exit: 38,931 bytes in 58 blocks
  4. ==32069== total heap usage: 585 allocs, 527 frees, 200,302 bytes allocated
  5. ==32069==
  6. ==32069== Searching for pointers to 58 not-freed blocks
  7. ==32069== Checked 80,480 bytes
  8. ==32069==
  9. ==32069== 1 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1 of 58
  10. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  11. ==32069== by 0x10B3FE: mystrdup (textbuffer.c:34)
  12. ==32069== by 0x10B521: newTB (textbuffer.c:133)
  13. ==32069== by 0x1094B4: testNewTBDumpTB (testTextbuffer2.c:101)
  14. ==32069== by 0x1094B4: main (testTextbuffer2.c:34)
  15. ==32069==
  16. ==32069== 1 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 2 of 58
  17. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  18. ==32069== by 0x10B71E: dumpTB (textbuffer.c:197)
  19. ==32069== by 0x1094D4: testNewTBDumpTB (testTextbuffer2.c:103)
  20. ==32069== by 0x1094D4: main (testTextbuffer2.c:34)
  21. ==32069==
  22. ==32069== 2 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 3 of 58
  23. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  24. ==32069== by 0x10B3FE: mystrdup (textbuffer.c:34)
  25. ==32069== by 0x10B521: newTB (textbuffer.c:133)
  26. ==32069== by 0x1095C5: testNewTBDumpTB (testTextbuffer2.c:146)
  27. ==32069== by 0x1095C5: main (testTextbuffer2.c:34)
  28. ==32069==
  29. ==32069== 2 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 4 of 58
  30. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  31. ==32069== by 0x10B3FE: mystrdup (textbuffer.c:34)
  32. ==32069== by 0x10B521: newTB (textbuffer.c:133)
  33. ==32069== by 0x10964F: testNewTBDumpTB (testTextbuffer2.c:166)
  34. ==32069== by 0x10964F: main (testTextbuffer2.c:34)
  35. ==32069==
  36. ==32069== 2 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 5 of 58
  37. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  38. ==32069== by 0x10B3FE: mystrdup (textbuffer.c:34)
  39. ==32069== by 0x10B521: newTB (textbuffer.c:133)
  40. ==32069== by 0x109B9A: testMergeTB (testTextbuffer2.c:393)
  41. ==32069== by 0x109B9A: main (testTextbuffer2.c:36)
  42. ==32069==
  43. ==32069== 2 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 6 of 58
  44. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  45. ==32069== by 0x10B3FE: mystrdup (textbuffer.c:34)
  46. ==32069== by 0x10B521: newTB (textbuffer.c:133)
  47. ==32069== by 0x109ECC: testPasteTB (testTextbuffer2.c:530)
  48. ==32069== by 0x109ECC: main (testTextbuffer2.c:37)
  49. ==32069==
  50. ==32069== 16 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 7 of 58
  51. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  52. ==32069== by 0x10B3FE: mystrdup (textbuffer.c:34)
  53. ==32069== by 0x10B521: newTB (textbuffer.c:133)
  54. ==32069== by 0x10BD4B: cutTB (textbuffer.c:437)
  55. ==32069== by 0x10A4C6: testCutTB (testTextbuffer2.c:736)
  56. ==32069== by 0x10A4C6: main (testTextbuffer2.c:38)
  57. ==32069==
  58. ==32069== 16 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 8 of 58
  59. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  60. ==32069== by 0x10B3FE: mystrdup (textbuffer.c:34)
  61. ==32069== by 0x10B521: newTB (textbuffer.c:133)
  62. ==32069== by 0x10BD4B: cutTB (textbuffer.c:437)
  63. ==32069== by 0x10A5DC: testCutTB (testTextbuffer2.c:759)
  64. ==32069== by 0x10A5DC: main (testTextbuffer2.c:38)
  65. ==32069==
  66. ==32069== 18 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 9 of 58
  67. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  68. ==32069== by 0x10B3FE: mystrdup (textbuffer.c:34)
  69. ==32069== by 0x10B521: newTB (textbuffer.c:133)
  70. ==32069== by 0x109AF7: testMergeTB (testTextbuffer2.c:368)
  71. ==32069== by 0x109AF7: main (testTextbuffer2.c:36)
  72. ==32069==
  73. ==32069== 18 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 10 of 58
  74. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  75. ==32069== by 0x10B3FE: mystrdup (textbuffer.c:34)
  76. ==32069== by 0x10B521: newTB (textbuffer.c:133)
  77. ==32069== by 0x109BA9: testMergeTB (testTextbuffer2.c:394)
  78. ==32069== by 0x109BA9: main (testTextbuffer2.c:36)
  79. ==32069==
  80. ==32069== 18 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 11 of 58
  81. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  82. ==32069== by 0x10B3FE: mystrdup (textbuffer.c:34)
  83. ==32069== by 0x10B521: newTB (textbuffer.c:133)
  84. ==32069== by 0x109C7B: testMergeTB (testTextbuffer2.c:426)
  85. ==32069== by 0x109C7B: main (testTextbuffer2.c:36)
  86. ==32069==
  87. ==32069== 18 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 12 of 58
  88. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  89. ==32069== by 0x10B3FE: mystrdup (textbuffer.c:34)
  90. ==32069== by 0x10B521: newTB (textbuffer.c:133)
  91. ==32069== by 0x109D10: testMergeTB (testTextbuffer2.c:459)
  92. ==32069== by 0x109D10: main (testTextbuffer2.c:36)
  93. ==32069==
  94. ==32069== 18 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 13 of 58
  95. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  96. ==32069== by 0x10B3FE: mystrdup (textbuffer.c:34)
  97. ==32069== by 0x10B521: newTB (textbuffer.c:133)
  98. ==32069== by 0x109DE8: testPasteTB (testTextbuffer2.c:501)
  99. ==32069== by 0x109DE8: main (testTextbuffer2.c:37)
  100. ==32069==
  101. ==32069== 18 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 14 of 58
  102. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  103. ==32069== by 0x10B72F: dumpTB (textbuffer.c:228)
  104. ==32069== by 0x10BA1B: pasteTB (textbuffer.c:382)
  105. ==32069== by 0x109DFB: testPasteTB (testTextbuffer2.c:502)
  106. ==32069== by 0x109DFB: main (testTextbuffer2.c:37)
  107. ==32069==
  108. ==32069== 18 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 15 of 58
  109. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  110. ==32069== by 0x10B3FE: mystrdup (textbuffer.c:34)
  111. ==32069== by 0x10B521: newTB (textbuffer.c:133)
  112. ==32069== by 0x10BA23: pasteTB (textbuffer.c:383)
  113. ==32069== by 0x109DFB: testPasteTB (testTextbuffer2.c:502)
  114. ==32069== by 0x109DFB: main (testTextbuffer2.c:37)
  115. ==32069==
  116. ==32069== 18 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 16 of 58
  117. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  118. ==32069== by 0x10B3FE: mystrdup (textbuffer.c:34)
  119. ==32069== by 0x10B521: newTB (textbuffer.c:133)
  120. ==32069== by 0x109EDB: testPasteTB (testTextbuffer2.c:531)
  121. ==32069== by 0x109EDB: main (testTextbuffer2.c:37)
  122. ==32069==
  123. ==32069== 18 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 17 of 58
  124. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  125. ==32069== by 0x10B72F: dumpTB (textbuffer.c:228)
  126. ==32069== by 0x10BA1B: pasteTB (textbuffer.c:382)
  127. ==32069== by 0x109F0B: testPasteTB (testTextbuffer2.c:535)
  128. ==32069== by 0x109F0B: main (testTextbuffer2.c:37)
  129. ==32069==
  130. ==32069== 18 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 18 of 58
  131. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  132. ==32069== by 0x10B3FE: mystrdup (textbuffer.c:34)
  133. ==32069== by 0x10B521: newTB (textbuffer.c:133)
  134. ==32069== by 0x10BA23: pasteTB (textbuffer.c:383)
  135. ==32069== by 0x109F0B: testPasteTB (testTextbuffer2.c:535)
  136. ==32069== by 0x109F0B: main (testTextbuffer2.c:37)
  137. ==32069==
  138. ==32069== 18 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 19 of 58
  139. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  140. ==32069== by 0x10B3FE: mystrdup (textbuffer.c:34)
  141. ==32069== by 0x10B521: newTB (textbuffer.c:133)
  142. ==32069== by 0x10A007: testPasteTB (testTextbuffer2.c:568)
  143. ==32069== by 0x10A007: main (testTextbuffer2.c:37)
  144. ==32069==
  145. ==32069== 18 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 20 of 58
  146. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  147. ==32069== by 0x10B72F: dumpTB (textbuffer.c:228)
  148. ==32069== by 0x10BA1B: pasteTB (textbuffer.c:382)
  149. ==32069== by 0x10A037: testPasteTB (testTextbuffer2.c:573)
  150. ==32069== by 0x10A037: main (testTextbuffer2.c:37)
  151. ==32069==
  152. ==32069== 18 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 21 of 58
  153. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  154. ==32069== by 0x10B3FE: mystrdup (textbuffer.c:34)
  155. ==32069== by 0x10B521: newTB (textbuffer.c:133)
  156. ==32069== by 0x10BA23: pasteTB (textbuffer.c:383)
  157. ==32069== by 0x10A037: testPasteTB (testTextbuffer2.c:573)
  158. ==32069== by 0x10A037: main (testTextbuffer2.c:37)
  159. ==32069==
  160. ==32069== 18 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 22 of 58
  161. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  162. ==32069== by 0x10B3FE: mystrdup (textbuffer.c:34)
  163. ==32069== by 0x10B521: newTB (textbuffer.c:133)
  164. ==32069== by 0x10A126: testPasteTB (testTextbuffer2.c:609)
  165. ==32069== by 0x10A126: main (testTextbuffer2.c:37)
  166. ==32069==
  167. ==32069== 18 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 23 of 58
  168. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  169. ==32069== by 0x10B72F: dumpTB (textbuffer.c:228)
  170. ==32069== by 0x10BA1B: pasteTB (textbuffer.c:382)
  171. ==32069== by 0x10A13F: testPasteTB (testTextbuffer2.c:615)
  172. ==32069== by 0x10A13F: main (testTextbuffer2.c:37)
  173. ==32069==
  174. ==32069== 18 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 24 of 58
  175. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  176. ==32069== by 0x10B3FE: mystrdup (textbuffer.c:34)
  177. ==32069== by 0x10B521: newTB (textbuffer.c:133)
  178. ==32069== by 0x10BA23: pasteTB (textbuffer.c:383)
  179. ==32069== by 0x10A13F: testPasteTB (testTextbuffer2.c:615)
  180. ==32069== by 0x10A13F: main (testTextbuffer2.c:37)
  181. ==32069==
  182. ==32069== 18 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 25 of 58
  183. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  184. ==32069== by 0x10B3FE: mystrdup (textbuffer.c:34)
  185. ==32069== by 0x10B521: newTB (textbuffer.c:133)
  186. ==32069== by 0x10BD4B: cutTB (textbuffer.c:437)
  187. ==32069== by 0x10A3AB: testCutTB (testTextbuffer2.c:713)
  188. ==32069== by 0x10A3AB: main (testTextbuffer2.c:38)
  189. ==32069==
  190. ==32069== 25 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 26 of 58
  191. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  192. ==32069== by 0x10B3FE: mystrdup (textbuffer.c:34)
  193. ==32069== by 0x10B521: newTB (textbuffer.c:133)
  194. ==32069== by 0x109C6C: testMergeTB (testTextbuffer2.c:425)
  195. ==32069== by 0x109C6C: main (testTextbuffer2.c:36)
  196. ==32069==
  197. ==32069== 25 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 27 of 58
  198. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  199. ==32069== by 0x10B3FE: mystrdup (textbuffer.c:34)
  200. ==32069== by 0x10B521: newTB (textbuffer.c:133)
  201. ==32069== by 0x109D01: testMergeTB (testTextbuffer2.c:458)
  202. ==32069== by 0x109D01: main (testTextbuffer2.c:36)
  203. ==32069==
  204. ==32069== 25 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 28 of 58
  205. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  206. ==32069== by 0x10B3FE: mystrdup (textbuffer.c:34)
  207. ==32069== by 0x10B521: newTB (textbuffer.c:133)
  208. ==32069== by 0x109FF8: testPasteTB (testTextbuffer2.c:567)
  209. ==32069== by 0x109FF8: main (testTextbuffer2.c:37)
  210. ==32069==
  211. ==32069== 25 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 29 of 58
  212. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  213. ==32069== by 0x10B3FE: mystrdup (textbuffer.c:34)
  214. ==32069== by 0x10B521: newTB (textbuffer.c:133)
  215. ==32069== by 0x10A117: testPasteTB (testTextbuffer2.c:608)
  216. ==32069== by 0x10A117: main (testTextbuffer2.c:37)
  217. ==32069==
  218. ==32069== 25 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 30 of 58
  219. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  220. ==32069== by 0x10B3FE: mystrdup (textbuffer.c:34)
  221. ==32069== by 0x10B521: newTB (textbuffer.c:133)
  222. ==32069== by 0x10A202: testPasteTB (testTextbuffer2.c:650)
  223. ==32069== by 0x10A202: main (testTextbuffer2.c:37)
  224. ==32069==
  225. ==32069== 25 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 31 of 58
  226. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  227. ==32069== by 0x10B72F: dumpTB (textbuffer.c:228)
  228. ==32069== by 0x10BA1B: pasteTB (textbuffer.c:382)
  229. ==32069== by 0x10A21B: testPasteTB (testTextbuffer2.c:656)
  230. ==32069== by 0x10A21B: main (testTextbuffer2.c:37)
  231. ==32069==
  232. ==32069== 25 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 32 of 58
  233. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  234. ==32069== by 0x10B3FE: mystrdup (textbuffer.c:34)
  235. ==32069== by 0x10B521: newTB (textbuffer.c:133)
  236. ==32069== by 0x10BA23: pasteTB (textbuffer.c:383)
  237. ==32069== by 0x10A21B: testPasteTB (testTextbuffer2.c:656)
  238. ==32069== by 0x10A21B: main (testTextbuffer2.c:37)
  239. ==32069==
  240. ==32069== 29 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 33 of 58
  241. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  242. ==32069== by 0x10B3FE: mystrdup (textbuffer.c:34)
  243. ==32069== by 0x10B521: newTB (textbuffer.c:133)
  244. ==32069== by 0x1093A0: testNewTBDumpTB (testTextbuffer2.c:60)
  245. ==32069== by 0x1093A0: main (testTextbuffer2.c:34)
  246. ==32069==
  247. ==32069== 29 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 34 of 58
  248. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  249. ==32069== by 0x10B3FE: mystrdup (textbuffer.c:34)
  250. ==32069== by 0x10B521: newTB (textbuffer.c:133)
  251. ==32069== by 0x109827: testAddPrefixTB (testTextbuffer2.c:234)
  252. ==32069== by 0x109827: main (testTextbuffer2.c:35)
  253. ==32069==
  254. ==32069== 29 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 35 of 58
  255. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  256. ==32069== by 0x10B3FE: mystrdup (textbuffer.c:34)
  257. ==32069== by 0x10B521: newTB (textbuffer.c:133)
  258. ==32069== by 0x109900: testAddPrefixTB (testTextbuffer2.c:265)
  259. ==32069== by 0x109900: main (testTextbuffer2.c:35)
  260. ==32069==
  261. ==32069== 29 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 36 of 58
  262. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  263. ==32069== by 0x10B3FE: mystrdup (textbuffer.c:34)
  264. ==32069== by 0x10B521: newTB (textbuffer.c:133)
  265. ==32069== by 0x109AE8: testMergeTB (testTextbuffer2.c:367)
  266. ==32069== by 0x109AE8: main (testTextbuffer2.c:36)
  267. ==32069==
  268. ==32069== 29 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 37 of 58
  269. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  270. ==32069== by 0x10B3FE: mystrdup (textbuffer.c:34)
  271. ==32069== by 0x10B521: newTB (textbuffer.c:133)
  272. ==32069== by 0x109DD9: testPasteTB (testTextbuffer2.c:500)
  273. ==32069== by 0x109DD9: main (testTextbuffer2.c:37)
  274. ==32069==
  275. ==32069== 29 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 38 of 58
  276. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  277. ==32069== by 0x10B3FE: mystrdup (textbuffer.c:34)
  278. ==32069== by 0x10B521: newTB (textbuffer.c:133)
  279. ==32069== by 0x10A2E4: testCutTB (testTextbuffer2.c:692)
  280. ==32069== by 0x10A2E4: main (testTextbuffer2.c:38)
  281. ==32069==
  282. ==32069== 29 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 39 of 58
  283. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  284. ==32069== by 0x10BCE9: cutTB (textbuffer.c:424)
  285. ==32069== by 0x10A2F9: testCutTB (testTextbuffer2.c:693)
  286. ==32069== by 0x10A2F9: main (testTextbuffer2.c:38)
  287. ==32069==
  288. ==32069== 29 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 40 of 58
  289. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  290. ==32069== by 0x10B3FE: mystrdup (textbuffer.c:34)
  291. ==32069== by 0x10B521: newTB (textbuffer.c:133)
  292. ==32069== by 0x10BD4B: cutTB (textbuffer.c:437)
  293. ==32069== by 0x10A2F9: testCutTB (testTextbuffer2.c:693)
  294. ==32069== by 0x10A2F9: main (testTextbuffer2.c:38)
  295. ==32069==
  296. ==32069== 29 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 41 of 58
  297. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  298. ==32069== by 0x10BCE9: cutTB (textbuffer.c:424)
  299. ==32069== by 0x10A3AB: testCutTB (testTextbuffer2.c:713)
  300. ==32069== by 0x10A3AB: main (testTextbuffer2.c:38)
  301. ==32069==
  302. ==32069== 29 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 42 of 58
  303. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  304. ==32069== by 0x10B3FE: mystrdup (textbuffer.c:34)
  305. ==32069== by 0x10B521: newTB (textbuffer.c:133)
  306. ==32069== by 0x10A4AC: testCutTB (testTextbuffer2.c:735)
  307. ==32069== by 0x10A4AC: main (testTextbuffer2.c:38)
  308. ==32069==
  309. ==32069== 29 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 43 of 58
  310. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  311. ==32069== by 0x10BCE9: cutTB (textbuffer.c:424)
  312. ==32069== by 0x10A4C6: testCutTB (testTextbuffer2.c:736)
  313. ==32069== by 0x10A4C6: main (testTextbuffer2.c:38)
  314. ==32069==
  315. ==32069== 29 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 44 of 58
  316. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  317. ==32069== by 0x10B3FE: mystrdup (textbuffer.c:34)
  318. ==32069== by 0x10B521: newTB (textbuffer.c:133)
  319. ==32069== by 0x10A944: testDeleteTB (testTextbuffer2.c:874)
  320. ==32069== by 0x10A944: main (testTextbuffer2.c:40)
  321. ==32069==
  322. ==32069== 29 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 45 of 58
  323. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  324. ==32069== by 0x10B3FE: mystrdup (textbuffer.c:34)
  325. ==32069== by 0x10B521: newTB (textbuffer.c:133)
  326. ==32069== by 0x10A9C5: testDeleteTB (testTextbuffer2.c:893)
  327. ==32069== by 0x10A9C5: main (testTextbuffer2.c:40)
  328. ==32069==
  329. ==32069== 29 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 46 of 58
  330. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  331. ==32069== by 0x10B3FE: mystrdup (textbuffer.c:34)
  332. ==32069== by 0x10B521: newTB (textbuffer.c:133)
  333. ==32069== by 0x10AA52: testDeleteTB (testTextbuffer2.c:908)
  334. ==32069== by 0x10AA52: main (testTextbuffer2.c:40)
  335. ==32069==
  336. ==32069== 31 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 47 of 58
  337. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  338. ==32069== by 0x10B3FE: mystrdup (textbuffer.c:34)
  339. ==32069== by 0x10B521: newTB (textbuffer.c:133)
  340. ==32069== by 0x10942A: testNewTBDumpTB (testTextbuffer2.c:81)
  341. ==32069== by 0x10942A: main (testTextbuffer2.c:34)
  342. ==32069==
  343. ==32069== 31 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 48 of 58
  344. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  345. ==32069== by 0x10B3FE: mystrdup (textbuffer.c:34)
  346. ==32069== by 0x10B521: newTB (textbuffer.c:133)
  347. ==32069== by 0x1096D9: testNewTBDumpTB (testTextbuffer2.c:185)
  348. ==32069== by 0x1096D9: main (testTextbuffer2.c:34)
  349. ==32069==
  350. ==32069== 34 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 49 of 58
  351. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  352. ==32069== by 0x10B3FE: mystrdup (textbuffer.c:34)
  353. ==32069== by 0x10B521: newTB (textbuffer.c:133)
  354. ==32069== by 0x10A5C7: testCutTB (testTextbuffer2.c:758)
  355. ==32069== by 0x10A5C7: main (testTextbuffer2.c:38)
  356. ==32069==
  357. ==32069== 34 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 50 of 58
  358. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  359. ==32069== by 0x10BCE9: cutTB (textbuffer.c:424)
  360. ==32069== by 0x10A5DC: testCutTB (testTextbuffer2.c:759)
  361. ==32069== by 0x10A5DC: main (testTextbuffer2.c:38)
  362. ==32069==
  363. ==32069== 34 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 51 of 58
  364. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  365. ==32069== by 0x10B3FE: mystrdup (textbuffer.c:34)
  366. ==32069== by 0x10B521: newTB (textbuffer.c:133)
  367. ==32069== by 0x10AAE4: testDeleteTB (testTextbuffer2.c:921)
  368. ==32069== by 0x10AAE4: main (testTextbuffer2.c:40)
  369. ==32069==
  370. ==32069== 50 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 52 of 58
  371. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  372. ==32069== by 0x10B3FE: mystrdup (textbuffer.c:34)
  373. ==32069== by 0x10B521: newTB (textbuffer.c:133)
  374. ==32069== by 0x10A788: testSearchTB (testTextbuffer2.c:809)
  375. ==32069== by 0x10A788: main (testTextbuffer2.c:39)
  376. ==32069==
  377. ==32069== 54 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 53 of 58
  378. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  379. ==32069== by 0x10B3FE: mystrdup (textbuffer.c:34)
  380. ==32069== by 0x10B521: newTB (textbuffer.c:133)
  381. ==32069== by 0x109763: testNewTBDumpTB (testTextbuffer2.c:205)
  382. ==32069== by 0x109763: main (testTextbuffer2.c:34)
  383. ==32069==
  384. ==32069== 100 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 54 of 58
  385. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  386. ==32069== by 0x10B3FE: mystrdup (textbuffer.c:34)
  387. ==32069== by 0x10B521: newTB (textbuffer.c:133)
  388. ==32069== by 0x10A6FA: testSearchTB (testTextbuffer2.c:791)
  389. ==32069== by 0x10A6FA: main (testTextbuffer2.c:39)
  390. ==32069==
  391. ==32069== 231 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 55 of 58
  392. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  393. ==32069== by 0x10B3FE: mystrdup (textbuffer.c:34)
  394. ==32069== by 0x10B521: newTB (textbuffer.c:133)
  395. ==32069== by 0x10A816: testSearchTB (testTextbuffer2.c:828)
  396. ==32069== by 0x10A816: main (testTextbuffer2.c:39)
  397. ==32069==
  398. ==32069== 231 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 56 of 58
  399. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  400. ==32069== by 0x10B3FE: mystrdup (textbuffer.c:34)
  401. ==32069== by 0x10B521: newTB (textbuffer.c:133)
  402. ==32069== by 0x10A8A4: testSearchTB (testTextbuffer2.c:847)
  403. ==32069== by 0x10A8A4: main (testTextbuffer2.c:39)
  404. ==32069==
  405. ==32069== 18,586 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 57 of 58
  406. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  407. ==32069== by 0x10B3FE: mystrdup (textbuffer.c:34)
  408. ==32069== by 0x10B521: newTB (textbuffer.c:133)
  409. ==32069== by 0x10953B: testNewTBDumpTB (testTextbuffer2.c:126)
  410. ==32069== by 0x10953B: main (testTextbuffer2.c:34)
  411. ==32069==
  412. ==32069== 18,586 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 58 of 58
  413. ==32069== at 0x48357BF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
  414. ==32069== by 0x10B3FE: mystrdup (textbuffer.c:34)
  415. ==32069== by 0x10B521: newTB (textbuffer.c:133)
  416. ==32069== by 0x1099D7: testAddPrefixTB (testTextbuffer2.c:325)
  417. ==32069== by 0x1099D7: main (testTextbuffer2.c:35)
  418. ==32069==
  419. ==32069== LEAK SUMMARY:
  420. ==32069== definitely lost: 38,931 bytes in 58 blocks
  421. ==32069== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
  422. ==32069== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
  423. ==32069== still reachable: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
  424. ==32069== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
  425. ==32069==
  426. ==32069== ERROR SUMMARY: 58 errors from 58 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
  427. ==32069== ERROR SUMMARY: 58 errors from 58 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement
Public Pastes
Advertisement
We use cookies for various purposes including analytics. By continuing to use Pastebin, you agree to our use of cookies as described in the Cookies Policy.  OK, I Understand
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!