Advertisement
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- Thanks everyone for gathering around the fire and sharing your thoughts on structure and organization. I do
- believe it couldn't be more true that decentralization doesn't mean disorganization. Since the launch of this
- project we have enjoyed (or rather not) the entrance and exit of people that took it upon themselves to create a
- degree of value based on their volunteer work. Fundamentally - this helped jump start the project and to this
- day the very core of what makes a project in this industry work remains very well intact - the continuity of
- community and their willingness to give - because in most cases they believe in the image and the mission of
- being a part of a movement that operates not only globally but (mostly) in the same direction and with a common
- goal - an opportunity for all.
- People that have come and stayed, help towards the mission to this day, people that came and left taught us a
- lesson. The lesson? Well in my opinion it's the reminder that is the nature of human psychology and in a lot of
- cases, unfortunately, the need for some to be in a position of control and power, albeit disguised as "I'm just
- being a leader to help the project move forward". The persons we've learned carry with them a noticeable
- pattern of practice and that is: _I'll volunteer my time but eventually I want something in return (but I wont
- tell you that yet) and if I don't get it - I'll hurt your project because well you hurt me._
- If people that are volunteering their time make an exit - and can already hurt the project - then: *1)* people
- that the community hold in a regard as a 'leader' will see their departure as having lost a valuable asset
- because this person seemed to be very involved and now the project will die. In some cases the person did little
- and still tried to project that they were heavily involved. *2)* the departing person will have had in their
- position some community asset and will destroy it to hurt the progress of the project. This is in my opinion is
- the result of a thirst for power and control and they realized they weren't going to get it - it drives these
- types wild. This is a predominant effect of organized but decentralized leadership - because as we've seen we
- operate under pseudonyms mostly and people feel they can't be reached. That's only one of the issues.
- We've had, at least 5 times that I can remember, investors approach us asking for control of a certain component
- of the project (marketing, PR, development, controlled announcements, who knows what else). Our answer has
- always been - we cannot deliver control of something we don't have control of ourselves. One of them was
- strategically intelligent - they asked for control of our public facing components: Social media. Why? because
- they wanted to control the timing of when the news comes out - in other words - keep certain news under wraps
- while we buy a shitload of coins, then we'll release the news. At least that was my assessment of them, and we
- kindly said - sorry but we can't do that. (edited)
- As Hyxt said - trust. Trust has been a very critical component of assembling a community like this - the persons
- that do have access to the infrastructure have proven to this point to be of trustworthy nature and there will
- be more to come - I think decentralization of the community assets takes time and will continue to take time to
- add more persons to have access to the community assets. The only reason why this has to be this way is because
- as mentioned earlier - the power hungry will destroy based on an imaginary attack on them. You're right, and
- you're not the first and wont be the last to say that decentralization doesn't mean disorganization - but
- honestly the people that have done what you see here have assembled on their own, without any incentive other
- than to be part of the BitcoinZ progression because they truly believe in the mission - they essentially are
- self-proclaimed - through their actions, and the only involvement we've had is publicizing their efforts because
- they informed us of their efforts.
- _This_ is what decentralization is - no group of people have to tell you and hound you to do it - you do it
- because you want to.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement