Advertisement
Guest User

Untitled

a guest
Jul 2nd, 2017
513
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 4.43 KB | None | 0 0
  1. (12/03/10 11:16:25) otohime1978: ok, so I was thinking this morning in the shower
  2. (11:16:44) otohime1978: about ghost pokemon, ok?
  3. (11:16:55) otohime1978: ghost pokemon are just giant, complex metaphors
  4. (11:19:52) the42jabberwocky@yahoo.com: do go on, while I beat the crap out of these trolls
  5. (11:20:01) otohime1978: haha
  6. (11:20:03) otohime1978: ok
  7. (11:20:13) otohime1978: they're not actually "real" in the traditional sense
  8. (11:20:20) otohime1978: they are an idea
  9. (11:20:32) otohime1978: an idea or feeling so powerful, it manifested itself physically
  10. (11:20:59) otohime1978: this explains why they're able to change their corporeality at any time
  11. (11:23:28) the42jabberwocky@yahoo.com: how about they're just supernatural entities that aren't of this dimension so to speak. Also there's the ghost of that mother marowak to bust your theory, as well as Spiritomb, which is a group of souls sealed in a keystone as punishment. Then there's also Giratina, the god of distortion, dimension, and antimatter. He's definitely more than an idea considering he's one of the three lords created by Arceus to maintain the universe.
  12. (11:24:31) otohime1978: yeah
  13. (11:24:43) otohime1978: well, spiritomb is weird
  14. (11:25:25) otohime1978: the mother of marowak the soul of the creature
  15. (11:25:34) otohime1978: and what is a soul but a giant metaphor itself?
  16. (11:27:12) the42jabberwocky@yahoo.com: so you're soul is just a metaphor
  17. (11:27:19) the42jabberwocky@yahoo.com: it isn't actually real
  18. [LINE REDACTED][LINE REDACTED][LINE REDACTED][LINE REDACTED][LINE REDACTED][LINE REDACTED]
  19. (11:28:22) otohime1978: that's not what I meant by metaphor
  20. (11:28:35) otohime1978: smartass
  21. (11:28:36) otohime1978: *pets*
  22. (11:28:46) otohime1978: I'm saying they're not real in a physical sense
  23. (11:29:43) the42jabberwocky@yahoo.com: because they belong to two seperate dimminsions or locations at the same time
  24. (11:29:43) the42jabberwocky@yahoo.com: you can't say all ghosts are an idea
  25. (11:29:55) the42jabberwocky@yahoo.com: if you have two ghosts that aren't ideas but facts
  26. (11:30:07) otohime1978: that's an idea
  27. (11:30:07) the42jabberwocky@yahoo.com: it cancels out your statement
  28. (11:30:16) otohime1978: facts are still ideas
  29. (11:30:16) the42jabberwocky@yahoo.com: what is
  30. (11:30:20) the42jabberwocky@yahoo.com: no
  31. (11:30:30) the42jabberwocky@yahoo.com: because a table isn't an idea
  32. (11:30:37) the42jabberwocky@yahoo.com: it is a fact of life
  33. (11:30:38) the42jabberwocky@yahoo.com: a solid
  34. (11:30:39) otohime1978: a table carries an idea, though
  35. (11:30:54) the42jabberwocky@yahoo.com: B|
  36. (11:30:56) the42jabberwocky@yahoo.com: shut up
  37. (11:30:58) otohime1978: no offense, but learn to metaphysics
  38. (11:31:07) the42jabberwocky@yahoo.com: you sound really stupid right now
  39. (11:31:22) otohime1978: well, what is a table but something that conforms to a standard of a table?
  40. (11:31:29) otohime1978: a table is an idea
  41. (11:31:37) otohime1978: and there are physical objects which fit within that idea
  42. (11:31:37) the42jabberwocky@yahoo.com: a table is a flat plane on legs
  43. (11:31:41) otohime1978: yes
  44. (11:31:45) otohime1978: and that right there is the idea
  45. (11:31:46) the42jabberwocky@yahoo.com: it is a surface to put things on
  46. (11:31:52) otohime1978: we just happen to have things that MATCH that idea
  47. (11:31:54) the42jabberwocky@yahoo.com: no it isn't an idea
  48. (11:31:57) the42jabberwocky@yahoo.com: it is a thing
  49. (11:32:03) the42jabberwocky@yahoo.com: it doesn't carry anything
  50. (11:32:28) the42jabberwocky@yahoo.com: the person who made te table had the idea to make the table, but the table itself is just a act of life after the idea was enacted
  51. (11:32:35) the42jabberwocky@yahoo.com: the table itself is just a table
  52. (11:32:43) the42jabberwocky@yahoo.com: the person however carries the idea
  53. (11:32:52) the42jabberwocky@yahoo.com: if you turn your back on a table
  54. (11:32:55) otohime1978: do you mind if I share what you're saying here?
  55. (11:32:57) the42jabberwocky@yahoo.com: its still there
  56. (11:33:15) the42jabberwocky@yahoo.com: with who and why
  57. (11:33:57) otohime1978: a couple of people
  58. (11:34:09) otohime1978: Brian, a few atheists
  59. (11:34:19) otohime1978: just wanna hear their responses
  60. (11:34:25) the42jabberwocky@yahoo.com: whatever
  61. (11:34:38) the42jabberwocky@yahoo.com: they associate with you and will probably say I'm wrong
  62. (11:34:54) the42jabberwocky@yahoo.com: and then you'll rub it in my face
  63. (11:34:58) otohime1978: they say I'm wrong all the time
  64. (11:34:58) otohime1978: ;;<_<
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement