s&i rule addition

[2017-07-25 09:25:35] <Creati0n> reta/sir: thoughts on letting people bump their threads in s&i?
[2017-07-25 09:25:48] <Reta> if they are shit
[2017-07-25 09:25:50] <Reta> they are shit
[2017-07-25 09:25:55] <Reta> no bump changes that
[2017-07-25 09:26:06] <Creati0n> http://forum.toribash.com/showthread.php?t=585223
[2017-07-25 09:26:11] <Creati0n> this one isn't too shit
[2017-07-25 09:26:16] <Creati0n> just wants some more exposure
[2017-07-25 09:29:03] <Creati0n> albeit some of them that do bump are shit
[2017-07-25 09:30:39] <Reta> actually shit threads should be closed
[2017-07-25 09:30:39] <Reta> so
[2017-07-25 09:30:42] <Reta> ya why not
[2017-07-25 09:33:40] <Creati0n> i'm for it, so anyone that has a couple cents to throw would be neato burrito
[2017-07-25 09:35:37] <Creati0n> "You're allowed to bump your post every 24 hours to get more exposure for your suggestion.  Delete bumping is not allowed in any form, and will be infracted."
[2017-07-25 09:35:58] <Creati0n> post -> thread, but otherwise any suggestions?
[2017-07-25 09:36:37] <Reta> limit it somehow
[2017-07-25 09:36:54] <Reta> we dont need the same thread bumped 2 years long
[2017-07-25 09:44:25] <Creati0n> will likely be long closed after two years
[2017-07-25 09:44:31] <Creati0n> before*
[2017-07-25 09:45:13] <Reta> you get what i mean tho
[2017-07-25 09:52:50] <Creati0n> i get what you mean, but i don't see a reason to make a limit when we can just say
[2017-07-25 09:53:35] <Creati0n> "alright man, obviously this suggestion isn't going anywhere as is.  feel free to reopen it whenever you actually add something to it that makes it different from the last milliuon bumps you made"
[2017-07-25 10:36:24] <sir> I don't have anything against bumping threads there
[2017-07-25 10:36:46] <sir> It's just that if the thread didn't get any attention then it's probably bad
[2017-07-25 10:37:07] <sir> This auto-screenshot idea is bad and won't work
[2017-07-25 10:38:24] <Creati0n> agreed, but it's better than that one tori-booze suggestion
[2017-07-25 10:38:42] <Creati0n> might not hurt to just tell him that it won't be implemented, he's still keen on wanting it to happen
[2017-07-25 10:39:10] <sir> I think I said that it won't happen there
[2017-07-25 10:40:17] <sir> Well ok I didn't directly say that
[2017-07-25 10:40:39] <sir> But all the arguments against this idea imply that it's unlikely to be added
[2017-07-25 10:41:08] <sir> Considering I'm kiiiinda close to dev process and people know it
[2017-07-25 10:44:40] <Creati0n> fair, not saying that a post needs to be made, but a short query about it wouldn't be all too bad
[2017-07-25 10:44:56] <Creati0n> i'll poke that bumping rule up there if no one has anything against it