Advertisement
Krayfish

Krayfish Typing Declarations

Oct 16th, 2020 (edited)
481
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 12.01 KB | None | 0 0
  1. **TYPE ARGUMENTS** UPDATED 11/18/22
  2.  
  3. Enneagram: 936(145)
  4. I have settled on 9w1 core and was suggested to be 9w1 3w4 6w5 though typing services. I am under the impression that this is correct (or at least pretty close) as this resolves many of the issues I was running into typing within the system.
  5.  
  6. Essentially, I could write out a big ass essay for this, but 9w1 as a core is quite fitting. The most selling aspect of this is how much of my actual motivations have connected to anger rather than fear. Anger may be my most inconsistent emotion, resembling tides in it's presence (because I tend to repress most things), however what pushes me through life is constantly being irritated with the un-ideality of life and that desire to mold the world into an ideal where I am no longer angry or frustrated with what ruins my own comfort and that of those I hold dear. While rather embarrassing, triple attachment is pretty fitting. My personality is incredibly fluid and ill defined, catered to what I think will allow me to be successful and comfortable with life. I avoid life with activity and often require external pressures and goals in order to motivate myself and pursue my life. I have always been "a space cadet" who lives life half connected and half within my mental fantasies where I can play with ideas and engage with concepts in an internal space lacking risk and consequence. I love learning, analyzing, and thinking, but ironically am lacking the buzzing energy and fixation on fear as it would be defined in the head triad. While heavily doubtful, I am at my best and most naturals state when I am in a thoughtless flow state and am drawn to overthinking and the headspace primarily when I am doing poorly. My whole life has been about molding a self that will allow me to pursue what I want and to have autonomy though adapting to an environment I have no desire to engage in. This in a nutshell is the core of 93x.
  7.  
  8. As an aside, since I do know some focus exclusively on the Naranjo subtypes and enneagram, while I can still fit 9 somewhat within his original theory sp5 and 1 are the types that are most consistent with my behavior/how I would come across irl.
  9. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  10. Socionics: LII
  11. While not a "perfect fit" I think LII is probably the "best fit." Ne creative I think is most likely due having an angular thinking style. One of my few talents is looking at things from a variety of perspectives (especially those unconnected to myself) and rely on that ability to build a pool of logic/models that I can work off to move through life comfortably. It's easy for me to judge consequence because I can see what potential the things around me hold and work off of that in order to judge what seems most feasible and what doesn't (and move forward when possible, though I get stuck in the thinking phase because thinking is easier than doing). Se polR is also relatively fitting as well, as I have the presence of a ghost and often disappear into thin air while existing in plain space. I'm not forceful in the slightest and, while I have been called intimidating before, when I try to use the force of my will to manipulate the environment it is often half-hazard or not taken seriously. I am a thinker at best, pushing myself into action (unless I have a goal, then there's no problem) is a struggle and often extends into long term planning, resource allocation, and manipulation in order to pursue my goals. I'm more likely to make a long and detailed plan to avoid an obstacle then plow it down myself, which is why I think my Se is shit. I relate to Ni of course, but seem to value the Ne-Si axis above that I believe.
  12.  
  13. Ti dominance seems to show up in my necessity to break things down in order to do things and constantly have sets of models I can rely on to work though life. I spend a gross time creating these models by studying others like subjects and other systems I feel I must understand in order to progress through life and am nothing without these self constructed models. Many of them are models of people and emotions, as those are massive weakpoints in my life. I rely on gaining as many perspectives as possible and meshing those together in order to make my models general enough to move through to work through real life but also accurate and unbiased by myself and others (at least as much as I can, I'm no robot of course). I'm highly structured to an annoying degree and relate to the rule and structure orientation of LxI. Fe makes sense too, as I considered the possibility that I could be misordering the functions I figured I valued. I am capable of manipulating the emotional environment (mostly to reduce conflict and get people to agree with me so I can push my agenda) and, under stress/dire straights especially am pretty decent at doing that. My expression is erratic and inconsistent (to the point where people used to literally comment that I made them uneasy/peg me as a potential "school shooter" jokingly in passing because unless I'm friendly with you, random bursts of expression really catch people off guard I guess). I don't think I value Te-Fi because my Fi is literally the worst. I don't really have preferences for things and live primarily apathetically (mostly because as a child, having preferences was detrimental circumstantially). Relationships are a lost cause, as I don't prioritize them nor understand their dynamics. My behavior rarely changes between "close" and "non-close" friends because I don't pay attention to this aspect of relationships and don't generally value people enough in general (ie. attachment is pretty difficult in general, friends have asked before if I even like them).
  14. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  15. MBTI: INTP
  16. Much of the above (despite socionics and mbti being different theories with definitions only overlapping some places) could probably be used as an addition to my argument for INTP. It has come to my attention (though others debating with me and video based analysis) that I have an "imposter complex" when it comes to my Ti usage (by standard of mbti). My default stance for dealing with the world is through almost automatic analysis and generation of models. Much of my goals and weaknesses surround trying to be as "objective" and clearheaded as possible with the strong detriment of ignoring my feelings entirely and ignoring societal values such as connectivity and loyalty. My Si, while preferred and heavily relied upon, is almost exclusively used in a neurotic fashion, leading me to hyperfixate on generating structure and trying to predict the world around me through obtaining as much information as possible and using that to simulate possibilities. I enjoy and find ease in analyzing things from multiple perspectives and enjoy playing with ideas and theory to test the limits and expansive ability of ideas. When I allow myself to work off the information I have obtained from this "play," I am often more successful than when I resume my more normal, constipated and internalized prediction seeking attitude (since it is more congruent with my natural cognition, but devalued for some reason). It was mentioned how Fe is my demon and indeed, my almost neurotic analysis and patterning of people and their reactions, since is my only means of dealing with them in any form exhibits this well.
  17.  
  18. By dichotomy, this is fairly consistent as well. I am solidly an intovert and am consistently considered hyper logical (often to my detriment; Ethics and emotions are stunning blindspots I wish I did not have). S vs N is less defined, I can be fairly realistically and am often called practical. I have no attention to detail and am often a bit too quick to trust in theory though, so probably still a slight N lean. J vs P is rough since I have both ADHD and OCD, so you can just assume I'm near the middle on that one too.
  19. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  20. Objective Personality: CURRENTLY IN QUESTION
  21. I was typed by cognitive resolution as MF Ni-Te BSCP and am considering the possibility of this typing over the typical FF Ti-Si SCBP I both self typed as and was suggested to be by others. Lots to consider here and I don't expect to come to a conclusion soon.
  22. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  23. Instinctual Varients: sp/so
  24. I think I'm a pretty obvious sx blind by most merits. I struggle intensely and am somewhat averse to making attachments to just about anything, have a version of "enjoyable intensity" that is far below most's limits of enthuse, am deeply disconnected from desire and when initially reading sx descriptions thought they described a person who could not possibly exist. I am not "sx averse" in the sense that I enjoy intimacy, do crave thrill, and can connect with sx individuals in a way that has been satisfactory, and general can enjoy "sx" activities, I just have a much lower threshold for overwhelming than them. And of course if those sx things weren't there, I wouldn't feel lost. Sp/sx has been suggested by many friends, but I don't buy being soc blind for myself.
  25.  
  26. Sp vs soc is a bit harder because I am a drastically insecure individual and I would not consider myself healthy in either instinct. Regardless, sp seems to work most in front position because I am fixated on boundaries between myself and everything else. I am very aware of my mental resources and unwilling to compromise them for most things (unless they are required to maintain some other mental or physical resource). I'm pretty consistently considered grounded, work oriented, and aloof to others. I don't have much understanding of social dynamics, but I seem considerably more open to them than soc blind individuals. I basically live in a basement by mentality and am an "alien" to my own culture because I am too lazy to become interested in others or culture's pursuits, hence why I think sp/so is most fitting. On two occasions I was suggested to be a sp blind 5, but not being that "good" at sp doesn't mean it's not the biggest focus in my life of the three instincts.
  27. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  28. LVFE (4142)
  29.  
  30. Me typing as VLEF was probably a bit embarrassing, though I made good arguments for it haha. Anyone who has seen me on this site and elsewhere knows that I am the posterchild for 1L and am almost obnoxiously so. I am far less vocal and pushy irl, as the real world has consequences and I use typology arguments to let off steam. I am... Obnoxious and, despite the level of self doubt I experience with the thoughts I have, am often very confident with my ability to understand things, construct logical, and most things in regard to this element. I do not like to be obnoxious though, hence 1L-4
  31.  
  32. 2V-1 is described to be mentorlike and this is very fitting for me. Not that I am particularly an inspirational person or like... Anything but an armchair advisor, but I have typically enjoyed being in the position to help others through tutoring, teaching, and advisement. I am far too comfortable giving my advice and thoughts here, but have been consistently told that I am not pushy or obnoxious about this. I feel no urge to force people to do what I say and have a strong belief in autonomy, hence 2V over 1V
  33.  
  34. 3F-4 is no perfect fit, but it's as close as I am going to get. I am the type to anxiously deny my preoccupation on health, aesthetic, etc because I *really* do not have any natural intuition for these areas of life. I will arrogantly claim the F domain to be unimportant and not worth paying attention to will silently having a panic about this in my corner of shame.
  35.  
  36. 4E-2 is a pretty good fit. I actually enjoy talking about emotions because I'm pretty emotionally stupid. Discussions here are my favorite way to learn and I love hearing from others in this area. I trust others with the emotional realm more than I trust myself and do feel a lot of anxiety here, but I'm very comfortable with my lack of knowledge here and the fact that others could give my information here that could help me to be better.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement