Advertisement
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- 19:59 - Video my Games: i have a new pet peeve
- 19:59 - Video my Games: well i mean, a mutation of my usual pet peeve
- 19:59 - Video my Games: the pet peeve being people talking about misconceptions
- 19:59 - Video my Games: but i learned more about how fov works
- 20:00 - Video my Games: and now whenever i hear people say "I need at least x fov" etc, I get miffed
- 20:00 - Video my Games: what fov
- 20:00 - Video my Games: vertical? horizontal? the weird thing soruce games have?
- 20:00 - Faeris: The thing about FoV is
- 20:00 - Faeris: The value isn't exactly same across games
- 20:00 - Video my Games: but that's the thing
- 20:01 - Video my Games: it is, it just gets calculated differently
- 20:01 - Video my Games: in tf2, 90 fov is actually 74 vertical
- 20:01 - Video my Games: and horizontal fdepends on your aspect ratio
- 20:01 - Video my Games: many games use vertical
- 20:01 - Video my Games: but then 90 vertical would be roughly 110 in tf2
- 20:01 - Faeris: The thing is
- 20:01 - Faeris: honestly
- 20:02 - Faeris: As long as it doesn't look like I'm peering through a fucking keyhole
- 20:02 - Faeris: Like in Borderlands cuz fuck that game it has no FoV slider
- 20:02 - Faeris: Then I don't care
- 20:02 - Video my Games: optimally we should get a universal count
- 20:02 - Video my Games: but then people will complain
- 20:02 - Video my Games: that it's too low
- 20:02 - Video my Games: but it's not, it's just more accurate
- 20:02 - Video my Games: unless it is too low
- 20:02 - Video my Games: but ye i just dont like people saying "I want x fov", or "x fov is too low"
- 20:03 - Video my Games: but they dont specify what they mean
- 20:03 - Video my Games: they just say the numbers because those feel right in specific games
- 20:03 - Faeris: I always assumed it was just
- 20:03 - Faeris: Horizontal fov
- 20:03 - Video my Games: nah, it's vertical
- 20:03 - Faeris: Sorry I'm
- 20:03 - Video my Games: because horizontal changes with your aspect ratio
- 20:03 - Faeris: Being stupid
- 20:04 - Video my Games: but many games have some cumfuckery
- 20:04 - Video my Games: like tf2
- 20:04 - Video my Games: and i guess quake too
- 20:04 - Video my Games: for example in unity the measure is pure vertical fov
- 20:04 - Video my Games: so i set it to 110 because hey that felt nice in quake
- 20:04 - Video my Games: and its so fish eyes
- 20:05 - Video my Games: and then i find out quake actually was 90 vertical when it was 110 in settings
- 20:05 - Video my Games: its so dumb
- 20:05 - Video my Games: i suppose the framerate debate has lots of misconceptions too but at least the 60 mark has some solid grounding
- 20:06 - Faeris: the thing about frame rate is
- 20:06 - Video my Games: but a huge part of it is frame timing
- 20:06 - Faeris: The smoother it is, the more responsive a game is
- 20:06 - Faeris: Or should be, sorry
- 20:06 - Video my Games: well yes, but the reason why is a bit more involved
- 20:07 - Video my Games: so lets say you press mouse 1 to fire
- 20:07 - Video my Games: and ignoring the mouse lag etc
- 20:07 - Video my Games: lets assume the computer is at exactly 60fps
- 20:08 - Video my Games: one frame still takes 16.(6) miliseconds to display
- 20:08 - Video my Games: so that's the delay you're getting
- 20:08 - Video my Games: but let's say you have 120fps
- 20:08 - Video my Games: that makes each frame take 8.(3) miliseconds
- 20:08 - Video my Games: so even if your screen stil ldisplays 60
- 20:08 - Video my Games: it feels more responsive because the actual frame isnt that old
- 20:09 - Video my Games: so a lot of it is frame timing
- 20:09 - Video my Games: but you can't magically predict how long a frame takes to render outside a few cases, so it's best to just let it render as fast as possible
- 20:09 - Video my Games: and output the newest frame
- 20:09 - Video my Games: so 300fps still feels smoother on a 60hz monitor
- 20:10 - Video my Games: and if you get 60, the timing on the frames can be really uneven
- 20:10 - Video my Games: so a few frames might take longer or less than others
- 20:10 - Faeris: Man
- 20:10 - Video my Games: and that still feels jerky
- 20:10 - Faeris: Prof. Tom
- 20:10 - Video my Games: so you cant just say 60 makes things good
- 20:11 - Video my Games: but more is better generally
- 20:11 - Video my Games: but ye we need a universal fov count
- 20:12 - Video my Games: i vote vertical
- 20:12 - Video my Games: do i care too much
- 20:18 - Faeris: You know a lot
- 20:18 - Video my Games has changed their name to 6.9(4) miliseconds boy.
- 20:18 - Faeris: but I just think the general consensus is
- 20:19 - Faeris: "60 fps minimal, 90fov vertical"
- 20:19 - 6.9(4) miliseconds boy: what most people quote as 90 is often 74
- 20:19 - 6.9(4) miliseconds boy: 90 is where i like it, but it's already heavy fish eye
- 20:19 - 6.9(4) miliseconds boy: but ye, more = better
- 20:20 - 6.9(4) miliseconds boy: at least mroe choicew
- 20:20 - 6.9(4) miliseconds boy: more choice
- 20:20 - Faeris: Yeah for sure
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement