KEEP IT WIKIPEDIA RELATED ONLY, Keep on topic

==Evidence post==

More cases of misconduct can be found at http://wiki.gamergate.me/index.php?title=Wikipedia and http://gamergate.wikia.com/wiki/Wikipedia. Some of them fit the ArbCom issue and should be added whenever noticed. Administrator misconduct and involvement might also be worth adding to prevent them from unfairly affecting the dispute as "neutral" parties. The ones in question seem to be at least Acroterion, Dreadstar, Future Perfect At Sunrise, PhilKnight, Black Kite, DrMies, Gamaliel, Protonk and Ronhjones. Some of them such as Black Kite have collaborated with users like Tarc to edit the Gamergate article. Some of them have participated in referenced misconducts.

'''Tarc'''

Keeps insulting people, calls them misogynists because reasons, deletes complaints about edit warring and such
<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tarc&diff=624405877&oldid=624381306</ref>
<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tarc&diff=624797915&oldid=624767084</ref>
<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tarc&diff=626413652&oldid=626413371</ref>
<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tarc&diff=624281643&oldid=624251996</ref>
<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tarc&diff=623868917&oldid=623866721</ref>
<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tarc&diff=623869279&oldid=623868917</ref>

Deletes an ANI notice
<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tarc&diff=621385110&oldid=621261651</ref>

Got in trouble once for misrepresentation
<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive853#Misrepresentation_by_Tarc</ref>

Doesn't think being civil is a big deal
<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=624962825</ref>

POV pushing, says entirety of gamergate was centered on harassment of one female developer
<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=GamerGate&diff=625834745&oldid=625833966</ref>

Tries to delete information about GameJournoPros, even though it was well-sourced
<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gamergate_controversy&diff=627450462&oldid=627446884</ref>

'''Ryulong'''

Many of his misconducts such as the witch hunt are already well referenced and not needed here as clutter.

Has insisted on using using unreliable sources such as Boing Boing<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Gamergate_controversy#Anil_Dash</ref> and Buzzfeed. Buzzfeed mentions are currently removed from the GamerGate talk page so someone will need to check the history.

Has also insisted that reliable sources (according to the guidelines<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources#Self-published_sources_.28online_and_paper.29</ref><ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability#Newspaper_and_magazine_blogs</ref>) written by professional journalists are not to be included because they're in blog format.
''"Some news outlets host interactive columns they call blogs, and these may be acceptable as sources so long as the writers are professional journalists or are professionals in the field on which they write and the blog is subject to the news outlet's full editorial control"''

Ryulong being uncivil
<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:GamerGate&diff=626426679&oldid=626425940</ref>

Constantly tried to keep the lead that Gamergate is driven primarily by misogyny even though there were numerous sources saying it's about journalism
<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:GamerGate/Archive_3#Emphasis_on_Controversy suppress</ref>

Numerous sources saying it's about journalism
<ref>http://pastebin.com/86kuMkgB</ref>
<ref>http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2014/09/04/gamergate-a-closer-look-at-the-controversy-sweeping-video-games</ref>
<ref>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-life/11082629/Gamergate-Misogyny-death-threats-and-a-mob-of-angry-trolls-Inside-the-dark-world-of-video-games.html</ref>
<ref>http://www.brightsideofnews.com/2014/08/25/gamers-revolt-another-take-on-the-zoe-quinn-scandal</ref>
<ref>http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20140906VL200.html?chid=8</ref>
<ref>http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/bitwise/2014/08/zoe_quinn_harassment_a_letter_to_a_young_male_gamer.html</ref> Note: All of the sources in the first reference aren't appropriate for Wikipedia. It is merely a master list.

Frequently refuses to address his behavior, including a DRN
<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard/Archive_100#Talk:GamerGate</ref>

and a mediation
<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_mediation/GamerGate_(controversy)#Parties.27_agreement_to_mediation</ref>

'''NorthBySouthBaranof'''

Proof of NorthBySouthBaranof's misconducts and bad behaviour on Wikipedia.

Was accused of Wiki hounding
<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive851#Potential_wikihounding_by_NorthBySouthBaranof</ref>

Constantly censored information and discussion about Nathan Grayson, even though they were backed by reliable sources, because he didn't like it
<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gamergate_controversy&diff=624392905&oldid=624392777</ref>
<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gamergate_controversy&diff=624393930&oldid=624393843</ref>

Tried to remove post by Mundane Matt that showed proof of <redacted>
<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Zoe_Quinn&diff=623826402&oldid=623826181</ref>

Tried to reinsert a Cracked article written by Zoe Quinn AGAIN after it was already deleted, violates WP:BLPSELFPUB, WP:UNDUE, WP:NPOV. and WP:BLP
<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zoe_Quinn&diff=626450539&oldid=626450253</ref>

Got in an edit war where he reverted things nine times, complained about POV terms being used
<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RRArchive255#User:NorthBySouthBaranof_reported_by_User:Tutelary_.28Result:_protected_1_week.29</ref>

Then contradicted himself by using biased writing
<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:GamerGate&diff=626395547&oldid=626395517</ref>

Constantly tried to remove Eron's allegations against Zoe Quinn
<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:GamerGate&dir=prev&limit=500&action=history</ref>

Even though it was already discussed before that it could be sourced and used, also he thinks Slate is reliable
<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Zoe_Quinn&offset=&limit=500&action=history</ref>
<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive853#Zoe_Quinn_again</ref>

Was warned numerous times about his constant reverts and personal attacks, deleted all of them
<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NorthBySouthBaranof&diff=625755493&oldid=625752011</ref>
<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NorthBySouthBaranof&diff=625741932&oldid=625738328</ref>
<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NorthBySouthBaranof&diff=571164450&oldid=571164271</ref>
<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NorthBySouthBaranof&diff=564975736&oldid=564948996</ref>

More personal attacks
<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Zoe_Quinn/Archive_1#Reliable_Sources</ref>

Now he and '''Silver seren''' are quoting 8chan's users out of context. 8chan.co is also not a reliable source nor does a single post speak on the behalf of its userbase because anyone can write there anonymously. The two users could've written that themselves for all we know. 8chan's users' involvement with this doesn't undermine the complaints either, because they're referenced to Wikipedia. The first post of the notable thread said, quoting, "DIG UP ALL INFO POSSIBLE ON Ryulong, NorthBySouthBarnoff, TarainDC, and TheRedPenofDoom. '''Wiki related, we don't need twitter/tumblr/etc shit unless its related.'''"<ref>https://8chan.co/gg/res/471658.html</ref>

8chan and a huge demographic its users involved in GamerGate openly condemn harassment against him and others, regardless of the source, but it is also worth noting neither it or the sweet-talking towards the Arbitration Committee affect his misconducts and the matter at hand.