API tools faq
paste
Advertisement
Guest User

Untitled

a guest
Jan 31st, 2017
107
0
Never
Add comment
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 96.60 KB | None | 0 0
raw download clone embed print report
  1. Skip to ContentSkip to Wiki NavigationSkip to Site Navigation
  2. Games
  3. Movies
  4. TV
  5. Wikis
  6.  
  7. Search
  8.  
  9. Stevoawesome
  10. START A WIKI
  11. DPP Wiki
  12. On the Wiki
  13. Wiki Activity
  14. Random page
  15. Videos
  16. Images
  17. Episodes
  18. People
  19. Community
  20. Contribute
  21. General Discussion's wall > Should Gubra Lagima and The Door Handler Remain as Bureaucrats? (Deleted)
  22. The Gerudo Dragon
  23. The Gerudo Dragon deleted this thread because:
  24. No longer needed
  25. 00:27, March 3, 2016 Restore Thread
  26. The Gerudo Dragon
  27. Following 2 Kudos
  28. Should Gubra Lagima and The Door Handler Remain as Bureaucrats?
  29. The Gerudo Dragon
  30. No: They should be demoted by Wikia.
  31.  
  32. Yes: They should remain on the DP Wiki
  33.  
  34.  
  35.  
  36. Feel free to include further reasoning
  37. 03:28, February 28, 2016
  38. Eggs Rank
  39. 3 Kudos
  40. Eggs Rank
  41. No Bann him
  42. 03:29, February 28, 2016
  43. The Door Handler
  44.  
  45. The Door Handler
  46. We haven't broken any Wikia rules,you guys have blantantly gone against everything Ducksoup has said so Yes.
  47. 03:31, February 28, 2016
  48. Gubra Lagima
  49.  
  50. Gubra Lagima
  51. No: Gubra Lagima is being threatened with sexual assault by Bryan "Sword of Storms." Nobody should remain on a wiki that condones sexual assault.
  52. Screenshot 36463543525235
  53. 03:32, February 28, 2016
  54. Stevoawesome
  55. 3 Kudos
  56. Stevoawesome
  57. No: They should be demoted by Wikia.
  58.  
  59. They have been making edits that go against the views and spirit of the wiki and the owner and staff of the wiki want them gone. Even TJ from the Drunken Peasants himself said they need to go.
  60. 03:33, February 28, 2016
  61. SwordofStorms
  62. 2 Kudos
  63. SwordofStorms
  64. OH HELL NO!
  65.  
  66. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9o19CaOSuD8
  67. 03:34, February 28, 2016
  68. Gubra Lagima
  69.  
  70. Gubra Lagima
  71. reply to #6
  72. SwordofStorms wrote:
  73. OH HELL NO!
  74. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9o19CaOSuD8
  75. Screenshot 3646354345345
  76.  
  77. 03:38, February 28, 2016
  78. The Door Handler
  79.  
  80. The Door Handler
  81. reply to #7
  82. Gubra Lagima wrote:
  83. SwordofStorms wrote:
  84. OH HELL NO!
  85. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9o19CaOSuD8
  86. Screenshot 3646354345345
  87.  
  88. "United States"
  89.  
  90. DOXX
  91. 03:39, February 28, 2016
  92. Gubra Lagima
  93.  
  94. Gubra Lagima
  95. Let's dispel once and for all with this fiction that Bryan doesn't know what he's doing. He knows EXACTLY what he's doing. Bryan is undertaking a systematic effort to change this wiki, to make it more like the rest of Wikia. That's why he is starting this rape culture. It is a systematic effort to change the wiki. Liam is going to leave our children with what they deserve: the single greatest wiki in the history of the world.
  96. 03:40, February 28, 2016
  97. PaulsEgo
  98. 5 Kudos
  99. PaulsEgo
  100. I love this wiki. I see no reason why someone who clearly hates the show whould want to be an admin on a fan wiki, or why people would want him there -other than to fuck the place up.
  101. 03:46, February 28, 2016
  102. Gubra Lagima
  103.  
  104. Gubra Lagima
  105. reply to #10
  106. PaulsEgo wrote:
  107. I love this wiki. I see no reason why someone who clearly hates the show whould want to be an admin on a fan wiki, or why people would want him there -other than to fuck the place up.
  108. Let's dispel once and for all with this fiction that Paul can't drive across Phoenix in an hour. He knows EXACTLY how big Phoenix is. Gubra is undertaking a systematic effort to change the size of Phoenix, to make it more like Los Angeles. That's why he is sspreading these lies. Paul is going to leave our children with what they deserve: the single smallest Phoenix, Arizona in the history of the world.
  109. 03:48, February 28, 2016
  110. Some Horrible Schmuck
  111. 1 Kudos
  112. Some Horrible Schmuck
  113. I stand proudly by Gubra and Door Handler as this is an abuse of wikia power to silence dissent.
  114. 03:49, February 28, 2016
  115. The Door Handler
  116.  
  117. The Door Handler
  118. Screenshot 2016-02-28-03-51-30
  119. http://community.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Mira_Laime/How_to_Deal_With_a_Bad_Bureaucrat?
  120. If the bureaucrat in question or anyone else interferes with the voting in any way, please ask Wikia staff atSpecial:Contact for help.
  121. 03:52, February 28, 2016
  122. Sinistra Henry Hades
  123. 2 Kudos
  124. Sinistra Henry Hades
  125. GubraLogic
  126. This picture details my main criticism of Gubra. I know that it is not the only issue people have with him, but it is the one that I find completely unacceptable. I vote no.
  127. 03:53, February 28, 2016
  128. Stevoawesome
  129.  
  130. Stevoawesome
  131. You have already voiced your opinion. All those other posts are just useless spam.
  132. 03:53, February 28, 2016
  133. Eggs Rank
  134.  
  135. Eggs Rank
  136. reply to #13
  137. The Door Handler wrote:
  138. Screenshot 2016-02-28-03-51-30
  139. http://community.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Mira_Laime/How_to_Deal_With_a_Bad_Bureaucrat?
  140. If the bureaucrat in question or anyone else interferes with the voting in any way, please ask Wikia staff atSpecial:Contact for help.
  141. You are spamming the thread and is doxxing and posting info about SOS.
  142. 03:56, February 28, 2016
  143. Quote More
  144. The Door Handler
  145.  
  146. The Door Handler
  147. "Interferes" "In any way". This includes deletion of our comments.
  148. 03:57, February 28, 2016
  149. The Door Handler
  150.  
  151. The Door Handler
  152. We were not spamming or doxxing. Our comments never mentioned who's Skype that was.
  153. 03:59, February 28, 2016
  154. Some Horrible Schmuck
  155.  
  156. Some Horrible Schmuck
  157. I'd also add the only person guilty of the rule breaking prescribed to Gubra and DH have all been committed in the past by Eggs Rank.
  158.  
  159. If anyone should be demoted, it's him for abusing his powers.
  160. 04:00, February 28, 2016
  161. Gubra Lagima
  162.  
  163. Gubra Lagima
  164. Eggs Rank posted Vigilant Christian and Vegan Gains' IP addresses in the chat months ago. I wanted to ban him permanently, but the other staff wouldn't allow it. This is the culture of doxxing that Gerudo Dragon approves and oversees every single day.
  165. 04:03, February 28, 2016
  166. Some Horrible Schmuck
  167.  
  168. Some Horrible Schmuck
  169. Let's dispel once and for all with this fiction that Eggs doesn't know what he's doing. He knows EXACTLY what he's doing. Eggs is undertaking a systematic effort to change this wiki, to make it more like Wikia. That's why he is spreading these lies. Door Handler is going to leave our children with what they deserve: the best and most powerful wiki in the history of Wikia.
  170. Edited by Some Horrible Schmuck 04:05, February 28, 2016
  171. The Door Handler
  172.  
  173. The Door Handler
  174. Eggs Rank has also demoted and banned users this past week for no reason including myself.
  175. Screenshot 2016-02-25-15-48-04
  176. Screenshot 2016-02-27-18-42-05
  177. 04:06, February 28, 2016
  178. Some Horrible Schmuck
  179.  
  180. Some Horrible Schmuck
  181. I too was banned by Eggs this week. His reasons were completely arbitrary and only served to justify silencing me.
  182. Edited by Some Horrible Schmuck 04:08, February 28, 2016
  183. Eggs Rank
  184.  
  185. Eggs Rank
  186. Uh DH you banned me for a year for being rude.
  187. 04:10, February 28, 2016
  188. Some Horrible Schmuck
  189.  
  190. Some Horrible Schmuck
  191. Eggs Ban
  192. 04:13, February 28, 2016
  193. The Door Handler
  194.  
  195. The Door Handler
  196. You used profanity and racism. I was well within my rights to do so. You banned Schmuck and Xyele for no reason, given that they hadn't posted in weeks.
  197. 04:13, February 28, 2016
  198. Gubra Lagima
  199.  
  200. Gubra Lagima
  201. In addition to being demoted by Eggs this week with no justification, he reverted several substantive edits of mine, also without justification or explanation. He is demonstrating all of the symptoms of a "bad bureaucrat."
  202. Screenshot 9673472w6
  203. File:Screenshot 67357.png
  204. 04:14, February 28, 2016
  205. Eggs Rank
  206.  
  207. Eggs Rank
  208. You were adding false information and making edits that every admin except Gubra and DH disaprove of.
  209. 04:15, February 28, 2016
  210. Crazypayne93
  211. 1 Kudos
  212. Crazypayne93
  213. HEEEEEEEEEELLL NO
  214.  
  215. [1]
  216. 04:15, February 28, 2016
  217. The Door Handler
  218.  
  219. The Door Handler
  220. Find the false information Schmuck added. No basis in reality. Within the day before he was banned.
  221. 04:16, February 28, 2016
  222. Gubra Lagima
  223.  
  224. Gubra Lagima
  225. None of us added false information to my knowledge. You have doxed public figures, banned people without justification, and done just about everything else a bad bureaucrat would do. You were demoted for a long time due to the IP address dox when the wiki was under my supervision, but clearly you have not learned your lesson. You continue to exhibit unacceptable behavior, and 99.9% of wikis would have banned you long ago.
  226. 04:17, February 28, 2016
  227. Some Horrible Schmuck
  228.  
  229. Some Horrible Schmuck
  230. reply to #28
  231. Eggs Rank wrote: You were adding false information and making edits that every admin except Gubra and DH disaprove of.
  232. No. That's not why you did it. You specifically designated the ban for "inserting false information". I did no such thing. Everything I've posted has either been entirely factually accurate when it is needed or up to opinion/satire when it is needed.
  233. 04:17, February 28, 2016
  234. Some Horrible Schmuck
  235.  
  236. Some Horrible Schmuck
  237. What does it say about a wiki that the innocent are hanged for crimes they are accused of just because of political dissention and inflated claims, but the figure of most guilt leads the charge to persecution and faces no repercussions for his violations?
  238. 04:21, February 28, 2016
  239. The Door Handler
  240.  
  241. The Door Handler
  242. reply to #29
  243. Crazypayne93 wrote:
  244. HEEEEEEEEEELLL NO
  245. [1]
  246. "Once a good part of your community's active users voted"
  247.  
  248. You haven't been active in 6 months so this vote is illegible due to your inactivity.
  249. Screenshot 2016-02-28-04-22-56
  250. 04:22, February 28, 2016
  251. Gubra Lagima
  252.  
  253. Gubra Lagima
  254. I thought that everyone in the western world learned that mob rule does not work after the horrors of the French Revolution. Seems like this wiki is still living in the 19th century
  255. 04:23, February 28, 2016
  256. Some Horrible Schmuck
  257.  
  258. Some Horrible Schmuck
  259. Mob rule > Wikia Guidelines
  260.  
  261. Is that the precedents you all are setting for yourselves?
  262. Edited by Some Horrible Schmuck 04:27, February 28, 2016
  263. Crazypayne93
  264.  
  265. Crazypayne93
  266. reply to #34
  267. The Door Handler wrote:
  268. Crazypayne93 wrote:
  269. HEEEEEEEEEELLL NO
  270. [1]
  271. "Once a good part of your community's active users voted" You haven't been active in 6 months so this vote is illegible due to your inactivity.
  272. Screenshot 2016-02-28-04-22-56
  273.  
  274.  
  275.  
  276.  
  277. Well, I'm sorry that my life doesn't revolve around the damn wiki.
  278. 04:27, February 28, 2016
  279. Gubra Lagima
  280.  
  281. Gubra Lagima
  282. reply to #37
  283. Crazypayne93 wrote:
  284. The Door Handler wrote:
  285. Crazypayne93 wrote:
  286. HEEEEEEEEEELLL NO
  287. [1]
  288. "Once a good part of your community's active users voted" You haven't been active in 6 months so this vote is illegible due to your inactivity.
  289. Screenshot 2016-02-28-04-22-56
  290.  
  291.  
  292.  
  293. Well, I'm sorry that my life doesn't revolve around the damn wiki.
  294. Clearly our detractors are bringing inactive users to the wiki through a third party communications app, possibly Skype. The aim is clearly to have us banned through illegitimate means. This entire event can and must be considered null and void if this is the case.
  295. 04:31, February 28, 2016
  296. Sharkfang
  297. 1 Kudos
  298. Sharkfang
  299. reply to #37
  300. Crazypayne93 wrote:
  301. The Door Handler wrote:
  302. Crazypayne93 wrote:
  303. HEEEEEEEEEELLL NO
  304. [1]
  305. "Once a good part of your community's active users voted" You haven't been active in 6 months so this vote is illegible due to your inactivity.
  306. Screenshot 2016-02-28-04-22-56
  307.  
  308.  
  309.  
  310. Well, I'm sorry that my life doesn't revolve around the damn wiki.
  311. And mine doesn't as well anymore, but based on my past experience here and scrolling through the stuff going on very recently for the past hour after being told about it by someone, I vote no.
  312.  
  313. (And no, I'm not coming back, and yes, I know this will create drama, but I've got to do what I've got to do.)
  314. 04:34, February 28, 2016
  315. Some Horrible Schmuck
  316.  
  317. Some Horrible Schmuck
  318. This is a faux vote. A mere façade to justify a decision the elite have already prescribed! And while I have the floor,
  319.  
  320. Let's dispel once and for all with this fiction that EggHead doesn't know what he's doing. He knows EXACTLY what he's doing. EggHead is undertaking a systematic effort to change this wiki, to make it more like Wikia. That's why he is spreading these lies. Gubra is going to leave our children with what they deserve: the best and most powerful wiki in the history of Wikia.
  321. 04:34, February 28, 2016
  322. Gubra Lagima
  323.  
  324. Gubra Lagima
  325. reply to #39
  326. Sharkfang wrote:
  327. Crazypayne93 wrote:
  328. The Door Handler wrote:
  329. Crazypayne93 wrote:
  330. HEEEEEEEEEELLL NO
  331. [1]
  332. "Once a good part of your community's active users voted"You haven't been active in 6 months so this vote is illegible due to your inactivity.
  333. Screenshot 2016-02-28-04-22-56
  334.  
  335.  
  336. Well, I'm sorry that my life doesn't revolve around the damn wiki.
  337. And mine doesn't as well anymore, but based on my past experience here and scrolling through the stuff going on very recently for the past hour after being told about it by someone, I vote no.
  338. (And no, I'm not coming back, and yes, I know this will create drama, but I've got to do what I've got to do.)
  339. More long-inactive users who inexplicably know about this referendum and are conveniently reappearing. This is an illegitimate sham, and I will not stand for it.
  340. 04:36, February 28, 2016
  341. SwordofStorms
  342.  
  343. SwordofStorms
  344. reply to #41
  345. Gubra Lagima wrote:
  346. Sharkfang wrote:
  347. Crazypayne93 wrote:
  348. The Door Handler wrote:
  349. Crazypayne93 wrote:
  350. HEEEEEEEEEELLL NO
  351. [1]
  352. "Once a good part of your community's active users voted"You haven't been active in 6 months so this vote is illegible due to your inactivity.
  353. Screenshot 2016-02-28-04-22-56
  354.  
  355. Well, I'm sorry that my life doesn't revolve around the damn wiki.
  356. And mine doesn't as well anymore, but based on my past experience here and scrolling through the stuff going on very recently for the past hour after being told about it by someone, I vote no.
  357. (And no, I'm not coming back, and yes, I know this will create drama, but I've got to do what I've got to do.)
  358. More long-inactive users who inexplicably know about this referendum and are conveniently reappearing. This is an illegitimate sham, and I will not stand for it.
  359. Where did they say that it had to be active users fam? Just members of the community, which they are are were.
  360. 04:37, February 28, 2016
  361. Crazypayne93
  362.  
  363. Crazypayne93
  364. reply to #39
  365. Sharkfang wrote:
  366. Crazypayne93 wrote:
  367. The Door Handler wrote:
  368. Crazypayne93 wrote:
  369. HEEEEEEEEEELLL NO
  370. [1]
  371. "Once a good part of your community's active users voted"You haven't been active in 6 months so this vote is illegible due to your inactivity.
  372. Screenshot 2016-02-28-04-22-56
  373.  
  374.  
  375. Well, I'm sorry that my life doesn't revolve around the damn wiki.
  376. And mine doesn't as well anymore, but based on my past experience here and scrolling through the stuff going on very recently for the past hour after being told about it by someone, I vote no.
  377. (And no, I'm not coming back, and yes, I know this will create drama, but I've got to do what I've got to do.)
  378.  
  379.  
  380. Epic clap is epic
  381. 04:37, February 28, 2016
  382. The Door Handler
  383.  
  384. The Door Handler
  385. reply to #42
  386. SwordofStorms wrote:
  387. Gubra Lagima wrote:
  388. Sharkfang wrote:
  389. Crazypayne93 wrote:
  390. The Door Handler wrote:
  391. Crazypayne93 wrote:
  392. HEEEEEEEEEELLL NO
  393. [1]
  394. "Once a good part of your community's active users voted"You haven't been active in 6 months so this vote is illegible due to your inactivity.
  395. Screenshot 2016-02-28-04-22-56
  396.  
  397. Well, I'm sorry that my life doesn't revolve around the damn wiki.
  398. And mine doesn't as well anymore, but based on my past experience here and scrolling through the stuff going on very recently for the past hour after being told about it by someone, I vote no.
  399. (And no, I'm not coming back, and yes, I know this will create drama, but I've got to do what I've got to do.)
  400. More long-inactive users who inexplicably know about this referendum and are conveniently reappearing. This is an illegitimate sham, and I will not stand for it.
  401. Where did they say that it had to be active users fam? Just members of the community, which they are are were.
  402. http://community.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Mira_Laime/How_to_Deal_With_a_Bad_Bureaucrat?
  403.  
  404. "part of your community's active users voted"
  405. 04:41, February 28, 2016
  406. SwordofStorms
  407.  
  408. SwordofStorms
  409. reply to #44
  410. The Door Handler wrote:
  411. SwordofStorms wrote:
  412. Gubra Lagima wrote:
  413. Sharkfang wrote:
  414. Crazypayne93 wrote:
  415. The Door Handler wrote:
  416. Crazypayne93 wrote:
  417. HEEEEEEEEEELLL NO
  418. [1]
  419. "Once a good part of your community's active users voted"You haven't been active in 6 months so this vote is illegible due to your inactivity.
  420. Screenshot 2016-02-28-04-22-56
  421.  
  422. Well, I'm sorry that my life doesn't revolve around the damn wiki.
  423. And mine doesn't as well anymore, but based on my past experience here and scrolling through the stuff going on very recently for the past hour after being told about it by someone, I vote no.
  424. (And no, I'm not coming back, and yes, I know this will create drama, but I've got to do what I've got to do.)
  425. More long-inactive users who inexplicably know about this referendum and are conveniently reappearing. This is an illegitimate sham, and I will not stand for it.
  426. Where did they say that it had to be active users fam? Just members of the community, which they are are were.
  427. http://community.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Mira_Laime/How_to_Deal_With_a_Bad_Bureaucrat?
  428. "part of your community's active users voted"
  429. Okay, even if their votes don't count, we're still winning by a fair margine. 3v5.
  430. 04:44, February 28, 2016
  431. Stevoawesome
  432.  
  433. Stevoawesome
  434. http://drunken-peasants-podcast.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:22678
  435. 04:45, February 28, 2016
  436. Gubra Lagima
  437.  
  438. Gubra Lagima
  439. We have no idea who voted on this poll. Any of you could have used sock accounts to vote multiple times, or brought in more inactive users to sway the vote. This is an absolute miscarriage of justice.
  440. 04:45, February 28, 2016
  441. SwordofStorms
  442.  
  443. SwordofStorms
  444. reply to #47
  445. Gubra Lagima wrote:
  446. We have no idea who voted on this poll. Any of you could have used sock accounts to vote multiple times, or brought in more inactive users to sway the vote. This is an absolute miscarriage of justice.
  447. Do you have a better way? Of doing it then?
  448. 05:02, February 28, 2016
  449. Gatack
  450.  
  451. Gatack
  452. I would vote but I don't know who he is. I don't want to vote on something I'm i'll informed on.
  453. 05:03, February 28, 2016
  454. Gubra Lagima
  455.  
  456. Gubra Lagima
  457. reply to #48
  458. SwordofStorms wrote:
  459. Gubra Lagima wrote:
  460. We have no idea who voted on this poll. Any of you could have used sock accounts to vote multiple times, or brought in more inactive users to sway the vote. This is an absolute miscarriage of justice.
  461. Do you have a better way? Of doing it then?
  462. A jury trial where the evidence is laid out in an objective manner and 6-12 members of an impartial third party decide whether we've broken any rules.
  463. 05:05, February 28, 2016
  464. Eggs Rank
  465.  
  466. Eggs Rank
  467. reply to #50
  468. Gubra Lagima wrote:
  469. SwordofStorms wrote:
  470. Gubra Lagima wrote:
  471. We have no idea who voted on this poll. Any of you could have used sock accounts to vote multiple times, or brought in more inactive users to sway the vote. This is an absolute miscarriage of justice.
  472. Do you have a better way? Of doing it then?
  473. A jury trial where the evidence is laid out in an objective manner and 6-12 members of an impartial third party decide whether we've broken any rules.
  474. Fine. You can go on Drunken Recap and we'll bring 6 members of an impartial third party
  475. 05:26, February 28, 2016
  476. Gubra Lagima
  477.  
  478. Gubra Lagima
  479. reply to #51
  480. Eggs Rank wrote:
  481. Gubra Lagima wrote:
  482. SwordofStorms wrote:
  483. Gubra Lagima wrote:
  484. We have no idea who voted on this poll. Any of you could have used sock accounts to vote multiple times, or brought in more inactive users to sway the vote. This is an absolute miscarriage of justice.
  485. Do you have a better way? Of doing it then?
  486. A jury trial where the evidence is laid out in an objective manner and 6-12 members of an impartial third party decide whether we've broken any rules.
  487. Fine. You can go on Drunken Recap and we'll bring 6 members of an impartial third party
  488. I'd rather be burned alive as a witch than go on your program.
  489. 05:29, February 28, 2016
  490. FalseShepherd
  491. 1 Kudos
  492. FalseShepherd
  493. Enough with this. Can everyone who the founder wants gone leave and make their own wiki so everyone can get back to editing and we don't have to deal with unproductive atmosphere being created right now?
  494. 06:10, February 28, 2016
  495. Gubra Lagima
  496.  
  497. Gubra Lagima
  498. reply to #53
  499. FalseShepherd wrote:
  500. Enough with this. Can everyone who the founder wants gone leave and make their own wiki so everyone can get back to editing and we don't have to deal with unproductive atmosphere being created right now?
  501. I'm not the one creating the unproductive atmosphere. I was producing content, and then my edits began to be deleted by Gerudo and his cronies. I'm standing up for the principles that the wiki was initially based upon, even if nobody else will.
  502. 06:12, February 28, 2016
  503. FalseShepherd
  504.  
  505. FalseShepherd
  506. reply to #10
  507. PaulsEgo wrote:
  508. I love this wiki. I see no reason why someone who clearly hates the show whould want to be an admin on a fan wiki, or why people would want him there -other than to fuck the place up.
  509. This goes to show that the very people this wiki is about do not approve of Gubra or DH being here. TJ doesn't want you here, he told me himself.
  510.  
  511. Even Vadim Newquist has said that he doesn't approve of you being here.
  512.  
  513.  
  514.  
  515.  
  516. So can you just leave? Staying is completely counterproductive and the comment sections of these pills prove that
  517. 06:16, February 28, 2016
  518. Gubra Lagima
  519.  
  520. Gubra Lagima
  521. reply to #55
  522. FalseShepherd wrote:
  523. PaulsEgo wrote:
  524. I love this wiki. I see no reason why someone who clearly hates the show whould want to be an admin on a fan wiki, or why people would want him there -other than to fuck the place up.
  525. This goes to show that the very people this wiki is about do not approve of Gubra or DH being here. TJ doesn't want you here, he told me himself.
  526. Even Vadim Newquist has said that he doesn't approve of you being here.
  527.  
  528.  
  529.  
  530.  
  531. So can you just leave? Staying is completely counterproductive and the comment sections of these pills prove that
  532. Let me propose a deal. I'll leave the wiki once Paul drives across Phoenix in an hour. Does that sound fair?
  533. 06:18, February 28, 2016
  534. FalseShepherd
  535.  
  536. FalseShepherd
  537. reply to #54
  538. Gubra Lagima wrote:
  539. FalseShepherd wrote:
  540. Enough with this. Can everyone who the founder wants gone leave and make their own wiki so everyone can get back to editing and we don't have to deal with unproductive atmosphere being created right now?
  541. I'm not the one creating the unproductive atmosphere. I was producing content, and then my edits began to be deleted by Gerudo and his cronies. I'm standing up for the principles that the wiki was initially based upon, even if nobody else will.
  542. What the founder says goes, goes. The edits you've made were clearly not the ones anyone wanted. We're not pro-life, neither is DP, so don't write pro-life stuff. Simple
  543. 06:19, February 28, 2016
  544. Gubra Lagima
  545.  
  546. Gubra Lagima
  547. reply to #57
  548. FalseShepherd wrote:
  549. Gubra Lagima wrote:
  550. FalseShepherd wrote:
  551. Enough with this. Can everyone who the founder wants gone leave and make their own wiki so everyone can get back to editing and we don't have to deal with unproductive atmosphere being created right now?
  552. I'm not the one creating the unproductive atmosphere. I was producing content, and then my edits began to be deleted by Gerudo and his cronies. I'm standing up for the principles that the wiki was initially based upon, even if nobody else will.
  553. What the founder says goes, goes. The edits you've made were clearly not the ones anyone wanted. We're not pro-life, neither is DP, so don't write pro-life stuff. Simple
  554. I'll stop writing pro-life stuff once Paul drives across Phoenix in an hour. Maybe he can rent a clown car and take the wiki staff with him. It can be a whole romantic getaway.
  555. 06:20, February 28, 2016
  556. Some Horrible Schmuck
  557.  
  558. Some Horrible Schmuck
  559. Look False,
  560.  
  561. You're a nice guy
  562.  
  563. But you're an asshole
  564.  
  565. You're fired
  566. 06:32, February 28, 2016
  567. Gubra Lagima
  568.  
  569. Gubra Lagima
  570. Please False needs this job. False needs pizza time.
  571. 06:33, February 28, 2016
  572. Some Horrible Schmuck
  573.  
  574. Some Horrible Schmuck
  575. Last chance
  576. 06:35, February 28, 2016
  577. Some Horrible Schmuck
  578.  
  579. Some Horrible Schmuck
  580. GOOOOOOOOoooOOOOooooOOOOOOOOO
  581. 06:36, February 28, 2016
  582. Some Horrible Schmuck
  583.  
  584. Some Horrible Schmuck
  585. False Shepherd
  586.  
  587. Gubra has told me about you. He says you're brilliant. He also says you suck cock.
  588.  
  589. Sucking cock isn't enough, young man. Cock sucking isn't a privilege, it's a gift. And you use it for the good of mankind.
  590. 06:39, February 28, 2016
  591. Gubra Lagima
  592.  
  593. Gubra Lagima
  594. Schmick, you don't have the ass to justify this loan.
  595. 06:41, February 28, 2016
  596. Some Horrible Schmuck
  597.  
  598. Some Horrible Schmuck
  599. Gubra, bring me a violin
  600. 06:42, February 28, 2016
  601. Gubra Lagima
  602.  
  603. Gubra Lagima
  604. I'll give you 150
  605. 06:44, February 28, 2016
  606. Some Horrible Schmuck
  607.  
  608. Some Horrible Schmuck
  609. 300
  610. 06:45, February 28, 2016
  611. Gubra Lagima
  612.  
  613. Gubra Lagima
  614. I'll give you 100
  615. 06:47, February 28, 2016
  616. Some Horrible Schmuck
  617.  
  618. Some Horrible Schmuck
  619. 300
  620. 06:48, February 28, 2016
  621. Gubra Lagima
  622.  
  623. Gubra Lagima
  624. I'll give you 50
  625. 06:50, February 28, 2016
  626. Some Horrible Schmuck
  627.  
  628. Some Horrible Schmuck
  629. 300
  630. 06:54, February 28, 2016
  631. Gubra Lagima
  632.  
  633. Gubra Lagima
  634. I'll give you cooked steak
  635. 06:55, February 28, 2016
  636. Some Horrible Schmuck
  637.  
  638. Some Horrible Schmuck
  639. Gubra, every night. Until I find False IRL, it's 24/7//7/27/4/7
  640. 06:58, February 28, 2016
  641. Gubra Lagima
  642.  
  643. Gubra Lagima
  644. He stole your frisbee
  645. 06:59, February 28, 2016
  646. Some Horrible Schmuck
  647.  
  648. Some Horrible Schmuck
  649. I love my frisbee
  650. 07:01, February 28, 2016
  651. PaulsEgo
  652. 2 Kudos
  653. PaulsEgo
  654. Gubra, you admitted to me privately over a month ago that you no longer watch, enjoy, or care about the show. Given that fact, what relevant edits / content could you possibly adding to a wiki ABOUT THE FUCKING SHOW.
  655.  
  656. Your edgy, unfunny, irrelevant comments here highlight this problem, and show you for what you are: a butthurt, whiney faggot who wont just leave because the negative attention you get here is better than the zero attention you'd garner elsewhere.
  657.  
  658. Fuck off to some other show's wiki and try and add completely irellevant, contrary shit while banning friends of the show for simple disagreements. See how long you stay on staff there.
  659.  
  660. It's sad that you're still here, Gubra. Honestly. Straight up fucking sad. Take the butthurt brigade elsewhere and create a pro-life anti-dP wiki. I'm sure it'll blow the fuck up, man. Failing that, stop being fucking pitiful and leave with the tiny shred of dignity you might keep in doing so.
  661. 00:47, February 29, 2016
  662. The Door Handler
  663.  
  664. The Door Handler
  665. It's funny seeing someone calling someone else edgy when they themselves can't go a paragraph without saying the word "fuck".
  666. 00:50, February 29, 2016
  667. Gubra Lagima
  668.  
  669. Gubra Lagima
  670. reply to #76
  671. PaulsEgo wrote:
  672. Gubra, you admitted to me privately over a month ago that you no longer watch, enjoy, or care about the show. Given that fact, what relevant edits / content could you possibly adding to a wiki ABOUT THE FUCKING SHOW.
  673. Your edgy, unfunny, irrelevant comments here highlight this problem, and show you for what you are: a butthurt, whiney faggot who wont just leave because the negative attention you get here is better than the zero attention you'd garner elsewhere.
  674.  
  675. Fuck off to some other show's wiki and try and add completely irellevant, contrary shit while banning friends of the show for simple disagreements. See how long you stay on staff there.
  676.  
  677. It's sad that you're still here, Gubra. Honestly. Straight up fucking sad. Take the butthurt brigade elsewhere and create a pro-life anti-dP wiki. I'm sure it'll blow the fuck up, man. Failing that, stop being fucking pitiful and leave with the tiny shred of dignity you might keep in doing so.
  678. You got me Paul. 100% accurate commentary on my life. Now, all you have to do is drive across Phoenix in an hour and I will leave the wiki voluntarily.
  679. 00:51, February 29, 2016
  680. The Gerudo Dragon
  681. 1 Kudos
  682. The Gerudo Dragon
  683. All talk and no substance as per the usual. What a fucking charade. No need to address what was actually said, simply bullshit around it and deem yourself on top. Sickening.
  684. 00:59, February 29, 2016
  685. SwordofStorms
  686.  
  687. SwordofStorms
  688. reply to #78
  689. Gubra Lagima wrote:
  690. PaulsEgo wrote:
  691. Gubra, you admitted to me privately over a month ago that you no longer watch, enjoy, or care about the show. Given that fact, what relevant edits / content could you possibly adding to a wiki ABOUT THE FUCKING SHOW.
  692. Your edgy, unfunny, irrelevant comments here highlight this problem, and show you for what you are: a butthurt, whiney faggot who wont just leave because the negative attention you get here is better than the zero attention you'd garner elsewhere.
  693.  
  694. Fuck off to some other show's wiki and try and add completely irellevant, contrary shit while banning friends of the show for simple disagreements. See how long you stay on staff there.
  695.  
  696. It's sad that you're still here, Gubra. Honestly. Straight up fucking sad. Take the butthurt brigade elsewhere and create a pro-life anti-dP wiki. I'm sure it'll blow the fuck up, man. Failing that, stop being fucking pitiful and leave with the tiny shred of dignity you might keep in doing so.
  697. You got me Paul. 100% accurate commentary on my life. Now, all you have to do is drive across Phoenix in an hour and I will leave the wiki voluntarily.
  698. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tWC5qtfby4
  699. 01:05, February 29, 2016
  700. PaulsEgo
  701.  
  702. PaulsEgo
  703. reply to #78
  704. Gubra Lagima wrote:
  705. You got me Paul. 100% accurate commentary on my life.
  706. Trust me. I'm aware. I just re-read our little discourse via twitter DM. I'm dead on balls correct about you. Months later and you're STILL here? Still actively shitting up a wiki you don't give a fuck about? Still weeping openly in the throes of your persecution complex?
  707.  
  708. It must suck to be reduced to trying to force memes in your own "should this guy be fired" thread. What a sad spot to be in. Unable to answer critique, left with nothing but unfunny, inside jokes between your one and only friend...
  709.  
  710. This is a hell of a job interview you're putting on here, Gubs. Can we promote this guy ASAP? What a fabulous candidate for admin. Hates the show, is observably dumb, is unfunny, is desperate for attention of any kind...man, you're almost TOO good for this position.
  711.  
  712. INB4 "another "drive across Phoenix" zinger.
  713. 01:07, February 29, 2016
  714. The Door Handler
  715.  
  716. The Door Handler
  717. "Unable to answer critique, left with nothing but unfunny, inside jokes between your one and only friend..."
  718.  
  719. >Continues to make the same Brett Keane "Situation" and "Individual" jokes for the past 50 or so episodes.
  720. 01:12, February 29, 2016
  721. Gubra Lagima
  722.  
  723. Gubra Lagima
  724. If the ever-so-eloquent Paul thinks that I'm an 'edgy faggot loser,' that's fine. It's ironic, considering DP's brand of humor, but fine. You can't point to any rules that I've broken, because I haven't broken any. I, however, can point to any number of rules that you and several other staff members have broken. I honestly don't want to get the wiki deleted, so I won't post any of my evidence unless I have to. However, if my account is threatened with a permaban or deletion, I'll do what I have to.
  725.  
  726. Paul, you clearly don't know the entire story, and I'm 100% sure that you won't listen to anything I have to say, so I'll keep it short. I was not the person who wrote the 'evil pro-life propaganda' on the abortion page. I have not banned anyone because they disagree with me. I banned one person for less than an hour, but it was because he was removing edits I made and I wanted to talk to him about it. If he simply would have disagreed with me instead of covering up my edits, I wouldn't have taken any action against him.
  727.  
  728. None of the staff have pointed to a single rule I have broken. If being hated by Paul makes me banworthy in the eyes of Wikia, that's a conversation we can have. Until then, I'm going to need concrete evidence that I did anything wrong before I leave the wiki. <3
  729. 01:15, February 29, 2016
  730. Gubra Lagima
  731.  
  732. Gubra Lagima
  733. reply to #81
  734. PaulsEgo wrote:
  735. Gubra Lagima wrote:
  736. You got me Paul. 100% accurate commentary on my life.
  737. Trust me. I'm aware. I just re-read our little discourse via twitter DM. I'm dead on balls correct about you. Months later and you're STILL here? Still actively shitting up a wiki you don't give a fuck about? Still weeping openly in the throes of your persecution complex?
  738. It must suck to be reduced to trying to force memes in your own "should this guy be fired" thread. What a sad spot to be in. Unable to answer critique, left with nothing but unfunny, inside jokes between your one and only friend...
  739.  
  740. This is a hell of a job interview you're putting on here, Gubs. Can we promote this guy ASAP? What a fabulous candidate for admin. Hates the show, is observably dumb, is unfunny, is desperate for attention of any kind...man, you're almost TOO good for this position.
  741.  
  742. INB4 "another "drive across Phoenix" zinger.
  743. I'm not dumb. My grandma worked in a volcano factory for 75 years. Check your language policing tbh fam
  744. 01:17, February 29, 2016
  745. SwordofStorms
  746.  
  747. SwordofStorms
  748. reply to #83
  749. Gubra Lagima wrote:
  750. If the ever-so-eloquent Paul thinks that I'm an 'edgy faggot loser,' that's fine. It's ironic, considering DP's brand of humor, but fine. You can't point to any rules that I've broken, because I haven't broken any. I, however, can point to any number of rules that you and several other staff members have broken. I honestly don't want to get the wiki deleted, so I won't post any of my evidence unless I have to. However, if my account is threatened with a permaban or deletion, I'll do what I have to.
  751. Paul, you clearly don't know the entire story, and I'm 100% sure that you won't listen to anything I have to say, so I'll keep it short. I was not the person who wrote the 'evil pro-life propaganda' on the abortion page. I have not banned anyone because they disagree with me. I banned one person for less than an hour, but it was because he was removing edits I made and I wanted to talk to him about it. If he simply would have disagreed with me instead of covering up my edits, I wouldn't have taken any action against him.
  752.  
  753. None of the staff have pointed to a single rule I have broken. If being hated by Paul makes me banworthy in the eyes of Wikia, that's a conversation we can have. Until then, I'm going to need concrete evidence that I did anything wrong before I leave the wiki. <3
  754. You may not have broken any of wikia's rules per say, but you certainly have broken the very rules you have set up for this wiki . You have at the very least doc dropped me, unwittingly or not, it does not matter. I just reccommend you leave before you embaress yourself further. Before we take to other measures.
  755. ^505EC594FDD7C9F6B8E040C482731935E901CF2378C09C4E51^pimgpsh fullsize distr
  756. Edited by SwordofStorms 01:23, February 29, 2016
  757. Gubra Lagima
  758.  
  759. Gubra Lagima
  760. Bryan, I've explained the "doxing" situation several dozen times by now. Please read my past explanations and tell my why they are wrong, or drop it.
  761. 01:25, February 29, 2016
  762. SwordofStorms
  763.  
  764. SwordofStorms
  765. reply to #86
  766. Gubra Lagima wrote:
  767. Bryan, I've explained the "doxing" situation several dozen times by now. Please read my past explanations and tell my why they are wrong, or drop it.
  768. nigga that's why I said doc dropping. There's a difference.
  769. 01:28, February 29, 2016
  770. Gubra Lagima
  771.  
  772. Gubra Lagima
  773. reply to #87
  774. SwordofStorms wrote:
  775. Gubra Lagima wrote:
  776. Bryan, I've explained the "doxing" situation several dozen times by now. Please read my past explanations and tell my why they are wrong, or drop it.
  777. nigga that's why I said doc dropping. There's a difference.
  778. I made a joking tweet that included your last name, it was only seen by people who already knew your last name, and I deleted it as soon as I saw it made you upset. This is your best evidence that I should be banned from the wiki?
  779. Edited by Gubra Lagima 01:31, February 29, 2016
  780. SwordofStorms
  781.  
  782. SwordofStorms
  783. reply to #88
  784. Gubra Lagima wrote:
  785. SwordofStorms wrote:
  786. Gubra Lagima wrote:
  787. Bryan, I've explained the "doxing" situation several dozen times by now. Please read my past explanations and tell my why they are wrong, or drop it.
  788. nigga that's why I said doc dropping. There's a difference.
  789. I made a joking tweet that included your last name, it was only seen by people who already knew your last name, and I deleted it as soon as I saw it made you upset. This is your best evidence that I should be banned from the wiki?
  790. a) Didn't know you deleted it
  791.  
  792. b) you still posted it on the wiki
  793.  
  794. c) I don't care anymore, like I said, just saying that was a technical violation of the wiki rules.
  795. Edited by SwordofStorms 01:36, February 29, 2016
  796. SwordofStorms
  797.  
  798. SwordofStorms
  799. Besides, that's not why I want you bannned. I want you banned because you're a fucking dick. The only reason you're not banned yet is because wikia's retarded and won't let the founder demote bureaucrats.
  800. 01:37, February 29, 2016
  801. FalseShepherd
  802. 1 Kudos
  803. FalseShepherd
  804. Ask yourself this question Gubra. What are you doing here?
  805.  
  806.  
  807.  
  808.  
  809. What are you doing really? You don't care about DP, so why remain?
  810.  
  811.  
  812.  
  813.  
  814. You are wasting your time. Go buy some ice cream, go get laid, go sDeadpool and quite worrying about the wiki
  815.  
  816. I pose the same question to everyone else who is anti-dp
  817. 01:38, February 29, 2016
  818. Gubra Lagima
  819.  
  820. Gubra Lagima
  821. You can call me a "dick," a "faggot," a "loser," and anything else. It does not change my views toward the wiki. I enjoy making constructive edits, and your feelings toward me are irrelevant.
  822.  
  823. False, you may notice that the pages that have caused all of this upheaval are related to politics, not DP. I enjoy editing those pages, and I don't view it as a waste of time. I don't "worry" about the wiki, but you all seem to do a whole lot of worrying about me and my personal life.
  824.  
  825. I'm not anti-DP. I used to enjoy the show, and now I don't. Every time I've spoken with a fan of the show since I stopped watching, I have been met with hostility. Every time I have ever spoken with Paul, he's called me a faggot and a loser and made hilarious claims about my personal life. While I think you're all quite rude, I don't think I'm being persecuted as Paul claims, I don't wish any of you any ill-will, I'm happy that the wiki and show are successful, and I'd like to be able to make edits to pages if I want to do so. This is a very simple situation that you're all blowing out of proportion.
  826. 01:46, February 29, 2016
  827. SwordofStorms
  828.  
  829. SwordofStorms
  830. reply to #92
  831. Gubra Lagima wrote:
  832. You can call me a "dick," a "faggot," a "loser," and anything else. It does not change my views toward the wiki. I enjoy making constructive edits, and your feelings toward me are irrelevant.
  833. False, you may notice that the pages that have caused all of this upheaval are related to politics, not DP. I enjoy editing those pages, and I don't view it as a waste of time. I don't "worry" about the wiki, but you all seem to do a whole lot of worrying about me and my personal life.
  834.  
  835. I'm not anti-DP. I used to enjoy the show, and now I don't. Every time I've spoken with a fan of the show since I stopped watching, I have been met with hostility. Every time I have ever spoken with Paul, he's called me a faggot and a loser and made hilarious claims about my personal life. While I think you're all quite rude, I don't think I'm being persecuted as Paul claims, I don't wish any of you any ill-will, I'm happy that the wiki and show are successful, and I'd like to be able to make edits to pages if I want to do so. This is a very simple situation that you're all blowing out of proportion.
  836. This is the most disingenuous shit I've ever read. You don't want to make good edits. You want to watch the wiki burn. We all know that. Stop pretending. Besides, if EVERY PERSON in a fan base acts hostile, maybe you need to take a good hard look at yourself and wonder what you're doing.
  837. 01:56, February 29, 2016
  838. PaulsEgo
  839. 1 Kudos
  840. PaulsEgo
  841. reply to #83
  842. Paul, you clearly don't know the entire story, and I'm 100% sure that you won't listen to anything I have to say, so I'll keep it short. I was not the person who wrote the 'evil pro-life propaganda' on the abortion page. I have not banned anyone because they disagree with me. I banned one person for less than an hour, but it was because he was removing edits I made and I wanted to talk to him about it. If he simply would have disagreed with me instead of covering up my edits, I wouldn't have taken any action against him.
  843.  
  844.  
  845. So you didn't ban Phere for literally nothing? Or did you forget to mention that?
  846.  
  847. If you are not responible for the out of context pro-life bullshit, do you support the banning or removal of admin powers for those doing it? Are you, as a site Admin actively reversing the pro-life edits and deleting off topic pages?
  848.  
  849. Do you watch and enjoy the show? If so, why did you tell me otherwise? If not, what the fuck are you still doing here months later, other than fucking with a wiki you don't care about?
  850.  
  851. I'm listening, so long as you're talking and not jerking off your little buddy with inside mems.
  852. 01:57, February 29, 2016
  853. The Door Handler
  854.  
  855. The Door Handler
  856. Show us proof he wants the wiki to burn.
  857. 01:57, February 29, 2016
  858. FalseShepherd
  859.  
  860. FalseShepherd
  861. Gubra 20160228 205428
  862. Quality edits you say?
  863.  
  864.  
  865.  
  866. Does reverting perfectly justified edits count?
  867. 01:59, February 29, 2016
  868. The Door Handler
  869.  
  870. The Door Handler
  871. "not jerking off your little buddy with inside mems"
  872.  
  873. I learned from watching you on DP hun XOXOXO.
  874. 01:59, February 29, 2016
  875. SwordofStorms
  876.  
  877. SwordofStorms
  878. reply to #95
  879. The Door Handler wrote:
  880. Show us proof he wants the wiki to burn.
  881. The proof is self-evident in his actions.
  882. 02:00, February 29, 2016
  883. Gubra Lagima
  884.  
  885. Gubra Lagima
  886. Nobody had a single problem with my edit quality until I became right-leaning. It's entirely possible that my editing skills have dropped precipitously since that time, but somehow I doubt it.
  887.  
  888. I don't want to watch the wiki burn. I care less about maximizing its popularity than Gerudo does, but I think it would suck if the wiki was deleted or left barren.
  889.  
  890. "If EVERY Jehovah's Witness acts hostile toward you because you're an atheist, maybe you need to take a good hard look at yourself and wonder what you're doing wrong." - Bryan, 2016.
  891. 02:00, February 29, 2016
  892. Gubra Lagima
  893.  
  894. Gubra Lagima
  895. reply to #96
  896. FalseShepherd wrote:
  897. Gubra 20160228 205428
  898. Quality edits you say?
  899.  
  900.  
  901. Does reverting perfectly justified edits count?
  902. I was protecting my edits from other people who were removing them. Once again, I have addressed this countless times.
  903. 02:01, February 29, 2016
  904. The Door Handler
  905.  
  906. The Door Handler
  907. reply to #98
  908. SwordofStorms wrote:
  909. The Door Handler wrote:
  910. Show us proof he wants the wiki to burn.
  911. The proof is self-evident in his actions.
  912. Wow. Thanks for solving the fucking puzzle.
  913.  
  914. "Show us proof that Allah exists"
  915.  
  916. "The proof is self-evident in nature"
  917. 02:02, February 29, 2016
  918. Stevoawesome
  919.  
  920. Stevoawesome
  921. reply to #100
  922. Gubra Lagima wrote:
  923. FalseShepherd wrote:
  924. Gubra 20160228 205428
  925. Quality edits you say?
  926.  
  927. Does reverting perfectly justified edits count?
  928. I was protecting my edits from other people who were removing them. Once again, I have addressed this countless times.
  929. Well they were protecting their edits from what you were putting in.
  930. 02:03, February 29, 2016
  931. FalseShepherd
  932.  
  933. FalseShepherd
  934. reply to #95
  935. The Door Handler wrote:
  936. Show us proof he wants the wiki to burn.
  937. He doesn't. Not unless you count transforming the wiki in his vastly unpopular and non-dp image
  938. 02:03, February 29, 2016
  939. SwordofStorms
  940.  
  941. SwordofStorms
  942. reply to #99
  943. Gubra Lagima wrote:
  944. "If EVERY Jehovah's Witness acts hostile toward you because you're an atheist, maybe you need to take a good hard look at yourself and wonder what you're doing wrong." - Bryan, 2016.
  945. Yeah, I actually agree with that. Some Jehova's Witnesses I'm fairly certain would NOT be hostile towards atheists, so if all are hostile to you then it probably is something you're doing.
  946. 02:03, February 29, 2016
  947. Gubra Lagima
  948.  
  949. Gubra Lagima
  950. reply to #94
  951. PaulsEgo wrote:
  952. Paul, you clearly don't know the entire story, and I'm 100% sure that you won't listen to anything I have to say, so I'll keep it short. I was not the person who wrote the 'evil pro-life propaganda' on the abortion page. I have not banned anyone because they disagree with me. I banned one person for less than an hour, but it was because he was removing edits I made and I wanted to talk to him about it. If he simply would have disagreed with me instead of covering up my edits, I wouldn't have taken any action against him.
  953.  
  954.  
  955. So you didn't ban Phere for literally nothing? Or did you forget to mention that?
  956.  
  957. If you are not responible for the out of context pro-life bullshit, do you support the banning or removal of admin powers for those doing it? Are you, as a site Admin actively reversing the pro-life edits and deleting off topic pages?
  958.  
  959. Do you watch and enjoy the show? If so, why did you tell me otherwise? If not, what the fuck are you still doing here months later, other than fucking with a wiki you don't care about?
  960.  
  961. I'm listening, so long as you're talking and not jerking off your little buddy with inside mems.
  962. The Phere thing is 100% unrelated. I had support from a majority of the staff when I did it, and I explained to you privately why it was done.
  963.  
  964. I think that expressing a different opinion is not a valid reason to be banned. It's that simple. If everyone is really so sore about a pro-life view being expressed, maybe that page can be reverted and you all can stop trying to get me banned? I would be happy with that solution.
  965.  
  966. I do not watch the show, as I have already stated. I do not edit DP-related pages, only political/religious/misc. pages. Like I said, I wish you all well and hope the show continues to be successful. I don't enjoy it personally, but I would never force my apathy toward the show upon anyone else.
  967. 02:06, February 29, 2016
  968. FalseShepherd
  969. 1 Kudos
  970. FalseShepherd
  971. reply to #100
  972. Gubra Lagima wrote:
  973. FalseShepherd wrote:
  974. Gubra 20160228 205428
  975. Quality edits you say?
  976.  
  977. Does reverting perfectly justified edits count?
  978. I was protecting my edits from other people who were removing them. Once again, I have addressed this countless times.
  979. Protecting is one thing. But you don't see me reverting every edit someone other than myself makes to the Kaceytron page.
  980.  
  981. You are constantly undoing everyone else's edits in order to keep to your right wing bias. Youre not being open-minded or objective. You're being Conservapedia
  982. 02:07, February 29, 2016
  983. The Door Handler
  984.  
  985. The Door Handler
  986. reply to #103
  987. FalseShepherd wrote:
  988. The Door Handler wrote:
  989. Show us proof he wants the wiki to burn.
  990. He doesn't. Not unless you count transforming the wiki in his vastly unpopular and non-dp image
  991. In total, he has added his political views to roughly around 7 pages or less out of 800.
  992.  
  993. He hasn't changed the CSS, people are free to make pages.
  994.  
  995. How has this transformed the wiki?
  996. 02:07, February 29, 2016
  997. Gubra Lagima
  998.  
  999. Gubra Lagima
  1000. reply to #102
  1001. Stevoawesome wrote:
  1002. Gubra Lagima wrote:
  1003. FalseShepherd wrote:
  1004. Gubra 20160228 205428
  1005. Quality edits you say?
  1006.  
  1007. Does reverting perfectly justified edits count?
  1008. I was protecting my edits from other people who were removing them. Once again, I have addressed this countless times.
  1009. Well they were protecting their edits from what you were putting in.
  1010. Pages get overhauled all the time. I wasn't filling those pages with nonsense or spam, I was just changing wording, adding things, etc. If you want to get into problems you have with each individual edit, I will hear you out. However, I'm going to have to ask you to put your pitchforks down first.
  1011. 02:09, February 29, 2016
  1012. PaulsEgo
  1013.  
  1014. PaulsEgo
  1015. reply to #99
  1016. Gubra Lagima wrote:
  1017. Nobody had a single problem with my edit quality until I became right-leaning. It's entirely possible that my editing skills have dropped precipitously since that time, but somehow I doubt it.
  1018. I don't want to watch the wiki burn. I care less about maximizing its popularity than Gerudo does, but I think it would suck if the wiki was deleted or left barren.
  1019.  
  1020. "If EVERY Jehovah's Witness acts hostile toward you because you're an atheist, maybe you need to take a good hard look at yourself and wonder what you're doing wrong." - Bryan, 2016.
  1021. Didn't answer a single question.
  1022.  
  1023. Do you actively police the board for off-topic shit, like, for example a pro-life page on a wiki about a show filled with pro choice guys?
  1024.  
  1025. Do you support the banning / removal of admin powers for people who routinely post and re-post off topic shit?
  1026.  
  1027. Do you still watch and enjoy the show? If so, what changed since we talked privately? Would you like me to send you a link to that conversation privately so you can brush up on where you actually stand when you're not meme-ing it up in public?
  1028.  
  1029. Did you or did you not ban BeyondPhere for silly, insignificant personal reasons?
  1030.  
  1031. Once again, I'm listening.
  1032. 02:09, February 29, 2016
  1033. FalseShepherd
  1034.  
  1035. FalseShepherd
  1036. reply to #107
  1037. The Door Handler wrote:
  1038. FalseShepherd wrote:
  1039. The Door Handler wrote:
  1040. Show us proof he wants the wiki to burn.
  1041. He doesn't. Not unless you count transforming the wiki in his vastly unpopular and non-dp image
  1042. In total, he has added his political views to roughly around 7 pages or less out of 800.
  1043. He hasn't changed the CSS, people are free to make pages.
  1044.  
  1045. How has this transformed the wiki?
  1046. Transforming can be as small as seven pages ormas big as 10,000 pages.
  1047.  
  1048. There may be a difference in scale, but there is no difference in what he is doing
  1049. 02:10, February 29, 2016
  1050. This reply has been removed
  1051. This reply has been removed
  1052. SwordofStorms
  1053.  
  1054. SwordofStorms
  1055. reply to #101
  1056. The Door Handler wrote:
  1057. SwordofStorms wrote:
  1058. The Door Handler wrote:
  1059. Show us proof he wants the wiki to burn.
  1060. The proof is self-evident in his actions.
  1061. Wow. Thanks for solving the fucking puzzle.
  1062. "Show us proof that Allah exists"
  1063.  
  1064. "The proof is self-evident in nature"
  1065. For one thing, he's costing us traffic.
  1066.  
  1067. https://ask.fm/PaulsEgo/answers/134832151303
  1068. 02:13, February 29, 2016
  1069. Gubra Lagima
  1070.  
  1071. Gubra Lagima
  1072. reply to #109
  1073. PaulsEgo wrote:
  1074. Gubra Lagima wrote:
  1075. Nobody had a single problem with my edit quality until I became right-leaning. It's entirely possible that my editing skills have dropped precipitously since that time, but somehow I doubt it.
  1076. I don't want to watch the wiki burn. I care less about maximizing its popularity than Gerudo does, but I think it would suck if the wiki was deleted or left barren.
  1077.  
  1078. "If EVERY Jehovah's Witness acts hostile toward you because you're an atheist, maybe you need to take a good hard look at yourself and wonder what you're doing wrong." - Bryan, 2016.
  1079. Didn't answer a single question.
  1080. Do you actively police the board for off-topic shit, like, for example a pro-life page on a wiki about a show filled with pro choice guys?
  1081.  
  1082. Do you support the banning / removal of admin powers for people who routinely post and re-post off topic shit?
  1083.  
  1084. Do you still watch and enjoy the show? If so, what changed since we talked privately? Would you like me to send you a link to that conversation privately so you can brush up on where you actually stand when you're not meme-ing it up in public?
  1085.  
  1086. Did you or did you not ban BeyondPhere for silly, insignificant personal reasons?
  1087.  
  1088. Once again, I'm listening.
  1089. I don't police anything on the wiki. I don't care what viewpoints are expressed, as long as the grammar and writing are decent.
  1090.  
  1091. There are all kinds of topics discussed on the wiki. The Hitler page isn't related to DP, but I think it should stay. Same goes for lots of other pages. If someone is posting spam or something on pages, I think they should be talked to, and then banned if they keep spamming.
  1092.  
  1093. I have said at least twice in this thread that I don't watch the show, which is why I only edit pages that aren't expressly related to DP. I still wish you guys the best, despite not enjoying your podcast anymore.
  1094.  
  1095. I banned BeyondPhere with the consent of a majority of the staff, and for reasons that I expressed to you in private. I already answered this question above.
  1096. 02:14, February 29, 2016
  1097. Gubra Lagima
  1098.  
  1099. Gubra Lagima
  1100. reply to #113
  1101. SwordofStorms wrote:
  1102. The Door Handler wrote:
  1103. SwordofStorms wrote:
  1104. The Door Handler wrote:
  1105. Show us proof he wants the wiki to burn.
  1106. The proof is self-evident in his actions.
  1107. Wow. Thanks for solving the fucking puzzle.
  1108. "Show us proof that Allah exists"
  1109.  
  1110. "The proof is self-evident in nature"
  1111. For one thing, he's costing us traffic.
  1112. https://ask.fm/PaulsEgo/answers/134832151303
  1113. We have no idea who wrote that. It could've been one of you for all I know. Furthermore, you have no evidence that any edit I made has led to a decrease in traffic.
  1114.  
  1115. Once again, if you want to get into each individual edit I made and why you have a problem with them, I would be happy to discuss it with all of you.
  1116. 02:16, February 29, 2016
  1117. SwordofStorms
  1118.  
  1119. SwordofStorms
  1120. reply to #115
  1121. Gubra Lagima wrote:
  1122. SwordofStorms wrote:
  1123. The Door Handler wrote:
  1124. SwordofStorms wrote:
  1125. The Door Handler wrote:
  1126. Show us proof he wants the wiki to burn.
  1127. The proof is self-evident in his actions.
  1128. Wow. Thanks for solving the fucking puzzle.
  1129. "Show us proof that Allah exists"
  1130.  
  1131. "The proof is self-evident in nature"
  1132. For one thing, he's costing us traffic.
  1133. https://ask.fm/PaulsEgo/answers/134832151303
  1134. We have no idea who wrote that. It could've been one of you for all I know. Furthermore, you have no evidence that any edit I made has led to a decrease in traffic.
  1135. Once again, if you want to get into each individual edit I made and why you have a problem with them, I would be happy to discuss it with all of you.
  1136. It's funny, because you never cared about anyone breaking wikia rules when you banned people before, but now that it's on you, it has to be against wiki rules? Remember when you banned Innosflew, Lance, and Moon Lander for "conspiring against you? Show me where in wikia rules that's not allowed. Oh wait, there is nowhere. We want to ban you for a similar reason: We don't like you. Just like you didn't like them. Just like you didn't like BeyondPhere. You don't get to change the rules now that the tables have been turned.
  1137. 02:21, February 29, 2016
  1138. Sinistra Henry Hades
  1139.  
  1140. Sinistra Henry Hades
  1141. reply to #54
  1142. Gubra Lagima wrote:
  1143. FalseShepherd wrote:
  1144. Enough with this. Can everyone who the founder wants gone leave and make their own wiki so everyone can get back to editing and we don't have to deal with unproductive atmosphere being created right now?
  1145. I'm not the one creating the unproductive atmosphere. I was producing content, and then my edits began to be deleted by Gerudo and his cronies. I'm standing up for the principles that the wiki was initially based upon, even if nobody else will.
  1146. GubraEditing
  1147. Here is why that statement is terrible. And for you to claim that you understand the principles of the wikia better than both the owner of the wikia, and the people whose show is what the wikia is based off of, is remarkably narcissistic.
  1148. 02:21, February 29, 2016
  1149. Gubra Lagima
  1150.  
  1151. Gubra Lagima
  1152. reply to #116
  1153. SwordofStorms wrote:
  1154. Gubra Lagima wrote:
  1155. SwordofStorms wrote:
  1156. The Door Handler wrote:
  1157. SwordofStorms wrote:
  1158. The Door Handler wrote:
  1159. Show us proof he wants the wiki to burn.
  1160. The proof is self-evident in his actions.
  1161. Wow. Thanks for solving the fucking puzzle.
  1162. "Show us proof that Allah exists"
  1163.  
  1164. "The proof is self-evident in nature"
  1165. For one thing, he's costing us traffic.
  1166. https://ask.fm/PaulsEgo/answers/134832151303
  1167. We have no idea who wrote that. It could've been one of you for all I know. Furthermore, you have no evidence that any edit I made has led to a decrease in traffic.
  1168. Once again, if you want to get into each individual edit I made and why you have a problem with them, I would be happy to discuss it with all of you.
  1169. It's funny, because you never cared about anyone breaking wikia rules when you banned people before, but now that it's on you, it has to be against wiki rules? Remember when you banned Innosflew, Lance, and Moon Lander for "conspiring against you? Show me where in wikia rules that's not allowed. Oh wait, there is nowhere. We want to ban you for a similar reason: We don't like you. Just like you didn't like them. Just like you didn't like BeyondPhere. You don't get to change the rules now that the tables have been turned.
  1170. I'm a bureaucrat, and you're asking Wikia to interfere. That changes things. The fact that I have banned people in the past does not make it justifiable to ask Wikia to ban me.
  1171.  
  1172. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tu_quoque
  1173. 02:25, February 29, 2016
  1174. Gubra Lagima
  1175.  
  1176. Gubra Lagima
  1177. reply to #117
  1178. Sinistra Henry Hades wrote:
  1179. Gubra Lagima wrote:
  1180. FalseShepherd wrote:
  1181. Enough with this. Can everyone who the founder wants gone leave and make their own wiki so everyone can get back to editing and we don't have to deal with unproductive atmosphere being created right now?
  1182. I'm not the one creating the unproductive atmosphere. I was producing content, and then my edits began to be deleted by Gerudo and his cronies. I'm standing up for the principles that the wiki was initially based upon, even if nobody else will.
  1183. GubraEditing
  1184. Here is why that statement is terrible. And for you to claim that you understand the principles of the wikia better than both the owner of the wikia, and the people whose show is what the wikia is based off of, is remarkably narcissistic.
  1185. Like I have said for the third time now, we can discuss all of the edits one-by-one. It's impossible for me to succinctly justify every action I have done in the past 3 days when I'm being replied to faster than I can respond by people posting all kinds of general statements about my actions. We can discuss every edit I've done, and I will agree or disagree with what you say on a case-by-case basis.
  1186. 02:28, February 29, 2016
  1187. PaulsEgo
  1188.  
  1189. PaulsEgo
  1190. reply to #114
  1191. I don't police anything on the wiki.
  1192.  
  1193.  
  1194.  
  1195.  
  1196. I have said at least twice in this thread that I don't watch the show, which is why I only edit pages that aren't expressly related to DP. I still wish you guys the best, despite not enjoying your podcast anymore.
  1197.  
  1198. I banned BeyondPhere with the consent of a majority of the staff, and for reasons that I expressed to you in private. I already answered this question above.
  1199. So, you finally answer and, surprisingly answer your own question in the process. What rules have you broken? Why should you be removed as admin? Look above.
  1200.  
  1201. You don't police anything on the wiki? Then why the fuck are you an Admin on the wiki? Couldn't you post in "non-dP-related" shit as an average user? Why does a guy who doesn't police anything, doesn't monitor anything or take action on anything need admin powers?
  1202.  
  1203. You don't watch the show? What the fuck are you doing here, then? Would a wiki about microbiology keep an Admin that stated openly that he didn't give a fuck about the subject and would not police the wiki for off-topic content - in fact, all he would do is add to off topic content?
  1204.  
  1205. Think about that for a second, Gubra. That's you. You're the guy on the My Little Pony Wiki who doesn't watch the show anymore and only contributes via edits to wholly off-topic pages and the occasional banning. Who. The. Fuck. in their right mind would keep a guy like that on staff? You couldn't keep a fucking mop job at McDonalds with that fucking resume, Gubra.
  1206.  
  1207. Not to mention that the reason you blocked BeyondPhere which you shared with me privately was UTTER fucking horseshit that NOBODY - on the show, friend of the show, fan of the show or otherwise would EVER agree was needed or even warranted consideration. Why would a guy who "doesn't watch the show" ever have fucking CAUSE to ban a friend of the show from the wiki.
  1208.  
  1209. It's absurd, Gubra. And yes, it's straight up fucking sad.
  1210. Edited by PaulsEgo 02:35, February 29, 2016
  1211. SwordofStorms
  1212.  
  1213. SwordofStorms
  1214. reply to #118
  1215. Gubra Lagima wrote:
  1216. SwordofStorms wrote:
  1217. Gubra Lagima wrote:
  1218. SwordofStorms wrote:
  1219. The Door Handler wrote:
  1220. SwordofStorms wrote:
  1221. The Door Handler wrote:
  1222. Show us proof he wants the wiki to burn.
  1223. The proof is self-evident in his actions.
  1224. Wow. Thanks for solving the fucking puzzle.
  1225. "Show us proof that Allah exists"
  1226.  
  1227. "The proof is self-evident in nature"
  1228. For one thing, he's costing us traffic.
  1229. https://ask.fm/PaulsEgo/answers/134832151303
  1230. We have no idea who wrote that. It could've been one of you for all I know. Furthermore, you have no evidence that any edit I made has led to a decrease in traffic.
  1231. Once again, if you want to get into each individual edit I made and why you have a problem with them, I would be happy to discuss it with all of you.
  1232. It's funny, because you never cared about anyone breaking wikia rules when you banned people before, but now that it's on you, it has to be against wiki rules? Remember when you banned Innosflew, Lance, and Moon Lander for "conspiring against you? Show me where in wikia rules that's not allowed. Oh wait, there is nowhere. We want to ban you for a similar reason: We don't like you. Just like you didn't like them. Just like you didn't like BeyondPhere. You don't get to change the rules now that the tables have been turned.
  1233. I'm a bureaucrat, and you're asking Wikia to interfere. That changes things. The fact that I have banned people in the past does not make it justifiable to ask Wikia to ban me.
  1234. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tu_quoque
  1235. Nigga the fact that you're bureaucrat is the only reason we have to do this, and you're not even supposed to be. In fact, you were supposed to have deleted your wiki account months ago like you said you were going to.
  1236. 02:35, February 29, 2016
  1237. Gubra Lagima
  1238.  
  1239. Gubra Lagima
  1240. reply to #120
  1241. PaulsEgo wrote:
  1242. I don't police anything on the wiki.
  1243.  
  1244.  
  1245.  
  1246.  
  1247. I have said at least twice in this thread that I don't watch the show, which is why I only edit pages that aren't expressly related to DP. I still wish you guys the best, despite not enjoying your podcast anymore.
  1248.  
  1249. I banned BeyondPhere with the consent of a majority of the staff, and for reasons that I expressed to you in private. I already answered this question above.
  1250. So, you finally answer and, surprisingly answer your own question in the process. What rules have you broken? Why should you be removed as admin? Look above.
  1251. You don't police anything on the wiki? Then why the fuck are you an Admin on the wiki? Couldn't you post in "non-dP-related" shit as an average user? Why does a guy who doesn't police anything, doesn't monitor anything or take action on anything need admin powers?
  1252.  
  1253. You don't watch the show? What the fuck are you doing here, then? Would a wiki about microbiology keep an Admin that stated openly that he didn't give a fuck about the subject and would not police the wiki for off-topic content - in fact, all he would do is add to off topic content?
  1254.  
  1255. Think about that for a second, Gubra. That's you. Your the guy on the My Little Pony Wiki who doesn't watch the show anymore and only contributes via edits to wholly off-topic pages and the occasional banning. Who. The. Fuck. in their right mind would keep a guy like that on staff? You couldn't keep a fucking mop job at McDonalds with that fucking resumee, Gubra.
  1256.  
  1257. Not to mention that the reason you blocked BeyondPhere which you shared with me privately was UTTER fucking horseshit that NOBODY - on the show, friend of the show, fan of the show or otherwise would EVER agree was needed or even warranted consideration. Why would a guy who "doesn't watch the show" ever have fucking CAUSE to ban a friend of the show from the wiki.
  1258.  
  1259. It's absurd, Gubra. And yes, it's straight up fucking sad.
  1260. I'm an admin because I was promoted previously. I don't want to demote myself because I would almost certainly be banned by someone simply because they don't like me. I'm sure you can understand why I don't want that to happen. Agreeing to police the wiki is not a requirement for adminship. If I saw someone vandalizing the wiki, I would ban them and remove the vandalism. I do not consider this policing, however. It boils down to semantics.
  1261.  
  1262. There is a lot on the wiki that has little or nothing to do with DP. I enjoy editing those pages. I am not going to edit DP-related pages in the future, with the exception of fixing grammar mistakes if I happen to see them. I have said this multiple times.
  1263.  
  1264. This is not a profession. Even if it was, your argument does not hold water. To use your McDonald's example, what you're saying is the equivalent of "McDonald's sells burgers and fries. It is their main purpose. Therefore, if all an employee does is refill the soda machine and clean the tables, then they should not be working at McDonald's, because they are not making burgers and fries." Chronicling DP is the main purpose of the wiki, but that is not the only thing that happens here. I like to improve pages, like I did with the KKK page today. Of course this isn't the main purpose of the wiki, but what's the harm in me doing it?
  1265.  
  1266. In hindsight, I agree with you on the BeyondPhere issue. However, as I have said multiple times on this thread, I did it with the support of a majority of the staff at the time. We were being petty. We're human. That doesn't mean I should be banned.
  1267. 02:44, February 29, 2016
  1268. Gubra Lagima
  1269.  
  1270. Gubra Lagima
  1271. reply to #121
  1272. SwordofStorms wrote:
  1273. Gubra Lagima wrote:
  1274. SwordofStorms wrote:
  1275. Gubra Lagima wrote:
  1276. SwordofStorms wrote:
  1277. The Door Handler wrote:
  1278. SwordofStorms wrote:
  1279. The Door Handler wrote:
  1280. Show us proof he wants the wiki to burn.
  1281. The proof is self-evident in his actions.
  1282. Wow. Thanks for solving the fucking puzzle.
  1283. "Show us proof that Allah exists"
  1284.  
  1285. "The proof is self-evident in nature"
  1286. For one thing, he's costing us traffic.
  1287. https://ask.fm/PaulsEgo/answers/134832151303
  1288. We have no idea who wrote that. It could've been one of you for all I know. Furthermore, you have no evidence that any edit I made has led to a decrease in traffic.
  1289. Once again, if you want to get into each individual edit I made and why you have a problem with them, I would be happy to discuss it with all of you.
  1290. It's funny, because you never cared about anyone breaking wikia rules when you banned people before, but now that it's on you, it has to be against wiki rules? Remember when you banned Innosflew, Lance, and Moon Lander for "conspiring against you? Show me where in wikia rules that's not allowed. Oh wait, there is nowhere. We want to ban you for a similar reason: We don't like you. Just like you didn't like them. Just like you didn't like BeyondPhere. You don't get to change the rules now that the tables have been turned.
  1291. I'm a bureaucrat, and you're asking Wikia to interfere. That changes things. The fact that I have banned people in the past does not make it justifiable to ask Wikia to ban me.
  1292. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tu_quoque
  1293. Nigga the fact that you're bureaucrat is the only reason we have to do this, and you're not even supposed to be. In fact, you were supposed to have deleted your wiki account months ago like you said you were going to.
  1294. I marked my account for deletion, and then I edited a few other wikis and it was unmarked. I decided not to mark it for deletion again.
  1295.  
  1296. I was promoted to bureaucrat by Gerudo himself several months ago. As I'm sure everyone knows by now, Wikia only demotes bureaucrats under certain circumstances. Those circumstances have not been met in this case.
  1297.  
  1298. All I want to do is edit a few peripheral pages on the wiki. If you want, you can revert all of my 'right-wing' edits and we can pretend they never happened. I will not revert them back or pursue any action against the people who revert them. However, what you cannot do is have me banned by Wikia, because I have not done anything that would cause Wikia to do so. It's that simple.
  1299. 02:49, February 29, 2016
  1300. SwordofStorms
  1301.  
  1302. SwordofStorms
  1303. reply to #123
  1304. Gubra Lagima wrote:
  1305. SwordofStorms wrote:
  1306. Gubra Lagima wrote:
  1307. SwordofStorms wrote:
  1308. Gubra Lagima wrote:
  1309. SwordofStorms wrote:
  1310. The Door Handler wrote:
  1311. SwordofStorms wrote:
  1312. The Door Handler wrote:
  1313. Show us proof he wants the wiki to burn.
  1314. The proof is self-evident in his actions.
  1315. Wow. Thanks for solving the fucking puzzle.
  1316. "Show us proof that Allah exists"
  1317.  
  1318. "The proof is self-evident in nature"
  1319. For one thing, he's costing us traffic.
  1320. https://ask.fm/PaulsEgo/answers/134832151303
  1321. We have no idea who wrote that. It could've been one of you for all I know. Furthermore, you have no evidence that any edit I made has led to a decrease in traffic.
  1322. Once again, if you want to get into each individual edit I made and why you have a problem with them, I would be happy to discuss it with all of you.
  1323. It's funny, because you never cared about anyone breaking wikia rules when you banned people before, but now that it's on you, it has to be against wiki rules? Remember when you banned Innosflew, Lance, and Moon Lander for "conspiring against you? Show me where in wikia rules that's not allowed. Oh wait, there is nowhere. We want to ban you for a similar reason: We don't like you. Just like you didn't like them. Just like you didn't like BeyondPhere. You don't get to change the rules now that the tables have been turned.
  1324. I'm a bureaucrat, and you're asking Wikia to interfere. That changes things. The fact that I have banned people in the past does not make it justifiable to ask Wikia to ban me.
  1325. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tu_quoque
  1326. Nigga the fact that you're bureaucrat is the only reason we have to do this, and you're not even supposed to be. In fact, you were supposed to have deleted your wiki account months ago like you said you were going to.
  1327. I marked my account for deletion, and then I edited a few other wikis and it was unmarked. I decided not to mark it for deletion again.
  1328. I was promoted to bureaucrat by Gerudo himself several months ago. As I'm sure everyone knows by now, Wikia only demotes bureaucrats under certain circumstances. Those circumstances have not been met in this case.
  1329.  
  1330. All I want to do is edit a few peripheral pages on the wiki. If you want, you can revert all of my 'right-wing' edits and we can pretend they never happened. I will not revert them back or pursue any action against the people who revert them. However, what you cannot do is have me banned by Wikia, because I have not done anything that would cause Wikia to do so. It's that simple.
  1331. We just want you to be demoted by wikia, because who is or isn't staff should be under the control of the owner, which is Fancy in this case, and he wants you demoted. We're gonna do the banning part ourselves.
  1332. 02:55, February 29, 2016
  1333. PaulsEgo
  1334. 2 Kudos
  1335. PaulsEgo
  1336. Why the fuck would you CARE if someone banned you? You don't watch the show, right? Don't care about what happens on it? It's like getting blocked by Steve Shives. Why the fuck do you need to maintain status in a community who you share nothing with? Nobody is coming to the wiki to read your new, ultra hot edits on the "Hitler" and "Mashed Potatoes" pages. If those things interest you, go mod the fucking Hitler wiki.
  1337.  
  1338. So now you DO police the wiki. Got it. I think Gerudo can cover removing vandalism without having an Admin who doesn't give two shits about the topic of the wiki, nor keeping it readable by policing off-topic bullshit. You aren't exactly adding tons of value here.
  1339.  
  1340. My analogy is closer to this: "Guy works at McDonalds. Hates the food. Tells everyone who listens how much he hates it. Doesn't do what he's asked, and instead spends his day sitting at a table in the restauraunt, in employee uniform, and writes about Hitler and Collard Greens."See how it makes sense when you don't look at it through "Gubra's +5 Prism of bullshit"?
  1341.  
  1342. Yes, being petty and banning a friend of the show you admin the wiki for SHOULD be a bannable offense - ESPECIALLY given the other facts about you I mention above.
  1343.  
  1344. "WHOOPS GUYS I ACCIDENTALLY GOT BUTTHURT AND REPEATEDLY BANNED A FRIEND OF THE SHOW FOR ABSOLUTELY NO DEFENSIBLE REASON!!!! I ALSO HATE THE SHOW AND ONLY EDIT THE ARTICLE ON HORTICULTURE. I CAN STAY AN ADMIN, RIGHT?"
  1345.  
  1346. Who answers yes to that?
  1347. Edited by PaulsEgo 03:02, February 29, 2016
  1348. Gubra Lagima
  1349.  
  1350. Gubra Lagima
  1351. reply to #124
  1352. SwordofStorms wrote:
  1353. Gubra Lagima wrote:
  1354. SwordofStorms wrote:
  1355. Gubra Lagima wrote:
  1356. SwordofStorms wrote:
  1357. Gubra Lagima wrote:
  1358. SwordofStorms wrote:
  1359. The Door Handler wrote:
  1360. SwordofStorms wrote:
  1361. The Door Handler wrote:
  1362. Show us proof he wants the wiki to burn.
  1363. The proof is self-evident in his actions.
  1364. Wow. Thanks for solving the fucking puzzle.
  1365. "Show us proof that Allah exists"
  1366.  
  1367. "The proof is self-evident in nature"
  1368. For one thing, he's costing us traffic.
  1369. https://ask.fm/PaulsEgo/answers/134832151303
  1370. We have no idea who wrote that. It could've been one of you for all I know. Furthermore, you have no evidence that any edit I made has led to a decrease in traffic.
  1371. Once again, if you want to get into each individual edit I made and why you have a problem with them, I would be happy to discuss it with all of you.
  1372. It's funny, because you never cared about anyone breaking wikia rules when you banned people before, but now that it's on you, it has to be against wiki rules? Remember when you banned Innosflew, Lance, and Moon Lander for "conspiring against you? Show me where in wikia rules that's not allowed. Oh wait, there is nowhere. We want to ban you for a similar reason: We don't like you. Just like you didn't like them. Just like you didn't like BeyondPhere. You don't get to change the rules now that the tables have been turned.
  1373. I'm a bureaucrat, and you're asking Wikia to interfere. That changes things. The fact that I have banned people in the past does not make it justifiable to ask Wikia to ban me.
  1374. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tu_quoque
  1375. Nigga the fact that you're bureaucrat is the only reason we have to do this, and you're not even supposed to be. In fact, you were supposed to have deleted your wiki account months ago like you said you were going to.
  1376. I marked my account for deletion, and then I edited a few other wikis and it was unmarked. I decided not to mark it for deletion again.
  1377. I was promoted to bureaucrat by Gerudo himself several months ago. As I'm sure everyone knows by now, Wikia only demotes bureaucrats under certain circumstances. Those circumstances have not been met in this case.
  1378.  
  1379. All I want to do is edit a few peripheral pages on the wiki. If you want, you can revert all of my 'right-wing' edits and we can pretend they never happened. I will not revert them back or pursue any action against the people who revert them. However, what you cannot do is have me banned by Wikia, because I have not done anything that would cause Wikia to do so. It's that simple.
  1380. We just want you to be demoted by wikia, because who is or isn't staff should be under the control of the owner, which is Fancy in this case, and he wants you demoted. We're gonna do the banning part ourselves.
  1381. Like I've said, Wikia will never demote me, because I haven't done anything worthy of a demotion.
  1382.  
  1383. I'm extremely tired of defending myself from the exact same attacks over and over, so I'm going to take my leave. If you want to go through and roll back every edit I've made in the past few days, go ahead. I won't stop you. However, I will not demote myself or stop editing the wiki simply because you don't like me. If you have a problem with any edit I make from this point on, please tell me and we can discuss it then and there.
  1384.  
  1385. (By the way, if any of you do decide to rollback all my stuff, I recommend leaving the KKK page as is, since it's pretty impartial and I improved its format quite a bit. If you want to roll it back anyway, that's cool.)
  1386. 03:02, February 29, 2016
  1387. Gubra Lagima
  1388.  
  1389. Gubra Lagima
  1390. reply to #125
  1391. PaulsEgo wrote:
  1392. Why the fuck would you CARE if someone banned you? You don't watch the show, right? Don't care about what happens on it? It's like getting blocked by Steve Shives. Why the fuck do you need to maintain status in a community who you share nothing with? Nobody is coming to the wiki to read your new, ultra hot edits on the "Hitler" and "Mashed Potatoes" pages. If those things interest you, go mod the fucking Hitler wiki.
  1393. So now you DO police the wiki. Got it. I think Gerudo can cover removing vandalism without having an Admin who doesn't give two shits about the topic of the wiki, nor keeping it readable by policing off-topic bullshit. You aren't exactly adding tons of value here.
  1394.  
  1395. My analogy is closer to this: "Guy works at McDonalds. Hates the food. Tells everyone who listens how much he hates it. Doesn't do what he's asked, and instead spends his day sitting at a table in the restauraunt, in employee uniform, and writes about Hitler and Collard Greens."See how it makes sense when you don't look at it through "Gubra's +5 Prism of bullshit"?
  1396.  
  1397. Yes, being petty and banning a friend of the show you admin the wiki for SHOULD be a bannable offense - ESPECIALLY given the other facts about you I mention above.
  1398.  
  1399. "WHOOPS GUYS I ACCIDENTALLY GOT BUTTHURT AND REPEATEDLY BANNED A FRIEND OF THE SHOW FOR ABSOLUTELY NO DEFENSIBLE REASON!!!! I ALSO HATE THE SHOW AND ONLY EDIT THE ARTICLE ON HORTICULTURE. I CAN STAY AN ADMIN, RIGHT?"
  1400.  
  1401. Who answers yes to that?
  1402. I don't expect anyone to read any of the pages I edit. If they do, whatever. If 0 people read them, whatever. It's all the same to me. Unlike you, there are things I do for just fun, not to further my position or boost my ego.
  1403.  
  1404. Au revoir, lover boy. <3
  1405. 03:04, February 29, 2016
  1406. Stevoawesome
  1407. 1 Kudos
  1408. Stevoawesome
  1409. Just for the record, Wikia also needs to make sure Xyele1234 gets demoted too. You and DH promoted him to bureaucrat just so if Wikia actually does demote you two, you can just get your powers right back from Xyele.
  1410. 03:05, February 29, 2016
  1411. Eggs Rank
  1412. 2 Kudos
  1413. Eggs Rank
  1414. Gubra go cuck yourself.
  1415. 03:28, February 29, 2016
  1416. Sinistra Henry Hades
  1417.  
  1418. Sinistra Henry Hades
  1419. reply to #127
  1420. Gubra Lagima wrote:
  1421. PaulsEgo wrote:
  1422. Why the fuck would you CARE if someone banned you? You don't watch the show, right? Don't care about what happens on it? It's like getting blocked by Steve Shives. Why the fuck do you need to maintain status in a community who you share nothing with? Nobody is coming to the wiki to read your new, ultra hot edits on the "Hitler" and "Mashed Potatoes" pages. If those things interest you, go mod the fucking Hitler wiki.
  1423. So now you DO police the wiki. Got it. I think Gerudo can cover removing vandalism without having an Admin who doesn't give two shits about the topic of the wiki, nor keeping it readable by policing off-topic bullshit. You aren't exactly adding tons of value here.
  1424.  
  1425. My analogy is closer to this: "Guy works at McDonalds. Hates the food. Tells everyone who listens how much he hates it. Doesn't do what he's asked, and instead spends his day sitting at a table in the restauraunt, in employee uniform, and writes about Hitler and Collard Greens."See how it makes sense when you don't look at it through "Gubra's +5 Prism of bullshit"?
  1426.  
  1427. Yes, being petty and banning a friend of the show you admin the wiki for SHOULD be a bannable offense - ESPECIALLY given the other facts about you I mention above.
  1428.  
  1429. "WHOOPS GUYS I ACCIDENTALLY GOT BUTTHURT AND REPEATEDLY BANNED A FRIEND OF THE SHOW FOR ABSOLUTELY NO DEFENSIBLE REASON!!!! I ALSO HATE THE SHOW AND ONLY EDIT THE ARTICLE ON HORTICULTURE. I CAN STAY AN ADMIN, RIGHT?"
  1430.  
  1431. Who answers yes to that?
  1432. I don't expect anyone to read any of the pages I edit. If they do, whatever. If 0 people read them, whatever. It's all the same to me. Unlike you, there are things I do for just fun, not to further my position or boost my ego.
  1433. Au revoir, lover boy. <3
  1434. What you just said is obviously a lie. If you did not care if people read the pages you edit, you would not be editing this wikia. You would be writing your opinions on a wikia that agrees with you, or your own personal blog. It would also be more productive for you, as you wouldn't have to constantly undo edits to articles that you don't like. But you do care, and the fact that you have made post after post on this thread in a petty attempt to defend your edits, and your status as admin, easily proves that.
  1435. 04:05, February 29, 2016
  1436. FalseShepherd
  1437.  
  1438. FalseShepherd
  1439. We only want wikia to demote you and remove you your bureaucrat status. Same goes for all bureaucrats that are not staff.
  1440.  
  1441. Whether or not you get banned, stay or leave of your own accord, will not have wikia involved
  1442. 10:51, February 29, 2016
  1443. The Door Handler
  1444.  
  1445. The Door Handler
  1446. I slightly understand where you guys are coming from.
  1447.  
  1448. But don't you think we should allow people who don't care about the fanbase and haven't watched the show in months to continue editing and co-existing here through the goodness of our hearts as long as they care about editing/maintaining pages here and have made the wiki what it is today or should they be forced to leave?
  1449. 15:30, February 29, 2016
  1450. SwordofStorms
  1451. 1 Kudos
  1452. SwordofStorms
  1453. reply to #132
  1454. The Door Handler wrote:
  1455. I slightly understand where you guys are coming from.
  1456. But don't you think we should allow people who don't care about the fanbase and haven't watched the show in months to continue editing and co-existing here through the goodness of our hearts as long as they care about editing/maintaining pages here and have made the wiki what it is today or should they be forced to leave?
  1457. Yes, but they shouldn't be staff.
  1458. 15:33, February 29, 2016
  1459. The Door Handler
  1460.  
  1461. The Door Handler
  1462. I'd like to know everyone's thoughts
  1463. 15:40, February 29, 2016
  1464. Gubra Lagima
  1465.  
  1466. Gubra Lagima
  1467. As this thread has established, several people want me to be banned for ridiculous and shallow reasons. Eggs Rank just banned me earlier today, in fact. If I could actually trust that I could safely remain on the wiki if I demoted myself, I would consider it. However, since I can be pretty confident of the opposite, I will not.
  1468.  
  1469. Also, I like the ability to edit every page, and I don't see the harm in having an additional user with ban powers, especially considering the fact that 2 spam bots have vandalized the site in the past 2 days.
  1470. Edited by Gubra Lagima 18:09, February 29, 2016
  1471. Ducksoup
  1472.  
  1473. Ducksoup
  1474. OK, I wanted to give everyone a chance to talk this out and hopefully come to a resolution for yourselves. From what I can tell, though, this conversation isn't really going anywhere. It seems as if everyone's dug in. And unfortunately, this thread is almost impossible to follow, and we can't track who voted on the other poll, so we don't know if it was a legitimate outcome.
  1475.  
  1476. If you want to vote on your leadership, here's what you need to do: create a forum post or blog that simply says "We are voting on bureaucrat rights for [user], [user], and [user]. You need to vote 'Remain' or 'Demote'."
  1477.  
  1478. Responses should only say "[user]: remain" or "[user]: demote". If responses get off-topic, delete them and direct them to this thread or another thread.
  1479.  
  1480. Reply here with a link to the newly-created poll. It needs to stay up for a week before I take action, and I'll check each user to make sure they're an active member of the wiki before I make any decisions.
  1481. 20:29, February 29, 2016
  1482. The Door Handler
  1483.  
  1484. The Door Handler
  1485. reply to #133
  1486. SwordofStorms wrote:
  1487. The Door Handler wrote:
  1488. I slightly understand where you guys are coming from.
  1489. But don't you think we should allow people who don't care about the fanbase and haven't watched the show in months to continue editing and co-existing here through the goodness of our hearts as long as they care about editing/maintaining pages here and have made the wiki what it is today or should they be forced to leave?
  1490. Yes, but they shouldn't be staff.
  1491. This question still stands and people should say their thoughts before voting.
  1492. 20:38, February 29, 2016
  1493. FalseShepherd
  1494.  
  1495. FalseShepherd
  1496. reply to #136
  1497. Ducksoup wrote:
  1498. OK, I wanted to give everyone a chance to talk this out and hopefully come to a resolution for yourselves. From what I can tell, though, this conversation isn't really going anywhere. It seems as if everyone's dug in. And unfortunately, this thread is almost impossible to follow, and we can't track who voted on the other poll, so we don't know if it was a legitimate outcome.
  1499. If you want to vote on your leadership, here's what you need to do: create a forum post or blog that simply says "We are voting on bureaucrat rights for [user], [user], and [user]. You need to vote 'Remain' or 'Demote'."
  1500.  
  1501. Responses should only say "[user]: remain" or "[user]: demote". If responses get off-topic, delete them and direct them to this thread or another thread.
  1502.  
  1503. Reply here with a link to the newly-created poll. It needs to stay up for a week before I take action, and I'll check each user to make sure they're an active member of the wiki before I make any decisions.
  1504. I've been tasked with making it. So I'll link it when I finish
  1505. 20:41, February 29, 2016
  1506. Gubra Lagima
  1507.  
  1508. Gubra Lagima
  1509. I think that this is a very bad time to hold such a poll. The Drunken Peasants have all been told extremely biased versions of what happened, and they're planning on talking about this on the show tonight. That will inevitably lead to a massive surge in anti-conservatives visiting the wiki, and many of them are sure to vote. Perhaps it would be best to vote another time, or, as I have suggested, to rollback all of the conservative edits and allow me to remain on the wiki.
  1510. 20:42, February 29, 2016
  1511. SwordofStorms
  1512.  
  1513. SwordofStorms
  1514. reply to #139
  1515. Gubra Lagima wrote:
  1516. I think that this is a very bad time to hold such a poll. The Drunken Peasants have all been told extremely biased versions of what happened, and they're planning on talking about this on the show tonight. That will inevitably lead to a massive surge in anti-conservatives visiting the wiki, and many of them are sure to vote. Perhaps it would be best to vote another time, or, as I have suggested, to rollback all of the conservative edits and allow me to remain on the wiki.
  1517. In the video we've prepared, we made no mention of such a poll, nor your names. The poll is safe.
  1518. Edited by SwordofStorms 20:51, February 29, 2016
  1519. The Door Handler
  1520.  
  1521. The Door Handler
  1522. Thank God you've made a 100% unbiased video. You could've debated us on Skype or some shit but no. Making a video is the only way for you guys to get your precious little egos featured on DP.
  1523. 20:56, February 29, 2016
  1524. SwordofStorms
  1525.  
  1526. SwordofStorms
  1527. reply to #141
  1528. The Door Handler wrote:
  1529. Thank God you've made a 100% unbiased video. You could've debated us on Skype or some shit but no. Making a video is the only way for you guys to get your precious little egos featured on DP.
  1530. "Deal with it, fucker" - Albert Einstein
  1531. 20:58, February 29, 2016
  1532. SwordofStorms
  1533.  
  1534. SwordofStorms
  1535. http://drunken-peasants-podcast.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:22871
  1536.  
  1537.  
  1538.  
  1539. Just so everyone knows, here's the poll.
  1540. 21:00, February 29, 2016
  1541. The Door Handler
  1542.  
  1543. The Door Handler
  1544. "Gubra and his Gub Scouts causing disruption."
  1545.  
  1546. Look at all of these reasons why we should go.
  1547.  
  1548. http://community.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Mira_Laime/How_to_Deal_With_a_Bad_Bureaucrat
  1549.  
  1550. Go ahead, point them out and I'll link to another staff member here that has actually broken such a rule.
  1551. 21:18, February 29, 2016
  1552. SwordofStorms
  1553.  
  1554. SwordofStorms
  1555. reply to #144
  1556. The Door Handler wrote:
  1557. "Gubra and his Gub Scouts causing disruption."
  1558. Look at all of these reasons why we should go.
  1559.  
  1560. http://community.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Mira_Laime/How_to_Deal_With_a_Bad_Bureaucrat
  1561.  
  1562. Go ahead, point them out and I'll link to another staff member here that has actually broken such a rule.
  1563. Wikia rules are irrelivant. That's like saying "WHY ARE YOU KICKING ME OUT OF YOUR HOUSE, WHAT LAW HAVE I BROKEN?!" No. That's not how that works.
  1564. 21:21, February 29, 2016
  1565. The Door Handler
  1566.  
  1567. The Door Handler
  1568. I'd like everyone to know that SwordOfStorms has already attempted to skew the odds in his favour with this. As soon as the poll has been put in place he blocks the user:TheLordYourGod for "precautionary measures". This polling has already become a corrupt sham and I think that nothing short of Wikia intervention can shut this down or by the complete removal of SwordOfStorms from the wiki.
  1569. Imgpsh fullsize
  1570. 21:24, February 29, 2016
  1571. The Door Handler
  1572.  
  1573. The Door Handler
  1574. "Wikia rules are irrelavent" - SwordofStorms, 2016
  1575. 21:26, February 29, 2016
  1576. SwordofStorms
  1577.  
  1578. SwordofStorms
  1579. reply to #146
  1580. The Door Handler wrote:
  1581. I'd like everyone to know that SwordOfStorms has already attempted to skew the odds in his favour with this. As soon as the poll has been put in place he blocks the user:TheLordYourGod for "precautionary measures". This polling has already become a corrupt sham and I think that nothing short of Wikia intervention can shut this down or by the complete removal of SwordOfStorms from the wiki.
  1582. Imgpsh fullsize
  1583. So you can't promote him so he can unblock you. I wasn't even considering the poll when I did that.
  1584. 21:28, February 29, 2016
  1585. The Door Handler
  1586.  
  1587. The Door Handler
  1588. 1. I never thought of doing that for a second
  1589.  
  1590. 2. Great excuse man, great. Ban users that might impact the poll then proceed to say it's my fault.
  1591. 21:30, February 29, 2016
  1592. FalseShepherd
  1593.  
  1594. FalseShepherd
  1595. reply to #144
  1596. The Door Handler wrote:
  1597. "Gubra and his Gub Scouts causing disruption."
  1598. Look at all of these reasons why we should go.
  1599.  
  1600. http://community.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Mira_Laime/How_to_Deal_With_a_Bad_Bureaucrat
  1601.  
  1602. Go ahead, point them out and I'll link to another staff member here that has actually broken such a rule.
  1603. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9_gJLAI23hc
  1604. 21:30, February 29, 2016
  1605. The Door Handler
  1606.  
  1607. The Door Handler
  1608. The DP Wiki has proven that it doesn't abide by fairness in polling or care about the rules of Wikia.
  1609.  
  1610. 10/10
  1611. 21:32, February 29, 2016
  1612. SwordofStorms
  1613.  
  1614. SwordofStorms
  1615. reply to #151
  1616. The Door Handler wrote:
  1617. The DP Wiki has proven that it doesn't abide by fairness in polling or care about the rules of Wikia.
  1618. 10/10
  1619. explain to me how it's not fair. If I see anyone who I don't recognize vote, I'm planning on deleting the vote, as this is a community effort. How is it not fair? also, you might as well vote too...
  1620. 21:37, February 29, 2016
  1621. FalseShepherd
  1622.  
  1623. FalseShepherd
  1624. reply to #146
  1625. The Door Handler wrote:
  1626. I'd like everyone to know that SwordOfStorms has already attempted to skew the odds in his favour with this. As soon as the poll has been put in place he blocks the user:TheLordYourGod for "precautionary measures". This polling has already become a corrupt sham and I think that nothing short of Wikia intervention can shut this down or by the complete removal of SwordOfStorms from the wiki.
  1627. Imgpsh fullsize
  1628. He banned LYG cuz he is inactive and you'd probably enlist him to vote for you. Ducksoup is only counting the votes of ACTIVE users.
  1629.  
  1630. Plus we were gonna ban him anyway.
  1631. 21:38, February 29, 2016
  1632. FalseShepherd
  1633.  
  1634. FalseShepherd
  1635. reply to #151
  1636. The Door Handler wrote:
  1637. The DP Wiki has proven that it doesn't abide by fairness in polling or care about the rules of Wikia.
  1638. 10/10
  1639. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9_gJLAI23hc
  1640. 21:39, February 29, 2016
  1641. The Door Handler
  1642.  
  1643. The Door Handler
  1644. reply to #152
  1645. SwordofStorms wrote:
  1646. The Door Handler wrote:
  1647. The DP Wiki has proven that it doesn't abide by fairness in polling or care about the rules of Wikia.
  1648. 10/10
  1649. explain to me how it's not fair. If I see anyone who I don't recognize vote, I'm planning on deleting the vote, as this is a community effort. How is it not fair? also, you might as well vote too...
  1650. It's not fair because
  1651.  
  1652. A) Wikia's rules state that you should give a warning before banning someone.
  1653.  
  1654. B) It's not fair because banning someone because they might get promoted is stupid and "maybe" getting promoted" does not break any rule.
  1655.  
  1656. C) Situation individjul
  1657.  
  1658. D) Why were you planning on banning him? He has not broken any freaking rule.
  1659.  
  1660. E) Funny thing is I haven't contacted him in months and he would've voted for us to leave anyway.
  1661.  
  1662. Now if you want I can pull up a list of other unfair,unwarranted bans you guys, as admins have done.
  1663.  
  1664. Apparently taking people out before they've done anything is supported by you guys. Hail fucking Hydra.
  1665. 21:45, February 29, 2016
  1666. SwordofStorms
  1667. 1 Kudos
  1668. SwordofStorms
  1669. reply to #155
  1670. The Door Handler wrote:
  1671. SwordofStorms wrote:
  1672. The Door Handler wrote:
  1673. The DP Wiki has proven that it doesn't abide by fairness in polling or care about the rules of Wikia.
  1674. 10/10
  1675. explain to me how it's not fair. If I see anyone who I don't recognize vote, I'm planning on deleting the vote, as this is a community effort. How is it not fair? also, you might as well vote too...
  1676. It's not fair because
  1677. A) Wikia's rules state that you should give a warning before banning someone.
  1678.  
  1679. B) It's not fair because banning someone because they might get promoted is stupid and "maybe" getting promoted" does not break any rule.
  1680.  
  1681. C) Situation individjul
  1682.  
  1683. D) Why were you planning on banning him? He has not broken any freaking rule.
  1684.  
  1685. E) Funny thing is I haven't contacted him in months and he would've voted for us to leave anyway.
  1686.  
  1687. Now if you want I can pull up a list of other unfair,unwarranted bans you guys, as admins have done.
  1688.  
  1689. Apparently taking people out before they've done anything is supported by you guys. Hail fucking Hydra.
  1690. I'm planning on unbanning him once the vote is decided on. I temporarily banned him as a way to ensure that once you guys get banned you'll never get unbanned. Simple as that. Also, last I checked, he was in your group.
  1691. 21:50, February 29, 2016
  1692. The Door Handler
  1693.  
  1694. The Door Handler
  1695. He is not in our group. He left as soon as you did.
  1696.  
  1697. And "Planning to unban" someone once the vote is over is a fucking stupid idea. Yeah, "I'll let this guy go once he has no say in this poll".
  1698.  
  1699. Tan fucking fastic Sword. You're becoming the successor to Eggs Rank more and more by the second.
  1700. 23:20, February 29, 2016
  1701. SwordofStorms
  1702.  
  1703. SwordofStorms
  1704. reply to #157
  1705. Shits
  1706. The Door Handler wrote:
  1707. He is not in our group. He left as soon as you did.
  1708. And "Planning to unban" someone once the vote is over is a fucking stupid idea. Yeah, "I'll let this guy go once he has no say in this poll".
  1709.  
  1710. Tan fucking fastic Sword. You're becoming the successor to Eggs Rank more and more by the second.
  1711.  
  1712. 23:25, February 29, 2016
  1713. FalseShepherd
  1714.  
  1715. FalseShepherd
  1716. reply to #157
  1717. The Door Handler wrote:
  1718. He is not in our group. He left as soon as you did.
  1719. And "Planning to unban" someone once the vote is over is a fucking stupid idea. Yeah, "I'll let this guy go once he has no say in this poll".
  1720.  
  1721. Tan fucking fastic Sword. You're becoming the successor to Eggs Rank more and more by the second.
  1722. [[1]]
  1723. 01:14, March 1, 2016
  1724. Olli399
  1725.  
  1726. Olli399
  1727. All this drama started as I came in and as someone who got banned for no reason on the first fucking day by Gubra. (Literally for fucking nothing) They have all, when I have spoken to them, (Gubra, HPL and all that group) have all been disgusting people to talk to.(Incase you didn't notice, I especially hate you Gubra. Fuck you.) All it ever was.
  1728.  
  1729. Me and a couple others: Normal convo
  1730.  
  1731. Gubra Joined
  1732.  
  1733. Oh shit :/
  1734.  
  1735. Conversation dies,
  1736.  
  1737.  
  1738.  
  1739. So please kick these cancerous and toxic people.
  1740. 01:23, March 1, 2016
  1741. FalseShepherd
  1742.  
  1743. FalseShepherd
  1744. reply to #160
  1745. Olli399 wrote:
  1746. All this drama started as I came in and as someone who got banned for no reason on the first fucking day by Gubra. (Literally for fucking nothing) They have all, when I have spoken to them, (Gubra, HPL and all that group) have all been disgusting people to talk to.(Incase you didn't notice, I especially hate you Gubra. Fuck you.) All it ever was.
  1747. Me and a couple others: Normal convo
  1748.  
  1749. Gubra Joined
  1750.  
  1751. Oh shit :/
  1752.  
  1753. Conversation dies,
  1754.  
  1755.  
  1756.  
  1757. So please kick these cancerous and toxic people.
  1758. The most intelligent person on the wiki. You give Hawking a run for his money
  1759. 01:31, March 1, 2016
  1760. FalseShepherd
  1761.  
  1762. FalseShepherd
  1763. reply to #160
  1764. Olli399 wrote:
  1765. All this drama started as I came in and as someone who got banned for no reason on the first fucking day by Gubra. (Literally for fucking nothing) They have all, when I have spoken to them, (Gubra, HPL and all that group) have all been disgusting people to talk to.(Incase you didn't notice, I especially hate you Gubra. Fuck you.) All it ever was.
  1766. Me and a couple others: Normal convo
  1767.  
  1768. Gubra Joined
  1769.  
  1770. Oh shit :/
  1771.  
  1772. Conversation dies,
  1773.  
  1774.  
  1775.  
  1776. So please kick these cancerous and toxic people.
  1777. Xyele is just as much of a scumbag as Gubra
  1778. 01:32, March 1, 2016
  1779. Saab Pimping
  1780.  
  1781. Saab Pimping
  1782. NO, demotion
  1783. 01:33, March 1, 2016
  1784. FalseShepherd
  1785.  
  1786. FalseShepherd
  1787. reply to #163
  1788. Saab Pimping wrote:
  1789. NO, demotion
  1790. Did he promote you? You must immediately demote yourself.
  1791. 01:40, March 1, 2016
  1792. SwordofStorms
  1793.  
  1794. SwordofStorms
  1795. reply to #164
  1796. FalseShepherd wrote:
  1797. Saab Pimping wrote:
  1798. NO, demotion
  1799. Did he promote you? You must immediately demote yourself.
  1800. No, he didn't false. Why don't you check next time?
  1801. 01:41, March 1, 2016
  1802. Saab Pimping
  1803.  
  1804. Saab Pimping
  1805. reply to #164
  1806. FalseShepherd wrote:
  1807. Saab Pimping wrote:
  1808. NO, demotion
  1809. Did he promote you? You must immediately demote yourself.
  1810. No
  1811. 01:52, March 1, 2016
  1812. Gatack
  1813.  
  1814. Gatack
  1815. No: They should be demoted by Wikia. Kick his ass out that Door Handle boy!
  1816. 04:09, March 1, 2016
  1817. Topics for this thread:
  1818. Edit Topics
  1819. Recent Wiki Activity
  1820.  
  1821. Janet Bloomfield
  1822. edited by JudgeRichter 5 days ago
  1823. Galen Hallcyon
  1824. edited by Patriarchy
  1825. James Rolfe
  1826. edited by The Demon In Me
  1827. AlphaOmegaSin
  1828. edited by The Demon In Me
  1829. See more >
  1830. Games
  1831. Movies
  1832. TV
  1833. Explore Wikis
  1834. Follow Us
  1835.  
  1836. Overview
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement
Public Pastes
Advertisement
We use cookies for various purposes including analytics. By continuing to use Pastebin, you agree to our use of cookies as described in the Cookies Policy.  OK, I Understand
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!