Don't like ads? PRO users don't see any ads ;-)
Public Pastes
Guest

Untitled

By: a guest on Apr 15th, 2012  |  syntax: None  |  size: 1.88 KB  |  hits: 18  |  expires: Never
download  |  raw  |  embed  |  report abuse  |  print
Text below is selected. Please press Ctrl+C to copy to your clipboard. (⌘+C on Mac)
  1. Player Comments:
  2. ---[Enyalida on 4/3 @ 22:02 writes]:
  3. I'm against all of these solutions. Solution 2 would make people run
  4. away from the researcher more,
  5. not less and therefore dosn't address the issue at all. Solution 1 will
  6. allow for even easier
  7. shatterpless spamming, including shatterplexing with no rubies, and/or
  8. allowing very quicky ruby
  9. stacking for minimal cost. Yes, the rubies are dangerous outside of
  10. shatterplex. I agree that it's
  11. problematic to have a run-only cure, and that rubies are very important
  12. Type MORE to continue reading. (75% shown) >> VIEW MORE
  13. 6420h, 8640m, 9000e, 10p, 23400en, 33900w exkb<>-
  14. You continue reading:
  15. to insitute combat, and
  16. would support some other (non-OP) solutions to the problem. I would also
  17. note that you (Institute)
  18. are better equipped to hold people still than many other guilds.
  19. ---[Shuyin on 4/4 @ 19:36 writes]:
  20. Type MORE to continue reading. (81% shown) >> VIEW MORE >> VIEW MORE
  21. 7520h, 9025m, 8715e, 10p, 26400en, 35400w exkb<>-
  22. You continue reading:
  23. I like being able to violet rubies, since there's already precedent
  24. there, -in addition to- being
  25. able to run to get rid of them. If you got rid of running, the situation
  26. would arguably get worse
  27. especially if the rest of this report went in, which I don't agree with.
  28. 7p to insta shatterplex is
  29. a bit much. If not for the 1v1 application, then definitely the team
  30. aspect.
  31. ---[Alacardael on 4/5 @ 14:19 writes]:
  32. For a 1v1 application: Ruby (7p) -> Shatterplex (0p, massive timewarp)
  33. -> Shockstone (3p, eq loss) -
  34. > Soulless.
  35. ---[Draylor on 4/9 @ 17:01 writes]:
  36. Kethering rubies takes an -insanely- long time. Whilst rubies are
  37. definitely something that I feel
  38. could warrant a slight change either way, the solutions here in no way
  39. address the "problem" - It's
  40. Type MORE to continue reading. (99% shown) >> VIEW MORE
  41. 6420h, 8640m, 9000e, 10p, 23400en, 33900w exkb<>-
  42. You continue reading:
  43. a straight no from me on this one.
create a new version of this paste RAW Paste Data