Don't like ads? PRO users don't see any ads ;-)
Guest

Untitled

By: a guest on Aug 1st, 2012  |  syntax: None  |  size: 1.17 KB  |  hits: 15  |  expires: Never
download  |  raw  |  embed  |  report abuse  |  print
Text below is selected. Please press Ctrl+C to copy to your clipboard. (⌘+C on Mac)
  1. dabblego
  2. > antixml looked a bit average, but it doesn't handle malformed documents
  3. 25 [15:54:23] <
  4. !nc
  5. eneiry
  6. > In my opinion, antixml is the best available for Scala today. Dealing with incorrect XML should probably done in a preprocessing phase. Cleaner but with the possible penalty of parsing the document twice
  7. 20 [15:54:39]
  8. !n
  9. Guest74131
  10.  [~lizzin@
  11. !h
  12. c-24-14-148-164.hsd1.il.comcast.net
  13. ] has joined
  14. !c
  15. #scala
  16. 20 [15:55:10]
  17. !n
  18. Apocalisp
  19.  [~textual@
  20. !h
  21. c-174-62-237-65.hsd1.ma.comcast.net
  22. ] has joined
  23. !c
  24. #scala
  25. 34 [15:56:10]
  26. !n
  27. adammh`
  28.  [~user@
  29. !h
  30. 216.158.51.82
  31. ] has quit IRC: Remote host closed the connection
  32. 34 [15:56:10]
  33. !n
  34. ATuin
  35.  [~atuin@
  36. !h
  37. 79.153.37.116
  38. ] has quit IRC: Quit: WeeChat 0.3.8
  39. 25 [15:56:40] <
  40. !nc
  41. dabblego
  42. > in my opinion, that is a very bad idea
  43. 25 [15:56:45] <
  44. !nc
  45. Guest74131
  46. > http://pastie.org/4365044
  47. 25 [15:56:51] <
  48. !nc
  49. dabblego
  50. > and antixml has pretty piss poor library support
  51. 25 [15:57:10] <
  52. !nc
  53. Guest74131
  54. > why isn't Alice in scope. i thought it would be since they are part of the same package
  55. 25 [15:57:10] <
  56. !nc
  57. dabblego
  58. > which can be fixed a lot easier than if you fucked the parser