Advertisement
Guest User

Untitled

a guest
May 6th, 2016
70
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 5.31 KB | None | 0 0
  1. Friday, May 6, 2016
  2. 5:09 PM - Sail: I am curious in knowing why you didn't confront me over this ordeal? :V
  3. 5:10 PM - Fifty Shades of Nazz: I was told that you've been confronted for similar cases in the past. Be it passive aggression or just overall contempt towards other players.
  4. 5:10 PM - Fifty Shades of Nazz: I spoke with some other staff members a few days prior to your offense.
  5. 5:10 PM - Fifty Shades of Nazz: And that was literaly your lasta chnace.
  6. 5:10 PM - Sail: On an OOC standpoint?
  7. 5:10 PM - Fifty Shades of Nazz: literally* last chance*
  8. 5:11 PM - Sail: ICly, I played an irritable character; that being Jule. OOCly, I never had an issue with anyone.
  9. 5:11 PM - Sail: I had that confrontation with the player, whose logs are of a fragment to the whore ordeal. And the confrontation with Not-prepared; but that was to clarify some things in terms of turian trainings.
  10. 5:12 PM - Sail: I do not recall ever receiving any formal conversation over my OOC behavior, or a warning of sorts.
  11. 5:12 PM - Sail: From what I understand, I am being permanently banned for a single offense. Self-serving bias cast aside.
  12. 5:13 PM - Sail: I am not the flame kind of guy; it's pointless. Hence I did not engage much to the player involved in the logs you sent me.
  13. 5:14 PM - Sail: Nazz, I do feel that there is a huge misudnerstanding here. :V
  14. 5:14 PM - Fifty Shades of Nazz: That's what the appeal thread's for.
  15. 5:15 PM - Fifty Shades of Nazz: I'm not at liberty to just handle it in here.
  16. 5:16 PM - Sail: At the same time, it is robbing me of a weekend to roleplay. I understand it isn't my communtiy and you are an administration, but I do feel the ban should be lifted until people say more into the situation.
  17. 5:16 PM - Fifty Shades of Nazz: That would make the point of the ban completely obsolete.
  18. 5:17 PM - Sail: If you observed my IC and OOC behavior in server, I am very sure you will find that I am not a flamer. :V
  19. 5:17 PM - Sail: Pardon the words, but the ban itself is.
  20. 5:17 PM - Fifty Shades of Nazz: Given my position as an administrator, the things I'd like to say are definitely not something I'm -allowed- to say to a player.
  21. 5:18 PM - Sail: I understand that, and as someone whom is mature and knows from right from wrong I know what to not say to a player. Especially when I dedicate all of my free time to the server.
  22. 5:19 PM - Sail: I would not consciously start a quarrel with anyone over the internet. I only say "I don't care" (explicitly or implictly) or defend my innocence to any ethical degree.
  23. 5:19 PM - Sail: You yourself saw that with the situation I had with Demither.
  24. 5:20 PM - Fifty Shades of Nazz: 8:18 PM - Sail: I understand that, and as someone whom is mature and knows from right from wrong I know what to not say to a player.
  25. [LOOC] Pvt. Neilar 'Nil' Lumin: When kids think that I care OOCly.
  26. 5:20 PM - Fifty Shades of Nazz: [LOOC] Pvt. Neilar 'Nil' Lumin: When kids think that they are always right.
  27. [LOOC] Pvt. Neilar 'Nil' Lumin: :V
  28. 5:20 PM - Sail: Exactly.
  29. 5:20 PM - Fifty Shades of Nazz: That's contemptual.
  30. 5:21 PM - Sail: Also note how it's not pointed to the player himself.
  31. 5:21 PM - Sail: It isn't pointed to anyone, in that respect. If anything, I could be talking of something else- completely unrelated to the player.
  32. 5:22 PM - Sail: Then you have to look at who instigated the OOC conversation;
  33. 5:22 PM - Sail: [LOOC] Pvt. Michael Laurencine II: You obviously do not understand how fucking medigel works
  34. 5:23 PM - Sail: [LOOC] Pvt. Michael Laurencine II: Cause what you just said
  35. [LOOC] Pvt. Michael Laurencine II: is bullshit
  36. 5:23 PM - Fifty Shades of Nazz: If you read my response, I specifically stated that you're not the only one in the wrong, only the fact that you're a repeat-offender. If you're going to throw childish antics like that in my face in an attempt to jusify what ou said then I'm not going to talk to you any further regarding your ban. Send and and all quarrels you have to the forums thread.
  37. 5:23 PM - Sail: That, in itself, is flame - explicitly directed to me.
  38. 5:23 PM - Sail: I apologize, that response was not directed to yoru recent reply.
  39. 5:24 PM - Sail: This is not a childish antic, but moreso a professional conversation between administrator and player.
  40. 5:24 PM - Fifty Shades of Nazz: 'he started it'
  41. 5:24 PM - Fifty Shades of Nazz: 'I didn't say his name so you can't point it at me'
  42. 5:24 PM - Fifty Shades of Nazz: Like, come on, dude.
  43. 5:24 PM - Fifty Shades of Nazz: That's something that a five year old would say.
  44. 5:25 PM - Sail: I do not believe so. He did certainly start the ordeal; am I in the wrong for saying what I said? Perhaps, if he was to assume that I was directing my responses to him. However, I did not carry out the conversation like the traditional flame would- I left when I knew things were going to get heated.
  45. 5:27 PM - Sail: Another thing for me to point out- I am not a repeat offender, to the best of my knowledge. I do not recall ever fighting with someone in-server.
  46. 5:27 PM - Sail: Another thing to ask- why a permanent ban?
  47. 5:28 PM - Sail: I do not believe I am guilty of the charge, but assuming I was I would think that a permanent ban for "flamebating" is somewhat harsh? I understand it is not my community, but eh.
  48. 5:29 PM - Sail: But I can see you do not wish to carry out this conversation further. I will be submitting these chat logs over; just so you know.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement