SHARE
TWEET

everything of interest from 17th March 2013

a guest Oct 18th, 2015 5 Never
  1. (00:08:57) +scrubadour: what i don't understand
  2. (00:09:09) +scrubadour: is why these posters don't just post their obviously huge collection of elf porn to /e/
  3. (00:09:23) +scrubadour: or their lamias drinking cum to /d/
  4. (00:09:45) +scrubadour: god knows they have enough images to make a thread
  5. (00:10:12) %RapeApe: 'all my friends are here'
  6. (00:10:22) +scrubadour: it's not even western-style art, it's obviously anime stuff
  7. (00:10:27) %RapeApe: it's the excuse everyone uses to post off-topic crap
  8. (00:10:48) %RapeApe: they think *these* anonymous posters are special, and *those* anonymous posters are completely different
  9.  
  10. What they are to some extend. Board culture, customs and moderation do shape board and giving them different character.
  11. Does that excuse posting garbage? frankly, no.
  12.  
  13. (02:30:52) +scrubadour: mods have it even worse, they deal with the complaining, all of OUR mistakes, more than a few boards (which they have to be familiar with), and generally things we can't deal with
  14. (02:31:41) +Spitch: I sympathize with them, the Fallout Wiki is definitely not on their scale, but I've put up with quite a bit over there.
  15. (02:31:57) +scrubadour: moot has it worst of all, since he needs to run the whole shebang AND pay for it, with a toxic userbase that hates him and remembers every single slight
  16. (02:32:55) +scrubadour: at the end of the day, all of 4chan literally runs on sunshine and rainbows, because 10 years for a purely volunteer organization where nobody gets paid is a monumental achievement
  17.  
  18. (10:19:13) +errorname457: oi
  19. (10:19:28) +errorname457: what's the protocol when dealing with insane people
  20. (10:19:30) +errorname457: https://boards.4chan.org/v/res/181343149
  21. (10:20:01) +errorname457: I was thinking of BRing it for inciting a raid, but seems like he's got bigger problems
  22. (10:20:08) +errorname457: maybe it would be good to just delete it?
  23. (10:24:27) +AoC: Just delete them so it doesn't trigger them against us
  24. (10:24:42) +AoC: if pattern continues, issue BR over raid call
  25.  
  26. (13:11:07) +Deckenkatze: gif of a dog getting mutilated is global 1 or 3?
  27. (13:11:32) @ALTERNATIVE: a picture of it doesnt violate us law
  28. (13:11:54) +Deckenkatze: k i thought rapeape had said that crush gifs et al were global 1s
  29. (13:12:01) @ALTERNATIVE: if they were the person who did it it would be illegal
  30. (13:12:25) @ALTERNATIVE: it does say discuss so I can see how you can apply it to that
  31. (13:12:45) @ALTERNATIVE: but I would lean towards 3 in most cases
  32. (13:12:50) +Deckenkatze: aight den
  33. (13:13:23) @ALTERNATIVE: we can always increase the ban length to account for the added horribleness
  34. (13:15:17) %RapeApe: ALTERNATIVE, animal crush images are illegal
  35. (13:15:20) %RapeApe: there is a special law
  36. (13:15:54) %RapeApe: pictures of aan animal is being crushed to death for sexual pleasure is strictly illegal in the united states
  37. (13:16:36) @ALTERNATIVE: it really specifies that we need to know the photographer's level of arousal?
  38. (13:16:42) @ALTERNATIVE: or does it only become illegal when the viewer is aroused
  39. (13:16:46) %RapeApe: http://blog.aspca.org/content/victory-president-signs-new-crush-act-law
  40. (13:17:05) @ALTERNATIVE: oh the high heels ones
  41. (13:17:17) @ALTERNATIVE: it's really that specific?
  42. (13:17:37) %RapeApe: yes, it's that specific
  43. (13:17:38) @ALTERNATIVE: I was speaking on a general level, can you photograph a burning cat?
  44. (13:18:02) %RapeApe: distributing animal abuse photos, other than animal crush, is legal as far as i am aware
  45. [...]
  46. (13:19:54) @ALTERNATIVE: Definition- In this section the term ‘animal crush video’ means any photograph, motion-picture film, video or digital recording, or electronic image that--
  47. (13:19:58) %RapeApe: i just want to make sure moot doesn't get in shit for illegal content on his website
  48. (13:20:16) +McNuggets: The old law was struck down because it didn't specify interstate commerce or foreign distribution and, thus, infringed on State's rights by overstepping Federal bounds. The new law is specifically for interstate/foreign distribution and that includes the internet.
  49. [...]
  50. (13:23:10) +Spitch: What are you guys talkinb about? I can't see the rest of the conversation
  51. (13:23:20) +McNuggets: "the intentional crushing, burning, drowning, suffocating, or impaling of animals for no socially redeeming purpose."
  52. (13:23:41) @ALTERNATIVE: he asked if an animal mutilation photo fell under a ban request for global rule 1 or 3
  53. (13:23:43) +McNuggets: This law, Splitch http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/111/hr5566/text
  54. (13:24:10) +McNuggets: Spitch ... sorry ... whiskey day
  55. (13:24:30) +Spitch: I would say so
  56. (13:24:34) +Spitch: Happy St pats day
  57. [...]
  58. (13:34:11) +AoC: I just BR as illegal all animal abuse since mods like to give customs for those
  59. (13:34:18) +AoC: including zippo cat, shovel dog
  60. (13:34:20) +AoC: and so on
  61. (13:35:15) +McNuggets: Yup. HR 5566 covers zippo cat and shovel dog.
  62. (13:36:07) +McNuggets: The lawyer voice in me would argue that exposing animal cruelty for the purposes of social justice would be defensable, but I can see 4channers seriously abusing that privilege.
  63. (13:38:40) %RapeApe: they have exposed those who have committed animal cruelty before
  64. (13:39:07) +AoC: woman throwing cats into garbage bin comes to mind
  65. (13:39:38) +AoC: but they're the exception rather than the norm. I've been seeing the same man defecating over a restrained baby too many times over the years
  66. (13:40:21) +Spitch: I doubt anyone posts that shit for the exposition lol
  67. (13:41:02) +AoC: they still do sometimes. That gang of smiling guys holding a beheaded cat started as a raid call
  68. (13:41:27) +McNuggets: True, and the Dusty thing was also pretty nice. But I can see the potential for some serious abuse if the loophole is allowed. It's best not to give the mouse a cookie. 4chan is not a court of law.
  69. (13:41:40) +AoC: unfortunately it just becomes shock ammo for driving away newfags and spamming whatever they dislike
  70. (13:42:08) %RapeApe: do they not understand that newfags come here specifically for shock images?
  71. (13:42:25) +Spitch: Case and point, "Hey I'm new to /b/, can I have a shock/gore thread?"
  72. (13:42:40) +AoC: "hey guys, I'm showing my friends this site, post gore"
  73. (13:42:46) +McNuggets: Ah, yes ... the "4chan is neo-Ogrish.com" mentality.
  74.  
  75. (13:43:34) +AoC: I seriously had to contain a spam wave yesterday over "nubs/GET a day keeps the newfags away" while they were derailing a perfectly good Dark Souls thread
  76. (13:43:53) +AoC: And that's why user moderation never works.
  77. (13:44:00) +BluRay: terrible
  78. (13:44:29) +McNuggets: I'd say that putting the nuts in charge of the nuthouse is insane, but then I remember that someone actually allowed me to be a Janitor.
  79. (13:46:24) +McNuggets: Honestly I can't believe there are people out there who seriously want us to go with an up/down vote system.
  80. (13:47:40) +Spitch: They're just people coming from reddit who can't stand to see a different system.
  81. (13:48:08) +Spitch: Moot described it perfectly, "A waterfall of content." it's good.
  82. (13:48:21) +McNuggets: Change is an odd thing to fear.
  83. (13:48:53) +AoC: the reddit system allows for bubbles of content and promoting only circlejerks. It's never used for promoting better content, just as a "I agree with this guy" button
  84. (13:49:08) +AoC: dissent dies in the hidden pages
  85.  
  86. (20:07:01) ~moots: AoC: are you around
  87. (20:07:43) +Spitch: Hey Moot
  88. (20:08:01) +Spitch: I just got in, so I don't know where he is
  89. [...]
  90. (20:09:16) ~moots: i asked him if he was around, not you
  91. (20:09:37) ~moots: who are the other a/jp janitors
  92. (20:10:43) +Spitch: Sorry.
  93. [...]
  94. (20:12:25) +Sange: me azatsu and mcnuggets moots
  95. (20:12:35) +Sange: in /jp/'s case
  96. (20:14:26) +andonuts: fsdfdsf, VCR, Nouz, Azatsu and myself are on /a/.
  97. (20:20:03) +AoC: hey moot
  98. (20:20:16) ~moots: you're fired
  99. (20:20:38) +AoC: oh well. See you some other day then
  100. (20:20:39) ~moots: pranked
  101. (20:20:43) ~moots: for once, i'm kidding!
  102. (20:20:54) ~moots: i require your sagely wisdom
  103. (20:20:57) +Anikitan: in before double trolled and he actually is fired
  104. (20:21:05) +AoC: oh you
  105. (20:21:07) ~moots: i wouldn't put that past me
  106. (20:21:17) +nemo`: inb4 moot fires himself by accident
  107. (20:21:26) ~moots: i also wouldn't put that past me
  108.  
  109. (20:32:01) +Anikitan: theres been a ton of MGS threads on /v/ lately
  110. (20:32:05) +Anikitan: im not complaining :3
  111.  
  112. Is that the moment where MSG's popularity began to rise?
  113.  
  114. (22:27:22) +duanemoody: is there a board where 'reddit' is filtered or autobanned or can someone please tell the boards this isn't a thing
  115. (22:28:03) +AoC: the reddit block is global as far as I know
  116. (22:28:16) +duanemoody: they can't spell out the letters or they can't post a link
  117. (22:28:23) +AoC: both
  118. (22:28:35) +AoC: no reddit, no reddit.com, no red.it
  119. (22:28:48) +duanemoody: was this a higher priority than other wordfilters
  120. (22:28:51) +duanemoody: seriously
  121. (22:28:58) LingeringParticles: you don't get a ban for it, though
  122. (22:29:05) LingeringParticles: last i checked
  123. [...]
  124. (22:29:31) +Deckenkatze: reddit is a global ban and kotaku is a /v/ ban iirc
RAW Paste Data
Top