++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ _ _ __ .__ __| || |_______ _____/ |_|__| ______ ____ ____ \ __ /\__ \ / \ __\ |/ ___// __ \_/ ___\ | || | / __ \| | \ | | |\___ \\ ___/\ \___ /_ ~~ _\(____ /___| /__| |__/____ >\___ >\___ > |_||_| \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ .____ .__ ____ ___ | | __ __| | ________\ \/ / _____ _____ ______ | | | | \ | \___ / \ / / \\__ \ / ___/ | |___| | / |__/ / / \| Y Y \/ __ \_\___ \ |_______ \____/|____/_____ \/___/\ \__|_| (____ /____ > \/ \/ \_/ \/ \/ \/ .___.__ __ .__ ____ __| _/|__|/ |_|__| ____ ____ _/ __ \ / __ | | \ __\ |/ _ \ / \ \ ___// /_/ | | || | | ( <_> ) | \ \___ >____ | |__||__| |__|\____/|___| / \/ \/ \/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Episode #...something. Stratfor eats Cocks: lurking emails. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ YEAH!!!MAILS MAILS MAILS MAILS MAILS MAILS MAILS also cocks. >STRATFOR MAILS TEASER #2. >ACTION! /* awesomeness: 1. An unmeasurable amount of awesomenimity something can produce. urbandictionary */ Well hope you all enjoyed that first teaser ---> http://pastebin.com/YwazdGRZ >.< So here we go again. More srs shit now cause internets is srs business. TITLE: STRATFOR ANALYZES ANONYMOUS AND WIKILEAKS > they called us hippie arseholes :( > and that we ll be 'hard to kill' > . ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ From: scott.stewart@stratfor.com To: analysts@stratfor.com List Name: mailto:analysts@stratfor.com Subject: RE: Wiki Hackers Talk to The Economist Date: 2010-12-10 20:25:20 Content: I also think there are more folks who are willing to be hacktivists than those who are willing to get tear gassed or charge a police line. It is more anonymous and less dangerous/uncomfortable. From: analysts-bounces@stratfor.com [mailto:analysts-bounces@stratfor.com] On Behalf Of Peter Zeihan Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 2:21 PM To: analysts@stratfor.com Subject: Re: Wiki Hackers Talk to The Economist ull never get rid of it completely -- as long as there are young people with no assets and a perception that they've nothing to lose this will exist but in times when home ownership is growing and there is a perception of a threat, the numbers of folks who will do this is very low -- while at the same time the state's ability to deal with them is relatively high and support in broader society is questionable at best for such anarchists On 12/10/2010 12:51 PM, Chris Farnham wrote: And what happens if your core are people in Chicago, Oslo, Aukland, Perth, Munich, Gothenburg, etc. who are not afraid and are only two years out of college working for a marketing company and their biggest financial liability is your AT&T monthly invoice? As I said, these guys are not yet a major destabilising force, but you look at the human flesh search engines in China, they unsettle the Party on a monthly basis with their ability track, identify, locate and out whatever target takes their interest and that has included Party members in the past. Wikileaks is a big deal in the world of the anti-establishment and the network based activists, it has displayed potential to strike at the established powers via information proliferation hand in hand with the conventional media. That's power and Anon has now latched on to the bandwagon. These guys have already crossed from net based activism to physical world activism, it has already happened at a very small level. As I said, the core may not be the danger but the fanatical fringe amongst them are knowledgeable, motivated, organised and spread across the world with a non-state, nihilistic agenda. Sounds somewhat familiar, no? I'm not saying that this shit is going down. I'm saying that there is significant potential there and to ignore it could be quite a mistake because if it doesn't make anything of itself, as Mike Mooney has said, it has created a wonderful template for others who may be more determined. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Peter Zeihan" To: analysts@stratfor.com Sent: Saturday, December 11, 2010 2:35:25 AM Subject: Re: Wiki Hackers Talk to The Economist yeah - its always there, but there are two trends in western soceities that have traditionally kept it weak for the past few decades: rising home ownership and the presence of an enemy if ur afraid you want a strong state, and if you have a mortgage you don't riot On 12/10/2010 12:31 PM, Marko Papic wrote: Agreed completely. They have definitely toned done and terrorism has lost its cool "edge" after 9-11. But things go in waves... I mean there is nothing new about anarchism. I would argue it is hormonal. You can't ever really weed it out, it is not purely ideological. You are always going to find young men who think they are destined for greatness. On 12/10/10 12:23 PM, scott stewart wrote: Yes, but.... The anarchist movement had generated a lot of momentum in the physical world around the time of the millennium with the battle in Seattle, London May Day and the WEF violence in Davos. They lost a lot of steam after 9/11. We still have yet to see them regain the mass, momentum and numbers they had a decade ago. WTO and G-7 meetings are far more peaceful. From: analysts-bounces@stratfor.com [mailto:analysts-bounces@stratfor.com] On Behalf Of Marko Papic Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 1:13 PM To: analysts@stratfor.com Subject: Re: Wiki Hackers Talk to The Economist I agree with Chris. We have to be aware that "anarchism" has deep deep roots in history and has been violent in many ways many times. I am afraid, for example, that all the anti-globalization people in Europe are looking to hitch a new wagon. I am worried that the protests in the UK and all this net anarchism activity could somehow bizzarly get connected. I have no real evidence, but I do think that is potential for net anarchism to get its real world anarchist equivalent. I think we need to consider what Chris is saying very seriously. The cross over into physical/real life is a serious potential. On 12/10/10 11:51 AM, Chris Farnham wrote: I watch anon and /b/ and have done for a while now (no I do not chan). There are some interesting crossovers with AQ and the decentralization/motivation of ideology. I don't think they have yet reached a point where they have become a cogent threat to security. However this wikileaks thing has the potential to be a catalyst for them. A web based subversive entity has just rocked the world for two weeks, that's dynamite for these guys. The chaners/anon/b are educated and at the leading edge of network based technology, have a nebulous structure of loyal people spread through the world with no nationalistic foundations bit drawn together under a shared interest in chaos (hentai and cats, for fuck sake). There are numerous examples where they have uncovered identities and all personal details of people based on a single photo (of a woman putting a cat in a garbage bin, for example) and bought some serious vigilanty style justice to those they disagree with. They have also crossed over into the physical/real life world a number of times. These guys are on the same level as the Chinese human flesh seach engines and quite possibly the cyber warfare units of many developed countries today. Most importantly, for the US at least, I have noted a number of militant libertarians within their periphery. It's going to be very interesting to watch what anon does in the 'post-wilileaks' environment. If they move from a bunch of tech geeks in mum's basement into a real movement they could cause serious trouble and be hard to kill. The coresy not be the problem but the few unhinged among them could prove to be quite destructive if so inclined. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 11, 2010, at 1:25, Fred Burton wrote: These global hippies and arseholes are like CHAOS or THRUSH. Fred Burton wrote: http://www.economist.com/blogs/babbage/2010/12/more_wikileaks I am talking to members of a group called "Anonymous", using a web-based collaborative text-editing service. It is the first such interview for all of us, and their answers begin to collide on the page. One member comes from Norway; another shows surprise, then offers that she is from New Zealand. Another writes that group members come from Nepal and Eastern Russia. They all speak through pseudonyms, but I don't even know which psuedonym comes from what country because shortly after I read these answers, someone who calls himself "Tux" erases them all and writes -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Marko Papic Geopol Analyst - Eurasia STRATFOR 700 Lavaca Street - 900 Austin, Texas 78701 USA P: + 1-512-744-4094 marko.papic@stratfor.com -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Marko Papic Geopol Analyst - Eurasia STRATFOR 700 Lavaca Street - 900 Austin, Texas 78701 USA P: + 1-512-744-4094 marko.papic@stratfor.com -- Chris Farnham Senior Watch Officer, STRATFOR China Mobile: (86) 1581 1579142 Email: chris.farnham@stratfor.com www.stratfor.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ :3 #ROFLMAOAPMP penis penis kayla> i didnt get my icecream yet...