SHARE
TWEET

other Highlights from 4th Octobe 2012

a guest Jul 30th, 2015 11 Never
  1. (13:06:48) ‹fsdfdsf› [00:57:20] >Nagi !!aFNubAnHQcc 10/04/12(Thu)02:35
  2. (13:06:48) ‹fsdfdsf› [00:57:20] >>72479513
  3. (13:06:48) ‹fsdfdsf› [00:57:20] >More people = more revenue, fag. 4chan has become an MMO and with 4chan pass, you pay to win.
  4. (13:06:48) ‹fsdfdsf› [00:57:24] Someone take her pass!
  5. (13:06:48) ‹Sange› [00:57:30] wtf
  6. (13:06:48) ‹Sange› [00:57:32] lol
  7. (13:06:48) ‹VCR_Working› [00:58:01] remember, the best way to deal with an attention whore is not to respond at all
  8. (13:06:48) ‹fsdfdsf› [00:58:13] Or delete her posts
  9. (13:06:48) ‹VCR_Working› [00:58:15] too bad retards will always give them attention : /
  10.  
  11. (13:06:49) ‹+AstronautBear› [02:44:29] man, whatever happened to the new janitors
  12. (13:06:49) ‹+AstronautBear› [02:44:43] they're not in here so i do not believe they exist
  13. (13:06:49) ‹fsdfdsf› [02:44:48] The apps haven't been gone over by all the mods yet
  14. (13:06:49) ‹+AstronautBear› [02:44:57] there was the one
  15. (13:06:49) ‹+Beam› [02:44:57] they haven't been hired dude
  16. (13:06:49) ‹+AstronautBear› [02:45:05] oh
  17. (13:06:49) ‹fsdfdsf› [02:45:09] Kami, katsu and dongs said they haven't got all their apps done yet
  18. (13:06:49) ‹fsdfdsf› [02:45:16] so I'm guessing a lot of the other mods are like that to
  19. (13:06:49) ‹+AstronautBear› [02:45:19] too many dongs
  20. (13:06:49) ‹fsdfdsf› [02:45:41] We did get 2 for /vg/ though
  21. (13:06:49) ‹fsdfdsf› [02:45:47] anikien
  22. (13:06:49) ‹fsdfdsf› [02:45:52] and I can't remember the other guy
  23. (13:06:49) ‹+Beam› [02:45:59] yeah that was recent
  24. (13:06:49) ‹+Beam› [02:46:06] we need some for /x/ and I guess /hm/
  25. (13:06:49) ‹+Beam› [02:46:14] really all the boards
  26. (13:06:49) ‹fsdfdsf› [02:46:15] Yea /x/ needs janitors bad
  27. (13:06:49) ‹fsdfdsf› [02:46:18] and /mu/
  28. (13:06:49) ‹fsdfdsf› [02:50:50] I like listening to this guy say what the fuck on this video
  29. (13:06:49) ‹fsdfdsf› [02:50:58] He's very good at it
  30. (13:06:49) ‹+Beam› [02:52:02] it's Dunky
  31. (13:06:49) ‹+Beam› [02:52:17] i'm pretty sure, anyways
  32.  
  33. (13:06:49) ‹+Bloom› [12:48:47] i thought the idea was that if someone just does it once or twice its just typical shitposting but if they flood a thread with it and reply to every get a million times its essentially spamming
  34. (13:06:49) ‹%kami`› [12:48:59] seriously moot you're just driving people away with these sort of severe bans
  35. (13:06:49) ‹%kami`› [12:49:06] inb4 no response as usual
  36. (13:06:49) ‹moot› [12:49:07] they're not severe you tard
  37. (13:06:49) ‹moot› [12:49:14] my ban templates are a thousand fucking times lighter than what the mods used to do
  38. (13:06:49) ‹moot› [12:49:17] 90% of them are 1 or 3 days
  39. (13:06:49) ‹%kami`› [12:49:17] 7 days global?
  40. (13:06:49) ‹%kami`› [12:49:28] I would give them 3 days local
  41. (13:06:49) ‹moot› [12:49:33] do you not realize mods used to ban people for weeks for this shit?
  42. (13:06:49) ‹moot› [12:49:38] i can change that one
  43. (13:06:49) ‹%kami`› [12:49:46] yeah but I'm not one of those mods
  44. (13:06:49) ‹moot› [12:49:51] try "hey please change this" instead of passive aggressive bitching
  45. (13:06:50) ‹%kami`› [12:50:05] I've been doing that with a lot of things moot
  46. (13:06:50) ‹%kami`› [12:50:11] you usually just ignore everything
  47. (13:06:50) ‹moot› [12:50:18] i dont sit in this chat all day
  48.  
  49. (13:06:50) ‹+Bloom› [13:01:54] yeah
  50. (13:06:50) ‹+Bloom› [13:02:12] it might be different if/when that thing where people cant post for an hour if they have a pending ban request
  51. (13:06:50) ‹Anikitan› [13:02:27] that'd probably just get abused
  52. (13:06:50) ‹+Bloom› [13:02:39] why, it was moots idea
  53. [...]
  54. (13:04:22) ‹+Bloom› and since we have the ban request button right on the posts now, i can see it getting really annoying for spammers when they have an hour cooldown every time they post and have to reset their router for every single post
  55. (13:04:44) ‹Anikitan› that's a good point
  56. (13:04:55) ‹+AoC› we still need a prompt with number of already filed ban requests for an IP though
  57. (13:05:14) ‹Anikitan› on the ban request button?
  58. (13:05:24) ‹+AoC› hate to pile them up for a single guy since when they go through, they see 6-10 different bans at the same time
  59. (13:05:36) ‹Anikitan› it'd also be handy if you had the option of deleting all posts under that IP if someone has a ban request on them
  60. (13:05:37) ‹+AoC› at least accela spammer in /jp/ is collecting them as trophies
  61.  
  62. (15:22:36) ‹VCR_Working› lol
  63. (15:22:53) ‹VCR_Working› https://boards.4chan.org/v/res/157321554 as expected of /v/
  64.  
  65. (18:47:18) ‹+AstronautBear› why are there so many anti-LoL threads lately
  66. (18:47:20) ‹+AoC› only a handful with 15-20
  67. (18:47:26) ‹+AoC› because of e-sports
  68. (18:47:32) ‹+AstronautBear› is DOTA 2 about to be officially released and this is some seriously underhanded shit
  69. (18:47:33) ‹+AstronautBear› oh
  70. (18:47:37) ‹+AstronautBear› oh yeah
  71.  
  72. (21:16:07) ‹Anikitan› https://www.4chan.org/reports/?mode=details&board=vg&no=15451723
  73. (21:16:09) ‹Anikitan› right on queue
  74. (21:16:56) ‹Anikitan› I'm shitposting if discussing the LoL World Championships in a LoL thread is shitposting
RAW Paste Data
Top