[17:23:04] nitrodog96: completing the square
[17:23:09] kierant3hz: oo good one
[17:35:49] nitrodog96: Isn't it 1.118, 1, 3
[17:35:54] nitrodog96: for q1
[17:36:25] nitrodog96: Never mind
[17:37:50] nitrodog96: 2.236,2,3
[17:38:04] kierant3hz: they should be whole numbers
[17:38:42] nitrodog96: Uh, no, I graphed it on Desmos.
[17:38:48] kierant3hz: it's a whole number
[17:38:53] kierant3hz: don't bother graphing that shit lol
[17:39:02] nitrodog96: HAHAHA-no
[17:39:03] kierant3hz: weren't you the one who suggested completing the square?
[17:39:23] nitrodog96: Yeah, but that's not what I meant!
[17:39:25] nitrodog96: I meant with vertex form
[17:39:26] kierant3hz: that's
[17:39:31] kierant3hz: easy af completing the square
[17:39:44] nitrodog96: Riight.
[17:39:57] nitrodog96: So you say to find the radius of the circle and xy coordinates of the center.
[17:40:06] nitrodog96: I graph the circle, calculate the radius, find the xy coordinates of the center, and it doesn't work
[17:40:12] kierant3hz: well then
[17:40:15] kierant3hz: complete the square
[17:40:25] nitrodog96: I don't know how to complete that square! That's no vertex form
[17:40:34] nitrodog96: I did y = a(x-p)^2+q
[17:40:40] kierant3hz: that's definitely wrong lmfao
[17:40:45] nitrodog96: That is NOT wrong!
[17:40:52] nitrodog96: This is quadratics I'm talking about!
[17:40:59] kierant3hz: that is WRONG if you're getting some shitty answer
[17:41:05] nitrodog96: I FUCKING GRAPHED IT
[17:41:12] nitrodog96: ON DESMOS
[17:41:13] kierant3hz: then don't fucking graph it
[17:41:17] nitrodog96: BY PUTTING IN THE ORIGINAL EQUATION
[17:41:32] nitrodog96: http://prntscr.com/cxq08t
[17:45:15] nitrodog96: Dude if you hadn't left out the square root
[17:45:25] kierant3hz: you still fucked up LOL
[17:45:30] nitrodog96: No, I didn't fuck up.
[17:45:35] nitrodog96: I graphed the equation that was given.
[17:45:45] kierant3hz: "1.118, 1"
[17:45:56] nitrodog96: Well, yeah, but that was a mistake in reading the equation.
[17:46:01] nitrodog96: I read the equation right the second time.
[17:46:05] kierant3hz: so you fucked up reading the equation
[17:46:06] kierant3hz: got it.
[17:46:12] nitrodog96: What do I get? The wrong answer, because you fucked up writing down the equation
[17:47:47] kierant3hz: you fucked up the x and y coords
[17:47:56] kierant3hz: and i clarified in chat that the radius was without the root
[17:47:58] nitrodog96: Yeah, because you fucking forgot a square root!
[17:48:07] kierant3hz: that doesn't affect the original equation in any way
[17:48:16] nitrodog96: Yes
[17:48:17] kierant3hz: the equation is the same
[17:48:21] kierant3hz: but the radius is not
[17:48:28] kierant3hz: the only problem is the formatting of the answer
[17:48:43] nitrodog96: Would you say that y = 4 and y = sqrt2 are the same
[17:48:45] nitrodog96: er
[17:48:48] nitrodog96: Fucking brain fart
[17:48:51] nitrodog96: y = 2 and y = sqrt4
[17:49:49] nitrodog96: Anyway, I did get it in the end, but the square root did screw me up. If you had put a square root into the equation in the right spot, I'd have had it right, but... oh well
[17:50:00] kierant3hz: there was no square root needed in the equation
[17:50:11] kierant3hz: yes, i needed the answer to be two three sqrt 5
[17:50:36] kierant3hz: but the original equation was correct