Advertisement
Guest User

Teaser 2 Stratfor Calls Anon and Wikileaks hippie arseholes

a guest
Jan 16th, 2012
13,596
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 10.44 KB | None | 0 0
  1. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  2. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  3. _ _ __ .__
  4. __| || |_______ _____/ |_|__| ______ ____ ____
  5. \ __ /\__ \ / \ __\ |/ ___// __ \_/ ___\
  6. | || | / __ \| | \ | | |\___ \\ ___/\ \___
  7. /_ ~~ _\(____ /___| /__| |__/____ >\___ >\___ >
  8. |_||_| \/ \/ \/ \/ \/
  9.  
  10. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  11. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  12.  
  13. .____ .__ ____ ___
  14. | | __ __| | ________\ \/ / _____ _____ ______
  15. | | | | \ | \___ / \ / / \\__ \ / ___/
  16. | |___| | / |__/ / / \| Y Y \/ __ \_\___ \
  17. |_______ \____/|____/_____ \/___/\ \__|_| (____ /____ >
  18. \/ \/ \_/ \/ \/ \/
  19. .___.__ __ .__
  20. ____ __| _/|__|/ |_|__| ____ ____
  21. _/ __ \ / __ | | \ __\ |/ _ \ / \
  22. \ ___// /_/ | | || | | ( <_> ) | \
  23. \___ >____ | |__||__| |__|\____/|___| /
  24. \/ \/ \/
  25. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  26. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  27. Episode #...something. Stratfor eats Cocks: lurking emails.
  28. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  29. YEAH!!!MAILS MAILS MAILS MAILS MAILS MAILS MAILS also cocks.
  30.  
  31. >STRATFOR MAILS TEASER #2.
  32. >ACTION!
  33.  
  34. /*
  35. awesomeness:
  36. 1. An unmeasurable amount of awesomenimity something can produce.
  37.  
  38. urbandictionary
  39. */
  40.  
  41.  
  42. Well hope you all enjoyed that first teaser ---> http://pastebin.com/YwazdGRZ
  43. >.<
  44.  
  45. So here we go again. More srs shit now cause internets is srs business.
  46.  
  47. TITLE: STRATFOR ANALYZES ANONYMOUS AND WIKILEAKS
  48. > they called us hippie arseholes :(
  49. > and that we ll be 'hard to kill'
  50. > .
  51.  
  52.  
  53. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  54.  
  55. From: scott.stewart@stratfor.com
  56.  
  57. To: analysts@stratfor.com
  58.  
  59. List Name: mailto:analysts@stratfor.com
  60.  
  61. Subject: RE: Wiki Hackers Talk to The Economist
  62.  
  63. Date: 2010-12-10 20:25:20
  64.  
  65. Content:
  66.  
  67. I also think there are more folks who are willing to be hacktivists than
  68. those who are willing to get tear gassed or charge a police line. It is
  69. more anonymous and less dangerous/uncomfortable.
  70.  
  71.  
  72. From: analysts-bounces@stratfor.com [mailto:analysts-bounces@stratfor.com]
  73. On Behalf Of Peter Zeihan
  74. Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 2:21 PM
  75. To: analysts@stratfor.com
  76. Subject: Re: Wiki Hackers Talk to The Economist
  77.  
  78.  
  79.  
  80. ull never get rid of it completely -- as long as there are young people
  81. with no assets and a perception that they've nothing to lose this will
  82. exist
  83.  
  84. but in times when home ownership is growing and there is a perception of a
  85. threat, the numbers of folks who will do this is very low -- while at the
  86. same time the state's ability to deal with them is relatively high and
  87. support in broader society is questionable at best for such anarchists
  88.  
  89. On 12/10/2010 12:51 PM, Chris Farnham wrote:
  90.  
  91. And what happens if your core are people in Chicago, Oslo, Aukland, Perth,
  92. Munich, Gothenburg, etc. who are not afraid and are only two years out of
  93. college working for a marketing company and their biggest financial
  94. liability is your AT&T monthly invoice?
  95.  
  96. As I said, these guys are not yet a major destabilising force, but you
  97. look at the human flesh search engines in China, they unsettle the Party
  98. on a monthly basis with their ability track, identify, locate and out
  99. whatever target takes their interest and that has included Party members
  100. in the past.
  101.  
  102. Wikileaks is a big deal in the world of the anti-establishment and the
  103. network based activists, it has displayed potential to strike at the
  104. established powers via information proliferation hand in hand with the
  105. conventional media. That's power and Anon has now latched on to the
  106. bandwagon. These guys have already crossed from net based activism to
  107. physical world activism, it has already happened at a very small level.
  108.  
  109. As I said, the core may not be the danger but the fanatical fringe amongst
  110. them are knowledgeable, motivated, organised and spread across the world
  111. with a non-state, nihilistic agenda. Sounds somewhat familiar, no?
  112.  
  113. I'm not saying that this shit is going down. I'm saying that there is
  114. significant potential there and to ignore it could be quite a mistake
  115. because if it doesn't make anything of itself, as Mike Mooney has said, it
  116. has created a wonderful template for others who may be more determined.
  117.  
  118.  
  119. --------------------------------------------------------------------------
  120.  
  121. From: "Peter Zeihan"
  122. To: analysts@stratfor.com
  123. Sent: Saturday, December 11, 2010 2:35:25 AM
  124. Subject: Re: Wiki Hackers Talk to The Economist
  125.  
  126. yeah - its always there, but there are two trends in western soceities
  127. that have traditionally kept it weak for the past few decades: rising home
  128. ownership and the presence of an enemy
  129.  
  130. if ur afraid you want a strong state, and if you have a mortgage you don't
  131. riot
  132.  
  133. On 12/10/2010 12:31 PM, Marko Papic wrote:
  134.  
  135. Agreed completely. They have definitely toned done and terrorism has lost
  136. its cool "edge" after 9-11.
  137.  
  138. But things go in waves... I mean there is nothing new about anarchism. I
  139. would argue it is hormonal. You can't ever really weed it out, it is not
  140. purely ideological. You are always going to find young men who think they
  141. are destined for greatness.
  142.  
  143. On 12/10/10 12:23 PM, scott stewart wrote:
  144.  
  145. Yes, but....
  146.  
  147.  
  148.  
  149. The anarchist movement had generated a lot of momentum in the physical
  150. world around the time of the millennium with the battle in Seattle, London
  151. May Day and the WEF violence in Davos. They lost a lot of steam after
  152. 9/11.
  153.  
  154.  
  155.  
  156. We still have yet to see them regain the mass, momentum and numbers they
  157. had a decade ago. WTO and G-7 meetings are far more peaceful.
  158.  
  159.  
  160.  
  161. From: analysts-bounces@stratfor.com [mailto:analysts-bounces@stratfor.com]
  162. On Behalf Of Marko Papic
  163. Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 1:13 PM
  164. To: analysts@stratfor.com
  165. Subject: Re: Wiki Hackers Talk to The Economist
  166.  
  167.  
  168.  
  169. I agree with Chris.
  170.  
  171. We have to be aware that "anarchism" has deep deep roots in history and
  172. has been violent in many ways many times.
  173.  
  174. I am afraid, for example, that all the anti-globalization people in Europe
  175. are looking to hitch a new wagon. I am worried that the protests in the UK
  176. and all this net anarchism activity could somehow bizzarly get connected.
  177.  
  178. I have no real evidence, but I do think that is potential for net
  179. anarchism to get its real world anarchist equivalent.
  180.  
  181. I think we need to consider what Chris is saying very seriously. The cross
  182. over into physical/real life is a serious potential.
  183.  
  184. On 12/10/10 11:51 AM, Chris Farnham wrote:
  185.  
  186. I watch anon and /b/ and have done for a while now (no I do not chan).
  187. There are some interesting crossovers with AQ and the
  188. decentralization/motivation of ideology. I don't think they have yet
  189. reached a point where they have become a cogent threat to security.
  190. However this wikileaks thing has the potential to be a catalyst for them.
  191. A web based subversive entity has just rocked the world for two weeks,
  192. that's dynamite for these guys.
  193.  
  194. The chaners/anon/b are educated and at the leading edge of network based
  195. technology, have a nebulous structure of loyal people spread through the
  196. world with no nationalistic foundations bit drawn together under a shared
  197. interest in chaos (hentai and cats, for fuck sake). There are numerous
  198. examples where they have uncovered identities and all personal details of
  199. people based on a single photo (of a woman putting a cat in a garbage bin,
  200. for example) and bought some serious vigilanty style justice to those they
  201. disagree with. They have also crossed over into the physical/real life
  202. world a number of times.
  203.  
  204. These guys are on the same level as the Chinese human flesh seach engines
  205. and quite possibly the cyber warfare units of many developed countries
  206. today.
  207.  
  208. Most importantly, for the US at least, I have noted a number of militant
  209. libertarians within their periphery.
  210.  
  211. It's going to be very interesting to watch what anon does in the
  212. 'post-wilileaks' environment. If they move from a bunch of tech geeks in
  213. mum's basement into a real movement they could cause serious trouble and
  214. be hard to kill. The coresy not be the problem but the few unhinged among
  215. them could prove to be quite destructive if so inclined.
  216.  
  217. Sent from my iPhone
  218.  
  219. On Dec 11, 2010, at 1:25, Fred Burton wrote:
  220.  
  221. These global hippies and arseholes are like CHAOS or THRUSH.
  222.  
  223. Fred Burton wrote:
  224.  
  225. http://www.economist.com/blogs/babbage/2010/12/more_wikileaks
  226.  
  227. I am talking to members of a group called "Anonymous", using a web-based
  228. collaborative text-editing service. It is the first such interview for
  229. all of us, and their answers begin to collide on the page. One member
  230. comes from Norway; another shows surprise, then offers that she is from
  231. New Zealand. Another writes that group members come from Nepal and
  232. Eastern Russia. They all speak through pseudonyms, but I don't even know
  233. which psuedonym comes from what country because shortly after I read
  234. these answers, someone who calls himself "Tux" erases them all and writes
  235.  
  236.  
  237.  
  238. --
  239.  
  240. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
  241.  
  242. Marko Papic
  243.  
  244. Geopol Analyst - Eurasia
  245.  
  246. STRATFOR
  247.  
  248. 700 Lavaca Street - 900
  249.  
  250. Austin, Texas
  251.  
  252. 78701 USA
  253.  
  254. P: + 1-512-744-4094
  255.  
  256. marko.papic@stratfor.com
  257.  
  258.  
  259.  
  260. --
  261.  
  262. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
  263.  
  264. Marko Papic
  265.  
  266. Geopol Analyst - Eurasia
  267.  
  268. STRATFOR
  269.  
  270. 700 Lavaca Street - 900
  271.  
  272. Austin, Texas
  273.  
  274. 78701 USA
  275.  
  276. P: + 1-512-744-4094
  277.  
  278. marko.papic@stratfor.com
  279.  
  280. --
  281.  
  282. Chris Farnham
  283. Senior Watch Officer, STRATFOR
  284. China Mobile: (86) 1581 1579142
  285. Email: chris.farnham@stratfor.com
  286. www.stratfor.com
  287.  
  288.  
  289. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  290. :3
  291.  
  292. #ROFLMAOAPMP
  293. penis penis
  294.  
  295. kayla> i didnt get my icecream yet...
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement