Don't like ads? PRO users don't see any ads ;-)
Guest

Untitled

By: a guest on Apr 28th, 2012  |  syntax: None  |  size: 2.98 KB  |  hits: 17  |  expires: Never
download  |  raw  |  embed  |  report abuse  |  print
Text below is selected. Please press Ctrl+C to copy to your clipboard. (⌘+C on Mac)
  1.  
  2. Session Start: Mon Apr 16 11:22:21 2012
  3. Session Ident: Zwanstic
  4. 01[11:22] <[Irvine]> psst
  5. [11:23] <Zwanstic> o/
  6. 01[11:24] <[Irvine]> psst psst
  7. [11:25] <Zwanstic> how can i help?
  8. 01[11:25] <[Irvine]> you wanted me last night?
  9. 01[11:25] <[Irvine]> I mean
  10. 01[11:25] <[Irvine]> you wanted to talk to me ;p
  11. 01[11:26] <[Irvine]> sounds so naughty
  12. [11:26] <Zwanstic> i spoke with Cartman :D
  13. [11:26] <Zwanstic> has he spoke to u yet?
  14. 01[11:26] <[Irvine]> hmm
  15. 01[11:26] <[Irvine]> I maybe on my laptop
  16. 01[11:26] <[Irvine]> what is it about?
  17. 01[11:26] <[Irvine]> I am on my computer now
  18. [11:27] <Zwanstic> about avoidance & us turning our attention to nd or ct
  19. 01[11:27] <[Irvine]> hmm
  20. [11:27] <Zwanstic> Ultores know we cant win & Fang are a good ally like us and can hold roids
  21. 01[11:27] <[Irvine]> just be honest with me ;)
  22. 01[11:28] <[Irvine]> did you guys had an avoidance for a week
  23. 01[11:28] <[Irvine]> with ct? \
  24. [11:28] <Zwanstic> if ct/nd want to act like a top4 ally lets see if they handle incs
  25. [11:28] <Zwanstic> i spoke with cartman about that :)
  26. 01[11:28] <[Irvine]> well
  27. [11:28] <Zwanstic> we had no deals with CT
  28. 01[11:28] <[Irvine]> then why us!
  29. 01[11:28] <[Irvine]> lol
  30. 01[11:28] <[Irvine]> I mean
  31. 01[11:29] <[Irvine]> why picking on us
  32. 01[11:29] <[Irvine]> for 7 days straight
  33. 01[11:29] <[Irvine]> CT didnt get any incs
  34. [11:29] <Zwanstic> you are as fat as cains gf :D
  35. 01[11:29] <[Irvine]> well
  36. [11:30] <Zwanstic> but u hold roids and defend well like top allys should
  37. [11:30] <Zwanstic> as do ultores
  38. 01[11:30] <[Irvine]> what are your ties with apprime?
  39. [11:30] <Zwanstic> we attack u
  40. [11:30] <Zwanstic> we have a common goal
  41. 01[11:31] <[Irvine]> so
  42. 01[11:31] <[Irvine]> hmm
  43. 01[11:31] <[Irvine]> so you want to test ct/nd
  44. 01[11:32] <[Irvine]> who are on your side anyways?
  45. [11:32] <Zwanstic> well i just think they should have incs
  46. [11:32] <Zwanstic> and this hands u #1
  47. 01[11:32] <[Irvine]> I have no problem being on the sideline
  48. 01[11:32] <[Irvine]> but
  49. 01[11:32] <[Irvine]> let me ask you 1 more time
  50. 01[11:32] <[Irvine]> did you or did you not have any agreements with CT made by you or others
  51. [11:33] <Zwanstic> no
  52. 01[11:33] <[Irvine]> you know by doing this
  53. 01[11:33] <[Irvine]> we will go after at 1 particular ally
  54. 01[11:34] <[Irvine]> which you prolly dont care about it anyways
  55. [11:34] <Zwanstic> Apprime?
  56. 01[11:35] <[Irvine]> ;)
  57. 01[11:36] <[Irvine]> leave ND out of this
  58. 01[11:36] <[Irvine]> me and you know
  59. 01[11:36] <[Irvine]> that they cant coop
  60. 01[11:36] <[Irvine]> and they dont have roids anyways
  61. [11:37] <Zwanstic> CT is the main reason
  62. 01[11:37] <[Irvine]> avoidance as like?
  63. [11:39] <Zwanstic> 3
  64. [11:39] <Zwanstic> ops
  65. [11:39] <Zwanstic> 3+ gals
  66. 01[11:39] <[Irvine]> so can only 2 or fewer?
  67. 01[11:39] <[Irvine]> ow my
  68. 01[11:40] <[Irvine]> I am in your bracket then ;)
  69. [11:40] <Zwanstic> but as u know it will be more like a nap so we can go 100% on CT
  70. 01[11:43] <[Irvine]> well wont call it a nap