SHOW:
|
|
- or go back to the newest paste.
| 1 | - | Re: http://www.androidcentral.com/sprint-adds-another-40-cities-its-lte-roster |
| 1 | + | Re: http://www.androidcentral.com/sprint-lights-20-new-lte-markets |
| 2 | ||
| 3 | - | Information retrieved on January 27, 2014 via http://maps.eng.t-mobile.com/ |
| 3 | + | Information retrieved on March 17, 2014 via http://maps.eng.t-mobile.com/ |
| 4 | ||
| 5 | - | Note: T-Mobile might be upgrading some of these areas, so their changes might not have been reflected on their coverage maps until these areas have been officially launched with the changes. |
| 5 | + | Note 1: T-Mobile might be upgrading some of these areas, so their changes might not have been reflected on their coverage maps until these areas have been officially launched with the changes. |
| 6 | Note 2: This is merely to compare LTE availability of one carrier to the LTE availability of another. | |
| 7 | - | Note 2: This comparison is only here to show how a lower-cost carrier with much less spectrum holds up to one with the most spectrum. |
| 7 | + | Note 3: Coverage is about where YOU are most of the time and might visit, not if coverage is good where you'll never go, unless you happen to want the assurance of getting good speeds anyway. |
| 8 | ||
| 9 | - | Note 3: Coverage is about where YOU are most of the time and might visit, not if coverage is good where you'll never go. |
| 9 | + | Of the 20 new Sprint areas with LTE, T-Mobile has: |
| 10 | - 17 LTE areas | |
| 11 | - | Of the 55 new Sprint areas with LTE, T-Mobile has: |
| 11 | + | - 2 "4G" areas |
| 12 | - | - 27 LTE areas |
| 12 | + | - 1 roaming areas |
| 13 | - | - 6 "4G" areas |
| 13 | + | |
| 14 | - | - 2 3G areas |
| 14 | + | So, of the 20 areas, just one them will have pretty poor performance in general. |
| 15 | - | - 15 2G areas |
| 15 | + | |
| 16 | - | - 4 roaming areas |
| 16 | + | |
| 17 | - | - 1 no service area |
| 17 | + | - LTE: Bakersfield, Calif. |
| 18 | - LTE: Bridgeport/Stamford/Norwalk, Conn. | |
| 19 | - | So, of the 55 areas, 20 of them will have pretty poor performance in general. |
| 19 | + | - 4G: El Centro, Calif. |
| 20 | - 4G: Hot Springs, Ark. | |
| 21 | - LTE: Kenosha, Wis. | |
| 22 | - | - 4G: Anderson, S.C. |
| 22 | + | - LTE: Lancaster, Pa. |
| 23 | - | - LTE: Camden, N.J. |
| 23 | + | - RM: Mason City, Iowa |
| 24 | - | - LTE: Cape Girardeau, Mo. |
| 24 | + | - LTE: Myrtle Beach, S.C. |
| 25 | - | - 2G: Jackson, Mo. |
| 25 | + | - LTE: Nogales, Ariz. |
| 26 | - | - LTE: Carson City, Nev. |
| 26 | + | - LTE: Ocean City, N.J. |
| 27 | - | - LTE: Colorado Springs, Colo. |
| 27 | + | - LTE: Omaha, Neb. |
| 28 | - | - 2G: Concord, N.H. |
| 28 | + | - LTE: Peoria, Ill. |
| 29 | - | - LTE: Eugene, Ore. |
| 29 | + | - LTE: Provo/Orem, Utah |
| 30 | - | - LTE: Springfield, Ore. |
| 30 | + | - LTE: Sarasota/Bradenton, Fla. |
| 31 | - | - LTE: Evansville, Ind. |
| 31 | + | - LTE: Scranton/Wilkes-Barre, Pa. |
| 32 | - | - LTE: Evansville, Ky. |
| 32 | + | |
| 33 | - | - LTE: Fayetteville, Ark. |
| 33 | + |
