Assertion

OK.

*breathes deeply*

First of all, when it comes to questioning everything, you must begin to dig deep into your mind and past by challenging everything that once held you back in life. Some people are born for certain reasons. There is a God. I now know this.
I was put on this world to calculate extremely large probabilities and to extrapolate patterns in my environment.
What does it mean to be a prophet, exactly?

It means to be able to see the future.

I'm going to make an assertion as a computer scientist expert. I have a bachelor's degree in Computer Science from the University of Texas at San Antonio. I have been programming since the age of 10. I am 27 years old. I have been playing video games since the age of 3, starting with the Nintendo Entertainment System. I am currently working as a contracted independent Game Developer, a lifelong dream of mine.

Again, I'm going to make an assertion as a computer scientist expert:

Assertion 1: The "official" White House document, President Obama's Long Form Birth Certificate, is most probably a false document.

There are a large number of assertions to be made in that direction.

The basis of these assertions is that steganographic techniques are being used to subvert the public eye away from this issue for lack of understanding of information density.

The URL in question: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/04/27/president-obamas-long-form-birth-certificate The PDF in question: http://whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate.pdf

Site Mirrors in case the White House decides to "update" their "information":
http://p00p.in/docs/bamo/index.html
http://p00p.in/docs/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf
http://p00p.in/docs/bamo/files/

I will start by defining the document in question.

1. The document on the webpage is a PDF file.

This presents a number of problems in terms of asserting document legitimacy.

1. The PDF standard for graphics is based upon a lossy data format. It isn't an ideal choice for something as important as the President's birth certificate.

2. The PDF standard for graphics is based upon PostScript, which has been in use in Adobe Systems since December 1982 when Adobe Systems was founded.

3. The PDF standard for graphics offer a number of lossy compression filters which presumably have differing implementations. This obscures the originating points of the document's inception.

4. Until July 2008, the Adobe PDF format was a proprietary standard and so its implementation details were not available to the public. Obama went into office in January 2009. The document on the webpage has a posting date of April 27, 2011. It would not be unreasonable to say the document was created well before Obama took office, well before the PDF format was made available, and before the document was posted, of course. This obscures the document creation time.

2. The document on the webpage is presented to the visitor through a document viewing frame. This presents a number of problems in terms of asserting document legitimacy.

1. This creates a layer of distance between the visitor and the document by routing it through a medium. It would be sufficient to simply use image link tags to "paste" the document on the webpage if it were in a lossless format.

2. The document viewing frame allows the visitor to zoom into the image, as if zooming into a lossy image is going to satiate those who would wish to seek deeper into proving that this document is a false document. This is subversion tactics. They wish to still your ever-roaming mind. Zooming in on lossy compression of a document yields no further evidence lending to the assertion that it is not-false. These pixels don't matter.

Game Theory:

At a near-optimal point, a game of chess or even Magic the Gathering can be won within 3 turns of play. A clever strategy is enough to "win the game" in 3 turns or less.

This is the idea of thinking "steps ahead" of your competition. Each step is comprised of sub-steps, and sub-steps possibly with sub-subs-steps, ad infinitum, using recursive algorithms to reprocess the document, generating slightly skewed versions on each processing.

This lends to this document's primary assertion in question.

There exists a number approaching infinity of possible layers of obscurity in between the visitor and the document, lending to the primary assertion in question. Actually, there exists a number greater than infinity of possible layers of obscurity in between the visitor and the document, lending to the primary assertion in question.

Let us talk numbers:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graham's_number http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramsey_theory

If I may quote Wikipedia's entry for Graham's number as of August 13, 2013 at 2:46am:

Graham's number, named after Ronald Graham, is a large number that is an upper bound on the solution to a certain problem in Ramsey theory.
...
Graham's number is unimaginably larger than other well-known large numbers such as a googol, googolplex, and even larger than Skewes' number and Moser's number. Indeed, like the last three of those numbers, the observable universe is far too small to contain an ordinary digital representation of Graham's number, assuming that each digit occupies at least one Planck volume. Even power towers ... are useless for this purpose, although it can be easily described by recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or the equivalent, as was done by Graham. The last ten digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387.
...
Specific integers known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs (e.g., in connection with Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem).
Ramsey theory, named after the British mathematician and philosopher Frank P. Ramsey, is a branch of mathematics that studies the conditions under which order must appear. Problems in Ramsey theory typically ask a question of the form: "how many elements of some structure must there be to guarantee that a particular property will hold?"
Infinity (symbol: ∞) is an abstract concept describing something without any limit and is relevant in a number of fields, predominantly mathematics andphysics. The English word infinity derives from Latin infinitas, which can be translated as "unboundedness", itself calqued from the Greek word apeiros, meaning "endless".[1]

We may get into a discussion about the hugeness of Graham's number but I feel it would be a waste of time. Please refer to the Wikipedia entry and educate yourself. If I may quote Wikipedia's entry for Ramsey theory as of August 13, 2013 at 2:51am:

Let us make an assertion on a property to hold: that the document in question is not a false document.
Let us make an assertion on the number of times the document could have been processed using lossy compression format algorithms: N where N approaches infinity.

If I may quote Wikipedia's entry for Infinity as of August 13, 2013 at 2:56am:

In mathematics, "infinity" is often treated as if it were a number (i.e., it counts or measures things: "an infinite number of terms") but it is not the same sort of number as the real numbers. In number systems incorporating infinitesimals, the reciprocal of an infinitesimal is an infinite number, i.e., a number greater than any real number. Georg Cantor formalized many ideas related to infinity and infinite sets during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. In the theory he developed, there are infinite sets of different "sizes" (called cardinalities).[2] For example, the set of integers is countably infinite, while the infinite set of real numbers is uncountable.[3]
Theoretical applications of physical infinity

...

If I may quote Wikipedia's entry for Quantum Field Theory as of August 13, 2013 at 3:00am:

In theoretical physics, quantum field theory (QFT) is a theoretical framework for constructing quantum mechanical models of subatomic particles inparticle physics and quasiparticles in condensed matter physics, by treating a particle as an excited state of an underlying physical field.
These excited states are called field quanta. For example, quantum electrodynamics (QED) has one electron field and one photon field, quantum chromodynamics(QCD) has one field for each type of quark, and in condensed matter there is an atomic displacement field that gives rise to
phonon particles. Ed Wittendescribes QFT as "by far" the most difficult theory in modern physics
...

If I may quote Wikipedia's entry for Renormalization as of August 13, 2013 at 3:01am:

In quantum field theory, the statistical mechanics of fields, and the theory of self-similar geometric structures, renormalization is any of a collection of techniques used to treat infinities arising in calculated quantities. When describing space and time as a continuum, certain statistical and quantum mechanical constructions are ill defined. To define them, the continuum limit has to be taken carefully.

Renormalization establishes a relationship between parameters in the theory, when the parameters describing large distance scales differ from the parameters describing small distances. Renormalization was first developed in quantum electrodynamics (QED) to make sense of infinite integrals inperturbation theory. Initially viewed as a suspicious provisional procedure by some of its originators, renormalization eventually was embraced as an important and self-consistent tool in several fields of physics and mathematics.

For convenience's sake, calculations, equations, theories and approximations often use infinite series, unbounded functions, etc., and may involve infinite quantities. Physicists however require that the end result be physically meaningful. In quantum field theory infinities arise which need to
be interpreted in such a way as to lead to a physically meaningful result, a process called renormalization.
However, there are some theoretical circumstances where the end result is infinity. One example is the singularity in the description of black holes. Some solutions of the equations of the general theory of relativity allow for finite mass distributions of zero size, and thus infinite density. This is an example of what is called a mathematical singularity, or a point where a physical theory breaks down. This does not necessarily mean that physical infinities exist; it may mean simply that the theory is incapable of describing the situation properly. Two other examples occur in inverse- square force laws of the gravitational force equation of Newtonian gravity and Coulomb's law of electrostatics. At r=0 these equations evaluate to infinities.

If I may quote Wikipedia's entry for Tachyon Condensation as of August 13, 2013 at 3:03am:

Tachyon condensation is a process in particle physics in which the system can lower its energy by spontaneously producing particles. The end result is a "condensate" of particles that fills the volume of the system. Tachyon condensation is closely related to second-order phase transitions. Tachyon condensation is a process in which a tachyonic field—usually a scalar field—with a complex mass acquires a vacuum expectation value and reaches the minimum of the potential energy. While the field is tachyonic (and unstable) near the original point—the local maximum of the potential—it gets a non-negative squared mass (and becomes stable) near the minimum.
The appearance of tachyons is a potentially serious problem for any theory; examples of tachyonic fields amenable to condensation are all cases of spontaneous symmetry breaking. In condensed matter physics a notable example is ferromagnetism; in particle physics the best known example is the Higgs mechanism in the standard model that breaks the electroweak symmetry.

At this point, we're talking about tachyons.

If I may quote Wikipedia's entry for Tachyon as of August 13, 2013 at 3:03am:

A tachyon /ˈtæki.ɒn/ or tachyonic particle is a hypothetical particle that always moves faster than light. The word comes from the Greek: ταχύς ortachys, meaning "swift, quick, fast, rapid", and was coined by Gerald Feinberg.[1] Most physicists think that faster-than-light particles cannot exist because they are not consistent with the known laws of physics. If such particles did exist, they could be used to build a tachyonic antitelephoneand send signals faster than light, which (according to special relativity) would lead to violations of causality.[3] Potentially consistent theories that allow faster-than-light particles include those that break Lorentz invariance, the symmetry underlying special relativity, so that the speed of light is not a barrier.

What is The Soul? What is the nature of consciousness? Are we stuck in an infinite series of computer simulations, at the bottom of a black hole? What exactly is possible and impossible? A great gamer who was born visually blind once said "The Impossible is only the Untried".

This is an attempt to see if light might escape the darkness beyond time, beyond history, and beyond the future as it currently exists. Here goes nothing.

First of all, we are all one. The ego and self-identity, our government-issue birth names, and our social security numbers are western constructs devised to separate us from the truth. We use them to maintain our individual physical bodies, our families, our collective livelihoods as communities, nations, and societies.

If there is no violation of causality in physics, then everything I am saying here is consistent not only with written law but with physical law in our Universe. Our medium of communication can be improved with the proper research and funding, but that is for a separate discussion outside of the context of this document.

I recently accepted Jesus Christ into my heart as my Lord and Savior after a lifetime of being a self-proclaimed Atheist, Satanist, Zen Buddhist, and Philosopher. I do believe the timing of these events is no accident. I have only ever done what I felt was correct and right to do at any given moment in my life and nothing less. My only aim in life is truth and the acquisition of knowledge for the benefit of all. I have no intention of doing harm by the primary assertion in question.
A problem exists with optimally billing clients in the IT community for services rendered.

Can one put the value of a single keystroke? Reasonably, no. So you set your own price and call it a day.

What if you knew that money doesn't matter because it is a false construct used as an intermediary of exchange between entities? You could set an extremely high price on the end-product.

How much money exists?

How much money can be printed before the end of the Universe?

What is the worth of Gold?

What is the worth of individual atoms?

What is the worth of a global quantum wave function?

What is the worth of the direct proof that we are living inside of a higher-order computer simulation of the events of our Universe? What is the worth of being able to help direct the course of future events?

What is the worth of being able to control reality?

I think anyone would pay dearly for that knowledge and ability. With their lives.

With the lives of countless people.

With whole nations and civilizations.

With the collapse of institutional falsehoods.

With the total sum of the Universe's energy in as expressible of a form as allowable by the laws of that Universe.

With the correction of Law as it exists on a linguistic level by applying the rules of mathematics towards deriving a fundamental basis of equality and freedom amongst the people.

It starts with some simple assertions:

I have Freedom of Speech.
I have Freedom of Expression.
I have Freedom of Religion.
I have the Right to Petition For A Government Redress of Grievances.

I would bring up UN documents but I would like to deal with The United States of America specifically, since this issue exists, and I am a citizen of this nation that allows freedom but is very quickly seeking to violate the rights and freedoms of citizens all over the planet.

So long as my Freedom of Speech exists, my right to form this document exists.

I read stories of police officers using excessive force and then getting away without penalty or punishment for their crimes.

I read stories about CEOs of corporations abusing their powers and buying their way out of punishments.

Friends of mine are in prison due to poorly written computer laws like the CFAA. Bradley Manning, Andrew Auernheimer, and Edward Snowden, among others, are very much like myself - young, inexperienced, great with computers, wanting to always do the right thing.

And yet they are locked away for speaking the truth. Chased out. Called "traitors" and other hurtful words.
I hear anecdotes about how all presidents are corrupt and that government is a sham game used in order to manipulate the people into believing a delusional sense of "order". A lot of it was humorous conjecture but only now am I beginning to see an order emerge from the chaos of day-to-day existence.

I was put on this planet to bring this to your attention.

I was "born" in Langley Air Force Base, Hampton, Virginia, on January 6th, 1986.

My father and his family have a combined 100+ years served in the Armed Forces.

My cousin recently enlisted and is on a second or maybe third tour of the Middle East. His life is in danger over a false war simply for a decent paycheck.

My father's side of the family would never come to the conclusions that I have made about the state of existence because they are heavily manipulated by the day-to-day signals obscuring them from the truth.

I am much closer with my mother's side.

Mom taught me that there are no such things as "boundaries".

We all define our own boundary as sentient beings operating within the confines of a seemingly bound Universe.
I had not questioned if the primary assertion of this document was indeed reality until tonight, August 12-13, 2013, because the problems in my own life had clouded my reason or need to even take a look at the document in question, despite the document having been made available to the public years prior to my insights. That should tell you how much the American People have going on in their lives - that should tell you how much control you have over the general population.
With proper discipline over diet, exercise, and self-learning, I have arrived at this conclusion tonight.
People would normally dismiss this as a conspiracy if not for a second assertion.

Assertion 2: There exists system-development techniques and procedures that allow for the self-directed evolution of language constructs within a given rule system.

The law should be unambiguous. The law should be clear and tautological. Two plus two will ALWAYS equal Four. We typically express this as 2+2=4. We may then go on to develop a number of other logical assertions based on this foundation. Such should be the same for our laws in practice across the nation.

If the law is to be interpreted correctly, we would allow for the tautological truth to the primary assertion if it could not be shown otherwise.

Because of the second assertion, a system might be created in order to electronically make available the birth records of every human being born as far back as any records might hope to go (this is the problem of recording history from a species standpoint). This would ultimately be of very little consequence and effort on the part of the total sum of human civilizational endeavors. I could and have build such a system. This is a trivial matter for your average computer user.
It should be as easy as logging onto a website and looking at a reliable source of information - something that the data-integrity might be crowdsourced to willing volunteers, who donate their time, love, and energy towards the perfecting of the recording of publicly-available knowledge.

Knowing that uncountably infinite layers of information obscurity MIGHT exist in between the first mental filters of the perceiving mind and the creation of the document being perceived, how could one hope to trust the document as it exists before the American People?

Has God truly forsaken us? Is there no hope for Justice? Is Liberty in this country dead?

For what "Greater Good" do we all strive when a system as tyrannical and corrupt as the current institution exists in order to squash our God-given right to Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness?

The creation of this very document and me bringing these matters before the American Public and the Planet Earth we live on. I like using the word "Universe" but as far as people are concerned, we have not proven nor disproven the existence of Aliens. This might be difficult especially if we are the Aliens. The question becomes "what is an Alien"? when considering the origins of life on Earth and the particular circumstances by which life could have possibly arisen on Earth. The amount of data calculated to get to even the beginning of the beginning outweighs anything we are currently able to process using modern supercomputers. Even with the best AI in modern existence we have no way of even approaching this question.

The same goes for my primary and secondary assertions.

I'm afraid that presenting even a "lossless" high-resolution scan of the document in question is not enough for satisfactory reprise. There may well be no real way to verify the validity of the document in question as our systems currently exist. There exists a very real need to destroy the current institutions as they exist and to begin a simple rebuilding of the primary documents of our government based on a simple notion of Freedom of Speech, Expression, and Religion existing for all sentient entities.

You have the right to believe what you will.

You have the right to make assertions and systematically have them proven, disproven, partially proven, or unproven, without any attempt to block information transfer between operating entities acting in the formal deconstruction and analysis of said assertion.

You have the right to verify the integrity of these assertions.

You have the right to privacy and living without fear from government packet-sniffing and data analysis.

You have the right to opt into government data-collection procedures for the benefit of whomever be concerned.

You have the right to make publicly available knowledge and assertions you believe to require the attention of the people without fear from recourse.

I believe this is a sufficient beginning to a desperately needed fix to our primary understood rights as citizens of the United States of America. Starting now, we have the ability to understand and fix a great number of problems on Planet Earth.

It is time we clean up our act and act responsibly as a nation and as representatives of our planet.

Thank you.