Coppelion

COPPELION

[Hulu] ([Horrible Subs])

*6:24 - NUANCE - "Isn't that much simpler?" --> Really not liking the phrasing here. --> "It's so much easier!"
*11:32 - SCRIPTWRITING - "Only those girls can walk freely" ---> "Only" was not implied in this sentence. It's more of "With their background," which does not need to be included in the translation.


[Anime-Koi]
*1:45 - NUANCE - "We're almost there!" --> "We're finally here!" -- They have arrived at their destination, which was Tokyo in general.
5:13 - NEGLIGIBLE - "There!" --> "Whoa!"
*7:48 - NUANCE - "Fuck school regulations!" -- Sounds way too harsh and out of character.
*10:11 - NUANCE - "Because" is unnecessary. She made a statement.
*11:29 - SCRIPTWRITING - "Only those girls can walk freely" -- "Only" was not implied in this sentence. It's more of "With their background," which does not need to be included in the translation.
*12:01 - MISHEARING - "minced meat with chestnuts" --> "minced chicken" -- 「鶏そぼろ」 not 「栗」
*12:59 - DETAIL - "I'm" etc should be plural.
**13:45 - LOGIC/SCRIPTWRITING - "from history shows" came out of nowhere. It is not implied they've seen antique cars before.
**15:55 - ERROR/LITERAL - 「放送事故」 is not "accident on live broadcast". It is generally either technical difficulty (which makes sense due to radiation), or showing something inappropriate/banned (which is possible). Ambiguous line like CR's "Don't blame me if something goes wrong" is ideal since it may very well include both.
17:56 - EDITING - "Hold on! This place is too huge!" -- "too" makes no sense here.


[EveTaku]
*2:04 - DETAIL - "We just arrived in Tokyo" --> "We've just entered one of the 23 wards" OR "We've just entered the Greater Tokyo Area" -- the mention of "23 wards" indicate they're still far from center of the city.
**3:10+3:15 - ERROR - "Elevated areas make it tough to see people in trouble." --> "It's hard to make out what's going on in the city from the sky." -- Severe context error.
*4:45 - DETAIL - "Commander Mishima", or at least "Commander" should be included in this line to set up for the next line where he prefer to be referred to as "vice principal" instead.
*5:35 - NUANCE - "Should we...?" --> "I guess so." -- Pretty much agrees already in this line.
**6:02 - CONTEXT/NUANCE - "What are you, a hiker?" --> "Do you think you're on a picnic?" OR "Do you think we're hiking right now?" -- It sounds out of context right now. Enjoying the food in that situation is not typical of a "hiker", but it's someone who's taking a "picnic" or on a "hiking (trip)" would do.
*6:18 - NUANCE - "Y-You can't..." --> "I-It's like..." -- This is rather minor nuance nitpicking and usually not error-worthy, but this seems to be a critical character development line showing her desire to be human. This line is clearly "I-It's like (saying we're really dolls)". Wouldn't really work with "You can't..."
*6:43 - NUANCE - "Let's land where the red smoke is" -- This line is a clear order that shows chain of command. Not a suggestion.
**8:04 to 8:10 - CONTEXT - Talking to himself, not to her.
**8:50 - NUANCE - "What an angel..." --> "Is she an angel...?" -- Completely wrong tone.
{{I give up here. F}}