- (00:50:50) ‹~moots› please stop spamming us with global 6 BRs
- (00:50:52) ‹~moots› just delete the damn posts
- (00:53:04) ‹+Lich› I think that there's been a miscommunication of policy somewhere, because I remember hearing something to the effect of "90% of your ban requests should be global 6" and maybe another rule like 3.
- (00:53:09) » +Lich is now known as +Kyoubro
- [...]
- (00:59:00) ‹+Kyoubro› moot, have you made sure that all the mods are on board with global 6 not being worth using often? Because there might be a few who aren't, which has caused this problem in the first place.
- (00:59:46) ‹~moots› i just told them
- (01:00:00) ‹+Kyoubro› Okay then.
- (01:00:27) ‹+Kyoubro› Was it taking too long to go through all the ban requests?
- [...]
- (01:08:12) ‹+Kyoubro› Sorry if you didn't catch my earlier question, but is the reason to not use global 6 because it's clogging up the queue too much or because the stuff isn't banworthy enough?
- (01:09:50) ‹+Kyoubro› moot?
- (01:10:01) ‹~moot› both
- (01:10:14) ‹~moot› because we dont show people the post they were banned for, they're extremely confused
- (01:10:23) ‹~moot› especially with BRs which usually hit hours or a day later
- (01:11:07) ‹+Kyoubro› So if that part of the system ever gets updated, that policy might be rolled back?
- (01:11:27) ‹+Aerolite› moot: probably answered before, but is there ever a plan to show people what they were banned for? it was mentioned in one of your cons years ago and i think shut said it would be done, so i'm guessing it's obvious it's not something you really want to do
- (01:11:49) ‹~moot› shut was only on a panel ins 2005
- (01:11:52) ‹~moot› in*
- (01:11:57) ‹~moot› i'm not sure he ever said that either
- (01:12:01) ‹~moot› and no, we wont
- (01:13:24) ‹+Beam› oh well
- (01:14:28) ‹+Kyoubro› Why aren't we showing people what they're banned for?
- (01:14:38) ‹~moot› because i think it causes more problems then it solves
- (01:14:47) ‹~moot› er creates rather
- (01:14:59) ‹~moot› than even
- (01:15:12) ‹~moot› i am tired and not going to argue with you my favorite axe grinder
- (01:16:11) ‹+Kyoubro› Would you tell me what the problems are if I promise to leave it at that? I feel kind of oblivious here for not seeing them. Increased server storage for the images, maybe?
- (01:16:29) ‹~moot› no
- (01:17:00) ‹+Kyoubro› All right, then.
- (01:46:53) ‹+AlBorland› man
- (01:46:56) ‹+AlBorland› why cant it be april yet
- (01:47:02) ‹+AlBorland› i have what /v/ needs: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNI_90-lV5k
- (11:32:55) ‹+WalterWhite› Borderlands 2 and Torchlight 2 next week.
- (11:32:59) ‹+WalterWhite› Anyone getting either?
- (11:33:06) ‹+AoC› Obsidian is doing a new game through kista too
- (11:33:25) ‹+AoC› man, way to stir awake from slow gaming events month
- (11:41:42) ‹+RapeApe9k› got borderlands 2 pre-ordered
- (11:41:52) ‹+RapeApe9k› loved the first one
- (11:46:18) ‹+WalterWhite› PC?
- (11:48:00) ‹+RapeApe9k› yeah. not much of a console gamer.
- (13:22:53) ‹+Bloom› could you imagine if /v/ got adverts for video games
- (13:23:05) ‹+Bloom› they would go apeshit and the viral complaints would never stop
- (14:12:21) ‹+Bloom› man im pretty sure most of current /v/ spends more time watching shitty let's plays on youtube and talking about the so called "e-celebrities" that make them than they do playing games themselves
- (17:30:10) ‹+Bloom› its rare for /v/ to discuss borderlands in peace because the first game is one of the few cases of actual viral marketing on /v/
- (20:53:29) ‹+nikka› Just wanted to say that our janitor on /v/ is doing a horrible job as usual (deleting valid vidya threads because of whatever reasons) and that I hope we'll get someone good soon.
- (20:53:34) ‹+nikka› how sweet
- (20:54:09) ‹Sange› I think sometimes all threads containing "janitor" in the OP should filtered out if not placed in /q/
- (20:54:19) ‹Sange› should be*
- (20:55:11) ‹+AoC› Inquisitive Lorena.jpg
- (20:55:18) ‹+AoC› rising spam pattern in /v/
- (20:56:45) ‹+nikka› aoc u fail again it seems
- (20:57:09) ‹+AoC› silly nikka, I don't fail
- (20:58:18) ‹+nikka› mad post on /v/ wow
- (20:58:20) ‹+nikka› e
- (21:04:30) ‹+Beam› https://images.4chan.org/v/src/1347677250465.png
- (21:47:34) ‹+Bloom› honestly why the fuck do we hold the constitution in such high regard when 80% of our politicians apparently haven't even read it
- (21:47:41) ‹+Bloom› because they all thing america is a christian nation
- (21:47:46) ‹+RapeApe9k› this isn't the fault of a crappy filmmaker
- (21:48:15) ‹+Bloom› we spend so much time debating what the constitution allows us to do and not do, shouldn't we be deciding for ourselves what we can and can't do
- (21:48:26) ‹+Bloom› instead of some old white men from 200 years ago when the world was a completely different place
- (21:48:31) ‹+Aerolite› Bloom: the problem lies in your misinterpretation of the constitution
- (21:48:40) ‹+Bloom› when did i misinterpret it
- (21:48:41) ‹+Aerolite› you think it has restrictions in it against private citizens
- (21:48:44) ‹+Aerolite› it doesn't
- (21:48:46) ‹+Bloom› woah
- (21:48:49) ‹+RapeApe9k› the constitution says what the government can never do to you
- (21:48:54) ‹+Bloom› i never said he was not within his rights
- (21:48:55) ‹+RapeApe9k› not what you can or cannot do
- (21:48:56) ‹+Aerolite› the constitution was specifically written to restrain the power of the federal government
- (21:49:06) ‹+Aerolite› and we can amend it at any time
- (21:49:08) ‹+Bloom› my point was that the government does not have to protect him from himself
- (21:49:18) ‹+Bloom› if he acts like a retard people will treat him like a retard
- (21:49:21) ‹+RapeApe9k› if anything, the constitution needs to be stregthened and enforced more rigorously
- (23:35:57) ‹BluRay› https://boards.4chan.org/v/res/154915481 see this is why pokemon can be discussed on other relevant boards and mlp can't
SHARE
TWEET
other Highlights from 14th September 2012
a guest
Jul 23rd, 2015
216
Never
RAW Paste Data
