Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- INTRODUCTION
- by
- Robert Anton Wilson, Ph.D.
- The one sure way to make yourself unpopular in the United States
- these days is to mention the fact that Christianity and Democracy
- have been among the worst disasters to ever befall the human race.
- Nonetheless, as all students of history know, Christianity has been
- the bloodiest and most destructive religion in the long career of
- fanaticism on this planet; although Liberals and Rationalists keep
- reminding us of that tragic record of the Religion of Love, few of
- them have cared to observe or remember the data on warfare
- collected by Harvard sociologist, Prof. Pitrim Sorokin. In Social and
- Cultural Dynamics, and other works, Sorokin documents beyond all
- doubt that democratic nations have been involved in more imperialistic
- wars, and have fought them with greater ferocity, than any other
- kinds of governments, from the dawn of civilization to the present.
- Oriental despotisms, absolute monarchies, even modern fascist and
- communist nations have all had heinous records of tyranny and
- general human oppression, but collectively they have been much
- less aggressive and war-like than the democracies, from ancient
- Athens to modern America.
- The blood-thirsty nature of Christianity and Democracy — which
- is obvious, psychologically, if one listens even for a few minutes to a
- typical speech by Rev. Jerry Falwell or his good friend Ronald
- Reagan — is, of course, based on arrogance, megalomania and a deep-
- rooted sense of total moral superiority to all non-Christian and
- non-Democratic peoples. But beyond that, the violent nature of
- Christian/Democratic countries is rooted in the singular delusion
- shared by both the Religion of Love and the Politics of Liberty. This
- iii
- iv
- Robert Anton Wilson
- delusion is the belief that human beings are born with some sort of
- metaphysical "free will" which makes them unique in the animal
- kingdom and only slightly less exalted than the gods themselves.
- The "free will" fantasy is not a minor error, like thinking it is
- Tuesday when actually it is Wednesday. It is not even to be compared
- to a major intellectual blunder of the ordinary sort, like Marx's
- notion that once a totalitarian "worker's state" was created, it would
- then quickly and magically "wither away." It is even more nefarious
- and pernicious than the medieval lunacy that imagined witches
- everywhere and burned over 10,000,000 women at the stake on the
- basis of hysteria, superstition and the kind of hearsay and rumor
- that no modern court would permit to be entered as evidence. The
- "free will" delusion is much more serious than any of that. It is the
- kind of radical 180-degree reversal of reality that, once it enters a
- person's mind, guarantees that they will be incapable of understanding
- anything happening around them; they might as well be deaf, dumb,
- blind and wearing signs warning the world, "ULTIMATE DESTINA-
- TION: THE MADHOUSE."
- I do not speak flippantly, nor do I mean to be understood as
- writing satire or polemic. The facts of modern biology and psychology
- have demonstrated clearly and conclusively that 99 percent of the
- human race is in a robotic or zombi-like state 99.99999 percent of the
- time. This does not refer to "other people." It refers to YOU AND
- ME. As the Firesign Theatre used to say, We're all Bozos on this bus. The
- best that can be said of any of us, usually, is that we have occasional
- moments of lucidity, but that can be said of any schizophrenic
- patient.
- EAST, WEST AND THE MIDDLE
- In the Orient, which has its own idiocies and superstitions,
- there has always been a singular sanity about the "free will" myth:
- virtually without exception, all the great Oriental philosophers have
- recognized that donkeys, grass-hoppers, dolphins, toads, humming-
- birds, dogs, chickens, tigers, sharks, gophers, spiders, chimpanzees,
- cobras, cows, lice, squid, deer, and humans are equally important,
- equally unimportant, equally empty, equally expressive of the
- "World Soul" or "Life Force." Buddhism, Vedanta and Taoism also
- recognize that each of these clever animals just mentioned, including
- Robert Anton Wilson
- v
- the humans, have about equally as much "free will" as flowers,
- shrubs, rocks and viruses, and that the human delusion of being
- separate from and superior to the rest of the natural order is a kind of
- narcissistic self-hypnosis. Awakening from that egotistic trance is
- the major goal of every Oriental system of psychology.
- Opposing this Oriental recognition of, and submission to, the
- order of things as they are, and yet opposing also the Christian and
- Democratic delusions of "free will" and "individual responsibility,"
- there is the hidden tradition of Sufism in Islam and Hermeticism in
- Europe. This "occult" teaching recognizes that, although domesticated
- primates (humans) are born as mechanical as the wild primates (such
- as chimpanzees), there are techniques by which we can become less
- mechanical and approximate in daily and yearly increments toward
- freedom and responsibility.
- These "spiritual" (neurological) techniques of Un-doing and re-
- robotizing oneself are, of course, of no interest in the Orient, where
- it is accepted that we are born robots and will die robots; and they are
- of even less interest in the Christian-Democratic cultures which
- assume that we are already free and responsible and do not have to
- work and work HARD to achieve even a small beginning of non-
- mechanical consciousness and non-robotic behavior.
- The Orient forgives easily, because it does not expect robots to do
- anything else but what was programmed into them by the accidents
- of heredity and environment. The Christian and Democratic nations
- are so bloody-minded because they can forgive nothing, blaming
- every man and woman for whatever imprinted or conditioned
- behavior is locally Taboo. (This is why Nietzsche called Christianity
- "the Religion of Revenge" and Joyce described the Christian God as a
- Hanging Judge.) The Sufic and Hermetic traditions are almost
- Oriental in forgiving robots for being robots, but are far from
- sentimental about it. As one Sufi poet said:
- The fool neither forgives nor forgets;
- The half-enlightened forgive and forget;
- The Sufi forgives but does not forget.
- That is, Sufism and other Hermetic traditions recognize that
- robots will behave like robots, and does not "blame" them, but it also
- does not forget, for a moment or even a nanosecond, that we are
- living in a robotic world — "an armed madhouse" in the metaphor of
- vi
- Robert Anton Wilson
- poet Allen Ginsberg. Those of this tradition know that when a man
- spouts Christian and Democratic verbalisms that does not mean he
- will act with brotherly love at all, at all; he will go on acting like a
- badly-wired robot in most cases.
- Sufism is only the largest of several Near Eastern and European
- "mystic" movements which recognize the robotry of ordinary
- humanity but, unlike the Orient, attempt to Un-do and de-robotize
- those who have a dawning apprehension of their mechanical state
- and sincerely want to become less mechanical, as far as that is
- possible. I am not writing a recruiting manual for Sufism (which is
- doing quite well without my advertisements): I am merely using the
- Sufi school as one example of the tradition to which this marvelous
- book, UNDOING YOURSELF, belongs.
- Most readers, if they have encountered such ideas at all, probably
- identify them with Gurdjieff and Ouspensky, two of the most
- talented expositors of a school of neo-Sufism which they peddled
- under the brand name of "Esoteric Christianity." The present book
- also owes a great deal to Aleister Crowley, who belonged to this
- tradition but sold his own brand of it under the label of Gnostic
- Magick. There is also a strong influence here of the bio-psychology
- of Wilhelm Reich; but all this tracing of "sources" is ultimately
- trivial. The importance of Christopher Hyatt's work is what you can
- get out of it and that depends entirely on what you put into it.
- IT WORKS, IF YOU WORK
- In my travels, I often encounter people who somehow have gotten
- the wild idea that I am the Head of the Illuminati (actually, I am at
- most a toe-nail) and who want me to explain the Secrets of High
- Magick to them. (Although it is hard to restrain my sense of humor
- at such times, I usually resist the temptation to tell them they can
- achieve Total Illumination by singing "Lucy in the Sky with
- Diamonds" in pig Latin while standing on their heads.) The
- questions I am asked most often, by those who can ask something
- more specific than "What is The Secret?" are almost always about
- Crowley's doctrine of the True Will. People tell me, most earnestly,
- that they have read ten or twenty or more of Crowley's books, and
- have read them many times, and still do not understand what "True
- Will" means.
- Robert Anton Wilson
- vii
- As Gurdjieff would say, "What does this question signify? It
- signifies that these people are walking in their sleep and only
- dreaming they are awake. That is what this question signifies."
- There is only one possible reason why people can read Crowley at
- length and not understand what True Will means. That reason seems
- incredible at first sight, but it is the only reason that can explain this
- astounding scotoma. The reason many readers of Crowley do not
- understand True Will is that these earnest students have never
- performed any of the exercizes that Crowley provides for those who
- sincerely want to de-robotize themselves and experience what is
- meant by True Will.
- Shortly after my manual of de-mechanization exercizes, Prometheus
- Rising, was published, I was at a Cosmic Con with, among others, E.J.
- Gold of the Fake Sufi School. He told me that nobody would do any
- of the exercizes in my book, but I would still get lots of letters from
- people saying the book had "liberated" them. Since I sometimes
- think Sufis and even Fake Sufis are perhaps overly skeptical about
- humanity in its present evolutionary stage, I have made a point of
- asking people, when they praise that book in my presence, how
- many of the exercizes they've done.
- Most people look faintly abashed and admit they have only done a
- "few" of the exercizes (which probably means they haven't done
- any). However, some people claim to have done all or most of the
- exercizes, and these people generally look so delighted about the
- matter that I tend to believe them. I therefore conclude that the Sufi
- and Gurdjieff traditions are wrong in saying that 999 out of 1000
- will never work on the techniques of liberation. Actually, it appears
- to be only around 987 out of 1000 who prefer to talk about the work
- rather than doing it. At least 13 out of every 1000 will actually do the
- exercizes.
- I have decided that one of the reasons that most readers of self-
- liberation books never even make the effort to liberate themselves is
- that reading the books is actually a kind of superstitious "magick
- ritual," which they think will have an effect with no other effort on
- their parts. The same sort of superstition leads others to think that
- peeking at the answers in the back of the book of logical puzzles is as
- beneficial as solving the puzzles for themselves; and there is even a
- text out now with the answers to Zen koans, as if the answers, and
- not the process of arriving at them, were the meaning of Zen.
- Aside from such "symbolic magick" (as distinguished from real
- viii
- Robert Anton Wilson
- magick ritual, which is a type of Brain Change experiment), the
- main reason people prefer to read neurological exercizes rather than
- doing the exercizes is the dread and sheer horror which the word
- "work" invokes in most people. Some great teachers, especially
- Gurdjieff and Crowley, have literally frightened away thousands of
- would-be students by insisting on the necessity of HARD WORK (as
- I also frightened a lot of readers by using those words several times
- in this essay.)
- Of course, there is a quite legitimate reason why the word "work"
- has such horrible conditioned associations for most people in the
- modern world. That reason is that most "work" in this age is stupid,
- monotonous, brain-rotting, irritating, usually pointless and basically
- consists of the agonizing process of being slowly bored to death over
- a period of about 40 to 45 years of drudgery; Marx was quite right in
- calling it "wage slavery." Most people know this, but are afraid to
- admit it, because to dislike "work" is regarded as a symptom of
- Communism or some other dreadful mental illness.
- I recently heard a politician admit on BBC that the reason English
- workers are so notoriously "lazy" is that their jobs are so unspeakably
- sub-human and dull. "If I had to do that kind of work, I would call in
- sick as often as possible and goof off at every chance," he said flatly.
- Alas, I had tuned in late and never did catch this chap's name, which
- is a terrible misfortune for me, since I suspect he is the only Honest
- Politician in the world.
- It is this universal but repressed hatred of "work" that causes
- almost everybody to despise and persecute the unemployed. Almost
- everybody envies the folks of the dole (on Welfare, as you say in The
- States) because almost everybody secretly wishes they could escape
- their own jobs and live without working.
- It has taken me decades to understand this, because I am part of
- that very fortunate minority who work at jobs we actually enjoy. (It
- is hard to make me stop working, as my wife will assure you.) The
- minority who actually loves its work seems to be made up chiefly of
- the writers, dancers, actors and other artists, most scientists above
- the technician-troll level, computer freaks, and the righteous dope-
- dealers of California. Everybody else wishes they had the courage to
- go on the dole, but is ashamed of the stigma attached to being a
- non-worker, and resolves the tension by being as nasty as possible to
- the unemployed on every possible occasion.
- ix
- Robert Anton Wilson
- HEY! CATCH THIS! A SECRET OF
- THE ILLUMINATI REVEALED!
- Here I want to let you in on a real Secret of the Illuminati, one that
- has never been published before.
- The so-called "work" involved in Brain Change is not like
- ordinary "work" at all. It is more like the creative ecstasy of the artist
- and scientist, once you really get involved in doing it. Most people
- are afraid of it only because they think "work" must be a curse and
- can't imagine that "work" can be fun.
- So it is best not to think of Energized Meditation as "work" at all,
- at least as you have experienced "work" in most of the world today. It
- might be better and more accurate to consider the EM exercizes as
- "play" than as "work." Of course, play has its own rigours, and you
- do have to put energy into it to become a winner rather than a
- perpetual loser, but it is still entirely unlike the wage slavery that
- most people call "work." In fact, to be blunt about it, it is more like
- sex-play than any other kind of play because it definitely unleashes
- energies that have erotic as well as therapeutic side-effects. You are a
- dunce if you avoid it just because you think anything that needs
- effort must be "work" in the sense that people in factories and offices
- are suffering from the curse of "work" in our society.
- Think of it more in terms of your favorite sport or recreation—
- fishing or bird-watching or softball or whatever you do with passion
- and just for the excitement of it. If that kind of thing should not be
- called "play," then I do not know what "play" means.
- So when I wrote "Hard Work," I was just trying to jar you into
- actually paying attention for once. I really should have said, for
- accuracy, Hard Play.
- The second part of this Secret of the Illuminati is what I have
- called elsewhere Wilson's 23rd Law. (Wilson's First Law, of course, is
- "Certitude belongs exclusively to those who only own one encyclo-
- pedia." Wilson's Second Law is the Snafu Principle described in
- ILLUMINATUS: "Communication is only possible between equals."
- All of Wilson's Laws will be published when the world is ready for
- the staggering revelations contained therein.)
- Wilson's 23rd Law is
- Do it every day
- Robert Anton Wilson
- x
- This is the most profound of all the Secrets of the Illuminati and I
- have often been warned that Terrible Consequences will ensue if I
- reveal it prematurely, but—what the hell, these are parlous times,
- friend, and this primitive planet needs all the Light that can be
- unleashed on its dark, superstitious mind. Let me repeat, since I am
- sure you didn't get it the first time:
- Do it every day!
- Have you ever wondered why Einstein became such a great
- physicist? It was because he loved the equations and concepts of
- mathematical physics so much that he "worked" on them—or played
- and tinkered with them—every day. That's why Otto von Klemper
- became such a great conductor: he loved Beethoven and Mozart and
- that crowd so much that he practised his music every day. It's why
- Babe Ruth became such a great ball-player: he loved the game so
- deeply that he was playing or rehearsing every day.
- This rule also explains, incidentally, how people destroy themselves.
- Do you want to become a suicide (it's the fashionable thing in some
- circles, after all)? Practise being depressed, worried and resentful
- every day, and don't let anybody distract you with Energized
- Meditation or any other mind-change system. Do you want to land
- in jail on an assault and battery charge? Practise getting damned
- bloody angry every day. If you want to become paranoid, look
- carefully every day for evidence of treachery and duplicity around
- you. If your ambition is to die young, do the depression-worry-
- resentment system every day but center in especially on visualizing
- and worrying about every imaginable illness that might possibly
- inflict itself upon you.
- (On the other hand, if you want to live as long as George Burns,
- "work hard" every day at being as cheerful and optimistic as he is.)
- Almost anything is possible if you
- DO IT EVERY DAY
- Of course, this rule does not guarantee 100 percent results.
- Playing Chopin on the piano every day for 4 or 5 decades does not
- mean you will become as good as Van Cliburn; it merely means that
- you eventually will be a better piano player than anybody in your
- home state. Worrying every day does not absolutely guarantee a
- clinical depression or an early death, but after only a few years it does
- Robert Anton Wilson
- xi
- ensure you will be one of the three or four most miserable people in
- your neighborhood. Writing a sonnet every day for twenty years
- may not necessarily make you Shakespeare or Mrs. Browning, but it
- will make you the best poet for an area of about forty to fifty miles,
- probably. Doing Energized Meditation or similar exercizes does not
- mean you will be a Perfectly Enlightened Being or a Guru in a few
- years, just that you will be a great deal happier and a hell of a lot
- more perceptive, creative and "intuitive" than most people you'll
- meet in an average city.
- There is a story that Bobbie Fisher, the chess champion, was once
- in a room with other chess masters when the conversation turned to
- the latest nuclear accident and the effects of the resultant fall-out.
- Fisher listened impatiently for a few minutes and then exclaimed
- irritably, "What the hell does that have to do with chess?" While I am
- not urging that you imitate that degree of monomania or obsession,
- there is a significant lesson in this tale. The reason Fisher became a
- champion is that he cared so much about chess that he did not even
- have to nag himself or remind himself to
- do it every bloody day.
- WARNING!
- THREATS TO THE PRIMATE EGO
- ARE COMING!
- Unfortunately—while the Energized Meditation system is fun,
- and erotic, and makes you "smarter" (in the sense of more aware of
- detail and complexity), and even jolts you out of total mammalian
- reflex behavior into something approximating in slow but definite
- increments toward that mystic "free will" Christians claim you were
- given at birth, and I recommend it heartily—I must admit that there
- are pages coming up shortly in this book that will probably make
- you extremely uncomfortable.
- Dr. Hyatt is a rude, insulting and deliberately annoying writer. He
- does not soothe or pacify the reader with the Christian and
- Democratic mythology of our society by pretending that we are all
- free and rational people here. He insists on reminding us, every few
- pages, in the most blunt language possible, that most of us most of
- the time are conditioned chimpanzees in a cage.
- xii
- Robert Anton Wilson
- Don't let it worry you too much.
- The situation is this: there are mechanical systems operating
- throughout the domesticated primate (human) organism, each on
- different levels. For instance, as Bucky Fuller liked to say, you never
- sit down and ask how many hairs you should sprout on your head
- and body in the next week: that is one of the thousands of biological
- programs that operate entirely on mechanical circuitry. Except in
- various systems of yoga, you do not have much control over your
- breathing, either: that is also an auto-pilot. The digestive-excretive
- circuits also operate with a minimum of conscious attention or
- strategy, except when you need to find a public toilet and the bars are
- all closed. (Make a list of ten more programs that keep you alive and
- functioning, over which you have never had any conscious control.
- Be one of the 13 readers out of a thousand who actually do it before
- reading on.)
- The reason that mystics and certain other psychologists are always
- "attacking" the ego is that the ego is the one mechanical circuit that
- suffers chronically from the illusion that it is non-mechanical and
- "free."
- The ego and its delusions must be undermined—either attacked
- openly and bluntly, as in the Gurdjieff system and this book, or
- subverted more subtly and slowly, as in certain other systems—
- before any real progress can be made toward "liberation," "enlighten-
- ment," "finding IT," discovering the "True Will" in Crowley's sense,
- or whatever is your favorite term for becoming less robotic and more
- aware—less the computer and more the programmer of the computer—
- less the conditioned rat in the Behaviorist's maze and more the
- Beyond-Human that the Sufic-Hermetic traditions and Neitzsche
- have predicted.
- The main reason you shouldn't be afraid of this attack on your
- precious little ego is that the ego is infinitely resourceful and finds
- ways to sneak back into its habitual mechanical trance no matter
- how many times you think you have Awakened once and for all.
- This is another Secret of the Illuminati and explains the great
- humility and the keen sense of humor of all the genuine Mages. In
- other words, if you think it is scary to lose your precious primate
- ego abruptly and forever, don't worry about that; it is no more likely
- than becoming the world's greatest Rock star tomorrow morning.
- The only real way to get loose from mechanical ego trips is to learn
- Robert Anton Wilson
- xiii
- several ego-transcending games and then for twenty or forty years
- or longer DO THEM EVERY DAY
- Before you put that much effort and time into it, you need
- not worry that your wonderful, precious and totally marvelous Ego
- will go away suddenly, it will merely get transformed a bit,
- "enlarged" in perspective and "reduced" in conceit (a little), freed
- from some of its more idiotic habits, and it will even pretend to go
- away at times, but it will always come back and usually at the most
- embarrassing times. It's easier to assassinate the President of the
- United States than to kill your own ego.
- 500 micrograms of pure Sandoz LSD will "destroy" the ego more
- totally than any of the EM exercizes in this book—atom bomb it out
- of existence, as it were. The results even in that case, as all old
- acid-heads will assure you, are, however spectacular, always temporary.
- As Dr. John Lilly wrote in Programming and Metaprogramming in the
- Human Biocomputer, after a heavy trip on genuine laboratory Acid,
- For a time, the self then feels free, cleaned
- out. The strength gained can be immense; the
- energy freed is double . . . Humor appears in
- abundance, good humor... Beauty is enhanced,
- the bodily appearance becomes youthful . . .
- These positive effects can last as long as two to
- four weeks before reassertion of the old programs
- takes place.
- We are the products of mechanical genetic programs, mechanical
- imprints and mechanical conditioning, just like the other animals.
- The progress to post-animal, non-mechanical and trans-ego freedom
- is often rapidly accelerated for a period, or several periods, of sudden
- flash-like Awakenings and post-human perspectives, and I personally
- suspect that is happening increasingly under the stress of our age of
- terrorism and accelerated evolutionary change, but the ultimate
- result of a true transcendence of robot consciousness is approached
- in slow increments over years and decades. (Total "freedom" from
- mechanism on all circuits seems impossible to me, in my current
- level of ignorance. I don't think the organism would survive if most
- of it did not remain a smooth-running and unconscious machine.)
- E.J. Gold of the Fake Sufi School, mentioned earlier, has a saying
- to the effect that the attempt to achieve total Transcendence of
- xiv
- Robert Anton Wilson
- mechanical ego programs is as absurd as "sticking toothpicks
- between your eyelids to be sure you never go to sleep for a moment."
- There seem to be genuine biological reasons why we need to spend
- about one third of our lives asleep and a large part of the other
- two-thirds half-entranced by mechanical conditioned processes. The
- purpose of all schools of liberation is to wake up fully often enough
- to have some perspective outside the sleeping and conditioned ego
- states.
- WHAT "IS" ALL THIS?
- The great Dublin scientist and philosopher, de Selby, once took an
- empty jam jar and filled it with all the small cruddy items he could
- find around the house. The fuzz that accumulates on carpets, the
- dust on book shelves, bent paperclips, broken staples, the grunge
- from bathtub rings, grotty kitchen encrustations, nameless shards of
- forgotten plaster statues long broken, archaeological excavations
- from the cellar, miscellaneous delvings in the rubbish bin, torn
- covers of match books scrawled with inscrutable phone numbers,
- even belly-button lint, all went in. This was a labour of some weeks,
- and when it was finished even de Selby himself could not remember
- or classify the total contents of the jar. He then selected a statistical
- universe of 123 Dubliners and 246 visitors form England or the
- Continent just off the Dun Laoghaire ferry and asked each to guess
- what the jar contained.
- 77.6 percent of the sample answered at once, "Oh, I know, it
- is
- " and then made some wild guess. (The most common guess,
- given by 54.3 percent, was that it "was" the stuff mixed into the curry
- sauce in Pakistani restaurants. Others commonly said it "was"
- uranium ore, wood cement and tree bark.)
- Of the 22.4 percent who did not guess what it "was," 83.5 percent
- immediately asked the directions to Clontarf Castle and presumably
- did not want to guess because they were in hurry to catch the
- evening Musical show.
- De Selby concluded that most Europeans, at this stage of
- evolution, believe that everything and anything can meaningfully be
- described in a simple proposition in the form, "This is a thingamajig."
- I believe, on the basis of experience, that similar results would be
- found in an American sample of the same size. We are still haunted
- Robert Anton Wilson
- xv
- by the ghost of Aristotle, the bloke who first tried to describe and
- explain the whole universe in permutations of sentences having the
- form, This is a Y, All Z are Y, Some Y are X, therefore some Z are X.
- Most people, and especially most politicians and clergymen, remain
- firmly convinced that anything and everything can be meaningfully
- discussed in that Aristotelian manner—or as Ernest Fenollosa once
- said, Western culture thinks that "A ring-tailed baboon is not a
- Constitutional Assembly" is one of the two types of meaningful
- statements (the other being "The U.S. Congress and U.K. Parliament
- are Constitutional Assemblies.")
- From the point of view of current science, c. 1980-87, there appear
- to be two things wrong with this Aristotelian mind-set. In the first
- place, scientific models are not expressed in this metaphor of
- identity (A is a B) but in the functional language of relationships
- (When A moves an increment of x in any dimension, B will move an
- increment of y in some other dimension.) The latter type of
- functional statement allows for scientific predictions, which can be
- partially verified or totally refuted by experience and experiment;
- the former, Aristotelian type of is-ness statement leads only to
- verbal argument.
- The second objection to Aristotelian A is a B statements is that
- they appear totally contradicted by neurology and experiments with
- instruments. Neurologically, we never know what A "is," but what
- it appears to our senses and brain. The senses pick up some (not all)
- the signals of the space-time event and the brain edits and
- orchestrates these signals into some familiar Gestalt. (This seems to
- be how de Selby's subjects edited and orchestrated a jar full of junk
- into Pakistani sauce or uranium ore.) Instrumentally, the same
- editing goes on. An instrument does not tell us what A "is" but what
- class of signals from A that particular instrument can measure. A
- voltmeter tells us nothing about the temperature of A, a thermometer
- tells us nothing about the height of A, a ruler or scale tells us nothing
- about the molecular structure of A, etc.—each instrument creates its
- own gloss or reality-tunnel, just as our inner instruments (brain and
- perceptors) create a gloss or reality-tunnel. To speak accurately, we
- should never say "This 'is' an A," but, rather, "This seems to fit the
- category of A in my system of glossing or in this instrument's
- reality-tunnel."
- Does this sound like pedantry or unnecessary hair-splitting?
- Consider for a moment the human suffering and social catastrophes
- xvi
- Robert Anton Wilson
- that have been unleashed in various times and places by such
- statements as "Miss Jones is a witch," "Mr. Smith is a homosexual,"
- "Mr. Goldberg is a Jew," "This book is heretical," "This painting or
- photo is pornography." If you think about this deeply enough, it
- might almost appear that the Catholic witch-hunts, most idiotic
- censorship, Hitler's annihilation camps and quite a few other
- historical horrors never would have happened if we had no words
- for "is" in our languages, or if we remembered that "is" always
- functions as a metaphor.
- Most of the guilt and "chronic low-grade emergency" (as Fritz
- Perls called it) which keeps you from realizing your full potential can
- usually be traced to some sentence having the form "I am a B" in
- which B equals roughly "no-good shit." That sentence got conditioned
- into you when you were very young and you may not think it
- consciously any more, or you may well think it and even say it aloud
- frequently, but if you feel basically unhappy with your life some
- such sentence exists somewhere in your brain.
- Even is-ness sentences that seem factual contain dangers due to
- the mechanical-conditioned level of most human consciousness on
- this planet at this time. "He is a homosexual" may appear a safe
- remark when heard in a Group Encounter session, or at a San
- Francisco cocktail party, but in the Bible Belt, "homosexual" contains
- the conditioned association of "sinner" and particularly nefarious
- "sinner" at that, and it is not unknown for violence or even murder
- to result from this is-ness sentence, just as "Jew" seems to be a
- neutral label for one of three major religions of the West but in Nazi
- Germany signified somebody subject to arrest, slave labor and
- eventual execution.
- I read recently in a science-fiction fan magazine, "The Irish really
- are disgusting." Leaving aside my own mechanical prejudices (as a
- person of partially Irish genetic structure who lives by preference in
- Ireland) the most fascinating thing about this is-ness statement
- seems to me that it occurred in a publication where one would never
- see such semantically isomorphic statements as "The Jews really are
- sub-human" or "Women really are inferior to men."
- To quote Mr. G. again, "What does this signify? It signifies that
- most people are walking in their sleep and dreaming they are
- awake." That is, certain historically infamous types of racial or
- sexual stereotypes have become unfashionable and virtually Taboo
- in "educated" circles, but the mechanical conditioned reactions
- Robert Anton Wilson
- xvii
- underlying such stereotypes still exist, the machine is still asleep, in
- Gurdjieff's terms, so people who would not stereotype Jews see
- nothing inconsistent in stereotyping the Irish or the Poles or some
- other group. In a mechanical or primitive stage of evolution, this
- cannot be considered surprising.
- What does still surprise me (occasionally) is that people who can
- see this mechanical level of functioning in others can remain
- blissfully oblivious of the same mechanisms in themselves.
- One way to understand Energized Meditation, and simultaneously
- grasp the significance of what I have just been saying about
- Aristotelian habits, is to apply mathematical subscripts to significant
- nouns in the manner urged by the semanticist, Alfred Korzybski. For
- instance, the Nazi mentality consists of something like
- Now this is obviously false to sensory-sensual space-time experience.
- In sensory-sensual space-time experience—or what we ordinarily
- call "reality" if we haven't been ruined by philosophy courses—every
- Jew we meet is a specific event in the space-time continuum. The
- first may be a poet, the second an actress, the third a grocer, etc. if we
- place this group in the gloss of category-by-occupation. Put them in
- the category of good looks, and the first may seem as handsome as
- Paul Newman, the second as unhandsome as Edward G. Robinson,
- the third as cute as Barbra Streisand, etc. Put them in any other grid,
- and differences still emerge, just as there are no two leaves on an oak
- tree that are exactly the same in all respects.
- Don't go back to sleep yet; hang in there a moment. We are not
- preaching a sermon on "tolerance" like a 1950s Hollywood movie.
- We are just using anti-semitism as an example of a mechanical
- mental set that illuminates many, many other mechanical mental
- sets that you are going to have to recognize in yourself if Energized
- Meditation is to do you any good.
- For instance, at the beginning, for the shock effect, I said some
- critical things about Christianity and Democracy. If you drew the
- conclusion that I dislike all aspects of Christian and Democratic
- society, you had a mechanical "is" somewhere in your evaluations. In
- fact, I would much rather live in Christian Democratic nations, for all
- their faults, than in any of the Moslem Fundamentalist nations or
- Buddhist nations, and I would rather be gored by a rhinoceros than try
- xviii
- Robert Anton Wilson
- to live in a Marxist nation. As for fascist nations, whether I tried to
- cope or not, I rather suspect they would shoot me in a few months, if
- not in the first week.
- If the Nazi mentality acts "as if Jewn = Jewk or any Jew is "the
- same" as any other Jew, people who seem a lot more sophisticated
- often act "as if any Rock music = any other Rock music (it "is" all
- equally wonderful or equally "barbarous")/ or any science fiction
- novel = any other science fiction novel (the book critics in Time seem
- to have that mechanical conditioned reflex), or "all television should
- be abolished" (there was a book on that subject recently, in which the
- author seriously seemed to have the Nazi-like hallucination that TV
- shown = TV showk), or any cop = any other cop, or any fast food
- place is as "bad" as any other fast food place, etc.
- Mechanical reactions are the statistical norm; full conscious
- attention remains very rare. (That's why one Zen Master always
- gave the answer "Attention!" when he was asked what Zen "is.") We
- started from that unChristian and unDemocratic premise and we
- have worked our way back to it by a circuitous route, but now
- perhaps we can see more clearly what this mechanical A=B hypnosis
- does to us.
- We have been using examples of difference between elements of
- the "same" group, but no element remains unchanged in time.
- Consider yourself as an element, X, in the group "humanity." It
- should be obvious that
- X1987 is not X1976
- You have changed quite a bit in the last ten years, have you not? If
- people weren't in the habit of calling you by the same name, you
- might not even "believe" that the You of today "really is" in some
- sense the You of 1976. In fact, if you can forget your name for a few
- moments, the entity or more precisely the space-time event called
- You obviously was changing, sometimes faster and sometimes more
- slowly all through the decade. If you are more than 20 years old, just
- think of how absurd it would be to claim that the You of 1986 "really
- is" the You of 1966 ...
- Think about this seriously. It would be a damned good idea, right
- now, to make a list of ten important changes that have occurred in
- "You" since 1966 and ten changes since 1976. Is it too much trouble
- to get a paper and pen? Well, at least make a list in your head. Can
- Robert Anton Wilson
- xix
- you even visualize what you looked like and dressed like in 1966?
- Really think hard about some of the other changes in You over 20 years.
- Now, to understand what this book can do for you, try to apply
- this awareness on a smaller time-scale. Is it possible that Youlast
- week "really is" in every respect Youthis week? Alas, this may almost
- seem possible, but it is not strictly true unless you have died and they
- pickled you in formaldehyde.
- Think, really, about the changes in "You" in one week. How many
- more changes could have occurred in that week, if You did not have
- the illusion that You are a finished product and not a Work in
- Progress?
- Keep at it. Think seriously about whether it is strictly and totally
- true that Youyesterday really is Youtoday.
- When you get to the point of understanding that Youone second
- ago is not strictly Youright here and now, then you are ready to begin
- to understand what Christopher Hyatt is offering you in this book
- and how you can use it.
- Howth, Ireland
- 17 November 1986
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment