Paul's problem with a silly little gate

Logging started 2014-11-15
[08:01:51] <Pseudoplayer> [06:19:27] <Paultrw> Cov and I talked about it when first you said you were thinking about. He said their response would be to come with catapults
[08:02:40] <Pseudoplayer> i believe that would be a poor response for a couple reason. 1. before i deeded i had no clue there was any sort of mission location. 2. You dont 'catapult' Von Ravenstien to complete the mission.
[08:03:39] <Pseudoplayer> and 3. The mission is not accessible since all gates are unlocked to alliance members anyways.
[08:04:04] <Pseudoplayer> i would, however, appreciate a more conversational approach to the subject opposed to, what appears to be, a threat.
[08:06:53] <Pseudoplayer> we are members of the same team, there is no need to make suggestive remarks, my friend.
[08:15:13] <Paultrw> it was undeededwhen last we spoke
[08:15:48] <Paultrw> the gate was also very lovcked
[08:15:55] <Paultrw> locked
[08:16:07] <Paultrw> and is still
[08:16:11] <Pseudoplayer> i remember now, yes, you are correct, we had to go through the side of the mountain.
[08:16:20] <Pseudoplayer> but in anycase, it is accessible to alliance members.
[08:16:26] <Pseudoplayer> it should not be locked.
[08:16:46] <Paultrw> it was locjked yesterday
[08:17:32] <Pseudoplayer> that can be solve, paul. i did not see a mission to use that pillar yesterday, was there?
[08:17:49] <Pseudoplayer> i must have missed it.
[08:17:56] <Paultrw> if one comes up the gate will be removed
[08:18:16] <Pseudoplayer> is this how you speak to vanille as well?
[08:18:34] <Pseudoplayer> maybe it's early in the morning for me, but i feel that this is more threatening that i would like.
[08:18:35] <Paultrw> nonsequiteur
[08:19:17] <Paultrw> you were asked not to and you did it anyway
[08:19:35] <Pseudoplayer> there are many missions that are not accessible, to make suggestions to destroy another's deed for the sake of the mission sounds...unreasonable. especially when it can be solved
[08:20:04] <Paultrw> no suggestion was madeabout detroying your deed
[08:20:24] <Pseudoplayer> but, catapulting down my gate...is not suggestive?
[08:20:45] <Pseudoplayer> I believe you are being quite unreasonable. However, i have no problem giving permission for people to fulfill the quest.
[08:20:51] <Paultrw> no,you are
[08:20:54] <Pseudoplayer> if it ever comes back up.
[08:21:16] <Paultrw> that woould require that you'd be here
[08:21:23] <Pseudoplayer> negative.
[08:21:28] <Pseudoplayer> i can leave the gate unlocked, paul.
[08:21:28] <Paultrw> we will open it a6t our convenienc3
[08:21:32] <Pseudoplayer> or put a gate house in front of it.
[08:21:48] <Pseudoplayer> now you just sound unreasonable, sir.
[08:21:58] <Paultrw> you're being an ass
[08:22:11] <Paultrw> there was no needto deedover it
[08:23:14] <Pseudoplayer> a matter of opinion.
[08:23:27] <Pseudoplayer> Paul, listen, there are plenty of ways to solve this problem
[08:23:37] <Paultrw> yes
[08:23:43] <Paultrw> remove the gate
[08:23:44] <Pseudoplayer> i dont understand why you are so upset about it when the issue is so insigifnicant.
[08:24:03] <Pseudoplayer> yes, i can even remove the gate, that isnt an issue anyway. In fact, i wouldnt have an issue if someone else removed it.
[08:24:06] <Paultrw> remove the gate and all it well
[08:24:15] <Paultrw> ok, then all is well
[08:24:19] <Pseudoplayer> it was how you approached the problem that makes me upset.
[08:24:46] <Paultrw> because we'd already talked about it, and you proceeded to deed it over anyway
[08:25:13] <Pseudoplayer> and this hindered your ability to perform the mission...how?
[08:25:26] <Pseudoplayer> that is suggesting i have to do what you suggestion.
[08:25:36] <Paultrw> by making people have to go hunted just to complete them mission
[08:25:47] <Paultrw> -m
[08:25:49] <Pseudoplayer> who went hunted to complete the mission, paul?
[08:25:56] <Pseudoplayer> no one.
[08:26:04] <Pseudoplayer> and, a solvable problem.
[08:26:10] <Paultrw> enough of the impairted legalisms
[08:26:36] <Pseudoplayer> it pains me that were even having a conversation like this and in this tone.
[08:26:41] <Paultrw> I'll put it to Max and cov... then you can deal with them
[08:26:43] <Pseudoplayer> we are on the same.
[08:26:55] <Pseudoplayer> i would love to speak with them. were on the same team.
[08:27:02] <Paultrw> you aren't
[08:27:06] <Pseudoplayer> im not?
[08:27:14] <Pseudoplayer> were in the same alliance, arent we/
[08:27:15] <Paultrw> you've already made it clear that your word is no good
[08:27:26] <Pseudoplayer> that is a false accusation.
[08:27:32] <Pseudoplayer> with no foundation.
[08:44:38] <Pseudoplayer> [08:43:21] You unlock the gate.
[08:44:55] <Paultrw> thanks...problem solved