- (06:42:25) Anikitan: are we only issuing temp bans for ban evasion now?
- (06:42:34) Anikitan: and by we i mean you
- [...]
- (06:42:39) Anikitan: and by you i mean mods
- [...]
- (06:44:52) VCR_Working: yes
- (06:45:08) VCR_Working: they completely removed all permas
- (06:45:11) VCR_Working: from us
- (06:45:11) Anikitan: really?
- (06:45:16) Anikitan: how come?
- (06:45:23) VCR_Working: they never said
- (06:45:29) Anikitan: weird
- (06:45:29) VCR_Working: likely overuse
- (06:45:45) VCR_Working: the only permas left
- (06:45:49) VCR_Working: are for cp
- (06:46:04) Anikitan: that doesn't make much sense to me, but whatever
- (06:51:03) Anikitan: oh hey
- (06:51:11) Anikitan: you can still request for ban evasion [perm]
- (06:51:19) Anikitan: in the report queue
- (06:51:27) Anikitan: just not from the inline extension
- (06:51:51) Azatsu: but moot did say he didn't want us to do that
- [...]
- (06:55:12) Anikitan: then how are you supposed to issue a temp ban for ban evasion from the report queue? its not even in the dropdown list
- (06:55:21) VCR_Working: new.php
- (06:55:24) Anikitan: oh
- (06:57:07) Anikitan: the request ban button doesn't even work for me on new.php
- (06:57:09) Anikitan: ;_;
- (06:59:04) Azatsu: inline
- (06:59:05) Azatsu: extension
- (06:59:32) Anikitan: >mfw i have to open 800 post threads on a 512k connection to ban request one post
- (07:06:30) Azatsu: that's how life is
- (07:06:32) Azatsu: ):
- (08:16:09) +duanemoody: uh, where's the option for "/b/ content outside of /b/" in ban requests
- (08:16:29) +duanemoody: kdel, magz, menchii, zorpheus
- (08:19:11) +duanemoody: seriously, now I'm not supposed to BR for porn despite it being an option, and I *can't* BR for furry or guro
- (08:19:32) +duanemoody: did i wake up and take crazy pills by mistake
- (08:21:56) +duanemoody: mvb, alternative, zanok is there a policy change i should have read about somewhere
- (08:29:56) Azatsu: a
- (08:29:58) Azatsu: moot removed
- (08:29:59) Azatsu: it
- (08:30:17) +duanemoody: and did lord moot explain what we were supposed to do
- (08:30:19) Azatsu: and he said that you're supposed to delete guro, loli and furry
- (08:30:21) Azatsu: not ban
- (08:30:35) +duanemoody: so what exactly is bannable besides CP
- (08:30:53) +duanemoody: because at this rate advertising and off-topic aren't going to last much longer
- (08:32:14) Azatsu: <+AoC> while you're changing the BR system, please add up the global 3 rules broken up in several reasons. We still need to be able to cover furry, loli, racism, guro. Let's say that trolling, flames, uncalled for catchphrases, macros and indecipherable replies are not enough to call for bans given how 4chan has evolved over the years.
- (08:32:14) Azatsu: <~moots> i would prefer most of those things be deleted and not banned for
- (08:32:46) +duanemoody: good, now the people whose content is deleted can just repost it
- (08:33:26) +duanemoody: and all i really need is to send BRs for reposting
- (08:33:34) +duanemoody: this is so much more intelligent
- (08:34:37) Azatsu: the issue was that
- (08:34:42) Azatsu: rule 3 was being overused
- (08:34:50) Azatsu: and it flooded mod's ban request's queue
- (08:34:55) +duanemoody: boo fucking hoo
- (08:35:08) +duanemoody: i'm sorry the mods had to do their job
- (08:35:30) +duanemoody: we streamlined it already and they're still bitching
- (08:35:45) +duanemoody: maybe they'd like to janitor the boards themselves
- (08:36:31) +duanemoody: every time i get on this computer the first thing i do is go to the reports
- (08:36:46) +duanemoody: i do not send BRs for everything that's reported
- (08:36:56) Azatsu: also for some reason all of the requests for permabans were removed
- (08:37:17) +duanemoody: and i have practically never asked for those
- (08:37:25) Azatsu: I'm just telling you
- (08:37:32) Azatsu: I almost never asked for those too
- (08:37:34) Azatsu: only for ban evasion
- (08:37:47) +duanemoody: and i'm telling moot that if he wants to make my job shittier he can do it himself
- (08:38:42) +duanemoody: we had reasons removed, we had options removed, i got told anime was /co/ and the other janitor is a shitposter
- (08:39:20) +duanemoody: he gave me this position because i bitched about sexism and now i don't even have a category for controlling that
- (08:39:45) +duanemoody: people do not take deletion seriously
- (08:41:01) +duanemoody: if he wants to remove bans from everything that isn't CP he should just say so
- (08:41:17) +duanemoody: i'll quit, but at least he'll be honest about it
- (08:42:06) +duanemoody: and for the record, IRC is a retarded place to post policy changes
- (08:42:20) +duanemoody: he runs a forum, we have an internal board
- (08:46:53) +duanemoody: ok, it's not constructive to argue this point
- (08:46:58) +duanemoody: for me to argue it
- (08:47:25) +duanemoody: i'm still irritated that our options are reduced but our responsibilities are not
- (08:55:25) +duanemoody: the solution to bad moderation tools is NOT GO INTO IRC
- (08:55:36) +duanemoody: the solution is FIX THE TOOLS
- (08:56:02) +duanemoody: IRC should be a last resort
- (08:56:19) +duanemoody: because i guarantee the shit i will have to deal with will require it chronically
- (08:56:49) +WalterWhite: What tool is broken? Sure, that one ban request got removed. moot is probably saying that you don't need to keep ban requesting people for petty words. The only tool that is broken in my opinion is the "new.php" but even that is replaced by vanilla reports page and I've really grown to like vanilla reports.
- (08:57:20) +duanemoody: i'm not ban requesting for petty words, i'm looking at guro and furry
- (08:58:39) +RapeApe9k: and then, without bans and mutes, they just repost their shit saying U MAD JANITOR??
- (08:58:45) +WalterWhite: Yes, I know this.
- (08:58:45) +duanemoody: if the management is not aggressive about that, my job turns to shit and i quit
- (08:58:55) +WalterWhite: You are taking this too seriously man.
- (08:59:00) +WalterWhite: Have you not read /j/?
- (08:59:08) +RapeApe9k: we are doing this job because we care
- (08:59:14) +WalterWhite: And so am I.
- (08:59:24) +duanemoody: we are doing this job because /co/ is now in danger of becoming hate central
- (08:59:47) +duanemoody: and i was a regular for years before it started doing this
- (09:00:03) +WalterWhite: I'm pretty sure we all were.
- (09:00:20) +duanemoody: i have trolls who are dedicated to turning board members against each other
- (09:00:41) +duanemoody: if you want to see /co/ turn into /v/ just say the word
- (09:00:41) +WalterWhite: Maybe not /co/ but 4chan in general. However, you cannot take this to the extreme of "my job is shit and I quit".
- (09:01:01) +duanemoody: deletion is a shit tool without anything else to back it up
- (09:01:08) +duanemoody: do not even try to debate this
- (09:01:11) +WalterWhite: It's not.
- (09:01:21) +duanemoody: deletion of a single post? fine
- (09:01:57) +duanemoody: when a mod's queue is full of repost BRs will we get another "we removed that because there were too many of them"?
- (09:02:19) +WalterWhite: Who knows? It's not our concern.
- (09:02:23) +duanemoody: the fuck it isn't
- (09:02:27) +WalterWhite: It's not.
- (09:03:12) +duanemoody: i'll go cool off
- (12:10:52) +AoC: I really wish moot knew how to lead. He wants to have the last word on 4chan policies but he doesn't know how to communicate properly
- (12:13:34) %dongfix: well
- (12:13:49) %dongfix: he's done a good job for 9 years
- [...]
- (12:14:54) +AoC: I would say adequate job at best.
- (12:18:48) +RapeApe9k: So my understanding of this situation is: Too many BRs = mods overwhelmed. Current solution: Reduce ability to file BRs.
- (12:19:11) +RapeApe9k: This doesn't really address the underlying problem.
- (12:19:24) %dongfix: reduce ability? what
- (12:19:52) +RapeApe9k: we can't ban request for loli, guro, trolling, racism, flaming, etc
- (12:19:59) +AoC: we're still upset over losing BR for global 3 dong. At least we got the ban evasion BR back
- (12:20:01) +RapeApe9k: no global #3 other than dubs
- (12:20:09) %dongfix: l o l
- (12:20:16) %dongfix: i will have to ask moot about that
- (12:20:21) +RapeApe9k: good luck
- (12:20:37) +RapeApe9k: I still don't think that's the core problem.
- (12:21:02) +RapeApe9k: What the heart of the matter is, is that it's nigh impossible to properly vet candidates for janitor/mod in an anonymous environment.
- (12:21:07) +AoC: the issue is the lack of communication between Outer/Inner Party
- (12:21:16) +RapeApe9k: Other than just watching them for months or years, and judging based on performance.
- (12:21:28) +AoC: when kami asks us to please cut down on a request that is not being helpful, we do
- (12:21:28) %dongfix: isn't that what happens anyway
- (12:22:27) +RapeApe9k: With this long vetting process it's going to be very difficult to scale the number of mods.
- (12:26:49) +AoC: Yes, the moderation system can't scale up with the increased poster numbers because it relies on a single bottleneck that is "moot's sense of trustworthiness"
- (12:27:20) +AoC: which is good in the sense that it keeps harmful power hungry people away from a position where they can be a danger to the boards
- (12:27:41) +AoC: but it's far too slow and inconsistent
- (12:52:55) VCR_Working: was that whole dev banned thing resolved
- (12:53:21) +AoC: not that I know of. Dave just bowed out since it was out of his depth
- (12:53:31) VCR_Working: hue
- (12:53:54) VCR_Working: still wondering who's doing that was...
- (12:54:11) +AoC: let's do what the rest of 4chan already does
- (12:54:17) +AoC: Blame invisibro
- (18:03:24) +AoC: man, at least we get moot posting here now
- (18:03:31) +AoC: 2010 was hell
- (18:03:47) +duanemoody: you mean when he still believed canv.as was going to amount to anything
- (18:03:48) +AoC: which by the way is my general suggestion:
- (18:04:20) +AoC: if things ever gets beyond tolerance levels, just go for a sabattical rather than quiting because moot doesn't care if you stay or go
- (18:13:20) +duanemoody: reddit can be bigger retards than us with no effort
- (18:13:37) +duanemoody: tumblr is full of offensive people and the offended
- (18:13:44) +duanemoody: facebook has white trash all over it
- (18:14:11) +duanemoody: we're better off competing on content
- (18:14:15) +duanemoody: not assholery
- (18:14:39) +duanemoody: and don't even get me started with SA and fark
- (18:14:46) +RapeApe9k: >SA
- (18:14:56) +RapeApe9k: that place is just sad
- (18:15:03) +RapeApe9k: it's like a palative care ward
- (18:15:12) +duanemoody: it's the ghost of christmas future
- (18:15:14) +RapeApe9k: terminally ill but just won't fucking die
- (18:15:19) +duanemoody: look carefully at it
- (18:15:38) +RapeApe9k: 4chan's post rate keeps increasing, SA's keeps falling
- (18:15:48) +duanemoody: don't measure success by post rate
- (18:16:20) +duanemoody: i know a comic book company that every 18 months does something outrageous that spikes sales for roughly 11 months and then has to do it again after losing readers
- (18:16:55) +duanemoody: if i learned anything in economics it was the fallacy that a short term improvement is a long term trend
- (18:17:26) +duanemoody: of course that's not to say that lowtax isn't fucking himself in the ass
- (18:17:57) +duanemoody: i'll shut up now
- (18:22:40) +AoC: Well, let's see if we get lucky tonight and get a moot sighting
- (18:23:10) +Azatsu: Maybe we're not supposed to know
- (18:23:21) VCR_Working: why
- (18:23:28) +AoC: And I stand by what I've said earlier, the man has never been a good leader and an adequate admin at best
- (18:23:55) +AoC: keeping things in the dark is not the best way to handle policy, specially when you hide it from the people volunteering for you
- (18:24:16) VCR_Working: with a bunch of rule changes due to certain issues, and only speculation as to why
- (18:25:33) %kami`: ?
- (18:26:12) VCR_Working: oh don't mind us, just venting about changes
- (18:26:20) VCR_Working: there's not much we can do about it either way
- (18:53:55) %kami`: what I'm trying to say is that
- (18:54:06) %kami`: just because mods are supposedly 'inner party'
- (18:54:17) %kami`: doesn't mean that we have much say in what happens
- (18:54:37) %kami`: especially after what I told you some weeks ago
- (22:03:17) %dongfix: board culture is not a thing
- (22:05:39) +AoC: bullshit
- (22:07:05) %dongfix: it is a method for old users to exclude new users from forming their own ideas
- (22:07:26) +Azatsu: I wouldn't say it's always like that
- (22:08:00) +Azatsu: if you follow the pure definition of culture, OC threads are a plethora of board culture
- (22:08:07) %dongfix: what
- (22:08:24) +Azatsu: well, you know
- (22:08:46) +fsdfdsf: If new users sitck around for more than a week they'll learn the board culture.
- (22:08:48) +Azatsu: cul·ture/ˈkəlCHər/
- (22:08:48) +Azatsu: Noun:
- (22:08:48) +Azatsu: The arts and other manifestations of human intellectual achievement regarded collectively.
- (22:10:00) +AoC: greentext blogging flies in some boards, it's shot down in /jp/. People inside a board build upon shared experiences from eventful threads or going fads. There's a clear difference between a poster from /a/ and /v/, mostly on what they consider as acceptable
- (22:10:14) %dongfix: sure
- (22:10:23) +AoC: it's foolish to think all of 4chan is uniform and seeks each board for its topic rather than the userbase itself
- (22:10:29) %dongfix: but when you're demonised for doing something that they don't consider "board culture" it needs to be eradicated
- (22:10:33) +AoC: which is why /sp/ is such an interesting enclave
- (22:10:50) +Azatsu: Ah
- (22:10:57) +Azatsu: That kind of board culture
- (22:10:59) +Azatsu: doesn't exist
- (22:11:02) +AoC: that's elitism, which is a different story
- (22:11:06) +Azatsu: I was more looking at stuff like OC
- (22:11:11) %dongfix: they are basically the same thing
- (22:11:17) %dongfix: on topic content is not board culture
- (22:11:20) %dongfix: it's on topic content
- (22:11:22) +AoC: "we don't climb the ladder, you dumb fucking new monkey" and all that
SHARE
TWEET
other Highlights from 3rd November 2012
a guest
Aug 13th, 2015
12
Never
RAW Paste Data
