You paged Saskia with 'Well yeah. But I wanted the manse to be something other than, 'If I please, I can mutate anyone into an implicit concubine who cannot betray me ever''
Saskia pages: so your saying that a manse like that worries you on a conextual level?
You paged Saskia with 'Well, it was mostly the mutagenic thing. It just came off as a skeevy power fantasy, and considering that if I allow it, someone who honestly COULD use it for a skeevy power fantasy could cite your manse as a precedent? I just can't allow it.'
Saskia pages: I'm not sure if it makes much diference but the mutations only effect non essence wielders so would only really do anything to extras.
I can't find who you're trying to page with: Saksia
Unable to page: Saksia
You paged Saskia with 'No, it doesn't make that much difference. As I said, the precedent remains whether it's abused or not.'
Saskia pages: I guess I can see where your coming from but when I was making it myself I felt it was well, pfairly in line with the exalted themes since theres a few simmilar things in the books.
You paged Saskia with '...Such as?'
You paged Saskia with 'I mean, I'm not moving on this issue but I'm curious as to what your basis is.'
You paged Saskia with 'We don't use the sourcebooks as infalliable. For example, last incarnation we modified the setting to ignore Lillun, and use what the devs had said about 3E infernals and how their shards were handled.'
Saskia pages: house Cynis. how in creation slavery is everywhere. Slave races bread in the first age. also Exalted is generally a sexy setting where it does come up.
You paged Saskia with 'And? We don't want to encourage this. It's distasteful, and quite frankly 2E overplayed the sexy element unto inappropriateness. You can be approved, but not with the manse. End of story.'