Public Pastes
BitBucket - Backup your code in the cloud! Host unlimited private projects, for free. SIGN UP takes 10 seconds, and it's free!
SHARE
TWEET

other Highlights from 23rd September 2012

a guest Jul 27th, 2015 4 Never
  1. (01:49:14) ‹~moots› i added a new global spam ban template
  2. (01:49:20) ‹~moots› please stop using the old ones, i renamed them to "commercial spma"
  3. (01:49:24) ‹~moots› to clarify
  4. (01:49:27) ‹~moots› they are for SPAMBOTS
  5. (01:49:29) ‹~moots› not a user reposting
  6.  
  7. (02:08:47) ‹+Beam› >someone calling Valkyria Chronicles "pedoshit"
  8. (02:08:49) ‹+Beam› man what
  9.  
  10. (16:29:13) ‹+AoC› >Memelight II or ReferenceLands 2
  11. (16:29:16) ‹+AoC› goddammit /v/
  12. (16:29:41) ‹+AoC› fucking enjoy the games, every release it's not going to be ripe for a TOR-off
  13. (16:29:58) ‹Jakkarra› I am pissed Borderlands 2 is full of skyrim references and other shit
  14. (16:29:58) ‹VCR_Working› borderlands 2 is actually fun too
  15. (16:30:05) ‹Jakkarra› But that's because i hate fun
  16. (16:30:11) ‹Jakkarra› >:C
  17.  
  18. (17:08:43) ‹VCR_Working› >bring back doubles to /v/
  19. (17:08:44) ‹VCR_Working› fuck off
  20.  
  21. (19:34:48) ‹Bat-Guano› Dear Janitors: it's perfectly fine to submit an "other" ban request.
  22. (19:35:20) ‹+Beam› we've been told not to use it that much
  23. (19:35:34) ‹+WalterWhite› lolol
  24. (19:35:40) ‹Bat-Guano› Please include what should be stated and the recommended severity of the ban or if it should just be a warning.
  25. (19:36:07) ‹+AlBorland› tell that to der fuhrer
  26. (19:36:17) ‹+fsdfdsf› I don't think moot approves
  27. (19:36:21) ‹Bat-Guano› Yes, use the stock bans when possible, but the other is for special reasons.
  28. (19:36:39) ‹+fsdfdsf› ok
  29. (19:36:54) ‹+fsdfdsf› Are still not supposed to submit a ton for global 6?
  30. (19:37:27) ‹Bat-Guano› Yeah, take it easy with the Quality of posts ban.
  31. (19:37:35) ‹+fsdfdsf› Ok
  32. (19:37:45) ‹+Beam› it'd be nice to have a preset for "dubs" spam
  33.  
  34. (20:37:46) ‹+fsdfdsf› >4chan should really stop being assholes towards it's female users
  35. (20:37:49) ‹+fsdfdsf› wwwwwwwwwwwwwww
  36.  
  37. (20:44:34) ‹+Lich› Gender shouldn't, but occasionally it DOES come up in conversation, and to have people lash out at it gets annoying.
  38. (20:44:50) ‹VCR_Working› yeah
  39.  
  40. (21:59:27) ‹+Bloom› if all they want to do is talk about how they want to fuck the characters why don't they go make a thread on /c/
  41. (21:59:30) ‹+Bloom› neptunia is basically anime
  42. (21:59:39) ‹+fsdfdsf› It's getting an anime
  43. (21:59:39) ‹+Bloom› or even /h/
  44. (21:59:45) ‹+Bloom› oh yeah i forgot
  45. (21:59:58) ‹VCR_Working› ./c/ is for image dumps silly
  46. (22:00:02) ‹VCR_Working› not for actual discussion
  47.  
  48. (23:08:33) ‹+AoC› moots, require confirmation to start deleting filename threads
  49. (23:09:10) ‹~moots› i didnt say to delete them
  50. (23:09:11) ‹~moots› i said they were shit
  51. (23:09:35) ‹+AoC› hmm, I might be misremembering the /v/ chart
  52. (23:09:45) ‹+AoC› I thought tertiary was not allowed
  53. (23:09:53) ‹+AoC› well, that's a good clarification for me
  54. (23:14:39) ‹+Bloom› i dont really understand, if they're shit why cant we delete them
  55.  
  56. (23:17:27) ‹~moots› i have an idea
  57. (23:17:31) ‹~moots› that might make your lives easier
  58. (23:17:41) ‹~moots› make it so ban requests actually ban the user while the BR is pending
  59. (23:17:50) ‹~moots› and remove it if it's denied
  60. (23:17:55) ‹~moots› but leave it if it's accepted
  61. (23:18:04) ‹~moots› i think i'd still add a short timeout to it
  62. (23:18:06) ‹~moots› like an hour
  63. (23:18:08) ‹+AlBorland› >implying thats your idea
  64. (23:18:17) ‹~moots› https://boards.4chan.org/q/res/202544#p202577
  65. (23:18:18) ‹+AlBorland› >implying janibros havent been suggesting this for years
  66. (23:18:20) ‹~moots› this thread got me thinking about it
  67. (23:18:24) ‹~moots› and i'd always wanted to do probations
  68.  
  69. (23:18:26) ‹~moots› five or so years ago
  70. (23:18:31) ‹~moots› before we changed the ban system
  71. (23:18:37) ‹~moots› to be you-can-browse-but-not post
  72. (23:18:48) ‹~moots› was thinking mods would have browse+post bans, and jans would have just short posting bans
  73. (23:18:58) ‹~moots› so maybe a 1 hr temp ban would work
  74. (23:19:05) ‹+AoC› ah, good point. All they'll be missing will be is posting
  75. (23:19:09) ‹+AoC› until they evade that is
  76. (23:19:14) ‹~moots› BR submits a 1hr temp ban that expires if the BR isnt filled, it's removed if the BR is denied, and gets upgraded to a full ban if approved
  77. (23:19:20) ‹~moots› still requires mods handle them in an hour
  78. (23:19:22) ‹~moots› but better than nothing
  79. (23:19:31) ‹+AoC› I approve, and it will make our lives so much better
  80.  
  81. (23:20:15) ‹~moots› word, we'll do that then
  82. (23:20:26) ‹~moots› 1 hr temp ban, remove if BR denied, upgrade to a real ban if approved
  83. (23:20:37) ‹~moots› our system doesnt support <1 hour bans now though, hm
  84. (23:20:39) ‹~moots› er <1day
  85. (23:20:42) ‹~moots› we might need to hack it
  86.  
  87. (23:24:56) ‹~moots› oh
  88. (23:24:58) ‹~moots› i know how we can do this
  89. (23:25:02) ‹~moots› without using the existing system at all
  90. (23:25:03) ‹~moots› awesome
  91. (23:25:22) ‹~moots› yep, this should take like 5 minutes to do
  92. (23:25:25) ‹+AlBorland› inb4 4chan sql database corruption/every user banned
  93. (23:25:33) ‹~moots› im not going to do it
  94. (23:25:42) ‹~moots› we can just do a check when a user posts to the ban requests table
  95. (23:25:47) ‹~moots› and if <1 hour, dont let them post
  96. (23:25:53) ‹~moots› we wont even bounce them to /banned
  97. (23:26:01) ‹~moots› we'll just check the database
  98. (23:26:04) ‹~moots› easy peasy
  99. (23:26:15) ‹+i7MUSHROOM› that's a wonderful idea
  100. (23:26:17) ‹+AlBorland› inb4 a shitton of /q/ threads about "WHY CANT I POST?"
  101. (23:26:21) ‹~moots› itll say
  102. (23:26:27) ‹~moots› "You cannot post because you have a ban pending."
  103.  
  104. (23:32:48) ‹+AoC› I would go against this since that would mean people would be stuck seeing the "ban pending" message for days if not weeks, without knowing what they did wrong or being able to appeal
  105. (23:33:03) ‹+AoC› then I remembered mods now go through the ban req queue constantly
  106. (23:33:27) ‹+AoC› so yeah, sounds like a great idea
  107. (23:35:00) ‹~moots› er
  108. (23:35:02) ‹~moots› it will only last 1 hour
  109. (23:35:03) ‹+Aerolite› AoC: i believe he mentioned that they would need to respond to it within an hour
  110. (23:35:11) ‹+AoC› ah
  111. (23:35:37) ‹+AoC› that's even better
  112.  
  113. (23:38:55) ‹~moots› so this is the equiv of probations i guess, what i had in mind many years ago
  114. (23:39:17) ‹~moots› we should have it done soon
  115. (23:39:24) ‹~moots› whenever dongfix is around and i can chat with him
  116. (23:41:17) ‹BluRay› \o/
RAW Paste Data
Top