Advertisement
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- ELMER BARNES - HITLER PERDIO LA GUERRA POR SER MUY BUENO
- El historiador americano, Elmer Barnes dice que Hitler perdió la guerra por su excesiva bondad…
- “Mientras que la teoría del diabólico Hitler es generalmente aceptada, hay personas muy bien informadas que sostienen que él se llevó a sí mismo y a Alemania a la ruina por ser demasiado suave, generoso y honorable, y no malvado y despiadado.Ellos apuntan a las siguientes consideraciones:
- El (Hitler) hizo una oferta de paz genuina y liberal a Gran Bretaña el 25 de agosto de 1939; permitió que los británicos escaparan en Dunkirk para fomentar a Gran Bretaña a hacer la paz, este acto más tarde le costó la guerra en el norte de África; fallo en ocupar toda Francia, tomar el norte de África, y en dividir al Imperio Británico, Hitler perdió la batalla de Inglaterra, al no aprobar el salvajismo de la barbarie militar que jugó un papel muy importante en la victoria de los aliados, Hitler retrasó su ataque a Rusia y ofreció a molotov esplendidas concesiones en noviembre 1940 para mantener la paz entre Alemania y Rusia, Hitler perdió la guerra con Rusia al retrasar la invasión con el fin de rescatar a Mussolini de su ataque idiota en Grecia; y declaró la guerra a Estados Unidos para mantener su palabra con Japón, que desde mucho antes quedo en claro que no merecía tal consideración y lealtad de Hitler ".
- El 02 de marzo 1940 Hitler dijo el subsecretario de Estado Sumner Welles, que él había estado durante mucho tiempo en favor del desarme, pero no había recibido el estímulo de Inglaterra y Francia, que estaba a favor del libre comercio internacional; Alemania no tenía otro objetivo más que el retorno del pueblo alemán a la posición territorial que históricamente fue justamente de ellos"; Hitler no tenía ningún deseo de controlar a las personas no alemanas y no tenía intención de interferir en su independencia; y Hitler quería el regreso de las colonias que fueron robadas de Alemania en Versalles.
- Churchill, sin embargo, quería la guerra. Churchill era un criminal de guerra. Churchill no quería la paz. Churchill quería que la guerra continuara el mayor tiempo posible. El un 01 de enero 1944, en una carta a Stalin, Churchill dijo:
- "Nosotros nunca pensamos en la paz, ni siquiera en ese año cuando estábamos completamente aislados y podríamos haber hecho las paces sin grave perjuicio para el Imperio Británico, y extensamente a su costo.
- ¿Por qué deberíamos pensar en ello ahora, cuando la victoria se acerca para los tres de nosotros? "
- - Esta es una confesión de Churchill que demuestra que Hitler no quería la guerra con Inglaterra-
- Churchill en su discurso en Guildhall en junio de 1943 afirmó con toda claridad:"Entramos en la guerra con nuestro libre albedrío, sin que nosotros hayamos sido directamente agredidos"
- Cuando Churchill se iba de Londres para reunirse con Roosevelt en una conferencia en Quebec a finales del verano de 1943, un periodista le preguntó si tenían previsto ofrecer condiciones de paz con Alemania. Churchill respondió: "DIOS MÍO, NO. ELLOS ACEPTARÍAN DE INMEDIATO. "
- Así que la guerra continúo de agosto 1943 hasta mayo de 1945 - durante 22 meses más, sólo porque no se ofrecieron términos de paz.
- Hitler y el pueblo alemán no querían la guerra, pero al igual que Churchill, Roosevelt también quería la guerra y la quería que por razones políticas. Como Jesse Jones, miembro del gabinete de Roosevelt por cinco años, dijo:
- "A pesar de su afirmación tantas veces repetida: "No me gusta la guerra", el (Roosevelt) estaba ansioso de entrar en la lucha, ya que le aseguraría un tercer mandato."
- Hitler, sin embargo, tenía un solo objetivo en lo que respecta a sus relaciones con otras naciones. Ese objetivo era la paz. El 17 de mayo de 1933, Hitler se dirigió al Reichstag acerca de sus intenciones:
- “Alemania estará perfectamente lista para disolver todo su aparato militar y destruir la pequeña cantidad de armas pendientes de ella, si los países vecinos hacen lo mismo con la misma rigurosidad.
- Alemania está enteramente dispuesta a renunciar a las armas de agresión de todo tipo si las naciones armadas, por su parte, destruyen sus armas de agresión dentro del plazo fijado, y si su uso está prohibido por una convención internacional.
- Alemania es en todo momento dispuesta a renunciar a las armas ofensivas si el resto del mundo hace lo mismo. Alemania está dispuesta a aceptar cualquier pacto solemne de no agresión porque ella no piensa en atacar a nadie, sino sólo en la adquisición de seguridad.”
- No es sorprendente que ninguna de las "democracias amantes de la paz" prestó atención a las ofertas de Hitler. De hecho, la única razón por la que al rey Eduardo no se le permitió permanecer en el trono británico fue porque hizo saber que mientras él fuera el rey, Inglaterra no iría a la guerra con Alemania.
- Hitler se expresó acerca de los resultados que Alemania obtendría de la guerra:
- "Una guerra europea podría ser el final de todos nuestros esfuerzos, incluso si nosotros ganáramos, porque la desaparición del Imperio británico sería una desgracia que no se reparar de nuevos."
- --Michael McLaughlin, For Those Who Cannot Speak, página 10.
- Basándonos en lo anterior, a Hitler se le debe otorgar el Premio Nobel de la Paz a título póstumo para rectificar las cosas. Él no fue la causa de la 2º Guerra Mundial, y contrariamente a la creencia popular, Hitler sin duda y definitivamente NO quería la guerra – ninguna guerra. Él era un hombre de paz y trabajó por la paz en todas las maneras que pudo.
- =============================
- http://solargeneral.com/images/hitler/Nobel-Prize.txt
- ============================
- Nobel Prize
- Christmas Book Listing
- Why Civilizations Self-destruct, $16.00
- The New German Reichs-
- chancellery, $39.95
- The Hoax of the 20th Century, $25
- House of Rothschild, $37.95
- Thinkers of the Right: Challenging Materialism, $25
- Adolf Hitler - An Overlooked Candidate for the Nobel Prize
- If anyone deserved the Nobel Peace Prize, it was Adolf Hitler.
- Hitler did not want war. World War II was forced on Germany. Poland
- was encouraged to attack Germany by the promises of British
- Ambassador Sir Howard William Kennard and French Ambassador Leon
- Noel. They promised unconditionally that England and France would
- come to Poland’s immediate aid should she need it in case of war
- with Germany; therefore, no matter what Poland did to provoke
- Germany’s attack, Poland had an assurance from England and France.
- With this guarantee, Poland began acting ruthlessly. In addition,
- Kennard and Noel flattered Poland into thinking she was a great
- power. As the Chinese proverb says, “You can flatter a man to jump
- off the roof.” They sabotaged the efforts of those Polish leaders
- who wanted a policy of friendship with Germany.1
- By Alex S. Perry Jr.
- Poland delivered the first blow, and Hitler announced, “Since dawn
- today, we are shooting back,” when he spoke to the Reichstag on Sept
- ember 1, 1939. “Shooting back” is not the statement of an
- aggressor.2 When Hitler attacked, Donald Day said, Poland got
- exactly what she deserved. None of Poland’s immediate neighbors felt
- sorry for her. Poland had conducted a policy of terror. Ethnic
- Germans living on German soil that had been given to Poland at the
- end of World War I by the Versailles Peace Treaty had been so
- mistreated that 2 million left the area for Germany and elsewhere.3
- They were driven from what had been their homeland long before World
- War I. Leon Degrelle, a young Belgian political leader in the 1930s,
- and who later joined Hitler’s hardest fighting unit, the Waffen SS,
- with over 400,000 other non-German European volunteers, says, “Of
- all the crimes of World War II, one never hears about the wholesale
- massacres that occurred in Poland just before the war. Thousands of
- German men, women and children were massacred in the most horrendous
- fashion by press-enraged mobs. Hitler decided to halt the slaughter
- and he rushed to the rescue.”4 Young German boys, when captured by
- the Poles, were castrated.5
- William Joyce, nicknamed Lord Haw Haw by British propaganda, became
- a German citizen and took up for the German cause. He described the
- conditions of the Germans who were living in Poland because of the
- Versailles Treaty:
- German men and women were hunted like wild beasts through the
- streets of Bromberg. When they were caught, they were mutilated and
- torn to pieces by the Polish mob. . . . Every day the butchery
- increased. . . . [T]housands of Germans fled from their homes in
- Poland with nothing more than the clothes that they wore. Moreover,
- there was no doubt that the Polish army was making plans for the
- massacre of Danzig. . . . On the nights of August 25 to August 31
- inclusive, there occurred, besides innumerable attacks on civilians
- of German blood, 44 perfectly authenticated acts of armed violence
- against German official persons and property. These incidents took
- place either on the border or inside German territory. On the night
- of [August 31], a band of Polish desperadoes actually occupied the
- German Broad casting Station at Gleiwitz. Now it was clear that
- unless German troops marched at once, not a man, woman or child of
- German blood within the Polish territory could reasonably expect to
- avoid persecution and slaughter.6
- Due to Poland’s atrocious acts against the German people, Hitler
- declared to British Ambassador Sir Nevile Henderson on August 25,
- 1939: “Poland’s provocations have become intolerable.”7
- So Poland delivered the first blow, not Germany. The first blow was
- important to the United States in its war with Japan. It gave the
- United States the right and justification to do whatever was
- necessary to defeat the Japanese. But Germany did not have this
- right with Poland even after Poland had delivered the first blow.
- What fair-minded man, if he knew the true facts involved in the
- Polish situation, could blame Hitler for his retaliatory attack on
- Poland? Poland, if any nation ever did, deserved exactly what
- Germany gave her in return. But Hitler did not even want to do what
- he had to do. No sooner than Hitler began protecting the German
- people inside Poland, he was ready to stop all hostilities and begin
- peace negotiations. Prince Sturdza narrates:
- Only hours after the outbreak of hostilities between Germany and
- Poland, Mussolini, renewing his efforts for peace, proposed to all
- the interested powers an immediate suspension of hostilities and the
- immediate convocation of a conference between the great powers, in
- which Poland would also participate. Mussolini’s proposals were,
- without any delay, accepted by all governments concerned except
- Great Britain.8
- Before war broke out Britain’s ambassador to Berlin, Sir Nevil
- Henderson, on August 30, 1939, said, in his final report of
- Germany’s proposed basis for negotiations, “Those proposals are in
- general not too unreasonable.”
- Even Pierre and Renee Gosset, in their rabid anti-German book
- Hitler, declare: “It was a proposal of extreme moderation. It was in
- fact an offer that no Allied statesman could have rejected in good
- faith.”9
- As early as January 1941, Hitler was making extraordinary efforts to
- come to peace terms with England. He offered England generous terms.
- He offered, if Britain would assume an attitude of neutrality, to
- withdraw from all of France, to leave Holland and Belgium . . . to
- evacuate Norway and Den mark, and to support British and French
- industries by buying their products. His proposal had many other
- favorable points for England and Western Europe. But England’s
- officials did not want peace. They wanted war. Had they not
- celebrated their declaration of war by laughing, joking and drinking
- beer?10
- Hitler allowed the British to escape at Dunkirk.
- He did not want to fight England. German Gen. Blumentritt states why
- Hitler allowed the British to escape:
- He [Hitler] then astonished us by speaking with admiration of the
- British Empire, of the necessity for its existence, and the
- civilization that Britain had brought into the world. He remarked
- with a shrug of the shoulders, that the creation of the Empire had
- been achieved by means that were often harsh, but “where there is
- planning there are shavings flying.” He compared the British Empire
- with the Catholic Church—saying they were both essential elements of
- stability in the world. He said that all he wanted from Britain was
- that she should acknowledge Germany’s position on the continent. The
- return of Germany’s lost colonies would be desirable but not
- essential, and he would even offer to support Britain with troops if
- she should be involved in any difficulties anywhere.11
- Blumentritt’s statement is not the only notice about Hitler’s hope
- of peace and friendship with England. The renowned Swedish Explorer
- Sven Hedin observed Hitler’s confusion about Britain’s refusal to
- accept his peace offers: Hitler “felt he had repeatedly extended the
- hand of peace and friendship to the British, and each time they had
- blacked his eye in reply.” Hitler said, “The survival of the British
- Empire is in Germany’s interests too because if Britain loses India,
- we gain nothing thereby.”12 Harry Elmer Barnes says that Hitler lost
- the war because he was too good.
- While the theory of Hitler’s diabolism is generally accepted, there
- are very well informed persons who contend that he brought himself
- and Germany to ruin by being too soft, generous and honorable rather
- than too tough and ruthless. They point to the following
- considerations: he made a genuine and liberal peace offer to Britain
- on August 25, 1939; he permitted the British to escape at Dunkirk to
- encourage Britain to make peace, which later on cost him the war in
- North Africa; he failed to occupy all of France, take North Africa
- at once, and split the British Empire, he lost the Battle of Britain
- by failing to approve the savagery of military barbarism which
- played so large a role in the Allied victory; he delayed his attack
- on Russia and offered Molotov lavish concessions in November 1940 to
- keep peace between Germany and Russia; he lost the war with Russia
- by delaying the invasion in order to bail Mussolini out of his
- idiotic attack on Greece; and he declared war on the United States
- to keep his pledged word with Japan which had long before made it
- clear that it deserved no such consideration and loyalty from
- Hitler.13
- David Irving’s descriptive account of Hitler’s love for Great
- Britain confirms what others had to say of Hitler’s desire to do no
- harm to England:
- For 20 years Hitler had dreamed of an alliance with Britain. Until
- far into the war he clung to the dream with all the vain, slightly
- ridiculous tenacity of a lover unwilling to admit that his feelings
- are unrequited. As Hitler told Maj. Quisling on August 18, 1940:
- “After making one proposal after another to the British on the
- reorganization of Europe, I now find myself forced against my will
- to fight this war against Britain. . . .”
- This was the dilemma confronting Hitler that summer. He hesitated to
- crush the British. Accordingly, he could not put his heart into the
- invasion planning. More fatefully, Hitler stayed the hand of the
- Luftwaffe and forbade any attack on London under pain of
- court-martial; the all-out saturation bombing of London, which his
- strategic advisers Raeder, Jodl, and Jeschonnek all urged upon him,
- was vetoed for one implausible reason after another. Though his
- staffs were instructed to examine every peripheral British
- position—Gibraltar, Egypt, the Suez Canal—for its vulnerability to
- attack, the heart of the British Empire was allowed to beat on,
- unmolested until it was too late. In these months an adjutant
- overheard Hitler heatedly shouting into a Chancellery telephone, “We
- have no business to be destroying Britain. We are quite incapable of
- taking up her legacy,” meaning the empire; and he spoke of the
- “devastating consequences” of the collapse of that empire.14
- Hitler told Undersecretary of State Sumner Welles, March 2, 1940,
- (1) that he had long been in favor of disarmament, but had received
- no encouragement from England and France; (2) he was in favor of
- international free trade; (3) Germany had no aim other than the
- return of the “German people to the territorial position that
- historically was rightly theirs”; (4) he had no desire to control
- non-German people and he had no intention to interfere with their
- independence; and (5) he wanted the return of the colonies that were
- stolen from Germany at Versailles.15
- Churchill wanted war. Churchill was a war criminal. Churchill did
- not want peace. He wanted the war to continue as long as possible.
- In a January 1, 1944, letter to Stalin, Churchill said: “We never
- thought of peace, not even in that year when we were completely
- isolated and could have made peace without serious detriment to the
- British Empire, and extensively at your cost. Why should we think of
- it now, when victory approaches for the three of us?”16 This is a
- confession even by Churchill that Hitler never did want war with
- England.
- Churchill in his July 1943 Guildhall speech stated quite plainly,
- “We entered the war of our free will, without ourselves being
- directly assaulted.”17
- When Churchill was leaving London to meet Roosevelt for a conference
- in Quebec late in the summer of 1943, a reporter asked if they were
- planning to offer peace terms to Germany. Churchill replied:
- “Heavens, no. They would accept immediately.”18 So the war went on
- from August 1943 until May 1945—for 22 more months just because
- peace terms were not offered.
- Churchill wanted England to be in war with Germany as early as
- 1936.19
- Roosevelt was a war criminal. He wanted war and he wanted World War
- II to last as long as possible.
- @ @ @
- Hitler and the German people did not want war, but Roosevelt wanted
- war. He worked for getting World War II started. He wanted war for
- political reasons. Jesse Jones, a member of Roosevelt’s cabinet for
- five years, states, “Regardless of his oft-repeated statement, ‘I
- hate war,’ he was eager to get into the fighting since that would
- ensure a third term.”20
- While the president repeated he did not want war and had no intent
- to send an expeditionary force to Europe, the militant secretaries
- of the Navy and of the War Department, Knox and Stimson, denounced
- the neutrality legislation in speeches and public declarations and
- advocated an American intervention in the Atlantic Battle. As
- members of the cabinet they could not do it without the president’s
- consent.21
- When the press quoted Frank Knox as saying: “The only hope for peace
- for the United States would be the battering of Germany,” FDR did
- not rebuke him.22
- Dr. Milton Eisenhower, Gen. Eisenhower’s brother, said, “President
- Roosevelt found it necessary to get the country into World War II to
- save his social policies.”23
- Clare Booth-Luce shocked many people by saying at the Republican
- Party Convention in 1944 that Roosevelt “has lied us [the U.S.A.]
- into the war.” However, after this statement proved to be correct,
- the Roosevelt followers ceased to deny it, but praised it by
- claiming he was “forced to lie” to save his country and then England
- and “the world.”24
- Rep. Hamilton Fish made the first speech in Congress on December 8,
- 1941, asking for a declaration of war against Japan. In his book,
- FDR: The Other Side of the Coin, Fish says he is ashamed of that
- speech today and if he had known what Roosevelt had been doing to
- provoke Japan to attack, he would never have asked for a declaration
- of war.25 Fish said Roosevelt was the main firebrand to light the
- fuse of war both in Europe and the Pacific.26
- Roosevelt’s real policy was revealed when the Germans were able to
- search through Polish documents and found in the archives in Warsaw
- “the dispatches of the Polish ambassadors in Washington and Paris
- which laid bare Roosevelt’s efforts to goad France and Britain into
- war. In November 1938, William C. Bullitt, his personal friend and
- ambassador in Paris, had indicated to the Poles that the president’s
- desire was for “Germany and Russia [to] come to blows, whereupon the
- democratic nations would attack Germany and force her into
- submission”; in the spring of 1939, Bullitt quoted Roosevelt as
- being determined “not to participate in the war from the start, but
- to be in at the finish.”27
- Oliver Lyttelton, wartime British production manager, was undeniably
- correct when he declared, “America was never truly neutral. There is
- no doubt where her sympathies were, and it is a travesty on history
- ever to say that the United States was forced into the war. America
- provoked the Japanese to such an extent that they were forced to
- attack.”28
- @ @ @
- The Japanese were begging for peace before the atom bombs were
- dropped, and MacArthur recommended negotiation on the basis of the
- Japanese overtures. But Roosevelt brushed off this suggestion with
- the remark: “MacArthur is our greatest general and our poorest
- politician.”29 These statements tell the whole history of World War
- II from the beginning to the end, The war was started to keep
- Roosevelt in office and it was allowed to go on much longer than
- necessary—it could have been over any day from 1943 on. At the same
- time American boys were battling to end World War II, leading
- American politicians were doing all they could for political reasons
- to continue the conflict.
- Hitler had only one goal with regard to his relations with other
- nations. That goal was peace. On May 17, 1933, Hitler addressed the
- Reichstag about his intentions:
- Germany will be perfectly ready to disband her entire military
- establishment and destroy the small amount of arms remaining to her,
- if the neighboring countries will do the same thing with equal
- thoroughness. Germany is entirely ready to renounce aggressive
- weapons of every sort if the armed nations, on their part, will
- destroy their aggressive weapons within a specified period, and if
- their use is forbidden by an international convention. Germany is at
- all times prepared to renounce offensive weapons if the rest of the
- world does the same. Germany is prepared to agree to any solemn pact
- of non-aggression because she does not think of attacking anybody
- but only of acquiring security.30
- None of the “peace loving democracies” paid any attention to
- Hitler’s offer. The only reason why King Edward was not allowed to
- remain on the British throne was because he let it be known that as
- long as he was the king, England would not go to war with Germany.
- Hitler expressed himself about the results Germany would gain from
- war: “A European war could be the end of all our efforts even if we
- should win, because the disappearance of the British Empire would be
- a misfortune which could not be made up again” (Michael McLaughlin,
- For Those Who Cannot Speak, page 10).
- Based on the above, Hitler should be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize
- posthumously to set things straight. He was not the cause of World
- War II and he did not want any war. He was a man of peace and he
- worked for peace in every way he could.
- ENDNOTES:
- 1 Day, Donald, Onward Christian Soldiers, 68-9. Donald Day was The
- Chicago Tribune’s only correspondent in northeastern Europe before
- and during World War II.
- 2 McLaughlin, Michael, For Those Who Cannot Speak, 9.
- 3 Onward Christian Soldiers, 55.
- 4 The Journal of Historical Review, winter 1982, 454-5.
- 5 Fish, Hamilton, FDR: The Other Side of the Coin, 86.
- 6 Twilight Over England, 125-6.
- 7 The Suicide of Europe (memoirs of Prince Michel Sturdza, former
- foreign minister of Romania), 1.
- 8 Ibid., 145.
- 9 Ibid., 11.
- 10 McLaughlin, op cit., 10.
- 11 Barnes, Harry Elmer, Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace, 162. The
- last sentence in the paragraph just quoted should put an end to any
- claim that Hitler wanted to capture the world.
- 12 Irving, David, Hitler’s War, paperback edition, Avon History,
- 236.
- 13 The Barnes Trilogy, section “Revisionism and Brainwashing,” 33.
- 14 Irving, op. cit., 236.
- 15 Tansill, Charles Callan, Back Door to War, 577.
- 16 Walendy, Udo, The Methods of Reeducation, 3.
- 17 Martin, James J., The Saga of Hog Island, 42.
- 18 Martin, James J., Revisionist Viewpoints, 75.
- 19 Neilson, Francis, The Churchill Legend, 350.
- 20 Jones, Jesse H., with Edward Angly, Fifty Billion Dollars: My
- Thirteen Years with the RFC: 1932-1945, New York: the Macmillan
- Company, 1951, 260.
- 21 Fehrenbach, T.F., F.D.R.’s Undeclared War 1939 to 1941, pages
- 135, 189.
- 22 Walendy, Udo, The Methods of Reeducation, 3.
- 23 Grieb, Conrad, American Manifest Destiny and the Holocaust,
- 124-5.
- 24 Walendy, op. cit., 3
- 25 Ibid., 144.
- 26 Ibid., 149.
- 27 Irving, op. cit., 235.
- 28 The Saga of Hog Island, op. cit., 63.
- 29 Chamberlin, William Henry, America’s Second Crusade, 219.
- 30 Neilson, Francis, The Churchill Legend, 278.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement