SHARE
TWEET

What it means to be a janitor

a guest Apr 6th, 2015 195 Never
  1. What it means to be a janitor and an explaination on the 4chan mod system
  2.  
  3. (20:54:15) ‹+AoC› Anyway, how bad of a leak are we looking at with the raybrandt event?
  4. (20:54:28) ‹@ALTERNATIVE› I would guess nothing bad will happen
  5. (20:54:47) ‹+Azatsu› I hope so
  6. (20:54:57) ‹+Azatsu› he knows the password of the channel
  7. (20:54:59) ‹+Azatsu› that could be dangerous
  8. (20:55:19) ‹+AoC› they don't seem like the disgruntled employee sort though
  9. (20:55:20) ‹%kami`› AoC this is why you guys aren't given much power
  10. (20:55:28) ‹@ALTERNATIVE› he was very civil about it I think he will be okay
  11. (20:55:33) ‹+Kyoubro› ^AoC
  12. (20:55:34) ‹%kami`› if you remember your complaints about being 'outer party'
  13. (20:56:00) ‹%kami`› its not that we don't trust you guys
  14. (20:56:18) ‹+Azatsu› On my point of view, even if the guy looks very trustworthy, it takes some time to see if you really deserve so much power
  15. (20:56:20) ‹%kami`› its just that the odds are the team isn't secure
  16. (20:56:28) ‹+AoC› fair enough
  17. (20:56:35) ‹+AoC› also, hi dave
  18. (20:56:39) ‹@ALTERNATIVE› hello
  19. (20:56:44) ‹+Kyoubro› I think a wiser idea would be to simply add another tier of stratification...
  20. (20:56:47) ‹+Aerolite› dave, can you tell magz to come in here
  21. (20:56:54) ‹+AoC› been too long, but I guess you're enjoying your new life
  22. (20:57:00) ‹+Azatsu› magz has been idle 48hrs 12mins 20secs, signed on Wed Jul 04 06:32:20
  23. (20:57:06) ‹+Aerolite› welp
  24. (20:57:08) ‹+Aerolite› nevermind
  25. (20:57:13) ‹@ALTERNATIVE› lol
  26. (20:57:21) ‹@ALTERNATIVE› yeah life is good
  27. (20:57:27) ‹+Kyoubro› Janitors who have been around long enough that they're trusted to not mess anything up, but not in position for modship yet.
  28. (20:57:31) ‹+Azatsu› Adding a new tier of power would be too much of a bother I guess
  29. (20:57:34) ‹@ALTERNATIVE› I am always idle on irc but this channel isnt in my auto join list
  30. (20:58:33) ‹%kami`› Kyoubro that exists
  31. (20:58:38) ‹%kami`› it is called global janitors
  32. (20:58:51) ‹+AoC› !
  33. (20:58:56) ‹+Azatsu› ~
  34. (20:59:16) ‹+Azatsu› It's been a long time since someone was promoted to global I guess
  35. (20:59:46) ‹+Kyoubro› So do globals go to a separate channel?
  36. (20:59:48) ‹+AoC› we're pretty much frozen until reorientation, there are many new janitors
  37. (20:59:50) ‹+Azatsu› Of course not
  38. (20:59:58) ‹+Azatsu› They are janitors after all
  39. (20:59:59) ‹@ALTERNATIVE› moot's a busy man
  40. (21:00:04) ‹+Azatsu› They are just a little bit more trusted
  41. (21:00:20) ‹+Kyoubro› Yeah, but it's really nothing different.
  42. (21:00:33) ‹+Kyoubro› Nobody can actually BE a global janitor. The very concept of the position is flawed.
  43. (21:00:36) ‹+AoC› yup. Shame that global tier doesn't add anything to help you deal with things, just piles up more duties
  44. (21:00:47) ‹@ALTERNATIVE› we have had global janitors before
  45. (21:00:49) ‹@ALTERNATIVE› and still do
  46. (21:00:52) ‹%kami`› yeah
  47. (21:00:56) ‹+Kyoubro› I should be more clear.
  48. (21:01:06) ‹+Azatsu› I don~t think he meant that literally
  49. (21:01:11) ‹+Azatsu› *don't
  50. (21:01:13) ‹+Kyoubro› Nobody can effectively offer a proper level of moderation across all boards.
  51. (21:01:31) ‹@ALTERNATIVE› well to be fair they aren't expected to
  52. (21:01:34) ‹+AoC› Kyoubro I think what is expected from global janitors is the same as mods
  53. (21:01:39) ‹+Kyoubro› Boards have such vastly different needs that it is far more efficient to target things.
  54. (21:01:42) ‹+AoC› to focus on their known boards
  55. (21:01:55) ‹+AoC› but still be able to take on pressing issues globally if required
  56. (21:01:57) ‹+Kyoubro› I don't think having mods be global is very sensible either, except for an extremely select few.
  57. (21:02:07) ‹@ALTERNATIVE› its plenty sensible
  58. (21:02:12) ‹@ALTERNATIVE› we are given the ability to handle any issue
  59. (21:02:12) ‹%kami`› Mods don't need to focus on anything except cp and reports
  60. (21:02:27) ‹+Kyoubro› What it means is that the position of mod becomes even more restricted.
  61. (21:02:28) ‹@ALTERNATIVE› if we were restricted to boards we would be a much smaller force than we already are
  62. (21:02:52) ‹+AoC› think of it this way, see the /int/ situation a month or two ago. You have board specific mods and they wouldn't be able to do anything about it
  63. (21:02:52) ‹@ALTERNATIVE› as it stands now, global moderation allows us to handle any issue that arises, regardless of board
  64. (21:02:59) ‹+Kyoubro› It's a different thing to give someone free reign to ban on one board and to give someone free reign to ban on any board.
  65. (21:03:15) ‹+AoC› with globals you don't have to go into /int/ every day, but you're available to do so if the situation raises
  66. (21:03:16) ‹+Azatsu› From what I can see, janitors are really useful then
  67. (21:03:19) ‹@ALTERNATIVE› I think you are assuming we are going to make awful decesions
  68. (21:03:27) ‹+Kyoubro› Given the current situation? It's probably the best solution, because we just don't have enough mods.
  69. (21:03:49) ‹+Azatsu› Kyoubro : You mean board specific mods?
  70. (21:03:55) ‹+Kyoubro› No, I'm not doing that. I'm assuming that it's better to have a large force of highly specialized members than a small force of generalized members.
  71. (21:03:55) ‹@ALTERNATIVE› there's no reason to restrict a moderator to any given board unless you are confident they are going to fuck up hard core
  72. (21:04:05) ‹%menchii› kami, remember as mods, we're here to support the janitors too
  73. (21:04:20) ‹%menchii› so if a janitor from any board needs something, we need to be there to help..
  74. (21:04:23) ‹+Kyoubro› No, I mean the setup we have now. I think it's best considering that we have nowhere near enough active mods.
  75. (21:04:27) ‹%kami`› well yeah
  76. (21:04:28) ‹%menchii› like placing a ban for instance
  77. (21:04:47) ‹%kami`› but as you can see, only a handful of mods care to do that
  78. (21:04:50) ‹%kami`› :(
  79. (21:04:53) ‹+Azatsu› My only problem with that is when we need a large number of bans on boards that need a lot of help
  80. (21:04:58) ‹%menchii› the best ones!
  81. (21:04:59) ‹+Azatsu› and deletion in the end doesn't change anything
  82. (21:04:59) ‹+Kyoubro› A reason to limit a mod's sphere of influence is to simply give them more of an ability to focus.
  83. (21:05:00) ‹%menchii› :P
  84. (21:05:04) ‹%kami`› :)
  85. (21:05:21) ‹+Kyoubro› Restrictions have their benefits, too.
  86. (21:05:29) ‹@ALTERNATIVE› sorry man I can't help you I only have access to /d/
  87. (21:05:34) ‹@ALTERNATIVE› that child porn is just gonna have to wait
  88. (21:05:38) ‹%menchii› I think we focus on the boards we favor already anyway
  89. (21:05:46) ‹%kami`› yeah
  90. (21:05:51) ‹%kami`› like moot says about janitoring
  91. (21:05:54) ‹+Kyoubro› ALTERNATIVE, let me refer you to a previous post.
  92. (21:05:56) ‹%kami`› you just act like a normal user
  93. (21:06:04) ‹+Kyoubro› >No, I mean the setup we have now. I think it's best considering that we have nowhere near enough active mods.
  94. (21:06:17) ‹%kami`› taking care of issues your power allows you to resolve
  95. (21:06:18) ‹@ALTERNATIVE› I dont think having lots of moderators would be a bad thing if they were global
  96. (21:06:31) ‹@ALTERNATIVE› they'd be able to do all the ban requests
  97. (21:06:34) ‹@ALTERNATIVE› all of them
  98. (21:06:35) ‹@ALTERNATIVE› in seconds
  99. (21:06:36) ‹+Azatsu› I wonder if having something like 200 mods would work
  100. (21:06:38) ‹+Azatsu› like in 2ch
  101. (21:06:50) ‹%menchii› it's like a dream
  102. (21:06:52) ‹@ALTERNATIVE› I've seen the future
  103. (21:06:53) ‹+andonuts› >tons more moderation/janitors
  104. (21:06:56) ‹+andonuts› Bueno.
  105. (21:07:04) ‹@ALTERNATIVE› it does not get better quickly
  106. (21:07:09) ‹+AoC› What I think you're trying to say is that it would be nice to have a board specific mod as an added tier of trust, between global janitor and full modship. Am I reading right Kyoubro ?
  107. (21:07:24) ‹%menchii› we did at one time
  108. (21:07:29) ‹+Kyoubro› It increases the chances of a mod doing something that seemed sensible at the time but was done without enough knowledge of the board in question.
  109. (21:07:34) ‹+Kyoubro› That's one way, AoC.
  110. (21:07:36) ‹%menchii› the newer mods all started out as board specific janitors
  111. (21:07:37) ‹~moots› mods have not been board specific since 2004
  112. (21:07:43) ‹%menchii› then later became global, then mods
  113. (21:07:44) ‹+AoC› we know
  114. (21:07:57) ‹+Kyoubro› I actually think a better way would be to add the ability to warn and post officially to global janitors.
  115. (21:08:06) ‹+Azatsu› uh
  116. (21:08:08) ‹%menchii› 04? has it been that long? holy cow
  117. (21:08:08) ‹+Azatsu› that would be dangerous I think
  118. (21:08:24) ‹+Kyoubro› Global janitors are supposed to be heavily trusted.
  119. (21:08:33) ‹~moots› what does "post officially to global janitors" mean
  120. (21:08:42) ‹+Kyoubro› Oh, like modposts.
  121. (21:08:42) ‹@ALTERNATIVE› janitors should not be able to represent the policies of the site
  122. (21:08:46) ‹@ALTERNATIVE› moderators should post hardly ever if at all
  123. (21:08:48) ‹@ALTERNATIVE› capped
  124. (21:08:50) ‹~moots› fuck that
  125. (21:08:56) ‹~moots› ^
  126. (21:09:11) ‹@ALTERNATIVE› what it boils down to is that we are normal users
  127. (21:09:15) ‹@ALTERNATIVE› simply with the ability to remove other users
  128. (21:09:25) ‹+Azatsu› but wouldn't it be good to keep in touch with the boards to see how things are going once in a while
  129. (21:09:31) ‹+Azatsu› it's kind of rare to see a mod talking with the community and listening to them
  130. (21:09:36) ‹+AoC› I was going to say that. As nice as it would be to clarify sketchy policies, the potential for messing up is grand and janitors are enforcers, not interpreters of the rules
  131. (21:09:37) ‹~moots› that's the point of janitors
  132. (21:09:37) ‹%menchii› janitoring is the thankless silent job oc mopping up the crap on the boards
  133. (21:09:53) ‹+Azatsu› above everything I consider myself a poster that tries to contribute to my board
  134. (21:09:54) ‹~moots› board specific people who understand the culture of the board better than anyone and can report to the mods what's going on
  135. (21:10:04) ‹%menchii› "welcome to the shittiest job of your life" I think that was our welcome to the team lol
  136. (21:10:26) ‹+Kyoubro› Mm... one thing I see from /a/ is that people are happy to know that there are mods around, always.
  137. (21:10:34) ‹%menchii› well said, moot. well said
  138. (21:10:42) ‹+Kyoubro› I agree that mods are just users, but there is a degree to which silence can hurt.
  139. (21:10:50) ‹+Azatsu› so moots, janitors are not only those who can remove posts and access the report queue, but also the messengers of their boards?
  140. (21:11:01) ‹%menchii› I see a lot of /a/ and /jp/ culture specific stuff come up in discussions here, and I don't understand half of it
  141. (21:11:03) ‹~moots› what?
  142. (21:11:11) ‹~moots› the entire point of this channel is to communicate what's going on to moderators and ask questions
  143. (21:11:12) ‹%menchii› but if a janitor who does neds help, all he has to do is ask
  144. (21:11:14) ‹~moots› it's not meant to be a hangout
  145. (21:11:21) ‹~moots› if there is a problem, you should be mentioning it here
  146. (21:11:27)  » Quit: %Kobra ‹~Kobra@Rizon-A00B5B53.lightspeed.stlsmo.sbcglobal.net› ‹Ping timeout: 240 seconds›
  147. (21:11:51) ‹+AoC› which reminds me, haven't done a state of the board report in a while now
  148. (21:12:00) ‹~moots› "horrible"
  149. (21:12:02) ‹~moots› there i did it for you
  150. (21:12:11) ‹+AoC› yup. Job is done
  151. (21:12:16) ‹+AoC› see you in a month
  152. (21:12:22) ‹~moots› we will be adding something in the coming weeks that makes i easier for the users and moderators to interact
RAW Paste Data
Top