- (00:21:55) ‹+Bloom› /v/ has no bocu no pico, there aren't really many recommendation threads and usually they get on topic replies or people link them to the rec wiki
- (02:18:06) ‹+duanemoody› when did the spoilered images lose uploaded filenames
- (02:18:14) ‹+duanemoody› who thought this was a good idea
- (02:18:25) ‹%dongfix› moot
- (02:18:29) ‹+duanemoody› he's wrong
- (02:18:36) ‹+duanemoody› it's not cute
- (02:18:47) ‹+duanemoody› when does he get back
- (02:18:52) ‹%dongfix› it is good
- (02:18:56) ‹+duanemoody› no
- (02:18:59) ‹+duanemoody› how is it good
- (02:18:59) ‹%dongfix› you can hover over "spoilered image" to get the filanem
- (02:19:05) ‹+duanemoody› wat
- (02:19:07) ‹%dongfix› you can put spoilers in filenames
- (02:19:30) ‹+duanemoody› nope
- (02:19:39) ‹+duanemoody› is it a tooltip
- (02:20:06) ‹+duanemoody› oh i see
- (02:20:10) ‹+duanemoody› whatever
- (02:20:13) ‹+duanemoody› ignore me
- (02:21:44) ‹+duanemoody› oh wow /v/
- (02:21:59) ‹+duanemoody› are we back to the days of "download this .gif and rename it"
- (03:01:29) ‹+duanemoody› but i can't use 4chanX because dongfix says it fucks with his extension
- (03:01:39) ‹+duanemoody› and i take his word for it
- (03:01:42) ‹%dongfix› huh
- (03:01:45) ‹%dongfix› no i don't
- (03:01:47) ‹%dongfix› i say it sucks
- (03:24:52) ‹+Bloom› and i just asked why /co/ and /a/ hate eachother since they are fans of the exact same medium just with different words to describe it
- (03:25:05) ‹+Bloom› and someone had this image comparing FMA:B to Ben 10
- (03:25:08) ‹+duanemoody› it's almost invariably a third party stirrying shit
- (03:25:10) ‹+Bloom› as if thats an apt comparison
- (03:25:13) ‹+duanemoody› "let's you and him fight"
- (03:25:22) ‹+duanemoody› impersonating one party
- (03:25:41) ‹+duanemoody› i really really doubt regulars on /a/ run over to /co/ to start "why is your medium shit" threads
- This concerns IBs overall. What do we take from this? Do not listen to worthless trolls when discussing animation as a whole, I guess.
- (03:32:09) ‹+Bloom› i've kind of given up trying to clear the summer out of /v/
- (03:32:21) ‹+Bloom› its almost over so ive just been skimming and deleting really blatantly shitty stuff
- [...]
- (03:32:54) ‹+Bloom› mostly because i just get annoyed when i delete a genuinely shit thread that happened to mention a video game in it and then there are 20 /q/ threads about it
- (03:33:00) ‹+Bloom› i dont like /q/ as much as it hought i would
- (03:33:03) ‹+Bloom› in fact i think i hate /q/
- (03:33:10) ‹+VCR_Working› i used to like /q/
- (03:33:16) ‹+Bloom› i liked it for like 5 days
- (03:33:17) ‹+VCR_Working› when it was helping out /jp/
- (03:33:24) ‹+VCR_Working› then the naruto thing happened
- (03:33:26) ‹+Bloom› and then it stopped being constructive
- (03:33:30) ‹+VCR_Working› and everything went to shit
- (03:33:49) ‹+duanemoody› let people complain
- (03:34:12) ‹+duanemoody› for the love of god we now have a place to tell people to take their "my board sucks" threads
- (03:34:57) ‹+Bloom› nobody listens when you tell them to go to other boards
- (05:34:27) ‹+AoC› well, I guess it all comes down to what moot wants the site to be. 4chan doesn't need to have a space for every single thing, and it seems one of the topics that will never go in here is western drawn porn
- (05:40:21) ‹+AoC› And I really wish our policy with ban evaders wasn't just "deal with it, let's not waste time" because this Pinkie Pie avatarfag is a goddamn pest
- (05:41:40) ‹%kami`› yeah, it would be great if bans stuck
- (05:41:41) ‹+duanemoody› could i see an example
- (05:41:57) ‹+duanemoody› of pinkie pie avatarfag
- (05:41:58) ‹%kami`› and I wouldn't have to babysit all the assholes that think it is fun to ban evade
- (05:42:05) ‹%kami`› for the whole day
- (05:42:10) ‹%kami`› because that is so much fun
- (05:43:03) ‹+AoC› duanemoody http://archive.foolz.us/v/search/tripcode/%21DianeOECCA/order/desc/
- (05:43:28) ‹+AoC› We know they don't even watch MLP, they just do it for jimmy rustling, which is super effective in /v/ due to ponies
- (05:47:00) ‹+duanemoody› i suggested something to moot privately and his response was "we already use ban cookies" while ignoring the other two thirds of the idea
- (05:47:54) ‹+AoC› I think the biggest issue is that we still treat the ban tool as the biggest possible punishment but it remains a trivial nuisance that takes seconds to evade. We have to escalate and catch up with the threats
- (05:48:10) ‹+duanemoody› actually
- (05:48:21) ‹+duanemoody› we're missing an opportunity
- (05:48:26) ‹+duanemoody› we keep focusing on punishment
- (05:48:31) ‹+duanemoody› and that's a mistake
- (05:48:34) ‹+duanemoody› http://goo.gl/ldUXN
- (05:48:41) ‹+duanemoody› read this, it's short
- (05:49:17) » Join: moots ‹moots@the.run›
- (05:49:17) » ChanServ ‹+qo› moots moots
- (05:49:26) ‹+duanemoody› speak of the devil
- (05:51:25) ‹+AoC› Good point.
- (05:51:59) ‹+duanemoody› i don't think it's perfect but it's a compromise between creating accounts and present anarchy
- (05:52:00) ‹+AoC› Reading this, I have to ask, how does it stop you from getting a new IP, clearing cookies and requesting a new, fresh 24hr pass
- (05:52:30) ‹+duanemoody› it provides an additional layer of inconvenience, nothing more
- (05:52:33) ‹+duanemoody› however
- (05:52:49) ‹+duanemoody› as i pointed out, there is a reward for not shitposting
- (05:53:08) ‹+duanemoody› if you insist on shitposting you have to work harder to keep posting
- (05:53:27) ‹+duanemoody› right now the problem is that there is no disincentive
- (05:53:41) ‹+AoC› longer passes and no captcha is indeed a good reward. I've said before that if you offer posters the chance to go back to no captcha they will do anything to get it
- (05:53:41) ‹+duanemoody› because once you're back in you're on an equal ground with everyone else
- (05:53:50) ‹+duanemoody› i didn't promise no captcha
- (05:54:00) ‹+duanemoody› that's someone else's decision
- (05:54:17) ‹+duanemoody› i would however say that the present implementation of captcha sucks because it can be easily cached
- (05:54:23) ‹+duanemoody› that's google's fault
- (05:54:27) ‹+AoC› sorry, I was mixing it with the 4chan gold idea being considered
- (05:54:41) ‹+duanemoody› i automagically tune out anything with that picture
- (05:54:47) ‹+AoC› well, being considered is a stretch
- (05:55:10) ‹+duanemoody› the cornerstone of "Hall Pass" is that people who behave are rewarded, not just ignored
- (05:55:30) ‹+duanemoody› 4chan has no carrot
- (05:55:35) ‹+duanemoody› only a stick that's weak
- (05:55:47) ‹+duanemoody› social media works off of social engineering
- (05:56:05) ‹+duanemoody› hats, likes, that stuff's stupid but it works
- (05:56:15) ‹+duanemoody› we don't do any of it because we're too cool
- (05:56:19) ‹+duanemoody› well guess what
- (05:56:20) ‹+duanemoody› we're not
- (05:57:16) ‹+duanemoody› what i'm proposing isn't a fantastic or perfect system but it can be improved
- (05:58:13) ‹+duanemoody› basing everything on IP bans is a self-defeating mechanism
- (05:58:26) ‹+AoC› I do like it, but any attempt at changing the framework needs to be well polished in all aspects before being implemented, as to avoid the fiasco of the in-house captcha
- (05:58:27) ‹+duanemoody› asking people to voluntarily create accounts is suicide
- (05:59:07) ‹+duanemoody› honestly? 4chan is huge, if we talked to google why wouldn't they listen
- (05:59:19) ‹+duanemoody› ask them to put expirations on captchas
- (05:59:36) ‹+duanemoody› i understand why they'd be reticent given the secondary purpose
- (05:59:48) ‹+duanemoody› but they can and do put those scanned words on multiple captchas
- (06:00:10) ‹+duanemoody› they shouldn't want unexpirable captchas any more than we do
- [...]
- (06:08:28) ‹+duanemoody› it's not rocket science to create a captcha system
- (06:08:52) ‹+duanemoody› the trick is to make it easy to use and difficult to exploit
- (06:09:05) ‹+duanemoody› google ruined both of those
- (14:06:53) ‹+fsdfdsf› You suck, why are you so mean nikka, I'm coming to your board to troll.
- (14:07:01) ‹%kami`› lol
- (14:08:05) ‹+nikka› reported
- (14:08:21) ‹+nikka› brb making anime recomendation thread
- (14:08:37) ‹+fsdfdsf› whoa bro, you need to calm down
- (14:09:52) ‹+nikka› done
- (14:09:58) ‹+nikka› enjoy
- (14:10:14) ‹+fsdfdsf› Boku no pico
- (14:10:51) ‹+nikka› i await for that answer
- (14:11:12) ‹+nikka› nbody repsonded
- (14:11:18) ‹+nikka› sadfacepng
- (14:11:25) ‹+fsdfdsf› >please respond
- (14:11:34) ‹+fsdfdsf› >there's no replies
- (14:11:40) ‹+nikka› dont keep those pics
- (14:11:57) ‹+fsdfdsf› Me either but they make me laugh
- (14:12:22) ‹+nikka› boku no code geass
- (14:12:24) ‹+nikka› so lame
- (14:13:29) » Quit: +Volphied370 ‹~swordbrea@Rizon-2A9957C5.chello.sk› ‹Quit: Zzzz›
- (14:13:53) ‹+nikka› Naruto
- (14:13:53) ‹+nikka› Bleach
- (14:13:53) ‹+nikka› OnePiece
- (14:13:53) ‹+nikka› now fuck off faggot
- (14:14:02) ‹+nikka› ehh
- (14:14:08) ‹+fsdfdsf› yep, that's /a/
- (14:14:41) ‹+nikka› iknow
- (14:14:57) ‹+nikka› u know i made one cause i prmised you
- (14:14:59) ‹+fsdfdsf› and there's /a/'s janitor, 404ing your thread
- (14:15:12) ‹+nikka› already?
- (14:15:14) ‹+nikka› wich one
- (14:15:27) ‹+fsdfdsf› The one with the girl laughing
- (14:15:30) ‹+fsdfdsf› You made more?
- (14:15:34) ‹+nikka› brb remaking
- (14:15:40) ‹+nikka› maybe
- (14:34:14) ‹+Kazisho› http://fuuka.warosu.org/data/q/img/0001/34/1345921397163.jpg Mid-2011 - 2012 /v/ - Ironic shitposting and Reddit.
SHARE
TWEET
other highlights from 25th August 2012
a guest
Jul 12th, 2015
6
Never
RAW Paste Data
