SHARE
TWEET

other Highlights from 13th November 2012

a guest Aug 17th, 2015 2 Never
  1. (00:31:50) +Beam: https://boards.4chan.org/v/res/162300236#p162310443 he mad
  2. [...]
  3. (00:32:36) +pr0x: Beam he really mad
  4. (00:32:49) +AoC: you entitled bro
  5. (00:32:59) +WalterWhite: me?
  6. (00:33:10) +Beam: aw he's 40K spamming now
  7. [...]
  8. (00:33:23) +Beam: it's cute to see /v/ go through these tantrums
  9.  
  10. (00:49:43) +Beam: https://boards.4chan.org/v/res/162311736 I feel as though this needs a public ban almost
  11. (00:49:54) +WalterWhite: oh wow
  12. (00:49:59) +WalterWhite: I literally just deleted that.
  13. (00:50:03) +WalterWhite: Sorry.
  14. (00:50:21) +WalterWhite: Like two seconds before you posted it.
  15. (00:51:45) +WalterWhite: I hope moot will put up a "spoilers" ban request.
  16. (00:52:32) +WalterWhite: Beam: https://boards.4chan.org/v/res/162312106
  17. (00:52:37) +WalterWhite: He reposted, lol.
  18.  
  19. (01:11:36) +AoC: yeah, it means being more careful about what gets heads on a pike treatment, but I believe that people don't raise against the moderation when they see another tfw no gf thread get banned
  20. (01:11:48) +AoC: they do rebel when we do silly stuff though, or get strict
  21. (01:12:23) +AoC: then again, I'm for a more transparent moderation process which goes against moot's ideas so yeah
  22.  
  23. (01:47:50) +Lich: https://boards.4chan.org/q/res/278240#p279521
  24. (01:47:52) +Lich: please this
  25. (01:47:55) +Lich: but for every board
  26. (01:48:07) +WalterWhite: feels too.
  27. (01:48:09) +pr0x: yes
  28. (01:48:16) +pr0x: Throw moeshit in there for /a/
  29. (01:48:28) +AoC: what's b8 ?
  30. (01:48:32) +WalterWhite: bait
  31. (01:48:41) +WalterWhite: for their trolling
  32. (01:48:42) BluRay: lol
  33. (01:48:46) +AoC: ah
  34. (01:48:54) +pr0x: Naruto to
  35. (01:48:55) +pr0x: Oh wait
  36. (01:49:15) +WalterWhite: and sometimes not even trolling, people use it as a means of something they dont like
  37.  
  38. (02:13:35) +Lich: If moot decides that having janitors is a bad thing, then I can't help but think it's silly.
  39. (02:14:01) +Lich: AoC, if that was the case, he'd be asking for feedback.
  40. (02:14:21) %kami`: he has /q/ for that
  41. (02:14:29) +AoC: and mails
  42. (02:14:35) +AoC: and us of course
  43. (02:14:41) +Lich: He really should leave all the janitor-related stuff to invisibro. invisibro was good.
  44.  
  45. (02:21:42) ~moots: i have zero interest in making worksafe boards nfsw, or adding any more containment boards
  46.  
  47. (02:24:32) ~moots: i don't think there's anything that can be done about determined shitposters
  48. (02:24:36) ~moots: look at the brony threads
  49. (02:24:40) ~moots: they are started by a single guy
  50. (02:24:42) ~moots: on a cingular ip
  51. (02:24:49) ~moots: who just insta ban evades
  52. (02:24:53) ~moots: i've personally banned him hundreds of times
  53.  
  54. (12:38:36) @ALTERNATIVE: I want to make sure you guys are using the (Explicit Image) ban request for child porn when the image is actually child porn
  55. (12:38:39) @ALTERNATIVE: not when it's a link
  56. (12:38:43) @ALTERNATIVE: when the image they posted is literally child porn
  57. (12:39:08) @ALTERNATIVE: not jailbait, not non-nude awful still-bannable images
  58. (12:39:18) @ALTERNATIVE: just child porn
  59. (12:39:21) @ALTERNATIVE: that particular ban request
  60. (12:40:35) +WalterWhite: And we can use (Request or Link) when it's both, right?
  61. (12:41:01) @ALTERNATIVE: you cant use the ones that add autobans
  62. (12:41:13) @ALTERNATIVE: because that is why we have 800 thousand people in irc complaining about bad cp bans
  63. (12:41:24) @ALTERNATIVE: since some janitors/mods find it hilarious to add bans for child porn when it isnt
  64. (12:41:32) +WalterWhite: huh
  65. (12:41:35) +WalterWhite: Really?
  66. (12:41:45) @ALTERNATIVE: yes, it has royally fucked up everything
  67. (12:42:03) +WalterWhite: weird..
  68. (12:45:41) @ALTERNATIVE: I have like 50 PMs so sorry if you're waiting on me to respond to yours
  69. (12:46:13) +WalterWhite: Eh, no worries.
  70. (12:46:21) @ALTERNATIVE: actually sorry
  71. (12:46:28) @ALTERNATIVE: I thought one of the guys PMing me was a janitor
  72. (12:46:30) @ALTERNATIVE: he is not
  73.  
  74. (13:08:02) +WalterWhite: never having to click "accept" on the main page
  75. (13:08:08) +WalterWhite: and never seeing the rules ever
  76. (13:08:50) +WalterWhite: cause when you go to boards.4chan.org/v/ or w/e it doesnt give you the popup the main page does so they prob never see the rules or care to go check them out until after theyre banned and.. defeats all purpose
  77. (13:10:36) @ALTERNATIVE: that is really unfortunate
  78. (13:10:37) @ALTERNATIVE: for them
  79. (13:10:59) @ALTERNATIVE: if I sign up for SA and dont read the rules and then procede to act like a twat I'm still gonna get banned
  80. (13:11:31) +WalterWhite: pretty much
  81.  
  82. (14:25:50) @ALTERNATIVE: moots is porn allowed on /co
  83. [...]
  84. (14:26:59) ~moots: uh, no?
  85. (14:27:09) ~moots: You can BR for NWS on a owrksafe board
  86. (14:27:14) ~moots: but you dont need to br every single instance of something
  87. (14:27:27) +duanemoody: well i can't bloody well tell who posted what
  88. (14:27:40) +duanemoody: if they go anonymous then what
  89. (14:27:42) ~moots: so BR people who start NSFW threads rather than the random offhand image
  90.  
  91. (23:26:22) +Beam: Okay wiow
  92. (23:26:35) +Beam: some dude is caliming Jontron is making Neptunia threads on /v/
  93. (23:26:39) +Beam: *claiming
  94. (23:26:47) +Beam: this is balls-in-mouth retarded
RAW Paste Data
Top