Don't like ads? PRO users don't see any ads ;-)
Public Pastes
Guest

Untitled

By: a guest on May 7th, 2012  |  syntax: None  |  size: 1.04 KB  |  hits: 17  |  expires: Never
download  |  raw  |  embed  |  report abuse  |  print
Text below is selected. Please press Ctrl+C to copy to your clipboard. (⌘+C on Mac)
  1. [13:16:37] <&worf> we've got the "permanently evolved/transformed from" and "permanently evolves/transforms into" character relations for pokemon evolutions, since they are permanently
  2. [13:17:23] <&worf> sadly digimon dont really fit into that relation types .. some are more or less permanently but most of them are just temporary
  3. [13:17:50] <&worf> and even those that are more or less permanent can be "undone" by the digimon turning back into its child form
  4. [13:19:13] <&worf> back in 2009 i simply built a chain of guises to represent the chain of digimon evolutions
  5. [13:20:57] <&worf> Botamon <- Koromon <- Agumon <- Greymon <- SkullGreymon / MetalGreymon <- WarGreymon
  6. [13:21:01] <&worf> for example
  7. [13:21:06] <&worf> i'm not quite happy with that
  8. [13:22:15] <&worf> and with DNA evolutions this doesnt really work at all ... for that the "fuses into" character relation would have to be used for the digimon and the "trainer"
  9. [13:22:21] <&worf> so yeah ...
  10. [13:22:38] <&worf> i need an idea for a better, more fitting character relation type
create a new version of this paste RAW Paste Data