SHARE
TWEET

No flanfly for /jp/

a guest Apr 19th, 2015 217 Never
  1. No flanfly for /jp/
  2.  
  3. (11:31:25) +AoC: Sange, they lost flanfly privileges last night
  4. (11:32:14) Sange: What happened?
  5. (11:34:00) +AoC: basically they had a really bad one and I questioned the whole concept
  6. (11:34:30) +AoC: then I remembered that I deleted flanfly back in 2010 anyway, so whatever, it won't be missed since it has reached new shitty levels
  7. (11:36:18) » Join: dongfix (~kjj@dong.engineer)
  8. (11:36:18) » ChanServ (+h) dongfix
  9. (11:37:26) Sange: Why delete Flanfly?
  10. (11:37:29) AstronautBear: i'd imagine you shoot children like you shoot anyone else.
  11. (11:37:52) Sange: Just leave it up until the smiling Flan pic is posted, then delete it
  12. (11:37:58) AstronautBear: it takes a twisted mind to shoot up somewhere, i don't think it's any different.
  13. (11:38:02) » Quit: +Kazisho (~milkshake@denn.hier.sind.die.Verdammten) (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
  14. (11:42:22) Sange: I don't really feel like deleting Flanfly or Hoopdog, a case can be made for JBCS if it gets to a point where it's being posted daily, but otherwise I'd just leave it up
  15. (11:42:52) Sange: I consider them harmless board culture, and I'd rather not give in to the report abuser who keeps re-reporting said threads
  16. (11:43:46) +AoC: I stand for flanfly protection when there's people actually having fun
  17. (11:44:26) +AoC: at the moment it's just the same spam posted every night and I'm honestly tired of having a shitposter truce every night
  18. (11:44:29) Sange: If we started deleting Flanfly we would need to delete every other thread that stays up on the board purely for the "board culture" aspect
  19. (11:45:03) +AoC: that's a shortlist, and it's hoopdog/JBCS
  20. (11:45:03) Sange: I don't really like that decision because it does make the board look like a concentration camp
  21. (11:45:49) +AoC: yeah, it's not total policy just for last night because it was notably shitty instance of flanfly
  22. (11:47:01) Sange: The thing is, they will always complain about inconsistency if we delete a Flanfly thread and leave some other board culture thread up
  23. (11:47:27) Sange: So threads on the whole board start getting derailed from that point on
  24. (11:47:42) Sange: And we'd need to stay consistent with a decision
  25. (11:48:03) +AoC: I wish this was real...
  26. (11:48:12) +AoC: because they derail the thread regardless
  27. (11:48:32) +AoC: the current hoopdog thread is full of whining about the report queue being cleared
  28. (11:48:45) +AoC: they don't operate under the rules of logic
  29. (11:49:03) Sange: That person is the one who re-reports threads all day and also the multiple proxy abuser
  30. (11:49:21) Sange: Katsurugi confirmed it yesterday
  31. (11:51:04) Sange: I don't really care for Flanfly, I just really want to have consistent policies and not kill the board's fun. I don't see any problem with deleting an unusually bad Flanfly thread, but the board always starts to question whether there is some need moderation policy in effect after these events
  32. (11:51:24) Sange: new moderation policy*
  33. (11:52:32) +AoC: I'll agree on consistency, but nobody but the shitposters are finding the fun at this point
  34. (11:52:47) +AoC: even long running in-thread personas are dropping
  35. (11:53:29) +AoC: and if you ask me, the difference would be the fact that the other "board culture" threads aren't reposted every single day
  36. (11:53:51) Sange: /a/ has Sakura Fish, though
  37. (11:54:27) +AoC: I miss when it was "I'm the sexiest"...
  38. (11:54:33) Sange: As long it's just one thread, I don't see a problem
  39. (11:55:00) Sange: It'd be one if everyone wanted to start having their daily doses not deleted, but that doesn't seem to be the case
  40. (11:57:34) Sange: The last "ban Flanfly" /q/ thread got deleted, so I'd just completely ignore everything that happens inside those threads, personally
  41. (12:02:50) Sange: Either that or deleting everything "board culture", but I don't think that would be a popular decision
RAW Paste Data
Top