SHARE
TWEET

End of NEET threads on /jp/

a guest Apr 23rd, 2015 202 Never
  1. End of NEET threads on /jp/
  2.  
  3. (12:47:57) @ALTERNATIVE: Sange why are we deleting NEET threads again
  4. (12:48:11) @ALTERNATIVE: they appear to be complete shit but that's just me
  5. (12:48:22) @ALTERNATIVE: some guy is complaining about it in #4chan
  6. (12:49:14) +Sange: They are, and I'm just going with what AoC said yesterday
  7. (12:49:23) @ALTERNATIVE: what did aoc say yesterday
  8. (12:49:33) @ALTERNATIVE: the guy in the channel is claiming they're explicitly allowed
  9. (12:50:06) +Sange: They were using the thread to discuss all kinds of other board's subjects besides their usual blogging
  10. (12:50:14) +Sange: so a thread got deleted and they started spamming it
  11. (12:50:24) +AoC: spam and ban evasion. They're allowed by the rules that I drafted but how related to the topic flies out the window when the ones posting them are the same ones that post DAS IT MANE
  12. (12:51:42) +Sange: Basically they made a star wars/star trek general under the pretense of one of their threads and when it got deleted, they started spamming it again with star wars-referencing Touhou pictures
  13. (12:51:52) +Sange: to start their threads
  14. (12:52:00) » Quit: +Spitch (~Spitchy@Rizon-9FFFA57D.ph.ph.cox.net) (Quit: Leaving)
  15. (12:52:02) +Sange: also that das it mane spam
  16. (12:52:19) +AoC: don't forget the trollface combo attempts too
  17. (12:55:15) +Sange: https://archive.foolz.us/jp/search/subject/neet/deleted/deleted/type/op/
  18. (12:55:50) @ALTERNATIVE: why why delete those
  19. (12:56:18) +Sange: Das it mane spammer, and you can see the others referencing to star wars
  20. (12:56:32) @ALTERNATIVE: but why delete all of them
  21. (12:56:38) @ALTERNATIVE: like the first two
  22. (12:57:09) +Sange: Just going with what was said yesterday
  23. (12:57:24) @ALTERNATIVE: aoc why delete the first two
  24. (12:57:41) +Sange: Those are probably my deletions, by the way
  25. (12:57:59) @ALTERNATIVE: yeah but why should they ALL be deleted
  26. (13:00:22) +Sange: AoC  [#janiteam] Sange McNuggets NEET threads are non grata now
  27. (13:00:40) +Sange: I'll stop if I'm supposed to stop
  28. (13:02:33) +AoC: It's about consistency. Even if there are non-shitposter made NEET threads being made now they're getting hijacked early on and we're not going to sit and babysit their blog threads anyway
  29. (13:03:12) @ALTERNATIVE: so I can spam threads I don't like and then they'll be disallowed too?
  30. (13:03:36) @ALTERNATIVE: we either need to announce that the rule changed or leave the legit threads alone
  31. (13:03:38) +SatyricaltheBeherial: yeah I got /pol/ spitch
  32. (13:03:45) +AoC: would be nice if we could go back to just ignoring them, but as long as they remain hives of scum that aren't related to the board might as well try to control them along with the rest of the spam
  33. (13:04:14) +Sange: I'd appreciate if we could look into removing them officially
  34. (13:04:39) +Sange: they're not but shitposting/generals and go against previous mod statements like: https://archive.foolz.us/jp/thread/360493
  35. (13:04:45) +Sange: *nothing
  36. (13:05:15) +AoC: I would like to have the rest of the /jp/ team before proposing yet another rule change though
  37. (13:05:26) @ALTERNATIVE: we should do that soon
  38. (13:05:41) @ALTERNATIVE: because you can't delete them when we've come out and said they are explicitly allowed
  39. (13:06:09) @ALTERNATIVE: I'd say cut back on deleting them for now until we can come to a conensus about it and make the change
  40. (13:06:18) +Sange: Sure
  41. (13:07:00) +AoC: allowed topic doesn't mean a carte blanche to post about whatever though, and the initial hikki/neet leeway was because it was sort of otaku related and not the current truNEET idolatry, corporate neetdom and "I saw a girl today"
  42. (13:07:27) +AoC: but yeah, I'm okay with that
  43. (13:08:40) @ALTERNATIVE: cool
  44. (13:08:48) @ALTERNATIVE: it doesn't sound like a lot of people want them to stay
  45. (13:08:53) @ALTERNATIVE: the /q/ thread is split pretty evenly
  46. (13:09:21) +AoC: honestly, it's the least of our worries
  47. (13:09:32) @ALTERNATIVE: yeah but that doesn't mean we don't address it
  48. (13:09:34) +AoC: have you ever checked the deletion logs for /jp/? It's crazy in there
  49. (13:09:37) +Sange: No one really likes those threads
  50. (13:10:14) +Sange: I think they're a big part of the reason why /jp/ gets so much spam, they attract people whose only thing in common with the board is not having anything to do all day
  51. (13:10:32) +Sange: as you can see by the das it mane spammer defending them
  52. (13:10:36) @ALTERNATIVE: I'm all for explicitly disallowing them
  53. (13:11:01) » Join: SerWind (~SysAdmin@Rizon-1F057DC6.eastlink.ca)
  54. (13:11:01) » ChanServ (+v) SerWind
  55. (13:11:13) +Sange: They attract so much people with no interest in any of /jp/'s subjects I'd say they're a pretty big deal right now
  56. (13:13:16) @ALTERNATIVE: well we should figure something out sometime
  57. (13:13:23) » Join: UltraHoss (~Nick@Rizon-B4F0F0D6.hsd1.pa.comcast.net)
  58. (13:13:36) +Sange: Not only that but I'm not sure what's the correlation between having no job and discussing visual novels/touhou
  59. (13:13:51) +Sange: as a board subject
  60. (13:14:49) +AoC: none really, it was added to the rules draft as a "single thread, contain it please" appeasement since they had a strong history during the unregulated years
  61. (13:15:37) +AoC: of course, the second piss bottles stopped being a joke we should have stepped in and push it off to the blog boards, but no, let's be reasonable and give them a normal-free space of comfort
  62. (13:15:45) +Sange: I get it a lot of people who like those have no jobs, but it's no reason to make it an official board subject, so hopefully we can clear that out soon
  63. (13:16:12) +AoC: where is Azatsu anyway?
  64. (13:16:21) +Sange: No idea
RAW Paste Data
Top