- (00:38:51) +AoC: People really have no right to complain if they're not filing reports at all
- (00:39:26) +AoC: I do try to delete the reaction_image+2_lines_greentext threads, but I can't notice every single thread
- (07:11:20) @alternative: dont ban request normal pictures of kids as child porn or child models!
- (07:11:39) @alternative: you can still have us ban people for being creepy pedophiles but use your brain!
- (07:12:18) @alternative: in case this isnt clear
- (07:12:19) @alternative: http://img.chan4chan.com/img/2009-02-01/1233506310735.jpg
- (07:12:32) @alternative: was ban requested for child models/sexualized images of children
- (07:13:00) @alternative: I'm sure the OP had little intent of not being a creepy fuck but dont abuse the autoban system
- (07:14:11) +VCR: wasn't me
- (07:18:43) +WalterWhite: just saying for everyone
- (07:19:58) +VCR: ofc
- (08:46:55) +Bloom: namefags in /vg/ threads are truly the biggest autists outside of /jp/
- (08:47:33) +VCR: aaaaaaaaaa
- (08:47:47) +Bloom: >Out of all the closed beta applicants, tell us why we should choose you in the box below.
- (08:47:50) +Bloom: What should i write?
- (08:55:10) +Azatsu: when the "please delete posts less often" triggers
- (08:55:15) +Azatsu: you can't delete anything else for a while?
- [...]
- (08:55:35) +VCR: yes
- (08:55:39) +Azatsu: why?
- (08:55:44) +VCR: it's really really REALLY annoying
- (08:55:54) +Azatsu: what if for example, you're deleting accelspammer posts?
- (08:56:08) +VCR: it's supposedly not a 'feature'
- (08:56:09) +Azatsu: it's of course, a far fetched and unlikely example nowadays
- (08:56:17) +VCR: but ffs
- (08:56:22) +Azatsu: but there are cases where you must delete shit nonstop
- (10:03:15) Anikitan: >please delete posts less often
- (10:03:17) Anikitan: what
- (10:03:23) +AoC: bug, not a feature
- (10:03:25) +AoC: we all have it
- [...]
- (10:04:30) +duanemoody: i'm curious as to how we could possibly overload sys with these requests, but i also don't know what else sys does
- (10:04:39) +duanemoody: e.g. generate the page html
- (10:04:56) +AoC: and redirect. And handle deletes, reports and posts
- (10:05:23) +AoC: my theory is that it's something dongfix added for the regular users
- (10:05:28) +duanemoody: i'd separate out the janimod business to its own server
- (10:05:33) +AoC: and we're still seeing it by mistake
- (10:05:47) +duanemoody: oh so it's a timeout kind of thing for users
- (10:05:58) +duanemoody: still, why would you need it
- (10:06:19) +AoC: ┐(゚~゚)┌
- (10:06:42) +AoC: some people doing some complex trolling were they delete all of their own posts in a massive thread?
- (10:07:12) +AoC: You know what, I'm done https://boards.4chan.org/q/res/385133
- (10:07:18) +AoC: I try and I fucking try
- (10:07:35) +AoC: delete every single thing? bad
- (10:07:39) +AoC: BR everything? bad
- (10:07:54) +AoC: Try to sanitize a potentially on topic thread? double bad
- (10:07:55) +duanemoody: i'd read /q/ except for two things
- (10:08:03) +duanemoody: 1. i can't out myself to explain anything
- (10:08:13) +duanemoody: 2. i don't have the authority to change how 4chan works
- (10:08:15) Anikitan: /q/ is like, 90% people who have been rule breaking and come to /q/ to complain
- (10:08:23) +duanemoody: make one of these things different and i'll go there
- (10:09:12) Anikitan: >/q/ - Everybody But Me Is A Shitposter
- (10:09:13) Anikitan: lol
- (10:09:19) Anikitan: whoever that was hit the nail on the head
- (10:09:28) +duanemoody: seriously, if any board were an exception to "do not out yourself," it's this one
- (10:10:16) Anikitan: i think its a good idea in ways
- (10:10:26) Anikitan: it stops people from demanding answers from janitors
- (10:10:38) +duanemoody: what, my idea?
- (10:10:46) Anikitan: no, the fact you cant out yourself
- (10:10:49) Anikitan: on /q/
- (10:11:07) Anikitan: if you could post with a capcode on /q/ as ##janitor or whatever it is
- (10:11:19) +Kazisho: That would suck.
- (10:11:23) Anikitan: then the threads would be just going WHERES THE JANITOR
- (10:11:35) Anikitan: and then threads where youve br stuff would link to /q/ going JANITOR COME HERE AND TALK
- (10:11:49) +Kazisho: >Why are you here and not janitoring
- (10:11:55) Anikitan: lol
- (10:12:05) +duanemoody: nothing we do will be without consequence
- (10:12:10) +duanemoody: that's not a good enough argument
- (10:12:34) +duanemoody: people go to /q/ thinking there will be managerial/janitorial feedback
- (10:12:36) Anikitan: but if it's not a good enough argument then by the same matter it's also not a good preposition
- (10:12:49) +duanemoody: no, logic doesn't work like that
- (10:12:57) Anikitan: my logic does :3
- (10:13:05) +WalterWhite: People do not go to /q/ for janitor feedback, because there is none.
- (10:13:13) Anikitan: they go to /q/ to complain to moot
- (10:13:15) +WalterWhite: It's there for 4chan staff and admin.
- (10:13:21) Anikitan: and/or mods
- (10:13:23) +duanemoody: we're not staff?
- (10:13:30) Anikitan: we're volunteers
- (10:13:33) +WalterWhite: No.
- (10:13:34) Anikitan: to technically not really
- (10:13:37) Anikitan: so*
- (10:13:44) +duanemoody: the mods aren't volunteers?
- (10:13:54) +WalterWhite: They're staff chosen by moot.
- (10:13:56) +AoC: mods are inner party
- (10:14:00) +duanemoody: i was chosen by moot
- (10:14:04) +WalterWhite: To janitor.
- (10:14:15) +duanemoody: fair enough
- (10:14:41) +duanemoody: until told otherwise, i'm going to skip reading /q/ though
SHARE
TWEET
everything of interest from 22nd January 2013
a guest
Sep 3rd, 2015
4
Never
RAW Paste Data
